Thursday, July 20, 2023

Mac & cheese and wartime rationing

 

An interesting article in the Smithsonian Magazine reveals how one of America's favorite processed foods, Kraft Macaroni and Cheese, came to be - and why it became so popular, so quickly.


Boxed macaroni and cheese was one outcome of the quest for ways to keep cheese longer. Some cheese gets better as it ages—a well-aged cheddar is one of life’s delights—but once most cheeses hit their prime, they tend to quickly go bad. Before household refrigeration became common, many retailers wouldn’t even stock cheese in the summer because it spoiled so quickly.

Processed cheese solved this age-old problem.

Credit for inventing processed cheese should go to a pair of Swiss food chemists named Walter Gerber and Fritz Stettler who, in 1913, were looking for a way to improve the shelf life of Emmenthaler cheese using sodium citrate. When they heated up the treated cheese, they noticed it melted better as well. But Chicago cheese salesman James L. Kraft was awarded the first patent for processed cheese in 1916.

Kraft understood the spoilage problem and had tried various solutions to it. He tried putting it tin foil packages, sealing it in jars, even canning it. But none of these solutions caught on with the public.

He eventually realized that the same bacteria that made cheese age nicely was also the bacteria that ultimately caused it to go bad. So he took some cheddar cheese scraps, heated them to kill the bacteria, ground them up with some sodium phosphate as an emulsifier and voila—Kraft processed cheese was born.

These early processed cheeses were similar to the processed American cheese slices we see in the stores today, though wrapping slices individually didn’t happen for another 40 years. Kraft’s first big customer was the U.S. Army, which bought more than 6 million pounds of the stuff to feed soldiers in World War I. A number of variations appeared in the following years, including Velveeta and Cheez Whiz.

The product was a hit, but Kraft wanted to find more ways to sell processed cheese, and eventually came up with the idea to make a powdered base. The packet in the box of macaroni and cheese is essentially a cheese sauce that has been partially defatted and dehydrated. When you make it, you’re adding back the fat and the liquid when you mix in the milk and butter.

In 1937, Kraft debuted its boxed macaroni and cheese, which it sold for 19 cents and contained four servings. Its slogan was “make a meal for four in nine minutes,” and the product got a big lift with American consumers during World War II because you could get two boxes and spend only one ration point. With meat hard to come by, the cheap main dish substitute was a hit.


There's more at the link.

Rationing was a fact of life for my parents in Britain during World War II.  It had a dramatic impact on overall health;  my mother used to say that she got sick more often during the war than at any other time in her life, because nutrition deficits meant that people were more at risk of infection.  On the other hand, overall health of the population improved, because what food was available was carefully balanced from a nutritional point of view.  People got thinner from eating less food, but at least they were the "right" foods.  Butcher shops used to supplement the (very) meager rations (4 oz. of bacon and/or ham per week, for example) with "urban rabbit" (cats - if you wanted real rabbit, you had to ask for the body with the head attached, which showed what it was) or "mystery meat" (usually horse, sometimes even dog meat).  If you were hungry, you learned not to ask too many questions.  Kraft mac & cheese wasn't on the menu in Britain at that time, but I guess in America it stretched scarce "meat points" a lot further than they'd otherwise have gone.

Mom said that American servicemen arriving in England cut a swath through local women simply by bringing American food out of the camp with them.  A canned ham, or even a can of Spam, was an unheard-of luxury in England during the war, and canned chicken or turkey was unknown.  GI's could get them easily enough from their camp kitchens, or have family and friends in the USA send them over (nylon stockings, too, also very hard to find in Britain at the time).  She says GI's made ruthless use of the bounty they could offer.  If a woman wouldn't "put out", there were plenty of others that would in exchange for food and stockings they couldn't get any other way.

After the war, my parents emigrated to South Africa.  Mom used to tell us how she broke down in tears when they arrived (by ship) in Cape Town in late 1945, and were taken to the hotel where a room had been reserved for them.  On the table in the room was a basket of fruit, courtesy of the management, to welcome returning service personnel and their families - but Mom hadn't seen that much fresh fruit for six years.  Apples, oranges, bananas . . . she burst into tears at the sight.  She said she cried for three days, walking around the shops, to see clothing, food and every other desirable thing unrationed and freely available to anyone with the money to buy it.  Meals in the hotel dining room featured as much meat as anyone wanted, carved off roasts laid out ready on a big sideboard - pork, mutton, beef and a few other things as well.  She said it was like a whole new and very different world after the barrenness and lack of choice of wartime rationing.

