tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post1907257226483470816..comments2024-03-28T18:32:43.699-05:00Comments on Bayou Renaissance Man: Who owns your children?Peterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10595089829300831372noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-3069010556573970862014-09-03T08:42:09.166-05:002014-09-03T08:42:09.166-05:00If you would expect 'justice' after the st...If you would expect 'justice' after the state injures or kills your child while overriding your parental authority, you're a fool. I can't speak for others, but if the state forced some situation like that on me and my child died, I can promise I'd kill every bureaucrat that was involved - after enough preparation of course to know where to find them all in short order so I could exterminate the lot before being caught. It's only that kind of fear that will keep them from riding roughshod over us all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-6443026020781098482014-09-02T13:33:35.804-05:002014-09-02T13:33:35.804-05:00Peter, this post and comments ought provoke greate...Peter, this post and comments ought provoke greater investigation. Some examples.<br /><br />1) The further implications of the mention of shock troops at this stage. This is although Progs have made use of them from the start. Use of the word "threatening" in this regard is an understatement.<br /><br />2)"The state own the children." Given how our names are all caps on birth certs, passports, drivers licenses, credit cards, etc., the implications are that each of us is a recognized corporation of our nation -- an artificial entity and subject to its rule. <br /><br />3) IOW, and as Judy suggests, JUDY is not now seen as a natural person. Her economic life (and much else by consequence) is from birth stripped of basic human rights by the creation of corporate entity JUDY. She is seen as a capital asset of the state, and may be used and discarded as deemed fitting.<br /><br />4) And Coconut's words are most pleasing. Utilitarian indeed Coconut. The Progs started out disguised as altruists, and still there are those who upbraid any disapproval of Progressives with "who can be against progress?" But their disguise wore thin quite long ago to any thinking person. <br /><br />The thing is Coconut, John Stuart Mill never ever stood behind the notion that Utilitarianism would be used in this manner. <br /><br />The incremental nature in which Progs have thrown off their various disguises could provide a great study in the progress of evil. There must be loads of fictional accounts of such creepy advances, but it appears now that truth is much worse than fiction.<br /><br />5) And then Peter, there is this very story that you chose to start all this. About how the apparatchiks are targeting caring parent by accusing them of neglect is close to the pinnacle of evil projections. <br /><br />You bemoan the immorality in that the apparatchiks will never be held accountable, either for their overreach or any harm that follows from it. <br /><br />Please do not stop there. <br /><br />In the masthead of my blog is the warning: <i>notice where rulers never utter a harsh word towards Malthusian, Utilitarian and Green nutcases. There the ruled are at grave risk. </i><br /><br />From your active chronicling of news in the manner you do (far and away better than I for whom writing is very difficult) your decent human instincts seem to be to alert as many as who will heed your words. God bless you.Pascalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00303025432356543062noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-17179078160998850662014-09-01T13:12:52.150-05:002014-09-01T13:12:52.150-05:00Once you register your child for a birth certifica...Once you register your child for a birth certificate and a SSN you no longer are in control of that child's well being: mentally, physically or intellectually. Some States play nice and let you maintain the illusion that you are in control but it is only an illusion. Just look at the laws that are currently on the books and how they are applied.Judyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06530748998376076224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-63627722338759687142014-09-01T10:27:25.081-05:002014-09-01T10:27:25.081-05:00Probably a derivation of the philosophy that citiz...Probably a derivation of the philosophy that citizens are resources to be used for the good of the State and discarded once used up.<br /><br />"Altruism" I think it's called, or perhaps "Utilitarianism".<br /><br />Someone once said that there's no-one quite as dangerous as a man who believes he can create Heaven on earth, since he's not likely to have many problems with killing people who he thinks are in his way.Coconutnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-30467681045352111702014-09-01T10:22:28.109-05:002014-09-01T10:22:28.109-05:00Yes, the State owns the children. This ownership d...Yes, the State owns the children. This ownership does not lapse at adulthood. Sobering realisation?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-67487366340885436972014-09-01T09:27:22.362-05:002014-09-01T09:27:22.362-05:00“Good work some bureaucrats do”, I'm afraid I ...“Good work some bureaucrats do”, I'm afraid I must take exception to that assumption. I used to give them some benefit of the doubt, but learnt the error of my ways some time ago.<br /><br />I can't speak for over there, but here 'every' social worker, child protection officer (both police and council), 'Family' Court official and teacher (and most lefty politicians) is a rampant, extreme feminist. They even admit that there is 'filtering' at the level of university courses to ensure no-one with the 'wrong' ideas ever even qualifies as one, let alone is ever employed as such. My own, second, profession of nursing is almost as bad with constant filtering and indoctrination and instructions/orders/statutory instruments and 'guidelines' which assume an automatic usurpation of a parents rights by the true believers if the parents don't do/say/believe what they are suposed to.<br /><br />The simple fact remains that anyone working in one of those areas ' will' have an agenda steering their 'good works' – and any, minor and accidental, 'good' they do is always massively outweighed by the harm (Rotherham and all the other cities, the current story, welfare dependency and the destruction of the family to name a few examples).<br /><br />Care to check out the the Scottish 'good works'? Try googling 'Evidence2Success' roundly lambasted and campaigned against, so they changed the name and tried again as … 'ChildrenCount Survey' – or http://www.scottishreview.net/. All of which is part of the ongoing attempt to bring about the SNP's aim of enforcing a 'named person for every child in Scotland' – but be very sure that that 'named person' will have to be 'suitable' and will have greater say over the child than those mere 'parents' named on the childs birth-certificate.<br /><br />Personally, I believe social workers, 'specialist' child protection police and 'family' courts should be utterly destroyed as institutions - they have becomes tainted and corrupted beyond any repair. They are the shock-troops of the new fascist state.Ablehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18109723804885979128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-15395872734637656532014-09-01T07:54:18.557-05:002014-09-01T07:54:18.557-05:001984, Animal Farm, IUR, I Robot.
Much before, and ...1984, Animal Farm, IUR, I Robot.<br />Much before, and more.<br />Too many titles.<br />So many warnings.<br /><br /><br /><br /> Stu garfath.noreply@blogger.com