Friday, January 6, 2012

So much for the Darth Vader Burger . . .


A Belgian fast food chain is to offer a series of Star Wars-themed burgers during the first quarter of 2012. Yahoo! Shine reports:

How much force needs to be with you to eat a black burger? The Belgian fast food chain Quick is celebrating the upcoming "Phantom Menace 3D" movie premiere by launching a line of "Star Wars"-themed burgers.




The burgers will debut in Quick restaurants throughout France on January 31, just before the film's February release in the country. Despite being in French, the ads for the burgers have sent the entire Internet into a tailspin of equal parts repulsion and curiosity.


There's more at the link.

What intrigued (and convulsed) me were the comments to that report. Here's a very small selection out of the 2,997 comments recorded as at the time of writing.




There are many, many more like that. Click over and read them for yourself . . . but be prepared to spend quite a while doing so!



Peter

Thursday, January 5, 2012

"Raiders of the Lost Archives"


That's the title of a video clip I found on YouTube. It compares the opening scenes of the film 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' (first in the Indiana Jones movie franchise, directed by Steven Spielberg and produced by George Lucas) with scenes from 30 adventure movies made between 1919 and 1973. The influence of earlier movies and 'Saturday matinée serials' was acknowledged during 'Raider's' development, so it's fascinating to see them side-by-side like this.







It must have been a real labor of love to put this comparison together. I wonder how many hours of movie-viewing it took to to identify all the films concerned, copy the relevant scenes, then edit them together with the opening sequences of 'Raiders'?

Peter

Weird laws and ridiculous regulations


The Daily Mail has published an article mentioning 50 strange laws still in effect in these United States. Most of them appear to have simply 'withered on the vine' due to neglect, and no-one's ever bothered to repeal them: but one does wonder how they came to be passed in the first place! Here's a selection from the list.

Connecticut: A pickle cannot actually be a pickle unless it bounces.

Florida: If you tie an elephant to a parking meter, you must pay the same parking fee as you would for a vehicle.

Iowa: One-armed piano players must perform for free.

Louisiana: Biting someone with your natural teeth constitutes simple assault, but biting someone with your false teeth classifies as aggravated assault.

Minnesota: It's illegal to paint a sparrow with the intent of selling it as a parakeet.

New Mexico: Females may not appear unshaven in public.

Pennsylvania: It's illegal to sleep on top of a refrigerator outdoors.

Rhode Island: You may not bite off another person's leg.

Texas: You may not shoot a buffalo from the second story of a hotel.

Wyoming: Unless you have an official permit, you may not take a picture of a rabbit from January to April.


There are many more at the link. Amusing, if off-beat reading. I'm not sure how many of them are accurate (for example, there's a long list of Minnesota 'laws' that aren't and never have been laws there, including the one mentioned above), but they're funny, nevertheless.





Peter

It's enough to make your blood boil!


Two reports today made my blood-pressure spike, my eyes turn red with rage, and my heart pound harder than I prefer it to do (since my 2009 heart attack, that is). Both concern the misconduct of officials.

The first, from Judicial Watch, is their List of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2011. Judicial Watch is non-partisan, so the list is split between both major parties. It's quite sickening to read about the shenanigans of our elected representatives. I won't bother to reproduce their report here, but I highly recommend that you go to Judicial Watch's Web site and read it for yourself.

The second, from journalist and self-described 'agitator' Radley Balko, are his nominations for 'The 2011 Worst Prosecutor of the Year Award'. He describes their misconduct in no uncertain terms, and invites his readers to vote for who should receive the award. Again, I won't steal his thunder here, but I invite (and urge) you to click over to his site for the details. You certainly won't feel so sanguine about the US legal system after doing so!

I hope all my readers will let these reports inform and influence their voting in the November 2012 elections. As I've said many times before, I'm non-partisan - I distrust both the Democratic and Republican Parties equally! Both are, in my opinion, self-serving, essentially corrupt institutions, more interested in 'feathering their own nests' than serving this country or putting its needs before their own. We can't do much about that; but what we can do is try to help select, then elect, honest, upright citizens, who'll represent our interests in Washington rather than those of a political party, and won't simply become part of the status quo. I don't care what party they're from: if they're honest, moral, ethical citizens, they'll have my support, even if I can't agree with everything in their platform. It's far more important to me to have trustworthy politicians in office than it is to elect someone who thinks in lockstep with me.

