Wednesday, June 23, 2021

Can we trust the authorities about COVID-19 vaccines? HELL, NO!!!

 

I'm sure many of us have been following the controversy over the Center for Disease Control's VAERS database ("Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System").  The CDC says about it:


  • VAERS is an early warning system used to monitor adverse events that happen after vaccination. VAERS is the frontline system of a comprehensive vaccine safety monitoring program in the United States. It is one of several systems CDC and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) use to help ensure all vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, are safe.
  • VAERS gives vaccine safety experts valuable information so they can assess possible safety concerns related to vaccines, including new COVID-19 vaccines. It is especially useful for quickly detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of health problems (also called “adverse events”) that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine.
  • If a health problem is reported to VAERS, that doesn’t mean that the vaccine caused the problem. It warns vaccine safety experts of potential problems that may need investigation and alerts them to take further action, as needed.
  • Millions of people in the United States have received COVID-19 vaccines. Other than rare reports of severe allergic reactions, analysis of VAERS reports has not detected any patterns that would indicate a safety problem with COVID-19 vaccines.


Sounds excellent, doesn't it? - until one remembers that this program is run by the CDC . . . the same CDC that insisted on quarantines, shutdowns, mask mandates and other measures that have since been conclusively proven by multiple international studies to have been either useless, or of minimal effect, in stopping the spread of COVID-19, while helping to destroy the foundation of many economies around the world.  On the basis of that track record, if you expect me to believe the CDC's assurances about COVID-19 in future, you can think again.  My instant reaction to any CDC pronouncement will be suspicion and distrust, and a resounding "Prove it!"

I note that CDC itself says that incidents reported to VAERS are not necessarily caused by the vaccine;  that's for further investigation to determine.  Fair enough.  Nevertheless, there's so much obfuscation that it's dangerous, in my opinion.  Tucker Carlson pointed this out last month.  Bold, underlined text is my emphasis.


Some critics have argued for a long time that VAERS undercounts vaccine injuries. A report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 concluded that "fewer than one percent of vaccine adverse events are reported" by the VARES system. Fewer than one percent. So what is the real number of people who apparently have been killed or injured by the vaccine? Well, we don’t know that number. Nobody does, and we’re not going to speculate about it. But it’s clear that what is happening now, for whatever reason, is not even close to normal. It’s not even close to what we’ve seen in previous years with previous vaccines.

. . .

Most vaccines are not accused of killing large numbers of people. The Menveo vaccine, for example, is given to people around the world, often children, to prevent bacterial meningitis. In this country, only one person died from that vaccine in the entire period between 2010 and 2015. One. So, compare that to what’s happening now. In just the first four months of this year, the U.S. government has recorded more deaths after COVID vaccinations than from all other vaccines administered in the United States between mid-1997 and the end of 2013. That’s a period of fifteen and a half years. Again, more people, according to VAERS, have died after getting the shot in four months during a single vaccination campaign than from all other vaccines combined over more than a decade and a half ... We spoke to one physician today who actively treats COVID patients. He described what we’re seeing now as the single deadliest mass-vaccination event in modern history. Whatever is causing it, it is happening as we speak. So you’d think someone in authority might want to know what’s going on.

If the vaccine injury reporting system is flawed — and it clearly is flawed — why hasn’t it been fixed? And more to the point, why has there not been an independent vaccine safety board to assess what’s happening. And reassure people who stumble across official government numbers on the internet. But amazingly, none of that has been done. No one even mentions the numbers. And in fact, you’re not allowed to. You’ll be pulled off the internet if you do. The people in charge do not acknowledge them. Instead, they warn us about what might happen if we don’t take the vaccine.


There's more at the link.

Tucker Carlson's report was instantly pilloried by every left-wing, progressive outlet on the Internet and in the news media.  He'd dared to stand up against the "party line", so he had to be excoriated, denounced, vilified and discredited at all costs.  It didn't work, of course, because he could back up every allegation he made . . . but how many Americans never heard about that?  They were simply told by the mainstream news and social media that he was lying, or exaggerating, or perpetuating "fake news".  There were very few actual analyses of what he said (you can read one example here, which I recommend as a counterweight to his report - you'll have to decide for yourself who you believe).  In most cases, it was just a chorus of "Ignore him, trust the authorities, and do what you're told!"  That overwhelming reaction, in itself, tells me Mr. Carlson is on to something.

There are those who say, "Oh, death numbers aren't a valid comparison!  You need to look at the number of deaths versus the number of people vaccinated.  If you take the former as a proportion of the latter, it's minuscule."  That may be so - I'm not qualified to comment - but it doesn't alter the dreadful reality of the total number of deaths.  It's cold comfort to those who've already died, and even colder comfort to those who feel they're being forced to get a vaccine that they know full well may prove fatal.