I guess we've had it easy by comparison.

Peter


16 comments:

Aesop said...

Bear well in mind that formerly great Britain's "wartime" rationing schemes didn't end until 1954, nine years after the war was over.

Once the soft commies of the Labour Party took over about 10 minutes after VE Day (they didn't even wait until Japan threw in the towel), they didn't want to let go of all that power, and it wasn't until six years later Brits threw the commies out again, and it still took Churchill another three years after that to finally end rationing in the UK for good.

Anonymous said...

Thank you for sharing your parents' wartime experience with us all. It really puts things in perspective for me especially because most of the stories I heard from my parents and grandparents as a youngster were obviously as American experiences during the war on the home front.

glasslass said...

Found among my Mother's possessions was two ration books. One for her and me. Lived with aunt and memory of sitting on a stood in the kitchen with a bag of white pliable stuff, shortening I have found, with a red/yellow capsule inside. So this bag of fat could be pushed to eventually break the capsule and the food coloring would release itself into the fat so that eventually the white would become yellow and looked like butter. At three, I thought this was great fun. The next day, we had our fake butter on the table for our cinnamon toast. At 3 anything that got sugar in me was wonderful but have a distinct dislike of margarine. Both Mother and Aunt only served butter after war.

Beans said...

Glassglass, the reason for margarine was that animal fats were wanted for making explosives.

And after the war, the margarine manufacturers financed 'research' to 'prove' butter was bad for you.

Crazy, isn't it?

As to rationing, both my parents lived in areas where food could be raised. Dad in Louisiana so any animal was pretty much fair game. Mom in Columbus, Ohio and the property had a huge garden and they raised chickens mostly for eggs and rabbit for meat. To this day my mom gags at the thought of eating rabbit and can barely tolerate being around them. And she hated and hates gardening.

Anonymous said...

In the U.S. my father was drafted and was overseas. My mother was a some what picky eater when I was growing up in the 50’s and 60’s but she mentioned several times that horse meat was really good!

Anonymous said...

Life without meat sucks. Today's canned meat is time-stamped for 5 Years. I would trust it for 10. Pretty cheap insurance. It will transform any veggie laden soup into a hearty meal.

I had a relative who's husband left her with 4 kids in a literal tar-paper shack in Northern Minnesota in the 1930's. My grandmother told me that said woman and her kids survived on only potatoes and 2 rabbits they snared for an entire winter. I then remembered that one of this woman's children, while being a terrific cook, would never eat potatoes no matter the form. Then I understood why.

Anonymous said...

@Aesop:

You'll probably remain unconvinced, but the world is not 100% 2-Dimensional.

UK Labour won the election convincingly at the end of the war. Might come as a surprise to you that Bulldog Winnie wasn't quite as well-loved by much of the populace as present-day saccharine Finest Hour propaganda would have it.

To be sure Attlee & Co. proceeded to eff many things up with nationalisations.

The elephant in the room Re post-war rationing is that it had nothing to do with your fevered fantasies of totalitarian leftist statism and everything to do with directing as much of the economic output of the UK toward PAYING OFF THE UNITED STATES which was to put it mildly riding roughshod over the world and putting on the Shylock act and demanding payment for every screw, bolt, and nail supplied during the conflict.

Host of this blog will have some idea how much money his parents could take with them on that Union Castle (might have been before the two lines merged?) steamer to Cape Town but can imagine it would have been of the order of GBP10. The entire name of the game into the 50s was to extract enough surplus from the UK populace without starving them to death in order to placate the ravenous financial (US) beast demanding its pound of flesh for 'saving' them (whilst debauching their women with cans of spam and eunichizing a silent generation of UK servicemen-cuckolds). Literally *everything* was exported to the US to earn dollars to repay the US.

Peter said...

@Anonymous at 6:59PM: You're correct. Britain was left almost bankrupt after the war, and for nine years - 1945 through 1954 - scraped together every penny she could to repay her war debt to the USA. The Marshall Plan, which provided billions of dollars in aid to Western Europe, did not extend to aiding Britain. In 1954 the last rationing regulations were lifted, but right through the 1960's there were currency restrictions on how much Britons could take out of the country.

HMS Defiant said...