(In that regard, may I recommend a book by Peter Schweizer? It's titled 'Throw Them All Out: How Politicians and Their Friends Get Rich Off Insider Stock Tips, Land Deals, and Cronyism That Would Send the Rest of Us to Prison'. He covers much of what Judicial Watch talks about, but in a great deal more detail, and expands his reporting to cover many more politicians. Rage-inducing but worthwhile reading - and if your Congresscritter or Senator is on his list of those who particularly need to be thrown out, you know what to do!)

Peter

Raven Prometheus responds!


Last Monday I put up an article about a 'deceased' bomb-disposal robot in Iraq. One of the commenters was Raven Prometheus, who blogs intermittently at Ruminations of the Raven-Wolf. He had a few interesting things to say about my article, and mentioned that his EOD squad had once 'married' two of their bomb-disposal robots to each other. This got my attention, and in another article here, two days ago, I urged him to tell us more.

It seems he read it, and has graciously decided to do just that. He's put up a very interesting article on bomb-disposal robots in general (not least their tendency to 'hump' the legs of colonels), as well as details of the 'robot wedding'. Click on over to his place to read all about it. While you're there, please leave a comment encouraging him to tell us more! This story's just enough to whet my appetite.Link
Thanks, Raven Prometheus. Keep them coming!

Peter

It's time for the Harbin Festival again


The annual International Ice and Snow Sculpture Festival began today in Harbin, China. It runs every year from January 5th for a month. We've followed the festival in previous years, and this year is proving to be just as spectacular as past events, if not more so, judging by photographs released so far. Here are a few that have arrived in my e-mail inbox over the past few days.












Snow sculptures are also part of the Festival's offerings. Here's one copied from a famous painting by Russian artist Ilya Repin titled 'Barge Haulers on the Volga' (which may be viewed at the link).




It looks like the locals have been celebrating the completion of all the exhibits, in time-honored cold-climate fashion!




You can see more pictures in articles at the Daily Mail and the New York Daily News; and an Internet search will doubtless yield more fruit over the next few days and weeks, as more photographs from festival-goers are placed online.

The Harbin Festival is definitely on my 'bucket list' of places to go and things to see and do before I die.

Peter

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

You won't believe your eyes!


Reader Mike B. sent me the link to this video clip from Finland. In the few hours since he did so, its views have gone from 2,736 to (at the time of writing) 531,671! I guess that's what they call "going viral" . . .

Watch it for yourself, and see whether you can figure out what they're doing, and how they did it. I highly recommend watching it in full-screen mode. I'll explain more below.







I don't want to put the explanation immediately below the video, for the benefit of those still thinking about it: so please scroll down . . .

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

The camera is being held upside-down. When it looks as if the air bubbles are falling, or being 'poured', they're not - they're actually rising. Same with the divers - they're inverted in the water, which is easy enough for them, being weightless when submerged. The wheelbarrow is supported against the ice above it by the air inside it (it's also inverted, of course): and when the diver 'pours' the air from it, that air actually rises, causing the wheelbarrow to sink - but because of the inverted camera, it looks like the opposite is happening.

Clever and cute!





Peter

Dave Barry looks back at 2011


The inimitable Dave Barry has produced his usual look back at the old year. This one's even better (in my opinion, anyway) than his previous efforts. Here are a few excerpts to whet your appetite.

This was a year in which journalism was pretty much completely replaced by tweeting. It was a year in which a significant earthquake struck Washington, D.C., yet failed to destroy a single federal agency. It was a year in which the nation was subjected to a seemingly endless barrage of highly publicized pronouncements from Charlie Sheen, a man who, where you have a central nervous system, has a Magic 8-Ball.

This was a year in which the cast members of Jersey Shore went to Italy and then — in an inexcusable lapse of border security — were allowed to return.

. . .

As the year wore on, frustration finally boiled over in the form of the Occupy Various Random Spaces movement, wherein people who were sick and tired of a lot of stuff finally got off their butts and started working for meaningful change via direct action in the form of sitting around and forming multiple committees and drumming and not directly issuing any specific demands but definitely having a lot of strongly held views for and against a wide variety of things. Incredibly, even this did not bring about meaningful change. The economy remained wretched, especially unemployment, which got so bad that many Americans gave up even trying to work. Congress, for example.

