Electoral shenanigans in action

 

On Monday I wrote:

I continue to expect a deliberate attempt by the progressive left wing of US politics to cheat in this election:  to elect their preferred candidate to the Presidency, and even if they can't achieve that, to elect so many of "their" Congresspeople and Senators that they can block any initiative by the "wrong" President until they can reclaim that office.  I truly hope that the will of the people, as expressed at the polls, will prevail:  but looking at the shenanigans already unveiled during early voting, and the number of fraudulent mail-in ballots already submitted, I'm afraid that's a pipe-dream.

Don't get over-confident in the results of this election, and stand by for a massive nationwide campaign of fraud, disinformation and cheating that will make previous attempts pale into insignificance.

I hope I'm wrong . . . but I fear I'm not.  Only time will tell.

I had a few e-mails after that, accusing me of alarmism, or spreading untrue rumors, or what have you.  I'm afraid they're all wrong.  The evidence is as plain as a pikestaff to those who are willing to see it for what it is.  As witness to that, I'm going to cite two other bloggers who know what they're talking about.

Sarah Hoyt lived through the Communist "Carnation Revolution" in Portugal during the 1970's, and saw the electoral tactics of the Left at first hand.  (I went through part of the backlash of the Carnation Revolution in southern Africa, where Portuguese settlers in Mozambique and Angola fled to South Africa ahead of being dispossessed and abused by their new Communist-terrorist overlords, to whom power was handed willy-nilly after the revolution in Portugal.  When we've spoken about our experiences, our friends tend to sidle away from us, because our language tends to get rather rude and our fuses rather short . . . our memories of that time are not good, to put it mildly!)

Today Sarah sees precisely the same dishonesty, shenanigans and outright fraud being practiced in our own country.

I am in fact QUITE aware that I sound like a loon when I say that fully 25% of total counted votes are fraud. And that those are mostly on the left side. Oh, 25% is my low estimate. It could be that a full 70% of votes for Biden were fraudulent and that instead of being a closely divided nation we are in fact an overwhelmingly anti-left nation held captive by a small minority that rules by fraud. Which would explain a lot of the things we see.

. . .

2020 should have shown you some people weren’t reasonable. Or sane. Or decent. Or socialized to be rational members of the human species. For some people naked power is the only motivator.

. . .

First let’s establish why it’s 99% the left committing fraud. This is known as “because the press exposes only the right.” I.e. by chance or design (likely by design because it was part of doctrine for the USSR for subverting other countries) the press was early on captured by Marxists. They in turn made sure to serve the cause over their profession (this is also always true of Marxists.) Which meant that while the right might be — probably is — as larcenous and idiotic as the left, it could not fraud for the longest time. When it tried to, it got jumped on like a ton of bricks. Meanwhile a blind eye was turned to the left’s fraudulent practices. While people whispered about it, the press did not report it, and no one investigated it. The left was allowed to be prolix in its fraud. The right could not fraud without being denounced.

This is why when fraud is brought up and the left screams “both sides do it” the only fraud they can bring up on the right is some race for dog catcher in Back of Beyond, South Nowhere. It’s not because the others weren’t caught, it’s because that was the only fool who dared, at a very small level. And he got caught.

Meanwhile the left thrives on institutionalized and diversified fraud.

There's much more at the link, including many examples of electoral fraud in the USA and how it's conducted.  Sarah's article is essential reading if you want to understand why I wrote what I did last Monday.  You may disagree with her, but it's hard to disagree with the evidence she provides.

Next, Divemedic points out that Pennsylvania is rife with electoral shenanigans, including people posing as officials who are, in fact, Democratic Party activists.

Police cut off voting at 1345, when it was supposed to go until 1630. Why isn’t the press going nuts over this? Because its Quakertown, PA. The city is 94% White, mostly Trump voters.

. . .

I want to point out that the woman in this video isn’t an election official. She is a Democrat who is posing as one. Look at her badge very closely.

. . .

Similar stories are playing out all over Pennsylvania - in areas containing white, mostly Trump voters, the voters are being turned away from the polls.

. . .

The left, as well as the Federal bureaucracy, cannot and will not let Trump become President. They are terrified of what he will do if he regains power. The cheat, the fix, is in.

Again, more at the link.

EDITED TO ADD:  Apparent electoral fraud seems to be happening in Michigan as well.  From Matthew DePerno on X:

After reviewing the Qualified Voter File (QVF) of votes actually cast as of yesterday, Oct 29, 2024, the database identifies 114,545 Michigan voters who have cast 279,113 ballots from multiple addresses across the state. This results in 164,568 excess ballots as of 10/29/2024. Below is one Voter ID. [Click the image for a larger, more readable view.]

I repeat what I said two days ago:

I continue to expect a deliberate attempt by the progressive left wing of US politics to cheat in this election ... stand by for a massive nationwide campaign of fraud, disinformation and cheating that will make previous attempts pale into insignificance.

That doesn't mean we should not vote.  Rather, we should aim to get so many people out to vote that their honest ballots swamp any attempt to cheat.  As President Trump has often put it, the result of this election needs to be "too big to rig" - no matter who, or which party, is elected.

Peter