Monday, February 22, 2021

Why there's no voting our way out of this

 

Last week I published an article titled simply "TINVOWOOT", an acronym meaning "There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This".  Ongoing developments are proving that to be true on a daily basis.

Wirepoints, an organization that's done yeoman work in highlighting the fiscal insanity with which the state of Illinois governs itself, points out that the state's politicians are, at root, completely untrustworthy, because they don't care what the people of Illinois think or want.  They're functioning at their own whim, not answering to anyone - even those who nominally elect them.  Bold, underlined text is my emphasis.


Three stories told those who believe Illinois is on the wrong track that the state’s political establishment cannot care less about their concerns. Disdain and even hatred about those concerns prevail.

First was Gov. JB Pritzker’s State of the State and Budget Address. It’s not just that it was more of the same refusal to undertake the major reforms needed to solve the fiscal crisis, which we are writing about separately. It was the extreme rhetoric Pritzker used to attack a political obstacle that doesn’t exist.

That political obstacle, Pritzker said, is Illinois Republicans. Their purposeful destructiveness has undermined the mission of putting Illinois on the right path, Pritzker would have us believe.  “In essence, they eliminated the fire department, burnt down the house, and poured gas on the flames — and now they’re asking why we’re not doing more to prevent fires,” he said. “In a normal year, I might have more patience for their hypocrisy. But this is not a normal year,” he added.

In truth, however, Republicans have been unable to pass or block a single thing of any consequence during the Pritzker Administration because Pritzker’s party has held a supermajority in the General Assembly for years. Nor do Republicans hold even one statewide office. He has faced no political obstacle from those he excoriated.

Second, Illinois finalized the Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards through a vote by a legislative committee. A firestorm of opposition preceded the vote, expressed by Illinoisans who saw what the standards were plainly designed to accomplish: political indoctrination of kindergarten through high school students, imposing radically divisive critical race theory on classrooms.

Countless parents across the state were livid, but they watched helplessly as the standards were sold to the public through distortion and outright dishonesty, which we wrote about here.

Third, a commission appointed by Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot to identify city statues that perhaps should be removed returned its list of what it called “problematic” statues. The list includes five of Abraham Lincoln and two of George Washington.

. . .

Most Illinoisans may think it preposterous that those statutes could be tagged for possible removal, but Lightfoot is taking her commission’s list seriously.  “This project is a powerful opportunity for us to come together as a city to assess the many monuments and memorials across our neighborhoods and communities — to face our history and what and how we memorialize that history,” Lightfoot said in a statement.

The common element in each of those stories is the extreme contempt that Illinois’ political leadership shows for the most fundamental values held by many Illinoisans. And they make no effort to hide it. They simply don’t care.

It is therefore understandable if despair is the sentiment growing most rapidly in Illinois.


There's more at the link.

That's only one state, of course:  but Illinois is emblematic of many other "blue states" in its disregard for the will of its people.  Take California, where a petition seeks to gather enough signatures to force a recall election for that state's Governor.  During the recent general election, standards for signature comparison on ballot documentation were relaxed.  Strict comparison was deemed unnecessary, and an unduly onerous burden on election staff.  That was, of course, because Democratic Party politicians were expected to - and did - obtain the majority of the votes cast.  Now, with a Democratic Party governor in danger of recall, does the same standard apply?  Of course not!  Suddenly strict signature comparison and verification are the order of the day - because if enough of the signatures on the recall petition can be called into question, there will be no recall election.

The duplicity is sickening . . . but it's no more than what we've come to expect from the progressive left as soon as they gain power.  They try to make sure, by fair means and/or foul, that they never relinquish it again.

We're seeing this now on our southern border.  The point of letting in a flood of illegal aliens is not compassion, or altruism, or anything of the sort.  It's to ensure that left-wing voters and potential voters outnumber those who might oppose progressive left-wing policies.  We all know this . . . but you'll never see it mentioned in the mainstream news media, because it's politically incorrect to mention it.  "Out of sight, out of mind" is their mantra.

We've just had another example out of that bastion of progressive buffoonery, New York City, where an educator has allegedly been forced out after refusing to take part in politically correct indoctrination.


Ames was grilled about her “ethnic background,” chastised by a colleague at a training session when she shared her grandparents’ experience during the Holocaust in Poland, and “admonished” when she declined requests at superintendents meetings to take part in the comic book movie-inspired “Wakanda Forever” salute to “black power,” she charges in the legal filing.


Again, more at the link.

Wakanda?  A fictional, non-existent nation that exists only in imagination, being used as an ideological indoctrination point?  What happened to reality???

Any right-thinking American with children in that school system should be absolutely outraged if the report is true . . . but you'll hear only crickets from most parents, because they've stopped caring.  They regard the public school system as a warehousing project for their children.  They don't actually care about what they're taught, just as long as the kids are kept busy while their parents are doing other things.  When they "graduate", their lack of knowledge and understanding won't matter, just so long as they're part of "the system", and know enough to fill in welfare forms.  Those parents who do care about their kids' education will, indeed, be outraged . . . but they're outnumbered and outvoted by the mass of those who don't.  Therefore, nothing will be done.

Increasingly, if we care for traditional American values and morality and standards, we're going to have to inculcate them in our children in spite of, rather than with the help of, the state.  That will, in turn, arouse the suspicion of a state whose political leaders want everybody indoctrinated to think as they see fit.

As I've said before, if you find yourself trapped in such a "blue state", or in a blue enclave within a "red state", it's long gone time you started looking for a way out of there.  You may lose money by moving, but you'll at least retain at least some degree of the freedom for which our founding fathers fought . . . not to mention your self-respect.  Freedom begins locally, with citizens and their local government controlling their own affairs.  From there, we can move upward and outward to take back levels of government that have been infiltrated by the progressive enemies of freedom - but it all starts locally.

Peter


Memes that made me laugh 46

 

Last week's harvest.























































More next week.

Peter


Sunday, February 21, 2021

Sunday morning music

 

While chatting with a younger reader over the past week, I discovered to my horror that she'd never heard of Tom Lehrer.  This is, of course, entirely un-American of her, and inconceivable to any child of the Cold War era.  To remedy that, I promised her I'd put up a selection of Mr. Lehrer's comedy songs this weekend.  This is a concert recorded in 1959.



Evergreen musical humor!

Peter


Saturday, February 20, 2021

Saturday non-snippet: Reflections on a nasty bout with COVID-19

 

Rather than put up another excerpt from a book, I thought readers might like to know a bit more about my battle with COVID-19 over the past couple of weeks.  It's been educational.