. . .

In Europe, the economic crisis continues to worsen, especially in Greece, which has been operating under a financial model in which the government spends approximately $150 billion a year while taking in revenues totaling $336.50 from the lone Greek taxpayer, an Athens businessman who plans to retire in April. Greece has been making up the shortfall by charging everything to a MasterCard account that the Greek government applied for — in what some critics consider a questionable financial practice — using the name “Germany” ... Moody’s announces that it has officially downgraded Greece’s credit rating from “poor” to “rat mucus” following the discovery that the Acropolis has been repossessed.


There's much more at the link. Great fun.





Peter

You met a WHAT in mid-air???


A New Zealand airline pilot is probably still dining out on the story of what he encountered in mid-air during his approach to Christchurch International Airport last week. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:

The pilot of a passenger jet, thought to be an Air New Zealand flight, was on his descent to Christchurch International Airport on Boxing Day when he radioed ground control with an unlikely sighting – a shark flying at several thousand feet.

The fish out of water was identified as a remote-controlled, helium-filled shark that has topped must-have present lists this Christmas.




A spokeswoman for air traffic control company Airways, Monica Davis, said a pilot had reported the shark and its location about nine kilometres from the airport at 2pm on December 26.

"We advised subsequent traffic of its location, but no-one else reported seeing it."

. . .

New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association president Glen Kenny said a helium-filled shark would not pose a serious risk if it was sucked into an aircraft engine.

"The engine probably wouldn't stop, but it would do a bit of damage," he said.

"Helium is an inert gas, so there's no issue in that regard. The biggest hazard would be startling the pilot."

Wayward party balloons had been an air-safety issue overseas, especially in the United States, Kenny said.

He had heard about the Christchurch shark incident and had some experience with the toy, having bought his daughter the 91-centimetre clownfish version for Christmas.

He hoped common sense would prevail as people tried out their helium-filled toy.

"It says it's an indoor toy on the box. If you take them outside and the wind gets them, they can be goneburger, so you've got to be a bit careful," he said.

The Air Swimmer was created by 19-year-old Stanford University student Blake English and has proved to be one of the most popular toys worldwide since its release in July.


There's more at the link. Bold print is my emphasis.

Here's a video clip of two Air Swimmers sharks being flown at ComicCon in San Diego last year.







Yeah . . . I can imagine that coming across one of those, several thousand feet above the water (or the ground), might make a pilot wonder what was in his last cup of coffee - or the cabin air, for that matter!



Peter

Why movie revenues are dropping


Critic Roger Ebert offers five reasons for the decline. The most important, in my experience, is his No. 3.

3. The theater experience. Moviegoers above 30 are weary of noisy fanboys and girls. The annoyance of talkers has been joined by the plague of cell-phone users, whose bright screens are a distraction. Worse, some texting addicts get mad when told they can't use their cell phones. A theater is reportedly opening which will allow and even bless cell phone usage, although that may be an apocryphal story.


There's more at the link.

I can't figure out why Hollywood hasn't realized this long ago. It's the main reason why I haven't been to a movie theater in years! I detest being treated like an idiot, forced to sit through what seems like hours of advertisements, previews, etc. before the feature film begins; expected to pay ridiculous prices for not only my ticket, but also for low-quality snacks and soft drinks once I get inside; the theater itself was (and, I'm told, still is) frequently dirty, smelly and sticky; and worst of all, the audiences (at least, up to the point where I gave up in disgust) were getting noisier, less polite, and more irritating every time I went to the movies. (Pagers were bad enough in my younger days, but I understand that the advent of cellphones has only made things worse.)

Eventually I simply gave up, and for the past twenty-odd years I've watched only videos and DVD's. Based on what Mr. Ebert has to say, I don't think I'll be returning to a movie theater anytime soon . . .

Peter

The joys (and frustrations) of Alaskan bush flying


Some of you may be familiar with Blue Ice Aviation in Alaska - Miss D. links to them from her blog. The owner, Matt Keller, is an Alaskan bush pilot, flying year-round into the interior to take in and pick up parties of hunters, hikers, climbers, etc., and carrying supplies to those who live far from Alaska's few roads.