Back when we knew enough to make war pay. Now of course we make and fund war to give money to the monied class to produce war materials for other countries again. yep, kind of like us for the last 80 years'

Michael said...

Peter the "Real History" is so much more 3D than our sanitized history lessons.

Once we the USA get to "enjoy" bankruptcy from our money printing, Russian Sanctions destroying trust in the Rule of Law, welfare actions and foolish wars to spread "Our Democracy" (yeah RIGHT) acoss the globe WE will be looking at Britian's post war experiences (IF we are Lucky).

Aesop said...

And Point Of Order, Anon:

Please inform the class how rationing food staples produced privately by farmers enabled Britistan to pay off their war debts faster (or at all), unless they were outright confiscating the products of other people's labors, and selling them to directly benefit the government?

[Pro Tip: There's a word for the form of government that says "That which is mine is mine, and that which is yours is also mine.", isn't there?
Say it with me...]

Generally, tax revenues flowing into government's coffers go up when production goes up, which only happens when the people get to keep more of the fruits of their own labor by reducing the confiscatory tax burden placed upon them.
This has only been shown historically about 3000 times, including the Plymouth Colony and the Soviet Union.

And since it took the UK 60 years anyways to pay off their post-WWII debts, it seems like the only rationale for continued rationing there, just like everyone has witnessed with COVID mandates far beyond any common sense being in play, was neither expediency nor efficacy, but simple raw lust for absolute control, and malign unwillingness to relinquish it.

Some quote - from a British lord, no less - about absolute power comes to mind...

Michael said...

Aesop, while long time readers are quite aware of your Hollywood experiences, Law training, Marine artillery experience and ER nursing skills in a major hospital in Southern California.

Could you expand on your Finacial education with special knowledge of real world (tm) Sovereign Nation balance of trade and all that?

Your mad skills in GOOGLE FU are well known but is there a subject you're not an expert on?

Please advise.

Robert said...

"you’re adding back the fat and the liquid when you mix in the milk and butter." Ah. As I'm using powdered milk and powdered butter, that might explain my dismal results.

Unknown said...

"The elephant in the room Re post-war rationing is that it had nothing to do with your fevered fantasies of totalitarian leftist statism and everything to do with directing as much of the economic output of the UK toward PAYING OFF THE UNITED STATES which was to put it mildly riding roughshod over the world and putting on the Shylock act and demanding payment for every screw, bolt, and nail supplied during the conflict."

Not supported by the historical record:

1941-1945 the U.S. gave the U.K. over $30 billion in food, fuel, and other goods (mostly ammunition and equipment) at no cost under the Lend-Lease program. About $7 billion in goods came back to the U.S. through Reverse Lend-Lease.

When Lend-Lease was ended the U.S. sold over $10 billion in goods to the U.K. for a little over $1 billion.

In 1946 the Ango-American Loan Agreement loaned the U.K. $3.75 billion at 2%. This was paid off over 60 years and would not have crippled the economy.

Brief histories of both programs are accessible through Wikipedia and are have been documented thoroughly for many decades.

Totaling the above gives our British allies $32 billion net plus a load of $3.75 billion at 2% paid off over 60 years. The slander written by "anonymous" above is not put "mildly", it is put dishonestly.

Anonymous said...

and for those of us who really like Spam with our Mac and cheese...

Anonymous said...

Late comment to several earlier ones.
IIRC, UK had actual CONSCRIPTION of men to work in the coal mines. *VAST* numbers with little experience went into the pits. I imagine war time emergency status severely cut back on what few normal safety measures existed pre-war. Injuries were common and severe. Hundreds of thousands picked up a pick & shovel. But the real shocker is that unlike quick demobilization of armed service personnel the UK govt KEPT those conscripted men in the pit well into 1946 and some later. Talk about pissing folk off....wow! That might have contributed to Labour victory, too.

As for UK not being Marshall Plan "eligible"...meh! They had an EMPIRE. FDR was a known long time despiser of the idea of EMPIRE. It was his intent from early on to see the Empire broken up, both for strategic and moral (?) reasons.

Lastly, isn't it strange that UK govt had an active policy of shipping wartime veterans to colonies & former colonies (RSA). The £10 Poms flooded Australia & New Zealand and Rhodesia, but nearly simultaneously UK started the program to import black Caribbeans to fill the labor shortage?
So many questions ....