Monday, December 2, 2024

The Biden pardon

 

As my readers are doubtless aware, yesterday President Biden pardoned his son Hunter for any and all offenses against US law from 2014 until 2024.  In case you were wondering about the ten-year period, that's when Ukraine became the focus of US money-laundering and jiggey-pokery by our politicians.  Effectively, Hunter Biden was the bagman for certain corrupt US interests (some would call it the Biden crime family) during the whole of that period.

The pardon comes after President Biden repeatedly promised he would not pardon his son for his crimes.  There again, promises seldom (if ever) mean anything to crooked politicians, so we need not be surprised that the President broke them yet again.

I'm curious about the timing of the pardon.  I'd expected it, but figured it would more likely come as President Biden's term of office ended in January 2025, a last-minute "up yours!" to his political opponents and the American people.  I suppose it was brought forward to forestall a guilty verdict in the charges Hunter Biden was facing over tax evasion and other crimes.  The message conveyed by the pardon to the American electorate is, of course, the same.

I doubt we'll ever see President Biden and/or his family called to account for their crimes and misdemeanors while in office.  However, there are many politicians who "made hay while the sun shone", taking advantage of his protection to enrich themselves and get away with all sorts of shenanigans.  One hopes the incoming Trump administration will shine a light into the dark corners of American politics, uncovering those machinations and holding the guilty accountable.  That may be a pipe-dream - politicians tend to cover for each other, even their opponents, because so many of them are guilty of the same crimes - but we may hope.

Peter


32 comments:

  1. Not surprising. Just more evidence, as if we needed any more, of the double standards in our country.
    And these politicians are not the “ruling elites” or the “ruling class” they are just thieving, lying, treasonous, pedophile, bottom feeding scumbags with marxist/satanic leanings.

    Jim from down the bayou

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought a pardon had to list the specific crimes he is being pardoned for to be legitimate, but it looks like thats not legally true just part of a discussion.

    Exile1981

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wish people would stop calling them "politicians"; the greatest majority of them are failed lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The only time this would have mattered would have been BEFORE the election. If done then it might have messed up some house/senate runs and lengthened Trumps coat tails. I'm kind of surprised it didn't happen as soon as Vice President Harris (grudgingly) conceded the race. Maybe you'd have gotten a couple faithless electors without this but the magnitude of the 312 electoral vote win means one or two faithless electors are pointless. Nope this is old angry Joe poking a stick in the eye of those that made him give up the presidential run. He is a truly nasty piece of work.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't believe Trump should pursue chanrges against President Biden - first because the man has the mental acuity of a potato, and is not competent to stand trial, and second because it was wrong when the Biden admin went after Trump, and two wrongs don't make a right. I do not want to live in a country when the first thing the incoming president does is target the previous administration for whatever charges - legit or trumped up - he can come up with.

    That said, there is a Vice President and Cabinet who are wholly complicit in hiding the extent of Biden's dementia, and multiple government agencies who are about to learn the consequences of targeting Americans illegally.

    I'd rather see Biden (and Obama) totter off into ignominy while the Trump Coalition gets to work cleaning out the Swamp. That's a more important task.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So no one should be held accountable for their crimes? Who cares about Biden's dementia? He has been a criminal his whole career.
      Just let treasonous activity go and "totter off into ignominity"
      I think NOT!
      Obama especially needs to be held to account and his husband as well.
      We can agree to disagree.

      Delete
    2. I'm with Rich. Also, blanket pardon for 10 years, you can bet Hunter was guilty of stuff before that and probably won't be able to clean up his act after that. But more importantly investigate it because of all the other accomplices and bad actors involved. Hunter wasn't alone.

      Delete
  6. As soon as he is out of office it is time to go after Joe

    ReplyDelete
  7. I believe the timing of the pardon coming now rather than later had to do with some Hunter related court hearings or sentencing before the end of the year.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The timing confuses me as well. The best guess I've seen is they did this because Joe's health is failing, and it needed done sooner rather than later.