It started two weeks ago when, at one of our regular Saturday evening get-togethers of the North Texas Writers, Shooters and Pilots Association, one of our number was troubled by a nasty cough.  We didn't think much about it at the time;  that sort of thing goes around over the winter, and we've all been victims of it.  We shared supper and went our separate ways, and thought no more about it.

The following Tuesday (I think), a few of us got together at a local diner for lunch.  The coughing victim was there, and coughing even more than he had the previous weekend.  I was beginning to feel a bit under the weather, which I assumed was just another winter cold, or perhaps the start of a bout of flu.  However, by Wednesday it had turned into a fever and chills, and I put myself to bed.  Miss D. wasn't affected at that time, so she went to work as usual.

By Thursday morning, I was really badly affected, and Miss D. was beginning to come down with the same symptoms.  We also learned that day (if I recall correctly) that one of her colleagues at work had tested positive for COVID-19, and a couple who had been with us the previous weekend had also tested positive and were self-quarantining.  Miss D. was feeling bad enough that she didn't go to work on Friday.  Fortunately, we'd stocked up on cold and flu medications, dietary supplements and other necessities, and we had plenty of food in the house, so we hunkered down to ride it out.

I think what saved us from a really bad attack was that we'd read the warnings and boosted our intake of supplements.  Each day we'd been taking Vitamin D, zinc, a good multivitamin, etc., so that our immune systems were in reasonably good shape to fight off the attack.  Once COVID-19 set in, we had multiple packs of cold and flu medication to deal with the symptoms.  In my case, because I use a CPAP machine to sleep, I'd made sure I had high-strength nasal spray on hand, because with a clogged nose a nasal-cannula-mask CPAP becomes an expensive boat-anchor.  I was very grateful for it over the past week.

The most frustrating aspect of the situation was the almost complete lack of information and assistance from the medical profession.  I have serious reservations about many doctors and nurses, based on some very negative experiences following my disabling injury in 2004 and other medical conditions since then.  They were amplified and extended by the almost complete lack of interest shown by providers once we knew we had COVID-19.  Those to whom I spoke kept trying to fob me off to go somewhere else, rather than bother them.  They gave me wrong (sometimes conflicting) information, refused to even consider prescriptions for the better-known short-term treatments (e.g. hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, etc.), and were generally very unhelpful.  Staff at one regional hospital and its associated clinics gave me six different answers to the same questions at different times, and when I followed their instructions and turned up for a test, they wouldn't provide one.  It was intensely frustrating, and probably the most aggravating aspect of the situation.  (I had more to say about it a few days ago.)

At the time, of course, we were in a severe winter storm situation, which played havoc with local infrastructure.  Temperatures dropped below freezing on the same Wednesday I developed symptoms, and stayed that way for ten days, until yesterday morning.  We had up to a foot of snow, depending on whose figures you believe, and the ground is still covered with snow and ice.  It'll take several days of warmer temperatures to melt it off.  That's a big change from what we normally see of snow in these parts, which is a light dusting that melts away within a few hours.  We were fortunate that we didn't need to do any shopping;  the roads were very treacherous.  We were lucky enough not to lose power during the storm, unlike a few million other Texans.  If we'd had no power, I don't want to think what living with COVID-19 would have been like.  It was pretty miserable as it was!

Miss D. shook off her infection quite a lot faster than I did, largely (I think) because she's a couple of decades younger than I, and in better physical shape.  (As Old NFO and I have been known to ruefully remind each other, "It's not the years - it's the mileage!")  I ran a fever for a full eight days, finally shaking it off only two days ago;  and I still have chest congestion and an associated cough.  I'm taking expectorant medication to help get rid of that.  It's frustrating to me that I haven't "bounced back" faster . . . but I'm in my sixties, and not in great health due to partial physical disability, two heart attacks, and other vulnerabilities.  Under the circumstances, I'm told I should be very grateful that I got off as lightly as I did!

Our coughing friend from two weekends ago was admitted to hospital this week, and spent a few days on oxygen, being pumped full of remdesivir.  He got home yesterday afternoon, and will be resting for at least another week or so.  He had a rough time of it, and I'm glad he's OK.  Officially, Miss D. and I are out of quarantine now (ten days after the first symptoms), but we're going to be cautious and spend a few more days in self-imposed isolation, to make sure we don't carry any COVID cooties to anyone else.

Miss D. and I reckon this was our second bout with COVID-19.  We had a similar infection a year ago, in February 2020, and the symptoms and effects were very similar to this year - just not as pronounced.  At the time, testing wasn't available, and now, even though tests are available, cutting through the bureaucratic red tape to get one is frustrating as hell, so I haven't bothered.  (Miss D. got one at a local pharmacy, and expects to hear the results early next week.)

Will it be worth getting the vaccine?  I don't know.  I'm not anti-vaxx at all, provided it's safe and effective;  but the safety aspect has so many question marks over it that I'm not convinced.  (If Congress has to exempt the vaccine manufacturers from legal liability if anything goes wrong, that's a great big red flag, right there.  If something does go wrong, guess who's left holding the baby?  That's right - you and I, the recipients.)  There's also the very serious consideration that this "vaccine" is actually a form of DNA modification, if I understand the science behind it correctly.  There's never been a vaccine like that before, and I'm not sure I want to be a guinea-pig for it.

However, I must admit, COVID-19's whipped my butt over the past ten days.  I'm in a very high-risk group for it, due to age and other factors;  and I consider myself lucky to have beaten it so far.  I may have to reconsider my options and get the vaccine, rather than risk fighting it on my own again.  It might be "third time lucky" for COVID, rather than me!  I'll have to think very hard about that.

At any rate, I'm on the mend, as is Miss D.  We're grateful for that, and have a lot more respect for what COVID-19 can do to the human body.  If you get it, or if you're at high risk for it, take as many precautions as you can.  It's no fun at all.

Peter


Friday, February 19, 2021

The gun-banners' latest tactic: If you make it impossible to use a gun, then owners will have no reason not to surrender it

 

I note that Canada is broadening its gun control legislation.  The Public Safety Minister there has talked about the assumptions behind the measures.


What we've done in the legislation is really create the set of circumstances and conditions that will facilitate the buy-back.

We are eliminating all legal use of these prohibited firearms. They can't be legally discharged. You can't fire them. You can't take them hunting or to a range. They can't sell them or transport them. They can't bequeath them or trade them in any way. They will be required to store them in a very secure safe or vault.

