Saturday, October 20, 2018
The late, great Jeff Cooper promulgated four rules of firearms safety that have become almost universally recognized. Some modify the wording, others add more rules, but I guarantee you: if you observe his basic four rules faithfully, you won't ever injure anyone by a negligent or accidental discharge of your firearm. They are:
- All guns are always loaded.
- Never let the muzzle cover anything you are not willing to destroy.
- Keep your finger off the trigger till your sights are on the target.
- Know your target, and what is beyond it.
Sadly, in the heat of a defensive engagement, it may not be practical to follow all of those rules, all of the time. When that happens, something like this may follow.
Authorities in San Antonio say a man who was reaching for a handgun was shot by a police officer whose bullet grazed the suspect and then struck an 18-year-old sitting nearby, killing the teen.
. . .
The 24-year-old man, who hasn't been identified, was hospitalized. McManus told the San Antonio Express-News that the man has an "extensive" criminal record.
There's more at the link, and more information in this subsequent article.
I'm sure the officer is going to be affected by this for the rest of his life. There's no suggestion that he was not justified in defending himself; but, in the haste of having to react to an imminent threat, he had little or no time to take note of anyone on the far side of the threat. The result is a dead person who wasn't party to the threat - at least, if initial reports are correct. That he was in the company of a criminal, and at the scene of a reported crime, and therefore exposing himself to danger by association, as it were, doesn't mean that he deserved to die. I'm sure there will be many recriminations, and possibly lawsuits, resulting from this.
On the other hand, it bears out, yet again, the sage advice of John Farnam, which we've mentioned in these pages on several occasions. Follow this link and scroll down to the entry for March 19th, 2003 to find it.
The best way to handle any potentially injurious encounter is: Don’t be there. Arrange to be somewhere else. Don’t go to stupid places. Don’t associate with stupid people. Don’t do stupid things.
The deceased ignored that very practical advice, and chose to associate with criminals - who are, almost by definition, "stupid people", irrespective of their IQ (or lack thereof). Tragically, he paid for that choice with his life. Just as sadly, there are many (probably including his surviving family) who will ignore that reality, and blame anyone and everyone except him for what happened to him. The fact remains: if he'd chosen better company, he would almost certainly be alive right now.
Friday, October 19, 2018
A pizzeria in Michigan shows real dedication.
When Julie and Rich Morgan lived in Battle Creek 25 years ago, Rich would always bring home Steve’s Pizza for dinner each payday, even though money was tight. The couple has since relocated to Indianapolis, but those pizzas – the taste and the memories – have stuck with them.
In fact, the Morgans had planned to visit Battle Creek and Steve’s Pizza for a weekend getaway. But after a trip to the emergency room, their plans changed; Rich is now home with hospice care as his battle with cancer comes to a close, Julie said in a Facebook post.
Knowing how much that pizzeria meant to the couple, Julie’s dad called Steve’s Pizza to see if someone could send a card or text to cheer them up. But Dalton Shaffer, a manager, had a different idea.
“Well, what kind of pizza do they like?” Shaffer asked Julie Morgan’s father, according to MLive.com.
Her father quickly sought to clarify that he was calling from Indianapolis – nearly 200 miles away and in a different state. Shaffer, 18, said he understood and promised to make the special delivery of two 16-inch pepperoni and mushroom pizzas as soon as he closed the restaurant just after 10 p.m.
“And so, while Rich and I slept, at 2:30 a.m., Dalton rolled into our driveway, left the car running and delivered two extra special pizzas to my waiting family,” Julie said. “He told them we were in his prayers, and offered to help in any way he could.”
Julie said Shaffer also refused an offer from the family to put him up in a hotel. He also immediately left, she said, so he could make it home in time for work in the morning.
. . .
In all, Shaffer traveled about 450 miles round-trip to make the delivery. But here’s what makes it even more “epic:” Steve’s Pizza doesn’t even offer delivery services.
There's more at the link.
That's amazing customer service, to put it mildly! I live about a thousand miles from Battle Creek, so I can't show my appreciation by buying anything from Steve's Pizza there: but I hope any of my readers who are within "eating distance" will do so, as a gesture of thanks. I think they deserve it.
Today's award goes to the Bruce Rock Police Force in Australia. A tip o' the hat to reader Snoggeramus for sending me the link.
Police officers in Western Australia have been mocked after they posted a picture online showing off huge bags of marijuana they "seized", but people were quick to point out a glaring issue.
The Bruce Rock Police Force shared the picture on their Twitter account...
. . .
"Can I send you my address? I have some garden clippings I need to get rid of and I can't be bothered fetching the green bin," one user wrote.