    Another guess is that he could be impeached over this, Kamala gets her presidency, and she can then pardon him and the rest of the family. That avoids the questionable event of Joe pardoning himself. She'd have nothing to lose; she'll never be elected president.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Him, or Hillary. We need to intitute some vigilante shit for those assholes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. So, pardon trading is off the table. But, it's been suggested that Hunter's 5th Amendment protections are now moot.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Could it be that the timing was now because he fears he will be forced out before the actual end of his term, maybe so we can have our first female/black/whatever president, and he might not get the chance?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Opens the door for Trump to do something for the Jan 6 folks...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Next up for blanket pardon: Jim Biden. If they can't get Hunter or Jim, they can't lay a finger on Joe.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I believe the primary fact in the timing is the impending sentencing hearings on the firearms charges….but do not discount the nomination of Kash Patel for FBI director as having sent a message that it was no longer business as usual

    ReplyDelete
  15. I believe that the sentencing is sceduled for 4 Dec. If Hunter is pardoned after that date, it goes on his record; if prior, it does not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It'll alway be 'on the record'. Perhaps not as an actionable item but people will not just give him a pass.

      Delete
  16. Honestly, we don't have enough time (or the grounds) to impeach Biden over this. They can try to 25th Biden, but that does not make Kamala President - she's just Acting President until Joe is removed by resigning, impeachment and conviction, or death.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @boron, a pardon wipes all records of any convictions.

    Clemency would have left the conviction on the record, but eliminated the punishment.

    The only thing driving the timing that I see is that the family just spent a week together and wanted the results official before anyone had a chance to 'confuse' poor old Joe and scuttle the deal.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Note the dates for the pardon, 2014 to 2024. 2014 is before President Trump was in office. However, it corresponds to when Hunter Biden joined the board of Burisma [Ukraine]. This pardon isn’t about the gun charge, the Big Guy is protecting himself from Kash Patel. Looked at that way, Biden didn’t pardon his criminal son, he pardoned HIMSELF. Nobody would ever have use for Hunter except for his umbilical cord to daddy. Aside from dope and guns, all Hunter’s crimes lead back to Slow Joe.

    More thoughts


    ReplyDelete
  19. Interesting take on the pardon:

    https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2024/12/todays-blind-items-no-choice.html#disqus_thread

    ReplyDelete
  20. OK if Hunter is pardoned, can he be compelled to testify in any legal actions against his accomplices? Then if he lies in that testimony he could be tried for lying under oath.

    ReplyDelete
  21. A Presidential pardon in no way prevents state level charges...of which I am sure many such crimes occurred. Go after Hunter for these. And offer him a deal to testify against his family. He'll sell them all out in a heartbeat.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Unfortunately, accepting a pardon does not carry with it an implicit admission of guilt. Damn. I'd read otherwise, but the supreme court apparently disagreed.

    ReplyDelete
  23. If anyone can, it's Kash Patel, incoming FBI Director.He knows or has good ideas about where a lot of corpses are buried....

    ReplyDelete
  24. Black ops death squad...they already kill folks like Breitbart, why not let them whack some real dirtbags for a change. Above the law maybe, but not beyond justice. Pour encourager les autres, especially since les autres already murder at will.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Many people say Biden pardoned himself with this action, but I don't see it. Now Hunter can be called to testify without the 5th protection. As far as state charges go, when did he ever spend time in a red state?

    ReplyDelete
  26. The statute of limitations for almost all federal crimes is significantly less than the 10 years of this pardon

    ReplyDelete
  27. To everyone thinking the crackhead “lost” his 5th amendment protections.
    1. He is a crackhead
    2. Simple answer to any question for the crackhead is “oh, I don’t recall that. I’m a crackhead and was on crack”
    Use your brains, not what’s left of his.

    TMF Bert

    ReplyDelete
  28. This applies to federal charges only, as far as I know. Has he done anything that a friendly state could go after?
    Jonathan

    ReplyDelete
  29. Everybody knew Joe was lying, and that he would pardon Hunter to protect himself, but the scope of the pardon is astonishing.

    Pardons, as I understand things, are for convicted criminals, not for things one has never even been accused of.

    As it is, Hunter had a super-power for 10 years. If it comes to light that he once walked down Pennsylvania Avenue stark naked,snorting cocaine and machine gunning groups of tourists, well, there's nothing anybody could do about it.

    This is the stuff of mediaeval kings and great princes not a Republic of laws. This is a king announcing that no law of the land whatsoever applied to his son. It's third world garbage.

    It's a thing of shame for the United States of America, all around the world.

    ReplyDelete

ALL COMMENTS ARE MODERATED. THEY WILL APPEAR AFTER OWNER APPROVAL, WHICH MAY BE DELAYED.