That's the unspoken question posed by a cartel takeover of a Mexican port.
A sharp increase in drug seizures has been reported at Mexico’s west coast ports with caches discovered inside containers and vessels’ sea chests, said protection and indemnity club NorthStandard.
The alert follows the seizure earlier this month of 88 tonnes of chemicals needed for the manufacture of synthetic drugs at the country’s largest container port, Manzanillo.
Ports are a “critical part” of the criminal infrastructure of one of the most powerful cartels, the Sinaloa, which uses them to receive precursor chemicals and South American cocaine for trafficking into the US, according to a May report by the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).
. . .
The DEA report said that the Pacific coast port of Mazatlan was wholly controlled by the Sinaloa cartel and they charged other drug trafficking organisations to use the port.
A long history of alliances with drug trafficking groups also gave the Sinaloa access to the port of Manzanillo, said the report.
The port is “strategically significant because of its location on the central Pacific Coast and its high volume of shipping traffic due to widespread use of the port by foreign countries to exchange legitimate trade goods with Mexico and to refuel”, said the agency in its 2024 national drug threat assessment.
There's more at the link.
It's all very well to go after criminals . . . but what if the administrators and bureaucrats controlling government functions (such as a port) are themselves criminals? Remove them, and you'll have to appoint replacements - who will doubtless be threatened immediately with death or dismemberment, for themselves and/or their families, if they don't do precisely the same as their predecessors did. "Plata o plomo", remember?
Also, how can any honest law enforcement agent or agency work with a port administration that's so clearly criminal? Everything the latter learns about the "good guys" will undoubtedly be passed to the "bad guys", who will use the information to target law enforcement and operate with impunity.
Most worrying of all to me, we've just "imported" what are likely to be hundreds of thousands of cartel operatives and other criminals from South America, thanks to President Biden's border policies. They're now inside our borders, and I'm sure some are already working in our harbors, airports, etc. How long until they take over one of our transport hubs, and operate it for the benefit of their cartel buddies back home?
Peter
8 comments:
It's not just the cartels, or in this part of the world... Think Tangier Med (wholly owned subsidiary of China), Port Bell in Uganda (same,same)... sigh
All part of the Total Transformation™ of the United States of America.
You asked in the title, "How do you get rid of drug cartels if they're running a government agency?"
I'd guess you wait and after a bit you'll forget where they came from (the MSM will help with that) and this won't be a question.
Either that or invade like we did in Panama.
I would surmise that Trump will make this one of his to do list top priorities. I mean if we can drone an Iranian general, I bet we can dispatch a few cartel biggies.
Ole Grump
One of my fears is TPTB allow Trump to take office, but then unleash the hordes they've spent the last 4 years importing to cause chaos across America. They blame Trump, and offer to restore order if we only put them back in charge.
- Texas Mike
An easy solution is to legalise the lot. Then there's no need to be criminal about it. Legalise narcotics, regulate them, tax them. It's a win all round. Remember the Prohibition era? People want narcotics; it's as simple as that so the government needs to respect that.
I have heard whispered reports that the Cartels have suborned the State government of New Mexico, and some of Arizona as well.
From Chicago come reports that the drug gangs there are tied to, and control, the many Aldermen who allegedly represent their districts.
America used to not have major, widely distriblued, corruption problems. Now we do.
I rather admire the sentiments expressed by Sean Connery in The Untouchables at this point.
John in Indy
When I read the title, I assumed the article was going to be about the government of the state of Arizona.
Post a Comment