I think the vast majority of people who bought these guns to use as firearms, now that there is no legal way to do that, they'll be highly incentivized to surrender them for destruction, and then we'll have a fair compensation program available to them.


There's more at the link.

More measures are planned by some liberal Canadian cities.  For example, Toronto is to call on the federal government to ban the sale of handguns within city limits, and for the province to ban the sale of handgun ammunition within those limits.

I think we can expect to see similar measures introduced in many US "blue states" controlled by the Democratic Party.  If they can make firearms almost impossible to use legally, they can then put greater effort behind so-called "buy-back" campaigns (and yes, I know there's no such thing as a "buy-back", because they didn't own the guns in the first place).  They want to demonize, not only gun possession, but also gun use.

Those of us living in "red states" are likely to be insulated from such pressures, at least for now, but they'll get to us eventually.  The gun-grabbers mean to win.  They'll use fair means or foul, and ignore the realities of the situation, because they don't care about anything except imposing their will on the rest of us.  Our push-back is going to have to be just as strong, to avoid them steamrollering right over us.

One obvious line of attack is to require shooting ranges to keep records of who shoots there, and the type of weapon(s) and quantity of ammunition they shoot during each visit.  There might also be a requirement for shooters to buy all the ammunition they use from the shooting range, rather than bring their own.  They'll probably use the excuse that the safety of reloaded ammunition can't be guaranteed, and since there's no way to prove that shooters aren't using reloads, they must be prevented from using any of their own ammunition at all.  That'll make it a lot more expensive to shoot.  In response, I can see more and more regular gatherings of gun owners on farms and ranches out in the country, where they can spend a weekend shooting to their hearts' content, without being bothered by gun-grabbers.  I daresay our annual Blogorado gathering might evolve into a quarterly event along those lines.

We'll need to be on our guard against such intrusive measures.

Peter


A quick word about reader comments

 

Folks, I hate playing the censor.  I really dislike having to intervene in user comments here.  However, sometimes it's necessary.

Comments like "this race is sub-human", or "they do things like that because of their race, nothing else", and the like, are simply not acceptable.  For a start, they're blatantly untrue.  Many issues have to do with culture, rather than race.  The existence of highly esteemed and respected individuals of every race proves that.  The color of one's skin does not automatically mean that one's behavior will be that of a gang-banger or thug.  One's parentage, upbringing, the circumstances in which one has lived, etc. are going to have a much greater effect on that - which is why, dealing with prison gangs (which I've done ad nauseam), I found very little difference between those of one race and those of another.  They all behaved equally criminally, because that was their common culture.

There's another aspect to comments like that.  They're going to be used as a method to attack conservative outlets, seeking to drive them off the Internet.  (The latest attack was on Baen's Bar, a forum that's been in existence for decades.  You can read Larry Correia's take on it here.)  I don't have to worry about that with most of my commenters here, because they respect my wish to keep this place family-friendly, and self-moderate their comments accordingly.  However, there are some who don't seem to get it.  Friends, I respect your right to have your own opinions, even if I don't share them:  but please, express them in a way that doesn't attack others personally for factors such as race, creed or color.  That's not what we're about here.

I don't want to go to full comment moderation, largely because I don't have time for it.  If we all work together, that won't be necessary.  Thanks.

Peter


Food inflation: a growing threat to us all

 

As part of my ongoing series of articles about inflation, I'd like to consider food this morning.  It's getting harder to find for many nations, although individual First World consumers probably aren't aware of the problem;  and even in our own supermarkets, it's getting a lot more expensive.

Let's begin with worldwide food availability.  Bloomberg reports:


Global food prices reached a six-year high in December and are likely to keep rising into 2021, adding to pressure on household budgets while hunger surges around the world.

A United Nations gauge of food prices has jumped 18% since May, as adverse weather, government measures to safeguard supplies and robust demand helped fuel rallies across agricultural commodities from grains to palm oil. Prices will likely climb further, the UN’s Food & Agriculture Organization said.

The spike threatens to push up broader inflation, making it harder for central banks to provide more stimulus to shore up economies, while stirring memories of food-price crises a decade ago. It’s bad news for consumers whose incomes have been hurt by the Covid-19 crisis, and adds to concerns about global food security that’s being affected by conflicts and weather shocks.

That’s especially true for the poorest countries having to contend with limited social safety nets and purchasing power, according to the FAO.


There's more at the link.

It's important to understand how international trade in food is affected by the dramatic decrease in currency values, pressure from competing exports and non-food production, and labor and other shortages produced by the COVID-19 pandemic.  A great deal of America's food is grown outside our borders - fruit from South America, avocados from Mexico, some types of grain from other countries.  Because we pay high prices for it and provide a profitable market, those supplying it are less willing to grow staple foods for the benefit of their own population.  Indeed, they're likely to take over as much arable land as they can for their "cash crop", leaving relatively little for subsistence agriculture.  This can be a death blow to poorer communities, who can't afford "cash crops" at the best of times, and must grow what they need to survive.

Quite literally, when the First World pays well to buy fancy foodstuffs, it's reducing the supply of more basic foodstuffs that the Third World needs to survive.  It's a simple equation.  As a result, some nations are beginning to restrict the amount of food they export, in order to ensure that their own population has enough food to survive.  They'll forgo the cash income from crops in demand in the First World, in return for more basic foodstuffs that their people can eat (and enough farmland to devote to the latter as well).

On the other hand, the prices we're seeing on US supermarket shelves are reflecting the growing international imbalance in food production (and probably making it worse).  They also show the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for our economy.


In the United States, the local farmers, it seems, are being squeezed out of business, or paid not to grow food, while Big Agriculture is more concerned with exporting its supplies than keeping domestic food stocks safe and affordable.

In an effort to fight two wars at the same time – against a pandemic as well as purported climate change – the Biden administration risks putting the United States on a crash course with food shortages and soaring prices as early as this year.

. . .

One of those presidential actions envisions the conservation of 30 percent of the nation’s lands and waters over the next decade. Where will all of that protected land come from? Perhaps from Bill Gates, who now owns the deed to most of the farmland in the nation? Doubtful.

The answer is from small, independent farmers, whose agricultural activities, the Democrats say, are responsible for 10 percent of the manmade greenhouse emissions purportedly frying up the planet.

