A gentleman (?) named Jamarcus Oneal Spates was arrested by a gaggle of Houston police officers on Monday. It's not clear why so many of the officers were involved, or why they took such extreme precautions, but be that as it may . . .
On-duty uniformed officers arrived and attempted to stop the vehicle with Spates inside, the release states. HPD alleges Spates refused several commands to exit the vehicle.
The responding officers said they shot at Spates after they attempted to move toward the vehicle and saw him open the driver's door of the vehicle and extend his arm "in a shooting position," according to HPD's account. A bullet "grazed" Spates, the release said.
There's more at the link.
A bullet "grazed" Spates. One bullet. ONE SINGLE BULLET.
How many rounds were fired by all those officers to obtain just one slight, non-disabling injury to the suspect? See (and hear) for yourself.
ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME?????
All those bullets flying around, and the suspect was grazed by just one of them. Where, pray tell, did the rest of the bullets go? How many nearby buildings, vehicles, trees, etc. were struck as well? Oh - and what about innocent bystanders?
That's just about the most sickeningly incompetent firearms handling I've ever seen from uniformed cops. I've no idea how many rounds were fired in all, but I won't be surprised to hear it was a hundred or more . . . AND ONLY ONE STRUCK ITS TARGET, AND EVEN THEN, ONLY JUST!!!
What's the point of issuing firearms to police at all, if that's the way they're going to handle them in a crisis situation?
No handgun bullet is a very good fight-stopper compared to a rifle or shotgun. We know this. It's been common knowledge for years. However, even a handgun will stop a fight quickly enough if a bullet hits the target's central nervous system - i.e. the brain or the spine. A penetration of the heart and/or circulatory system will take a bit longer - up to 30-60 seconds for the suspect to "bleed out". However, if all the bullet does is "graze" the suspect's arm, it's not going to do one single damned thing to stop him. It may make him lose his temper, but that's about all.
(As the late, great Jeff Cooper used to say about the [infamously puny] .25 ACP round: "Carry a 25 if it makes you feel good, but do not ever load it. If you load it you may shoot it. If you shoot it you may hit somebody, and if you hit somebody, and he finds out about it, he may be very angry with you." Considering the lack of success of those police officers, armed with [comparatively much more powerful] 9mm handguns, shotguns and at least one AR-15 rifle, they may as well have been carrying .25 ACP pistols instead!)
I'd take away the badges of the whole lot of them, and send them all for remedial firearms training. I'd refuse to re-issue their badges unless and until they passed a truly practical, useful firearms test, such as the qualification for a basic handgun certificate from Gunsite or Thunder Ranch or equivalent shooting schools. Can't do that? Then you can't carry a gun to defend the public, because you're more of a danger to them than you are to the criminal!
Sheesh . . .
Peter


