tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post4772046056262731198..comments2024-03-28T09:43:20.058-05:00Comments on Bayou Renaissance Man: An update on Boeing's CHAMPPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10595089829300831372noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-56750139279644750602012-10-27T22:27:20.023-05:002012-10-27T22:27:20.023-05:00How about something very simple - knocking out dom...How about something very simple - knocking out domestic communications - or am I being phobic too soon?trailbeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06830065132795330618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-75631527888905722552012-10-25T21:13:39.368-05:002012-10-25T21:13:39.368-05:00I would like to see their faces if they tried to s...I would like to see their faces if they tried to stop my car with something like this. All they could kill is the radio and the cruise control.<br /><br />1987 Diesel Mercedes. Highly resistant to EMP.The Great and Powerful Ozhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01379953300283048280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-91092937507112283862012-10-25T14:00:39.947-05:002012-10-25T14:00:39.947-05:00dave:
I was told by a former cop that a hand-held...dave:<br /><br />I was told by a former cop that a hand-held stun gun applied to a car body will kill all active electronics. That means no noise, and no engine management system! VERY expensive hit.Willhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00722792638246578812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-36654763327523033932012-10-24T09:25:07.345-05:002012-10-24T09:25:07.345-05:00Can we use it to turn off the stereo in the car ne...Can we use it to turn off the stereo in the car next to us? You know the one I'm talking about....davehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13579043129470256468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-78217898701216820612012-10-24T08:06:17.093-05:002012-10-24T08:06:17.093-05:00@STxRynn: The wars in response to aggression were...@STxRynn: The wars <i>in response to aggression</i> were necessary to remove that threat; but the wars were started by aggressors, and I can't see a single way in which they were 'good'. The fact that an armed response was 'necessary' doesn't make it 'good', either. Ask those who died - and those they left behind . . .<br />Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10595089829300831372noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-36327853904763368472012-10-24T07:49:15.957-05:002012-10-24T07:49:15.957-05:00"but then, 'normal' warfare hasn'..."but then, 'normal' warfare hasn't been much good either, has it?"<br /><br />No, war is not good.... Unless you consider the Revolutionary War good for throwing off the oppression of the King, or the Great Unpleasantness for ending overt slavery in the US, or WW2 for defeating the genocidal Germans and Japanese..... <br /><br />Might be wise to ask those who were freed due to the above wars if they were good or not.STxRynnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6244999628674918029.post-62591046481572894662012-10-24T07:24:13.643-05:002012-10-24T07:24:13.643-05:00Good points all Peter. It IS nice that it works, ...Good points all Peter. It IS nice that it works, but it IS also worrying...Old NFOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404197287935017147noreply@blogger.com