While occupying the previously unknown ‘Office of the President-Elect’, the Democratic leader said he would pay U.S. farmers to “put their land in conservation” and live without their ‘cash crops.’ How much the tillers of the soil will receive has not been disclosed, nor if this program will be enforced upon farmers against their will.

Another reason that the future does not bode well for American farming is that Biden’s nominee for Agricultural Secretary is none other than Tom Vilsack, who also served as the USDA chief in the Obama administration. Biden said Vilsack will help American agriculture become “the first in the world to achieve net-zero [greenhouse] emissions.”

But is anyone considering what will happen if or when America achieves net-zero food production at a time when the rest of the world is hoarding limited supplies? Equally concerning will be the quality of the food being produced.

. . .

The question demands repeating: if the United States understands that it is dealing with a potentially critical situation with regards to food security in the middle of a pandemic, why does it continue to export at breakneck speed? While the major agricultural powerhouses, like Argentina, Brazil, Ukraine, Russia and China are taking steps to protect their domestic food supplies, keeping prices in check, the U.S. seems to be bucking the trend.

Perhaps the closest thing to a siren warning of danger came from a recent report by Bloomberg that carried the headline, ‘China Is So Thirsty for Soy That America Could Soon Be Importing.’ The question, however, that the article never dares to ask is: ‘importing from where?’

“China’s appetite for U.S. soy is draining silos to the point that American processors may need to import the most beans in years this summer,” the article began. “The boom in U.S. shipments to China comes after Brazil and other countries effectively ran out of exportable supplies – prospects traders in North America are now facing.”

Christian Westbrook, the host of Ice Age Farmer who has been warning about a potential “engineered famine” for some time, summed up the situation as “game over.”

“That’s why, to see the Biden administration roll forward these terrible executive orders, it’s insane,” Westbrook commented. “Other countries are frantically taking steps…to protect their domestic food supplies, keep prices low and be able to feed their animals, and then, in turn, be able to feed their people. Not here.”


Again, more at the link.

I've been keeping a careful eye on our supermarket purchases over the past few years.  Ever since we got into the twenty-teens, I've noted that food prices rose by plus-or-minus 10% every year.  Now, it's getting worse.  I won't be surprised to see our food costing 20-25% more in December than it did a month ago.  Just looking at the contents of our typical shopping cart is an eye-opener.  At Sams Club, paying discounted big-box store prices, it's easy to spend $200-$300 on meat and groceries that don't even half-fill the cart.  (Needless to say, we don't do that often!)  Contrast that with a decade ago, where for the same price we could fill almost two carts.

I've mentioned in the past two accurate resources to figure out the real rate of inflation;  Shadowstats and the Chapwood Index.  Both are far more accurate than the "politically correct" fudged figures provided by the Bureau for Economic Statistics.  I urge you to click over to each of them, read more about their methods, and begin to use them to track real inflation nation-wide, even as you track your own expenditure in your local market.  I think you'll be unpleasantly surprised.

Peter


Thursday, February 18, 2021

"Follow the money": what the Robinhood affair has revealed

 

Readers will recall the fuss and bother a few weeks ago, when a Reddit investing sub-forum used Robinhood and other low- or no-cost brokers to launch a short-selling campaign targeting certain hedge funds.  To the fury of those investors, Robinhood restricted their ability to trade, and in some cases sold their orders on the open market without their permission, thereby helping the hedge funds keep their heads above water.  Legal action has already resulted, and is sure to be in the courts for months, perhaps years to come.

Tyler Durden sums up what Robinhood did - and, more importantly, why it did it.  Yet again, we see that if a service or product is free, it simply means that you, the user, are the real product.  You're being bought and sold.


Frankly, we've had it with the constant stream of lies from Robinhood and neverending bull**** from the company's CEO, Vlad Tenev.

. . .

What he is referring to, of course, is Robinhood's outrageous decision to restrict the buying of 13 heavily shorted stocks on Jan 28 that had been driven to record highs, including GameStop, whose shares had surged more than 1,600%.

Tenev said the restrictions were necessary due to a large increase in collateral/deposit requirements by the DTCC, but that was not spelled out in automated emails sent to Robinhood customers early on Jan. 28.

And then he decided to pull the oldest trick and deflect attention from his own mistakes by blaming "conspiracy theories."

. . .

What Tenev did not say, or explain, is why his company - which is merely a client-facing front of Citadel, which buys the bulk of Robinhood's orderflow to use it perfectly legally in any way it sees fit - was so massively undercapitalized that the DTCC required several billion more in collateral to protect Robinhood's own investors against the company's predatory ways of seeking to capitalize on the gamification of investing making it nothing more (or less) than a trivial pursuit to millions of GenZ and millennial investors, a point which Michael Burry made so vividly.

Incidentally we know why Tenev did not mention it: it's because Robinhood's back office is a shambles of a shoestring operation, one which never anticipated either such a surge in trading not a multi-billion collateral requirement; had Robinhood been a true brokerage instead of pretending to be one, and run merely to open as many retail accounts as it could in the shortest amount of time, thus generating the most profit in the quickest amount of time to allow its sponsors a quick and profitable exit, it would actually have been on top of this.

. . .

Which brings us to a totally separate topic, and one which Tenev will one way or another have to address: the fact that Robinhood is a de facto subsidiary of Citadel, whose entire business model is to sell retail orders to a handful of HFT market makers first and foremost... Citadel. In doing so the only ones who benefited from the surge in retail trading are Robinhood itself, by pocketing millions more from selling orderflow to Citadel, Virtu, Two Sigma, Wolverine and other HFT frontrunning "market-making" venues, as well as Citadel which made billions by having an advance look at the biggest surge in retail stock and option orders flow in history, and being able to trade ahead of and around it.

And no, it's not a conspiracy theory Vladimir - it is the stone cold truth, as Jeffrey Gundlach suggested last week when he said "Robin Hood (sic) should be forced to change its name to Hood Robbin’.  I grow so weary of lies through nomenclature, which are ubiquitous these days" adding "To be clear, the name change would reflect Robinhood robbing the little guy, nothing else."

. . .

Would it therefore be farfetched to say that Robinhood is nothing more than a client-facing subsidiary of Citadel, one which pretends to offer free trades to tens of millions of young, naive traders, but in reality merely allows Citadel Securities to trade ahead and/or against this orderflow for which it paid over $300 million... and to generate record revenues of $6.7 billion!

