By now I'm sure readers are aware that last weekend, the Department of Health and Human Services released an open-source 11GB file containing every single Medicare claim from 2018 to 2024 - not individual patient diagnoses and private information, but every charge claimed against Medicare for every procedure by every provider. It's a gold mine of information that may lead to literal gold mines for those who find evidence of fraud and abuse in the data. As Jeff Childers pointed out:
This is clearly not just a DOGE project. It is a coordinated effort across the Trump Administration. For example, timed with the release of the data, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a related new program. Not only have they open-sourced the research, but they have gamified it. Bessent said Treasury was setting up a website for people to report Medicare fraud— and they’ll get up to 30% of whatever’s fined and recovered.
If the $1 trillion fraud estimate is even half right, the government just turned fraud detection into the world’s largest treasure hunt. Some kid in a bedroom with a laptop, a chatbot, and a case of energy drinks might make more money this year than most hedge fund managers. Dog the Bounty Hunter: Fraud Edition is coming soon, to a laptop near you.
Social media quickly began lighting up across the board. Within hours of the data release, citizen analysts had started flagging facilities billing for physically impossible numbers of procedures, clinics with addresses at residential apartments diagnosing hundreds of children with autism per month, and at least one provider that seems to have performed more Medicaid services than there are actual humans in its zip code.
However, the biggest aspect of this data treasure trove might be the unveiling, at long last, of the problems caused by COVID vaccines.
While most folks were off and running hunting for fraud bounties, the covid warriors instantly saw the other, riper fruit hanging higher up in the HHS data’s branches ... And now they have AI to help crunch the numbers, build spreadsheets, put up websites, and suggest, “Would you like me to draft the lawsuit?”
Since the agency was birthed by progressive geniuses in the Carter Administration, HHS has diligently protected the privacy of Big Pharma by keeping a death-grip on Americans’ health data. Even though, during the exact same period, we got fatter by the minute, our health got worse and worse, and we spent more and more trillions on healthcare. It’s none of your business because privacy. Science! Trust the experts! Shut up!
Now, taking the corporate media, pharma, and the political establishment completely by surprise, the data is suddenly out there. The VAERS data looked awful, but they wriggled out of that trap by sneering that the adverse event-reporting system —the system they created— was unreliable. But now we have a second data set— and it includes vaccination records.
What happens when the HHS data confirms the VAERS data? What will they say then?
I don’t say this lightly: this historic HHS data release could be even bigger than the Epstein files.
There's more at the link.
I think he's spot on. Anyone and everyone who's been affected by problems after receiving the COVID vaccine, or who's lost a relative or friend to vaccine-related issues, can now find out for certain whether there's any correlation between that vaccination and subsequent medical issues, as revealed by what care was billed, when, and for how long. With that information on hand, lawsuits for medical negligence and/or malfeasance of any kind by the vaccine manufacturers become more than just a theoretical possibility. They become almost a certainty.
Cue the vaccine manufacturers suddenly lobbying Congress to pass a law granting them retroactive immunity from lawsuits over negligence and malfeasance - immunity they do not have under the existing vaccine legislation.
I wonder how many ambulance chasers lawyers are suddenly rubbing their hands together with glee as they cue up their legal AI systems and turn them loose on the new data?
Peter
Vaccine manufacturers don't need retroactive immunity for COVID, as that was passed into law with the PREP act. My discovering Congress passed that law was the thing that turned me against ever receiving the jab as it indicated to me that the vaccine manufacturers didn't believe their vaccines were safe. Note: vaccine manufacturers have been sued over the years for their other vaccines.
ReplyDeleteTo sue the vaccine manufacturers, lawyers would first need to successfully argue the PREP act was invalid or unconstitutional, and having received a favorable judgement there, then proceed to the lawsuit.
I think that's an unlikely chance of success, which is why the vaccine manufacturers got Congress to pass it into law in the first place. Blanket immunity against COVID lawsuits.
Steven
Not quite so. Yes, the manufacturers have immunity under existing laws, PROVIDED THEY DID NOT LIE ABOUT THEIR TESTING OF THE PRODUCT OR ABOUT SIDE EFFECTS. If they did lie about that, and if the statistics prove it, it's a whole new ball game.
DeleteHey Peter,
ReplyDeleteI refused the Jab during the Covid season, My Dad was pressured to take the Jab by the VA in 2021 despite his heart conditions and 21 days after the 2nd stick he received orders to Fiddler's Green. Blood Clots. The amount of vitriol I and the wife got from people, for refusing the jab, from threats of our jobs, to being shunned from polite society and having people curse us in public Yeah, I hope heads roll for this. I hope this goes to government and burns those sanctimonious pricks too.
All of this evidence and uncovering of fraud is like closing the barn door after the horse has escaped. The country is bankrupt beyond salvation. It's all kabuki theater at this point. The government is still spending almost $1,000,000,000,000 a quarter.
ReplyDelete