"Putting Jim's mowing out of business if you keep this up," another said.
One added: "This is the dumbest thing on the whole internet. This is embarrassing for Australia."
Others suggested that the bags were just filled with the unwanted left overs from product that they either already sold or moved.
"Police have estimated the value of the haul in excess of seven dollars fifty," one person said.
There's more at the link.
Yes, looking at the photograph the cops posted, it's fairly obvious that isn't marijuana:
Either a cop didn't know what he was looking at, or some drug pusher figured he had really stupid clients, who wouldn't recognize that he wasn't selling them what he promised. Either way, I'd like to see any court convict anyone on a narcotics charge for selling those clippings! Maybe they could get them for fraudulent misrepresentation?
Thursday, October 18, 2018
The blog memes - and the hits - just keep coming for Senator Warren. I've long since lost count of how many there are out there. Here's my latest favorite:
Aesop has his own collection over at his blog. Click over there for some punny fun.
How on earth Senator Warren ever expects to be taken seriously again, I just can't imagine. She's not only painted herself into a wacky, lunatic-fringe corner, she's pulled it in after her and padlocked the corners together.
Oh, well . . . at least she's provided some much-needed light-hearted (not to mention light-skinned) entertainment to an American political scene usually lacking that commodity. Her fame may not be Indian, but it's undyin', for sure!
Having driven a pickup for most of my years in the USA, and covered tens of thousands of miles in them (and similar vehicles) in Africa prior to that, I've got a fair old collection of horror stories that I've seen, encountered and experienced. Cargo improperly loaded, loads improperly secured, things coming loose under the stress of travel and falling off, sometimes hitting other vehicles . . . there are any number of examples.
The latest comes from Florida. Click the image for a larger view.
A news report adds more details.
A driver in Florida is lucky to be alive after a large piece of plywood ended up impaled in her vehicle's windshield.
The Brevard County Fire Rescue said in a Facebook post the incident took place on Interstate 95 in Rockledge, located about 20 miles south of Titusville on the state's Atlantic Coast.
. . .
The plywood board was much wider than the vehicle and was hanging off either end of the car.
The driver, identified by Florida Today as 35-year-old Rebecca Burgman, had minor injuries but refused treatment at the scene.
There's more at the link.
Ms. Burgman is a very, very lucky lady.
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Britain's world-famous Natural History Museum has just released the results of its 2018 Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition. There are some spectacular images. Here are just two, to whet your appetite. Click each one for a much larger view.
The winner in the category "Animals in their Environment", from Spain, is Cristobal Serrano with a drone-captured overhead picture of crabeater seals on an ice floe. (Oddly enough, despite their name, they don't eat crabs!)
Highly commended in the category "Animal Portraits", here's a lioness captured by Isak Pretorius of South Africa.
There are many more photographs at the link. Highly recommended viewing.
Sent in by several readers, origin unknown. Is this the best Senator Warren DNA fiasco meme yet?
Indeed. She's certainly goosing her image . . . and is that a tribal
A brand-new container ship, the CMA CGM Mumbai, delivered from the shipyard in May this year, had an embarrassing steering failure at the port of Mumbai the other day. It left a mark.
Fortunately, the collision was at very low speed, but even so, it'll take a while to repair the quayside and replace the ship's stem post. Embarrassing, that, particularly with a brand-new vessel.
That's the title of a very thought-provoking article at Acting Man. We've spoken about the perils of debt, and the damage it's doing to our economy, on several occasions. This article puts a new perspective on the problem, and highlights how bad it's become. I only have space to quote a few paragraphs from the author's extensive treatment of the subject, which you should read in full.
Debt based stimulus is both sustaining and killing the economy at the same time. No doubt, this is a ridiculous situation. Here we will look to California’s San Joaquin Valley for parallels...
. . .
In the San Joaquin Valley, vast irrigation networks convey water thousands of miles to make the desert bloom. But as surface water is conveyed along the open California aqueduct, it both evaporates and collects mineral deposits. The combination of these factors concentrates the water’s salt content. Then, as it is applied to irrigation, the residual salts collect in the soil.
After decades of this, along with the over-application of fertilizer through mechanized fertigation systems, the salt in the soil has built up so that it strangles the roots of the plants. To combat this, over-watering is required, because the irrigation water – while salty – is fresher than the salt encrusted soil. By applying excess irrigation water, the soils around the plants are temporarily freshened up so that crops can grow.
Yet, at the same time, this over-watering accelerates the mass quantity of salt being applied to the soil. There is no outlet for the salt to flush to; the valley is the basin’s terminus. Thus, in this grand paradox, the relative freshness of the excess water that is keeping the farmland alive is, at the same time, the source of the salt that is killing it.