Probably not, but we won't have a definitive answer until we find out just how much profit Citadel made from buying all this critical data, which gives it an early glimpse into not only each discrete individual trade but also a sense of which way the retail horde is moving, critical and extremely valuable data which until last August was public and available to all (with a slight delay) courtesy of Robintrack, and which last August was inexplicably halted.


There's more at the link.

As always, the old adage "Follow the money" reveals who's really profiting - and it wasn't the individual investors using Robinhood's services.

Peter


"Unspeakable truths" about race in America

 

An interesting article examines the state of race relations in America from the perspective of a self-described "elite" African-American writer, and points out some uncomfortable truths.  Here's an excerpt.


Activists on the Left of American politics claim that “white supremacy,” “implicit bias,” and old-fashioned “anti-black racism” are sufficient to account for black disadvantage. But this is a bluff that relies on “cancel culture” to be sustained. Those making such arguments are, in effect, daring you to disagree with them. They are threatening to “cancel” you if you do not accept their account: You must be a “racist”; you must believe something is intrinsically wrong with black people if you do not attribute pathological behavior among them to systemic injustice. You must think blacks are inferior, for how else could one explain the disparities? “Blaming the victim” is the offense they will convict you of, if you’re lucky.

I claim this is a dare; a debater’s trick. Because, at the end of the day, what are those folks saying when they declare that “mass incarceration” is “racism”—that the high number of blacks in jails is, self-evidently, a sign of racial antipathy? To respond, “No. It’s mainly a sign of anti-social behavior by criminals who happen to be black,” one risks being dismissed as a moral reprobate. This is so, even if the speaker is black. Just ask Justice Clarence Thomas. Nobody wants to be cancelled.

But we should all want to stay in touch with reality. Common sense and much evidence suggest that, on the whole, people are not being arrested, convicted, and sentenced because of their race. Those in prison are, in the main, those who have broken the law—who have hurt others, or stolen things, or otherwise violated the basic behavioral norms which make civil society possible. Seeing prisons as a racist conspiracy to confine black people is an absurd proposition. No serious person could believe it. Not really. Indeed, it is self-evident that those taking lives on the streets of St. Louis, Baltimore, Philadelphia, and Chicago are, to a man, behaving despicably. Moreover, those bearing the cost of such pathology, almost exclusively, are other blacks. An ideology that ascribes this violent behavior to racism is laughable. Of course, this is an unspeakable truth—but no writer or social critic, of whatever race, should be cancelled for saying so.

. . .

Nor does anybody actually believe that 70 percent of African American babies being born to a woman without a husband is (1) a good thing or (2) due to anti-black racism. People say this, but they don’t believe it. They are bluffing—daring you to observe that the 21st-century failures of African Americans to take full advantage of the opportunities created by the 20th century’s revolution of civil rights are palpable and damning. These failures are being denied at every turn, and these denials are sustained by a threat to “cancel” dissenters for being “racists.” This position is simply not tenable. The end of Jim Crow segregation and the advent of the era of equal rights was transformative for blacks. And now—a half-century down the line—we still have these disparities. This is a shameful blight on our society, I agree. But the plain fact of the matter is that some considerable responsibility for this sorry state of affairs lies with black people ourselves. Dare we Americans acknowledge this?

. . .

... in terms of police killings, we are talking about 300 victims per year who are black. Not all of them are unarmed innocents. Some are engaged in violent conflict with police officers that leads to them being killed. Some are instances like George Floyd—problematic in the extreme, without question—that deserve the scrutiny of concerned persons. Still, we need to bear in mind that this is a country of more than 300 million people with scores of concentrated urban areas where police interact with citizens. Tens of thousands of arrests occur daily in the United States. So, these events—which are extremely regrettable and often do not reflect well on the police—are, nevertheless, quite rare.

To put it in perspective, there are about 17,000 homicides in the United States every year, nearly half of which involve black perpetrators. The vast majority of those have other blacks as victims. For every black killed by the police, more than 25 other black people meet their end because of homicides committed by other blacks. This is not to ignore the significance of holding police accountable for how they exercise their power vis-Ă -vis citizens. It is merely to notice how very easy it is to overstate the significance and the extent of this phenomenon, precisely as the Black Lives Matter activists have done.


There's more at the link.

The author raises important points, but in my opinion also bends over backwards to avoid offending those activists of his own race who are promoting "cancel culture" and trying to silence any views that dissent from their own.  I suppose it's like approaching the problem from two different perspectives.  Let's take inner-city crime as an example.  It's unarguable that most inner-city crime is committed by blacks against other blacks.  The FBI crime statistics tell the story, year after year after year.  That's the reality.

There are two main ways (probably more than two, but I digress) of approaching it.  One is to say, "Let's stop that behavior, by any means necessary:  then, when we've made our inner cities safer places to live, let's go into how to reform and improve them so that those living there have better life chances and choices in the future."  That's how I would tackle it.  Deal with the problem - by whatever means are necessary.  Once crime is under control, then we can sort out the underlying factors.  The other approach, often argued by "elites", is that we should fix the underlying problems first.  That would then lead to a decline in the problem, and its eventual solution.  I call that a cop-out.  What about those suffering right now under that crime wave?  They must be protected.  To do that, criminals must be stopped.  Unless and until that is done, we're abandoning those who most need help - and that's unacceptable.

The article strikes me as Utopian in its expectations, but the author's entitled to his opinion.  Go read it for yourself, and let us know what you think in Comments.

Peter


Learning from medical misadventures

 

Miss D.'s and my medical misadventures continue as we try to get tested for COVID-19, and figure out how to treat ourselves at home.  Basically, we've been shunted from pillar to post and back again by local medical facilities, to my profound and (by now) vituperative irritation.  She's booked a test at a local pharmacy for later this morning, while I'm going to try to get one at a local doc-in-a-box (if it's open . . . its Web site keeps changing on that subject, probably due to weather conditions, which are still far from ideal).

However, I've also been looking at the wildly varying prices being quoted or offered for tests and related issues.  They're all over the place, from "free" (provided you have insurance) to a minimum co-pay of $500 apiece.  Nobody will be specific about what's covered and what's not.  Furthermore, there's no guarantee that you'll be given a prescription for anything useful.  Remdesivir, the only approved COVID treatment, is available to hospital in-patients only, while hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, both widely used and proven "unofficially", are not guaranteed to be available even if your doctor will prescribe them.  It seems that pharmacists can exercise a right of veto over such prescriptions;  and if they don't want to issue them, you'll do without.  That makes me incandescent with anger, but the system is set up that way.  (I probably know more than most US doctors about those remedies, anyway.  Lawdog and I are both familiar with them from our years in Africa, where we both took them freely to deal with malaria, fungal conditions, etc.  Although they're scheduled drugs, they're so common over there that one can frequently buy them at roadside stalls.)

