Thursday, July 14, 2016

A jet airliner equivalent to a crop-sprayer???


Well, it's not exactly crop-spraying, but the technology is very similar.  Oil Spill Response describes itself as:

... the largest international industry-funded cooperative which exists to respond to oil spills wherever in the world they may occur, by providing preparedness, response and intervention services. We are wholly owned by most of the environmentally responsible oil and gas companies, and our membership represents the majority of global oil production. We currently employ 300 people across 9 locations around the world.

It seems the company has bought a former FedEx Boeing 727 airliner (the last ever produced, built in 1984) and converted it to spray dispersant chemicals over oil spills (presumably at sea).  Flight Global reports:

The 727’s usual oil-spill spraying flight profile involves passes at an altitude of 150ft (45m) and a speed of approximately 150kt (278km/h) with flaps at 15°. At Farnborough, the demonstration flyby is undertaken at around 300ft, followed by a steep climb-away.

Here's a video clip of its flight at the Farnborough air show in England this week, including a spraying demonstration.  Watch it in full-screen mode for best results.





That's pretty amazing, when you think about it - handling an airliner designed for high-altitude, high-speed point-to-point flight as if it were a low-flying, low-speed, turn-on-a-dime crop-sprayer!  It must take some very precise flying, particularly when the weather's stormy.  I suppose it's not dissimilar to the conversion of jet aircraft for use as water-bombers to fight fires, such as the well-known (and much larger) DC-10 Air Tanker.

Peter

5 comments:

  1. 727s have a LOT of power, and they're surprisingly maneuverable. They were one of the last 'hand fly' jets, and use leading edge slats to increase the chord of the wing for slower flight, in addition to the flaps (and it helps to have a GOOD pilot at the controls)...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have a picture somewhere in front of that airplane. It landed at SAT, and one of the ramp agents recognized it. It was kinda cool to have that after FredEx ditched the airframe.

    I'm glad it didn't just end up in a field, cooking under the sun.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not a big fan of most dispersants, myself. Plain old soap is about the least toxic dispersant, but it can't be used under most circumstances, as it mostly just emulsifies and makes the oil emulsion negatively buoyant, so it just sinks and can't be seen. The non-soap variants are incredibly toxic, and will kill any living plant or animal they contact, including the portion that emulsifies and sinks and hangs out on the bottom.
    I won't say I've never squirted a little Dawn at a scupper drain in my day, but even having a bottle of Dawn on the deck of a boat is a crime, now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Cue the chemtrail nuts in 3,2...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Instead of Dawn, I have found that AFFF mixed with water and in a spray bottle works as good as a minor sheen displacer and a soap for hands. A table spoon (roughly) of straight AFFF in a washer with clothes that have been exposed to oil does a good cleaning job.

    ReplyDelete

ALL COMMENTS ARE MODERATED. THEY WILL APPEAR AFTER OWNER APPROVAL, WHICH MAY BE DELAYED.