Yesterday he put up a post that epitomizes the job of a bush pilot during an Alaskan winter. I quote:

For anybody who might mistake my life as an endless flight of perfect weather and beautiful scenery, remember that every coin has two sides ... This evening I found myself stuffed in the tail cone of my "parts only" 185 fuselage at -15 degrees with my fingers froze to my wrenches, and my lips froze to the aft bulkhead while removing a cable and pulley. If you would like to know what this is like, cram yourself into an 18" aluminum tube, at -15, and try to milk a hamster. It'll give you a snap-shot of the other side of my coin. I still think it's a great job.


I have to admit, I spluttered into my coffee at the mental picture of milking a hamster!

He's also put up an article containing photographic highlights of 2011. Here's a small selection to whet your appetite. (Go to his article and click on the pictures to see them in larger sizes.)



Matt's daughter Ali in the cockpit of his Super Cub




Flying through the mountains of the Alaska Range




Beachcombing on the Nushagak Peninsula








Why bush pilots need skis on their aircraft during an Alaskan winter!



There are many more photographs at the link. Lovely pictures, interesting viewing - generally a must-see for bush aviation enthusiasts.

Peter

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Demolishing a silo, solo!


I had to laugh at this video clip of a man demolishing a grain silo on a farm - even as I winced at the lack of safety precautions, and the danger in which he placed himself!







He's lucky that didn't turn into an instant Darwin Award . . .





Peter

Montanans have the right idea!


As readers are doubtless aware, Congress and the Senate passed the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act last month. It included highly controversial and prima facie unconstitutional provisions. As retired US Marine Corps generals Charles Krulak and Joseph Hoar pointed out last month in a New York Times op-ed piece:

One provision would authorize the military to indefinitely detain without charge people suspected of involvement with terrorism, including United States citizens apprehended on American soil. Due process would be a thing of the past.

. . .

A second provision would mandate military custody for most terrorism suspects. It would force on the military responsibilities it hasn’t sought. This would violate not only the spirit of the post-Reconstruction act limiting the use of the armed forces for domestic law enforcement but also our trust with service members, who enlist believing that they will never be asked to turn their weapons on fellow Americans. It would sideline the work of the F.B.I. and local law enforcement agencies in domestic counterterrorism. ... Mandatory military custody would reduce, if not eliminate, the role of federal courts in terrorism cases. Since 9/11, the shaky, untested military commissions have convicted only six people on terror-related charges, compared with more than 400 in the civilian courts.

. . .

Having served various administrations, we know that politicians of both parties love this country and want to keep it safe. But right now some in Congress are all too willing to undermine our ideals in the name of fighting terrorism. They should remember that American ideals are assets, not liabilities.


There's more at the link. Bold print is my emphasis. The entire article is highly recommended reading.

It seems some citizens of Montana agree with Generals Krulak and Hoar, and are fighting back. They're mounting a recall drive to unseat their politicians who voted for the 2012 NDAA. Salem-News.com reports:

Moving quickly on Christmas Day after the US Senate voted 86 - 14 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA) which allows for the indefinite military detention of American citizens without charge or trial, Montanans have announced the launch of recall campaigns against Senators Max Baucus and Jonathan Tester, who voted for the bill.

. . .

Montana law requires grounds for recall to be stated which show conformity to the allowed grounds for recall. The draft language of the Montana petitions, "reason for recall" reads:

"The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees all U.S citizens:

'a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed...'

The National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 (NDAA 2011) permanently abolishes the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, 'for the duration of hostilities' in the War on Terror, which was defined by President George W. Bush as 'a task which does not end' to a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001.

Those who voted Aye on December 15th, 2011, Bill of Rights Day, for NDAA 2011 have attempted to grant powers which cannot be granted, which violate both the spirit and the letter of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

The Montana Recall Act stipulates that officials including US senators can only be recalled for physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of the oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of a felony offense. We the undersigned call for a recall election to be held for Senator Max S. Baucus [and Senator Jonathan Tester] and charge that he has violated his oath of office, to protect and defend the United States Constitution."


Again, more at the link. It's worth reading the report in full.