To make matters more interesting, the prices being charged for care appear to be outrageous - and not a little fraudulent.  Apparently a hospital can charge at least 20% more reimbursement from the federal government for a case of COVID-19 than it can for any other ailment;  so a whole lot of people are classified as COVID-positive, when in any other year they'd be called flu patients.  (Just look at the official CDC figures for flu cases over the past year, and compare them to previous years.  There's no doubt whatsoever what's going on.  Hospitals are making financial hay while the sun shines, by mis-classifying every flu symptom as COVID-19.)

This is on top of the vastly increased cost of health insurance, which buys us less and less care each year;  and also on the predatory pricing practices found in many emergency rooms, which bill anything and everything they can to those they think they can force to pay, while treating indigents and transients free of charge (largely thanks to EMTALA).  Go read those two links for yourselves.  They're enough to make your blood boil.  The "compassionate" and "caring" health care industry is revealed to be nothing of the kind - it's just another business to those running it.

Suffice it to say that I'm not a happy camper at present.  Miss D. and I are self-medicating as best we can on cold and flu treatments, taking vitamin and mineral supplements, and hoping for the best.  Please keep us in your prayers as the struggle continues.

Peter


Wednesday, February 17, 2021

An expensive follow-up to a previous "Doofus Of The Day"

 

In "Doofus Of The Day 1,072", back in December, we read how Citibank had mistakenly paid out $885.2 million too much to creditors of one of its clients.  It had persuaded some of them to return the money, but was suing others who'd refused.

Well, the verdict is in . . . and Citibank lost.  Big-time.


Citigroup Inc. unexpectedly lost a legal battle to recover half a billion dollars it sent Revlon Inc. lenders, after the embarrassing blunder forced it to answer to regulators and tighten its internal controls.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman on Tuesday ruled that 10 asset managers for the lenders -- which include Brigade Capital Management, HPS Investment Partners and Symphony Asset Management -- don’t have to return $504 million that Citibank said it mistakenly transferred in August while trying to make an interest payment. He said they shouldn’t have been expected to know that the transfer, which totaled more than $900 million before some lenders returned their share, was an error.

“To believe that Citibank, one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world, had made a mistake that had never happened before, to the tune of nearly $1 billion would have been borderline irrational,” wrote Furman, who presides in Manhattan.


There's more at the link.

I'm sure there'll be appeals galore - after all, even a financial giant like Citibank can't take a half-billion-dollar loss lying down! - but they'll face ongoing problems.


A 30-year-old legal precedent that essentially says “finders keepers” in certain financial transactions will make it hard for Citigroup Inc. to get a half-billion-dollar decision against it overturned.

. . .

In a 101-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in New York said Tuesday that the outcome of the case was surprisingly straightforward, even if it may not seem the fairest result.

“The transfers matched to the penny the amount of principal and interest outstanding on the loan,” Furman wrote. “The accompanying notices referred to interest being ‘due,’ and the only way in which that would have been accurate was if Revlon was making a principal prepayment.”

The key precedent is a 1991 New York state court case called Banque Worms v. BankAmerica International. In that case, New York’s highest court ruled that under a principle called discharge for value, when a third party mistakenly sends money from a debtor to a creditor, the creditor can keep the payment if it didn’t realize it was sent in error and didn’t make any misrepresentations.

. . .

Furman said representatives of each lender “credibly and persuasively testified that they reasonably believed the payments were intentional prepayments” of the 2016 loan. The judge rejected Citibank’s claim that the size of the transfer alone should have alerted the lenders to the blunder.

Given that banks have security procedures to ensure that such mistakes don’t occur, “it would have been virtually inconceivable to a reasonable investor in [the lenders’] position that Citibank had wired nearly $900 million by mistake,” Furman said.


Again, more at the link.

I haven't heard of any consequences for the officials in Citibank who made the mistake in the first place.  I wonder how many of them are still employed there?  If they're fired, of course, I daresay the creditors who received the unexpected windfall of full repayment of their loans might be willing to offer them a job . . .



Peter


So much for "the consent of the governed"!

 

Earlier this month, a Massachusetts bureaucrat defined the way government looks at its citizens subjects.


A Massachusetts climate official said people who heat their homes and fuel their cars will need to have their “will” broken in order to combat emissions and climate change.

“I know one thing that we found in our analysis is that 60% of our emissions come from … residential heating and passenger vehicles,” said David Ismay, Massachusetts, undersecretary for climate change, during a virtual meeting with the Vermont Climate Council. “Let me say that again: 60% of our emissions that need to be reduced come from you, the person on your street, the senior on fixed-income. Right now, there is no bad guy left, at least in Massachusetts, to point the finger at and turn the screws on and now break their will, so they stop emitting. That’s you. We have to break your will.”

Ismay reasoned that climate agencies were running out of options.

“We can’t have no offshore wind, no transmission, no solar, and have clean energy,” he said. “Something has to give. There has to be some mechanism we trust to find a place to site a transmission line.”

But Ismay also admitted his remarks would not be popular.

“I can’t even say that publicly,” Ismay said.


There's more at the link.

Frankly, I'm astonished the good people of Massachusetts didn't rise up in a body and run Mr. Ismay out of town on a rail (after the suitable application of tar and feathers).  If any North Texas government official said something like that, I venture to doubt he'd make it home to his family in safety that night.  Almost everyone's instant reaction would be, "Oh, yeah?  Well, break this!"

Nevertheless, that's the way our current Administration seems to think about energy.  It's all about the Green New Deal, which means big bucks for their supporters and sycophants, all the energy they want for their own homes and vehicles, and not very much for the rest of us.

The "consent of the governed" is normally regarded as a foundational principle of government.  Clearly, Mr. Ismay and his ilk don't share that perspective.  Perhaps someone should educate him.




Peter


Medical misadventures and frustrations

 

I'm about at the point where tar, feathers and a pole begin to look like essential equipment for dealing with medical establishments and their staff.

Yesterday Miss D. and I tried to get a COVID-19 test, just to confirm what is already very clear from the number of our friends who're down with it.  The nearby Big City Hospital was still overwhelmed by the recent snowstorms, and wasn't offering its usual testing facilities.  The free drive-up tests offered in the parking lot of an exhibition center weren't available, because of the temperature (or lack thereof).