Some of the medical reactions to the vaccine that are now being discussed - the spread of "spike proteins" to every organ in the body, effects on cardiac health, blood clots, etc. - are anything but comforting.  You can read up on them for yourself;  a simple Internet search will provide plenty of links.  Unfortunately, the CDC and other authorities are not responding vigorously to these reports.  Instead, they talk vaguely of "investigating" them, as if finding out after months or years that they're true or false is an adequate response.  To those of us under pressure to get vaccinated, that's hardly reassuring.

To make matters worse, the CDC's lukewarm response may be condemning more victims even as they dither.  Consider the alleged effects of vaccination on the heart muscle.  Young people - teenagers and early twenties - appear particularly vulnerable to this complication.  "Now there is a very real possibility we are going to see some percentage of the vaccinated who will need heart transplants in the next ten to thirty years."  Oh, great!  In that case, why not pause vaccinations until we know for sure whether there's a link?

There's also the issue that those of us who've already had COVID-19 are unlikely to benefit from being vaccinated.


A recent study finds people who have already had Covid-19 are unlikely to get any benefit from vaccination, because they already have immunity from their infection.

The study was conducted on employees of the Cleveland Clinic Health System.

It's in line with the initial studies by vaccine makers Moderna and Pfizer, which also did not find a benefit to vaccinating people who have already had Covid-19.

The findings directly contradict ... guidance distributed by CDC.


Again, more at the link.

In the midst of this blizzard of information, misinformation and disinformation, propaganda and counter-propaganda, who do we believe?  Who do we trust?  As far as I'm concerned, after the exposure of Dr. Fauci as a lying, deceitful bureaucrat who's deliberately conned the American public for well over a year, I'm not inclined to trust anyone who agrees with him.

I'm not going to get vaccinated unless and until there's clarity on all of these issues, and the ultimate safety of the vaccine is assured - and that can't be assured unless and until the manufacturers no longer insist on legal protection against liability for the consequences of using their product.

I refuse to be stampeded into doing something that might kill me.  It's as simple as that.

Peter


18 comments:

  1. Everyone is calling the Pfizer and Moderna shots vaccines. But are they?
    It would appear that the Janssen (J&J) falls within the definition; what are the problems with this one, if any?

    ReplyDelete
  2. A promising athlete's life is as good as over because of them:

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/greyson-follmer-pfizer-vaccine-myocarditis/

    ReplyDelete
  3. A commenter over at "Behind The Black", is convinced that most of the people that took the jab will be dead by 2025. The commenter had a link to an Alternate VAERS whose numbers were chilling.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I won't take the "vaccine". Soon to be age 77, I will continue to take my chances. In the past ten years I haven't had a flu shot, nor have I had the flu. My personal health plan focuses on keeping my immune system in good working order.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My daughter never had a single migraine in over 15 years of her life. Until a week after the 1st jab, when she had an abdominal migraine that lasted over a week. Abdominal migraines are unusual in that part of the pain profile is upper abdominal pain. They are also unusual in that they are almost always seen in small children. 15 isn't a small child. She was vaccinated because she was going to visit my sister and parents, and my parents are old, Dad has mild dementia, and Mom won't get within 25 feet of anyone not vaccinated.

    The day after the first jab I saw the reports about heart conditions for teens and young adults being vaccinated. I'm hoping a single jab wasn't enough to cause permanent harm - she did not and will not get the second.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, trust the CDC, because they are correct and right and good for us!

    The same CDC that said actual deaths from Covidiocracy were about 6% of the numbers they, the CDC, reported.

    Yeah, sure...

    And the real kicker? The CDC and NIH were both "oh, the Wuhan Flu isn't bad, it's nice and mellow, not a threat..." until and only until "IMPEACH IMPEACH IMPEAAAAAAAACH" failed spectacularly and blew up in the Dem's faces. Suddenly the CDC and NIH both started screaming "OMG, COVIDIOCRACY WILL KILL US ALL, OMG!!!"

    Yeah, tell me this wasn't a manufactured crisis.

    And even after all that, the level of cheat in the elections was so bad that even third-world nations were saying something was wrong...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'll just leave this here:

    https://westernrifleshooters.us/2021/06/22/good-on-ya-mate/

    Vaxx: 5000 deaths, 3900 disabled, 571 miscarriages, 1,500 Bell's Palsy, 1,900 heart attacks (just in the US, to date, that we know about).

    Yeah, no.

    N-95 masks, gloves, and handwashing, thanks. 100% success rate, in the Hot Zone, x 15 months and counting. 0 side affects. 0 sick days.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Boron: They're all (including, as I understand it, J&J) actually meta-vaccines; instead of delivering a measured quantity of the antigen, they deliver the instructions for making your own antigen. I don't know how well controlled the resulting dose is, nor what the time lag is.
    I'm certain, though, that there is a time lag, so waiting 15 minutes to check for an allergic reaction isn't all that useful. I've heard (anecdotally) of a severe reaction to the J&J product almost a week after the dose was administered.

