On Gab, Neon Revolt published this selection of choice quotations from scientists, particularly medical scientists. Click the image for a larger view.
Yep. "Science has taken a turn towards darkness." If the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines didn't prove that to everyone, then some people simply weren't paying attention. As the official VAERS statistics demonstrate:
Just look at those numbers for blood clots, D-dimer issues, and thrombosis; and then compare them with morticians' reports about strange, very large blood clots found in dead bodies they were embalming. That scares the living crap out of me!
I haven't taken the COVID-19 vaccinations, nor will I take any mRNA vaccination unless and until I have no choice in the matter whatsoever. The science is settled, all right - it's bloody dangerous!
Peter
It may be that big things with big effects are well known, and we're researching smaller things with smaller effects that are hard to quantify with small samples, making it hard to fund larger samples to prove or disprove a hypothesis.
ReplyDeleteI very reluctantly got the one shot J&J as I play duplicate bridge. It was a requirement of our club as we are almost all 'old' folks. No more, never again. What was amazing to me was how hard it hit developed first world countries but it didn't seem to make the same impact on the middle east or Africa.
ReplyDeleteYeah, that was just an accident, I'm sure.
DeleteJust to brighten everyone's day, Hogs and cattle are supposed to start being inoculated with mrna vaccines starting next month. Lay in your store of nattokinase.
ReplyDeleteJust out, starting this month they are giving mRNA (its gene therapy, not a vaccination) to cattle and hogs. You will get it one way or another. Should be able to find out about it on the Goog.
ReplyDeleteKnow your farmer. Don't buy from IBF (aka your grocery store).
DeleteSo, wait, hold it, according to this VAERS report, in the US there are 35,000 deaths supposedly related to the COVID-19 vaccine, out of nearly 270 million people who've gotten it, over the course of two years. That's a 1 in 7,714 chance of dying. I have worse odds of survival driving to work.
ReplyDeleteNo surprise over here... sigh
ReplyDeleteIn 3rd world countries (Africa, Latin America, Inda, SE Asia) the water isnt the best so giarda and other bugs ar common. Because of this HCQ and Ivermection are very commonly, if not unbiquitiously used.
ReplyDeleteSo there is that
The shot isn't the only way to get mRna into your body. With so many people having had the shots, you will now likely get mRna from any blood you may need for a medical procedure.
ReplyDeleteThe presentation of the VAERS data is quite concerning.
ReplyDeleteHowever, the presented C19 / Others ratio may or may not be partially misleading. I note that there are almost 2x the number of covid injections vs all others (1.5mil vs 0.9mil). If the ratio is not adjusted to reflect the much larger number of covid injections, then the data is not as severe as appears on the surface.
Pretty sure I was give a covid19 vaccine without my permission or knowledge. Any reports by others of same? Mine related to a bladder stone laser proceedurethe I had to be under general anesthesia for.
ReplyDeleteHe sure does. A word to all. Keep your owees & boo boos to yourself because no one gives a rats ass. Like my dear old vaccine murdered mother used to tell me: "honey, pain is personal. Keep it to yourself".
DeleteI'll get my answers in my own way & in my own time. With the Lords help of course.
The Lord works in mysterious ways.
ReplyDeleteReal Science left us when "Global Warming" came out and scientists jumped on the bandwagon and showed their flawed research to get funding.....
ReplyDeleteThis is just the logical extension of that.
This is not Science, it is Paid Results that are dressed up to look like Science.
John Patrick MD, lecturer with the Christian Medical Association has been talking about the lack of ethics and lack of truth in medical research for 20-30 years. He calls them the "cheats". He is worth listening to. Johnpatric.ca (he is a Canadian physician specializing in childhood nutrition). He said he can't spot the cheats outside of his narrow specialty.
ReplyDeleteEven when there is not overt money involved there is pressure to "publish or perish". If you are in academia your job security relates to publishing papers on a regular basis. Most of the papers published don't move the needle on real world decisions. The writer of the paper doesn't want the paper to be so noticeable that other try to replicate it or ask to see the raw data. So many/most papers are literally and actually not worth the paper they are printed on and not worth the time to read. NOW - add on political and financial secondary gain - Makes me not trust any of it. My default position is don't trust and certainly don't take conclusions published in papers at face value.
How quickly we forget the vision out of Italy, India, Indonesia, Spain, UK and others in the early days of C-19....
ReplyDeleteYes, VAERS shows that the C19 vaccines are to be viewed with some suspicion.
The actual stats are about as reliable as anything Abe Lincoln said about the internet.
They are not the product of any sort of rigor or investigation.
There is no process to investigate the veracity of ANY of the reports, let alone remove false or misattributed reports.
Given the hysteria over the last few years about both the virus and the vaccine, it would be safe to assume a significant percentage are false and the smaller ratios are more like 1:1 or even better.
VAERS is the equivalent of a tin can trip-wire. The cans are rattling. VAERS provides no info on whether the cause is wind, bear, rabbit or enemy. One would hope that adults are looking HARD at the big ratio items - myocarditis, D-dimer, etc. (Clots was AstraZeneca and is already well researched)