After much calling around, we got no less than six different bits of advice from the staff of a small town hospital and its satellite clinics, leading us to drive out to its main hospital for testing - only to be told (contrary to what we'd been repeatedly promised) that they weren't conducting tests.  If we cared to walk into the ER and pay full ER fees, why yes, they'd test us:  but that would be a $500 deductible for each of us.  Our response was a somewhat vituperative "Thanks, but no thanks!"

We drove 30 miles the other way to Big City, and tried to contact several alternatives en route.  A "doc-in-the-box" establishment calling itself ER Now offered to do the testing, but again, only at full ER rates - this, from a small doc-in-the-box joint!  We walked out without treatment or testing.

We finally learned of one doc-in-the-box place that offers the quick-results test at a more reasonable price, but was closed on Tuesday.  We'll be going there this morning to get a test, weather permitting - we've had another 4-6" of snow since yesterday afternoon, so I'll have to wait and see what road reports look like.  Drivers in North Texas appear to think that if you've got a 4-wheel-drive pickup or SUV, you can drive at 80 on loose snow and black ice with nary a care in the world.  A fairly large number of them have recently discovered that's not quite the case . . .

Peter


Tuesday, February 16, 2021

More role-playing game laughs

 

A few years ago I mentioned a Dungeons and Dragons episode where a quick-thinking player outfoxed the Dungeon Master and all the other players, too.  It still makes me smile.

The other day, while scrolling idly through a Web site, I came across a tweet from Clinton J. Boomer, who describes himself as a novelist and free-lance game designer.  I had to laugh.



Intrigued, I clicked over to Mr. Boomer's Twitter account and spent an enjoyable half-hour browsing through his archives.  For example:



I like his sense of humor.  Go browse his archives for yourself, and enjoy!



Peter


It's not the crud, it's COVID-19

 

I reported last week that I was coming down with some bug or other.  I had a couple of bad days, but thereafter things have been improving slowly but surely.  Miss D. also got it, and is a couple of days behind me on the healing curve.

Sadly, it's almost certainly COVID-19.  We're in the process of arranging for tests (the big storm over the weekend kinda blocked access to that), but three of our circle of friends have been diagnosed with confirmed cases, so I think there's not much doubt about it.  It looks as if the "infection vector" started with one man at Miss D.'s place of work.  They now have at least three people out of the office, which for a small business is a huge burden.

Fortunately, we've been keeping up our doses of zinc, Vitamin D and other supplements, which gives our bodies a good foundation from which to fight the infection;  and we have plenty of cold and flu medication, which has kept our chests and sinuses largely clear.  I've no doubt we'll be prescribed some COVID-specific medicines as well, but what we have has kept it under control so far.

One of our friends was admitted to hospital last night.  Apart from confirming his COVID diagnosis, he also has viral pneumonia in both lungs, and they've put him in an oxygen tent until his condition improves and his blood oxygen levels return to more satisfactory measurements.  Two more are quarantined at home, including an expectant mother who was to give birth by C-section this week.  She's now had that postponed, in the hope that she can shake off COVID before surgery.

I'll keep you posted if there are any more developments concerning Miss D. and myself, but so far it doesn't look like we've been hit too hard.  Please keep us all in your prayers, if you're so inclined.  Thanks!

Peter


TINVOWOOT

 

For those who don't already know it, the headline to this post is an acronym meaning "There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This".  We're in an existential struggle for the life of the American constitutional republic, and facing enemies on all sides.  Unless and until we wake up to the fact that we're in a war, and going to have to react accordingly, we will lose every time.  What's more, so far, that war has been relatively peaceful - but there's no guarantee it'll remain that way.

The progressive leftists who fraudulently took control of our Administration are tireless in their efforts, and determined to make us obey their every whim.  Any and every act of resistance, or refusal to see things their way, will be treated as rebellion, domestic terrorism, extremism, racism, or any other -ism they can use against us.  As the anonymous blogger who writes at NC Renegade points out:


The United States of America is dead. It no longer exists. We are now ruled by Communist. You best get your mind wrapped around that. You only have the illusion of freedom as long as you do as you are told and be a good little peasant. If you are here reading this, you are an enemy of the state. Sooner or later they will come for you and decisions will have to be made. These Communist hate us, they hate everything we stand for. They aim to eradicate us. They don’t even hide their intentions anymore, they tell us on the mainstream media what they intend to do. Are you listening? If you think you can just be silent and obedient and they will leave you alone, you best think again. These people hate you and they are out to replace you. They want everything that we stand for GONE!

So what are we to do? I don’t know. Our side lacks organization, always has, and it seems we always will. Everyone on our side seems to always be the smartest person in the room and it’s always their way or no way. I don’t know how we get around that.

I understand everyone wants peace, but we are not going to take our Republic back by remaining pacifist. There can be no peace as long as our country remains in control of those who falsely gained control ... I don’t know what we Americans, we Patriots should do. I do know that you can’t remain silent. Our founders were willing to die for the rights espoused in the Declaration they crafted and signed at their own peril. Our founders were called traitors and radicals, no worse than what we are being called today. When it comes down to it, many Americans simply don’t have the spine or fortitude to stand up and fight, even with FREEDOM on the line.  Our children and grandchildren deserve better from us. What will you say when they ask what you did to take back our country from the Communist?


There's more at the link.

If you think NC Renegade is exaggerating, you haven't been paying attention.  How many of you noticed this report from New York City yesterday?


The principal of East Side Community School in New York sent white parents a manifesto that calls on them to become “white traitors” and advocate for full “white abolition.”

“This is the new language of public education,” tweeted Christopher F. Rufo along with an image showing “the 8 white identities,” which range from “white supremacist” to “white abolition.”

The accompanying text, which has been circulated before by left-wing extremists, defines the behavior white people must practice in order to put an end to “the regime of whiteness.”

The two final stages, “white traitor” and “white abolitionist,” demands that white people “subvert white authority,” “dismantle institutions,” dismantle whiteness and not allow whiteness to reassert itself.

. . .

Teaching of such self-hatred is now becoming commonplace in schools as kids are brainwashed that they’re inherently bad for being born white.


Again, more at the link.

To make matters worse, both political parties (Republican no less than Democrat) are determined to continue their rule as an effective "Uniparty", where they'll effectively support each other's policies and go on getting rich at our expense.  Mitch McConnell succeeded in destroying the Tea Party movement years ago, seeing it as a threat to his dominance of the Senate Republican caucus, and he's now trying to do exactly the same thing to MAGA supporters.