    Now it's coming to light that in this particular case the antigen (the spike protein) can do significant damage all by itself, even without being part of a functioning virus. Oh, great....

    Oh, and whose bright idea was it to push these products on children, pregnant women, and nursing mothers?

    ReplyDelete
  9. The legal protection as is does not cover them for everything. Intentional cover-up would not be protected for example, nor I believe, would culpable negligence.

    And then there are things like this coming out:
    https://coercioncode.com/2021/06/16/energy-companies-to-replace-vaccinated-employees-within-3-years/

    ReplyDelete
  10. There is also an apparent link between the Jab and flights at certain altitudes, which is affecting aircrews.

    The woman on the line making the reservation said that it would not be an issue but if he had been vaccinated that she would have cautioned him not to fly. My friend asked why she was asking this since this was something she had not heard or read anywhere at all. The airline reservations then proceeded to tell her that several people who had been vaccinated are developing blood clots at a certain altitude and they believe it is from the vaccine.

    Hundreds of American Airlines flights have been canceled this weekend and Monday because of significant staffing and maintenance issues.

    As of Sunday afternoon, 123 flights were canceled Saturday, 178 on Sunday and 97 were canceled for Monday – largely the result of a high number of sick calls, combined with maintenance and other staffing issues.


    link

    ReplyDelete
  11. As I've said before, I will not be a willing participant in the largest ever vaccine field trial in history. Mrs. Freeholder has taken the Pfizer jab (pretty much had to as a teacher) and I'm concerned for her future health.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm 77, wife 65; we got the Moderna shots and are doing fine. Helps, I suspect, to be in a rural area. And not going far from home.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The MILITARY won't even force its members to get the jab. This is the SAME military who FORCED its members to get the flu shots when they first started coming out; the ones that made us sick EVERY time. That's GOT to tell you SOMETHING!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Look into John Doe v Rumsfeld, https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/vaccines/Doe_v_Rumsfeld_I.htm

    I don't think the military has much legal choice.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hey Peter;

    My Stepmom is convinced that the 2nd "jab" killed my Dad, 3 weeks to the day after his second shot, he was gone. 24 hours after he was pressured to get his second shot by his Dr because of his age and the Dr office was calling him all the time to "get his shot" he acquiesced. 24 hours after his second "jab" he couldn't stay awake in the recliner and he started sleeping all the time, and My stepmom started taking his picture as his trunk started to swell up with fluid and it got worse and after the 2nd week he was losing controls of his bowels as his organs started shutting down and my Dad knew what was going on and refused to go to the hospital because he didn't want to die there, but at home and 3 weeks to the day he passed. I have had "covid" and I refuse to take"the Jab" and I am very angry about what has transpired, the human cost of his disease and the mismanagement from the Federal government as it was used as an excuse to screw over the economy and get rid of Trump. There will be a reckoning one day for those that had a hand in this.

    ReplyDelete
  16. My wife had covid, and she still has some issues with fatigue and headache. She has had that since February. She had a regular doctor's appt. on Tuesday, and the doctor told her that the health dept. had contacted her, and told her that my wife had not yet gotten her vaccine. Apparently the health dept. traces everyone who tests positive for Covid 19, and tries to force them to get the vaccine.
    My wife doesn't want to get the shot, and I also refuse to get it, myself due to the huge amount of data that I am seeing from many sources that I consider reliable, plus, the idea that a normal vaccine takes years to bring to market, and suddenly this time, it takes a matter of a few months, it tells me that somewhere along the line, either they took shortcuts, or they knew ahead of time and started to prepare the vaccine in advance. In either case, I have no intention of being a beta tester for a vaccine that works with my RNA to cause changes in my basic genome.
    I will be 61 this week, am in pretty good health, and will take my chances. If the government had put as much emphasis on treatment instead of a vaccine, then there would have been no pandemic, no reason to shut down the entire economy. Other than the election, of course.
    And also, I am a pariah to most of my family, as I have been vocal in my opinion of mandates about mask wearing, social distancing, etc. I have been accused of wanting to kill grandmothers, babies, and other very horrible things, that reflect badly on my upbringing. I tell them that I am not responsible for their grandmother, they are. that really pisses them off. I try to get my fun where I can.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I had Chinavirus in Jan. 2021. I m 76, but it was a mild case. I et an antibody test monthly,all show antibodies at max levels. I am also taking ivermectin as a preventive. No way in hell will I take the not-vsccine.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I will never take the mRNA based vaccines.

    The "vaccine" is not staying localized to the injection site, and is showing up in high concentrations in bone marrow and women's ovaries.

    Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology.

    Listen to him here:

    https://youtu.be/Du2wm5nhTXY

    https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/

    https://www.rwmalonemd.com/mrna-vaccine-inventor

    ReplyDelete

ALL COMMENTS ARE MODERATED. THEY WILL APPEAR AFTER OWNER APPROVAL, WHICH MAY BE DELAYED.