. . .
So, too, goes the U.S. economy. After nearly a decade of rapidly expanding its balance sheet, and pumping cheap credit and excess liquidity into financial markets, the Fed has produced a similar paradox. They must keep expanding the money base to keep the economy afloat... but in doing so they are ultimately killing it. [Click the image for a larger view.]
This, in short, is why it doesn’t matter if the Fed raises the federal funds rate or cuts the federal funds rate, or if Uncle Sam borrows more or borrows less. At this point, there is no way out. The present financial order, like the salty crop fields in the San Joaquin Valley, is doomed to choke on the salt of debt.
Only several lifetimes – or more – of fallow conditions will restore economic growth and fertility to the country. The demise of the San Joaquin Valley as an agricultural region, however, will be indefinite.
There's more at the link. Highly recommended reading.
I've said it before: debt is killing us, as a nation, as a society, and as individuals. It has short- and long-term consequences for everyone and everything. The truly frightening thing is, none of our elected political leaders, irrespective of their party affiliation, appear to be serious about doing anything about it. They just carry on spending more and more money we haven't got, adding more digits to the already un-repayable national debt, and never turning off the tap. They don't believe they can do that without being thrown out of office by those who've become dependent on the "debt tap" to pay for their way of life. They're probably right in that . . . but their approach is still cowardly.
"The salt of debt". An interesting way to put it . . . and, given the example of the San Joaquin Valley, a very appropriate one.
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Full marks to Senator Orrin Hatch for his response to Senator Elizabeth Warren's DNA faux pas:
What? No velociraptor genes - the better to chase the faux-Native American ones Senator Warren apparently still doesn't possess?
The Atlantic has some ideas.
These days, walking through parts of Manhattan feels like occupying two worlds at the same time. In a theoretical universe, you are standing in the nation’s capital of business, commerce, and culture. In the physical universe, the stores are closed, the lights are off, and the windows are plastered with for-lease signs ... A rich ghost town sounds like a capitalist paradox. So what the heck is going on?
. . .
There are at least three interlinked causes. First, the rent, as you may have heard, is too damn high ... commercial rents have ascended to an altitude where small businesses cannot breathe. Some of the city’s richest zip codes have become victims of their own affluence.
Second, the pain of soaring rents is exacerbated by the growth of online shopping ... it is no coincidence that New York storefront vacancy is climbing just as warehousing vacancy in the U.S. has officially reached an all-century low: A lot of goods are moving from storefronts to warehouses, where they are placed in little brown boxes rather than big brown bags ... Online shopping has digitized a particular kind of business—mostly durable, nonperishable, and tradable goods—that one used to seek out in department stores or similar establishments. Their disappearance has opened up huge swaths of real estate.
. . .
[Third,] Many landlords don’t want to offer short-term leases to pop-up stores if they think a richer, longer-term deal is forthcoming from a national brand with money to burn, like a bank branch or retail chain. The upshot is a stubborn market imbalance: The fastest-growing online retailers are looking to experiment with short-term leases, but the landlords are holding out for long-term tenants.
New York’s problems today are an omen for the future of cities. Most people don’t live downtown because they love drifting off to the endearing sounds of honking cars and hollering investment bankers. Rather, they want access to urban activity, diversity, and charm—the quirky bars, the curious antique shops, the family restaurant that’s been there for generations—and the best way to buy that access is to own a bedroom in the heart of the city.
What happens when cities become too expensive to afford any semblance of that boisterous diversity? ... what’s the point of paying New York prices to live in a neighborhood that’s just biding its time to become “everywhere else”?
There's more at the link. Thought-provoking and recommended reading.
The author raises a very important point. There are more than a few cities, particularly in the so-called "rust belt", where the local economy has been in the doldrums for years, thanks to the decline in US industrial production. One can buy a very nice three- or four-bedroom house in such cities for well below $50,000 - ten to twenty times less than many currently-booming major cities. I know some people who have deliberately chosen to move to such locations, because their money goes so much further there. They live in nicer houses, can buy goods and services more cheaply, and send their children to better, less burdened local schools (often private schools). The Internet means they can work from home, or at least run a small business with access to major markets without actually having to live in or near those markets. That's been a life-changer for them.
Of course, this also begs the question of the reliability and sustainability of the Internet as a primary backbone of commerce and industry. If anything - weather, natural disaster, war, hacking, whatever - takes down the Internet for an extended period, or even limits access to it, those relying on it to earn their daily bread will be in for a nasty time. Being among them now, as a writer who self-publishes some of his work, I can't help but think about that from time to time. There's nothing I can do about it, but it's still something to keep in mind, and against which to have contingency plans, if possible.