The Democrats are trying to achieve the same result by demonizing former President Trump.  They believe, if they can discredit him and knock him out of the political arena, they'll effectively derail his supporters and prevent them having any further populist influence in US politics.  They're wrong, of course;  but they haven't figured that out yet.  (They might have got a clue, if they were watching during yesterday's Presidents Day parade in Florida.)

Even if voting isn't a guaranteed way to fix our present problems, I'm more and more convinced that part of our solution to our national tragedy must be a genuine "third rail":  a new political party, drawing in centrist, populist Democrats and Republicans.  We've been betrayed by both progressives and conservatives, both liberals and traditionalists.  Let's abandon them all, and forge a new way forward.  I don't expect President Trump to lead it, but I'm sure he'll have a major part to play in putting momentum behind it and getting the effort off the ground - provided, that is, his political enemies don't engineer his assassination (something I fear they won't hesitate to do, if they think they can get away with it).

As for the rest of us . . . we need to be watchful.  Let's do our best to stamp on any extremist agenda in our local communities, and encourage our states to assert their constitutional rights and freedoms over a power-hungry federal state that no longer cares a fig for the constitution.  Let's also figure out which of our elected officials needs to be kicked out, and primary the heck out of them and their offices.  If we don't want to run for office ourselves, let's support others who do, and take back every elected position we can.  Every one we recapture helps to slow the march of Leviathan through our communities.  Take back enough of them, and who knows what might happen?  For a start, a properly functioning School Board could sort out the cretins who call upon white parents to abolish themselves!

However, remember the headline to this article.  "There Is No Voting Our Way Out Of This."  In the end, the ballot box almost certainly won't be enough, because the powers that be have already shown beyond a shadow of doubt that they're prepared to subvert, cheat and overturn elections to get their way.  That leaves us with few options, except direct action.  I still hope and pray we can avoid that;  but those now in power are grimly determined to hold on to it at any cost.  They're unlikely to give up without a fight.

That's a grim last step that nobody in his or her right mind wants to see.  However, in the end, it may be that resistance becomes the only option they leave open to us.  God forbid! - but start thinking about how it would affect you if it comes to that.  I don't think we're going to see a second Civil War along the lines of the first, with formal armies and marching and battles.  Instead, we're going to see urban unrest, fourth generation warfare, and constant internecine terrorism.  I'm here to tell you from long and bitter personal experience, that's no way to live . . . but I can see it happening here.  If you have the chance, even if it costs you money you can't afford, consider moving to a safer area, where your loved ones will be less exposed to that sort of thing.

Of course, the progressive left can see that coming, too.  That's why they're so determined to disarm the US populace.  A disarmed person is a serf, a slave, unable to protect himself or his family.  Expect legislation to outlaw so-called "assault rifles", high-capacity magazines and other paraphernalia.  Will Americans comply?  On the basis of past experience, I doubt it.  If possible, I suggest you move to a state that's likely to defend your right to keep and bear arms, even if the central government tries to abolish or restrict it.

Peter


Monday, February 15, 2021

Online dating: are you really talking, not to a person, but to a search committee?

 

I suppose it was only a matter of time, but it seems even online dating services are now becoming just another business.


One day when I was trawling through writing jobs on LinkedIn, I stumbled across an interesting-looking role as a creative writer with what appeared to be a dating company called Vida (Virtual Dating Agency) Select. As the position looked vaguely interesting, I sent off an application and was pleased to receive further details of the role and a link to a writing test. But when I looked at the job specification I became a little uncomfortable. 

Where I had expected that the role to mainly consist of spicing up and correcting clients' profiles, it wanted me to do much more. They wanted me to create a range of ice-breaker messages for client correspondence alongside communicating with matches until a date was set or a phone number was provided. It was made clear that, after this hurdle had been reached, the client would then take over the communication with the match. 

. . .

This whole experience left me with a lot of questions: why were people doing this? Was their work/life balance so consuming that they were unable to set aside the time to use dating apps? And, if this was the case, what did this say about our society? Did I really live in a world where everything had been commercialised to the degree that people were outsourcing themselves as products to be sold?

. . .

Vida Select charges anywhere between $695- $1695 per month for 2-12 dates. The more you pay, the more dates you get.

Depending on the package selected, a vast team of people from ghostwriters, stylists, and photographers help to create a version of yourself which is likely to get a positive online response. The client oversees the process right from the first meeting with a ghostwriter, where the writer is able to get a sense of the client’s personality in order to mimic them in future correspondence. 

Valdez explains, “We get to know our client during a 90-minute conversation, select the best platforms for their search, send a photographer out to meet them if needed, write their dating profiles, select the most optimal photo lineup, touch up their pics, and get their accounts fully configured. Our matchmaking team then identifies promising potential matches who meet the client’s ‘must-have’ criteria”.

From this meeting, the client must approve the presented dating profiles before they are posted on major dating websites like Tinder, OkCupid, and Bumble. Then, the client need only sit back and watch as the writer takes over to begin the introductory process with witty open-ended banter.  Clients are able to view and contribute to the conversation as well – and this has apparently only led to a couple of close shaves where both the ghostwriter and the client have simultaneously sent messages about entirely different subjects.

Clients are free to take over correspondence at any time but, as said, it is automatically passed over once the match provides their phone number or a date is made (and the writer received their $1.75 commission). Obviously, with such a degree of effort constituted, clients generally have multiple matches each week and have the luxury of being very picky.


There's more at the link.

So, you won't find "true love" so much as "true merchandising" through such services.  It makes my gorge rise.  Now romance has become just as much of a con game as anything else that's been financialized, consumerized, pixelized and automated.

I have no idea what modern dating is all about, but in my youth, it was all about meeting people in the flesh and deciding whether or not they appealed to you.  Friends would introduce you to people they felt might be compatible, and it was all done face-to-face.  There was little or no possibility of third parties controlling the process in the initial stages, to "package" you as rosily as possible.  Although Miss D. and I made initial contact online, it was through a mutual friend who felt we needed to talk, so we had that initial sense that this wasn't just a random encounter.  (Thanks again, Oleg!)

Here's a challenge for my more technologically inclined readers.  How can we introduce a virus or two into the automated dating process?  I want something that strips away the shallowness and stupidity, and exposes who's really doing the talking.  Have at it!

Peter