Electoral fraud becomes more obvious almost by the hour

 

The trickle of stories about electoral fraud and vote manipulation in our 2020 elections has become a torrent.  There is now so much evidence that anti-Republican and anti-President-Trump shenanigans are underway that only a purblind idiot or retarded moron could assert it's not happening.  I mean that literally.  Any reasonable person, confronted with the mass of evidence now available, must inevitably conclude that there's a widespread effort to defraud the American electorate and deny their democratic choice.

Larry Correia, whom we've met in these pages many times before, has a magnificent rant about the situation.  Here's an excerpt.  Bold, underlined text is my emphasis.

In auditing you look for red flags. That’s weird bits in the data that suggest something shifty is going on. You flag those weird things so you can delve into them further. One flag doesn’t necessarily mean there’s fraud. Weird things happen. A few flags mean stupidity or dishonesty. But a giant pile of red flags means that there’s bad **** going on and people should be in jail.

. . .

I’ve been trying to keep up with the firehose of information about what’s going on during this cluster**** of an election. Last night I was on Facebook talking about the crazy high, 3rd world dictatorship level voter turnout levels in the deep blue areas of these swing states was very suspicious. Somebody gas lighted me about how “I’d have to do better than that”, so this was my quick reply, listing off the questionable bull**** I could think of off the top of my head:

The massive turn out alone is a red flag.

But as for doing better…

The late night spikes that were enough to close all the Trump leads are a red flag.

The statistically impossible breakdown of the ratios of these vote dumps is a red flag.

The ratios of these dumps being far better than the percentages in the bluest of blue cities, even though the historical data does not match, red flag.

The ratios of these vote dumps favoring Biden more in these few battlegrounds than the ratio for the rest of the country (even the bluest of the blue) red flag.

Biden outperforming Obama among these few urban vote dumps, even though Trump picked up points in every demographic group in the rest of the country, red flag.

The poll observers being removed. Red flag.

The counters cheering as GOP observers are removed, red flag.

The fact that the dem observers outnumber the GOP observers 3 to 1, red flag (and basis of the first lawsuit filed)

The electioneering at the polls (on video), red flag.

The willful violation of the court order requiring the separation of ballots by type, red flag.

USPS whistleblower reporting to the Inspector General that today they were ordered to backdate ballots to yesterday, red flag.

The video of 2 AM deliveries of what appear to be boxes of ballots with no chain of custody or other observers right before the late night miracle spikes, red flag.

Any of those things would be enough to trigger an audit in the normal world. This many flags and I’d be giggling in anticipation of catching some thieves.

And it isn’t that I have to do better. I’m just an gen pop observer who happens to be a retired auditor with a finely tuned bull**** detector. This is going to the courts.

. . .

When you are auditing you see mistakes happen all the time. Humans make errors. Except in real life, mistakes usually go in different directions. When all the mistakes go in the same direction and benefit the same parties, they probably aren’t mistakes. They’re malfeasance.

. . .

Now, as a suspicious auditor type who spent a lot of hours looking for ****ery in complex systems, my gut tells me fake ballots were getting dumped into the system to make up the difference. And oh look, here is a giant pile of red flags indicating that’s the case.

. . .

[Wisconsin's] high turn out is the average for the state, but when you drill down on the source of these statistically improbable blue vote dumps, they’ve got districts with TWO HUNDRED PERCENT TURN OUT. That’s over 200%. There’s 7 over 100%, and a ton of them in the 90s ... if you’re an auditor, when you see super suspicious spikes like that in certain places, the first thing we think is that’s the place where you’ve got somebody over the controls colluding. So that’s where you go to fabricate your bull****.

200% turn out is ****ing insane. Same day voting or not. That’s madness.

. . .

Another thing you learn to spot when people are fraudulently manipulating data, is the mission-oriented spikes. On this one I’ve seen a few links, but the data has been so in flux that I’ve not been able to confirm it, but supposedly a bunch of the sudden Biden spikes weren’t just statistically improbable, they also voted for president but not the down ballot races. Now, lots of people will vote for president but don’t care about down ballot. However, when you get a pile of those in a row, that suggests somebody in a hurry filling out the mission critical bubble and then moving down stack, assembly line style.

. . .

I can say without hesitation ... that ****ery is afoot, and if an actual real investigation happens they’ll be able to prove it. Only this is politics, so who knows. The only thing I do know for certain is that this election is so ****ed up it is just going to make America’s two halves hate each other even more.

There's more at the link.  Indispensable reading if you want to know the breadth and depth of the electoral fraud that's going on.  (Read the comments below the article as well.)

Tyler Durden picks up on a point Larry made - that votes for President were made that did not include down-ballot races such as Congress, the Senate, etc. - and provides further evidence to prove it.

In most elections, the majority of votes are cast "down the ticket" - meaning, a voter supports both party's presidential nominee and state Congressional candidates. In fact, according to Pew Research, "overwhelming shares of voters who are supporting Trump and Biden say they are also supporting the same-party candidate for Senate."

Typically, this means that that the number of votes for a presidential candidate and that party's Senate candidates are relatively close.

Twitter user "US Rebel" (@USRebellion1776), however, found that the number of votes cast for Joe Biden far exceeds those cast for that state's Senate candidates in swing states, while those cast for Trump and GOP Senators remains far closer.

In Michigan, for example, there was a difference of just 7,131 votes between Trump and GOP candidate John James, yet the difference between Joe Biden and Democratic candidate Gary Peters was a staggering 69,093.

In Georgia, there was an 818 vote difference between Trump and the GOP Senator, vs. a 95,000 difference between Biden and the Democratic candidate for Senator.

Yet, in two non-swing states, there was "no massive flood of mysterious empty Biden votes," leading US Rebel to suggest "It's fraud."

In Wyoming, the difference on the Democratic side is is just 725 votes, while in Montana the difference is 27,457.

Again, more at the link, including graphs demonstrating the enormous discrepancies.  I agree - it's fraud.  It simply can't be anything else.  There's no other reasonable explanation.  If you can think of one, please share it with us in Comments - but I doubt you'll find many who'll agree with you.

In the face of all this evidence, I can only say yet again that this cannot be allowed to stand.  If we allow this travesty of an election to proceed without correcting the obvious fraud, we are effectively surrendering our constitutional republic to criminals.  There's no other way to put it.

I cannot and will not accept any electoral result that has not taken into account, investigated, and corrected the blatant, obvious fraud that's currently being perpetrated against us.  If, after doing so, Joe Biden wins the Presidency, all well and good.  I may not have supported him, but I'll acknowledge the true, honest votes of the American electorate and accept him as my president.  However, under current circumstances, there's no way on earth that I can ever accept his election as valid - and therefore he will not be my President.  Absent an honest result, he never will be my President, and his Administration will, as far as I'm concerned, be utterly illegitimate.  I think a large proportion of Americans feel the same way.

It's time to fix this problem once and for all.  The courts must ensure justice, fairness and honesty in our election.  If they fail to do so, then it's up to us, the American people, to take matters into our own hands.  I hope and pray we can avoid that, because the results will be irrevocable, and may be catastrophic.  Nevertheless, one way or another, justice must be done.

Another thing that must be done is to improve our electoral system to ensure that this cannot happen again.  We have got to have foolproof identification for voters;  a method to ensure that once they've voted, they cannot do so again;  and safeguards to ensure that nobody votes except those who are entitled to exercise the franchise.  One person, one vote, once per election - foolproof.  Without that, what Larry calls "this ****ery" will continue.  That's not acceptable.

Peter