I wasn't surprised to read this article the other day.
When guards at the Cook County Correctional Facility found 57-year-old inmate Thomas Diskin dead, slumped around his cell’s toilet in January 2023, investigators were left scratching their heads: There was no evidence of foul play or a fall that could’ve killed the prisoner.
The only thing out of the norm? Tiny strips of singed paper littered around his cell.
“I said, ‘We need to test this and find out what’s going on with it,’” Cook County Sheriff’s Office chief of staff Brad Curry recalled about that moment, referring to the paper shreds.
Eventually, a Pennsylvania lab would confirm that the strips were soaked in a synthetic cannabinoid called Pinaca, which proved lethal when Diskin smoked the paper.
Before authorities could stop it, other inmates were dropping dead under eerily similar circumstances.
. . .
Guards ... began inspecting every single piece of mail that came into the lockup, looking for stains and discoloration that could indicate synthetic drugs on it, and ramped up random cell searches and surveillance.
But the strips of drug-soaked paper were sometimes so tiny, guards wouldn’t find them — and not even drug-trained police K-9s were able to sniff out the new synthetic cannabinoid they contained, Curry explained.
. . .
When the mailroom got too hot with scrutiny, smugglers began dousing legal documents in drugs to make it look like they came straight from the courthouse.
They even put it on pages of thick books that came to the prison packaged as if they’d been sent straight from Amazon or a local bookstore.
Just one 8×11 piece of paper full of the drugs could run up to $10,000 — a price tag apparently high enough to turn the heads of several money-hungry staffers — who ended up in cuffs for smuggling it to inmates, according to Curry.
There's more at the link.
Drug dealers have a huge financial incentive to get drugs into prisons, because security precautions make it much harder to get them to their customers. Prices are thus often five to ten times more than "on the street", and sometimes - such as during a prolonged security lockdown - a lot more than that.
When I worked as a prison chaplain, one of our biggest headaches was the misuse of religious services materials by inmates and dealers trying to smuggle drugs inside through the chapel. Bibles with certain pages soaked in drug solutions, then dried out; "incense" that was nothing but (often very highly concentrated) drug powder; bottles of liquid drug concentrate concealed inside statues or within niches carved out of crosses before they were assembled; the list was endless, and was always expanding. Many of us said that if the inmates we supervised would put one-tenth as much effort into hard, honest work as they did into illegal activities, they'd all be millionaires. We had to institute a policy that religious goods could only be sent direct from the supplier (whom we had to approve beforehand) to the prison, without going through any other person, even the inmate's family. That was the only way we could keep the problem within manageable proportions.
Even that wasn't foolproof, because some suppliers are not what they appear to be at first glance. One of my favorite examples was the group of Rastafarian inmates who persuaded a relatively new prison staffer that they wanted to order some "holy oil of anointing" for their religious ceremonies. She authorized the purchase, and a few days later happened to innocently mention it to a senior corrections officer. He beetled his brows at her and issued special instructions to the Receiving Department. When the "holy oil" arrived, it was sequestered until it could be tested. Needless to say, it was high-test cannabis oil - doubtless of deep religious significance to Rastafarians, but not exactly in line with prison security regulations. Police at the place of origin were tipped off, and they proceeded to take a deep and abiding interest in the supplier (to his subsequent profound unhappiness).
So, this most recent episode, as reported above, doesn't surprise me at all. "Criminals gonna criminal", as I've heard more than one corrections officer put it; and behind bars, they have all the time in the world to figure out new ways to "stick it to the man" and get around, over, under or through security precautions and procedures. If they succeed, for a time their reputation in the prison will soar. If they fail, the other inmates will have a good laugh at their expense - then everyone will try even harder to get away with it next time.
Prison work is anything but boring. (Those who've read my memoir of prison ministry will recall Sam the Sex God, who had no need of illicit drugs to earn an automatic entry into the "anything but boring" category!)
Peter
OK, so prison inmates work their tails off to smuggle in illegal, and potentially lethal, drugs or chemical combinations that wind up killing them.
ReplyDeleteSo what?
Why are we supposed to care that Sammy Scum croaks sitting on his toilet? As long as authorities do not aid or abet the activity and actively strive to prevent it, the fault lies entirely with Sammy and his supplier.
"Oh, it's so terrible that some poor misfortunate suffered death (or serious injury), prison officials should protect inmates from that." Those same people didn't give a rat's rear end when Sammy put a gun in someone's face, or committed rape, or robbery of a citizen's livelihood, after a Soros-elected DA turned him loose on "personal recognizance" for the sixth time.
A lot of people feel as you do, but there are a number of factors you aren't taking into account. It would take far too long to list them all here: I discussed them at greater length in my book on prison chaplaincy. There's another issue, too: whichever arm of government - local, state or federal - controls the prison has a statutory duty to protect the well-being of its inmates, acting in loco parentis to those confined there. If it does nothing to safeguard them against such threats, it's legally liable for the consequences. In our litigation-mad society, that could bankrupt government agencies in short order.
ReplyDeletePeter,
ReplyDeleteI have a problem with the phrase "in loco parentis". Are these juveniles? If these are (you should excuse the expression) "consenting" adults, I cannot see that any arm of government should be legally liable for the consequences.
Perhaps it's about time we sent some judges back to school; many of them are unable to understand the English language and interpret it as they see fit. OTOH, most juries I see today are totally unable to speak (let alone understand or follow an argument in) English.
In loco parentis is probably the wrong phrase, but "in my custody, in my care" probably comes closer to it. When you assume authority over someone and restrict their movements, you do become at least somewhat responsible for their health, safety, and well-being.
DeleteWhy is criminals suiciding a problem exactly? The authoriyies should provide them the suicide drugs to relieve tax payers.
ReplyDeleteI suppose I'm just too calloused to care about inmates, convicts, those who prey upon society, whose victims continue to suffer long after trials, when they organize yet further crime and pay the price for it. They rolled the dice and lost. Game over.
ReplyDeletePeople have the right to do stupid things. Even fatal things. Allowing the dirt bags in jail to off themselves is a win for all of society. Stop interfering with darwinian selection.
ReplyDeleteWhile I 'understand' the ILP requirement, and having worked in the jail, it IS a PITA when an inmate offs him/herself... But they usually do it to themselves, after bragging about what they 'put over' on the man... Good riddance, and one less I had to worry about.
ReplyDelete