Go Montana! - and may other states with laws that permit such recall petitions follow your example! If we can't trust our Representatives and Senators to obey the Constitution (in terms of which they are elected and serve in the first place), and pass laws that are in accordance with its provisions, why the hell can't we get rid of all of them?

Peter

Never mind voter fraud - how about government fraud?


Yesterday I pointed out a particularly good argument in favor of requiring voter ID at US elections. It was well timed, because last Friday the Justice Department informed South Carolina that it would block that state's Voter ID law. MSNBC reported:

The Justice Department said the requirement could harm the right to vote of tens of thousands of people, noting that just over a third of the state's minorities who are registered voters did not have a driver's license needed to cast a ballot.

"The state's data demonstrate that non-white voters are both significantly burdened" by the law and "disproportionately unlikely to possess the most common types of photo identification" needed, Thomas Perez, head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, said in a letter to the state.

The state can appeal the decision at the Justice Department or in federal court.


There's more at the link.

Yesterday Andrew Breitbart's Big Government blog pointed out that the Justice Department's case was based upon mathematics so flawed that it amounted to chicanery. Here's an excerpt.

The Obama Department of Justice has used a mathematical trick in order to make its legal and public-relations case against South Carolina’s voter ID provisions. Officials of the DOJ intentionally created a false perception of the disparity between black and white voters in order to strike down the law that would haveve required photo ID or other proof for voters. Meanwhile, the media helped Eric Holder’s Department of Justice spin their intentionally misleading numbers to the general public.

This entire scam – there’s no better word for it – is based an interesting but totally irrelevant math quirk; when numbers are small, the difference between them is larger.

An Easy Math Trick

To understand the math behind this, let’s start simply and look at two very small numbers – 1 and 2.

If you had one dollar and I had two dollars, I have one dollar more than you. However, if I wanted to try to impress someone, just telling them that I was a dollar wealthier probably wouldn’t work. In an effort to sound more impressive, I could find a way to pump myself up by claiming that I had twice as much money as you. It’s true, of course – 2 is twice as much as 1 — but just knowing that I had twice as much money as someone else doesn’t really paint the whole picture.

If I want to get extra-fancy, I could also say “I have 100% more money than that person.” This is saying the same (misleading) thing as “I have twice as much” in a slightly different way.

. . .

Here’s the quirky part — as numbers get bigger, this difference decreases. Now imagine that you have $100 and I have $101. I still only have one dollar more than you but because the numbers are larger, I can’t pull my ‘twice as much money’ claim trick. In fact, I only have 1% more money than you.

. . .

Now, in both of these examples, the simpler way to express our financial differences is to say “I have a dollar more than you” or by spelling it all out, such as “I have two dollars and you have one dollar.” The whole bit about ‘twice as much money’ or ‘100% more’ is just a way to obfuscate the truth that I only have one more dollar and it works only when the numbers are low.

Thus ends the math lesson.

This intentional obfuscation is exactly what the Federal Government and the Holder Justice Department did to the people of South Carolina. They used this same mathematical quirk to hide the truth about the actual statistics and the media dutifully repeated the ‘Holder Math’. Unfortunately, the state of South Carolina was also bamboozled by this simple math game and failed to expose what the Obama DOJ was up to.

. . .

The number that matters is that there’s a 1.6% real difference, based on the data used – or to spell it out, 10% of black voters without DMV-ID versus 8.4% of white voters. The 20% figure had to be manufactured for some reason and the obvious assumption is that the DOJ is trying to hide the fact that the real difference is so small. They know public opinion is against them so they used a semi-clever trick to fool the state of South Carolina.

This intentional gaming of the statistics by a legal branch of the Federal government should be deeply troubling.


Again, more at the link, including a detailed exposition of how the Justice Department 'cooked the books' to make its case.

I can only hope that South Carolina will appeal this ridiculous decision through the courts, and prevail on the grounds of mathematics and logic, rather than allow mendacious and - let's not mince words - fraudulent arguments to derail its efforts to minimize voting fraud. I also hope Congress will investigate how and why such misleading arguments were relied upon by the Justice Department to make its case (such as it is). Heads need to roll.





Peter

Yep - EOD techs are strange . . . and funny!


Yesterday I published an article about a bomb-disposal robot that 'died' in an explosion in Iraq. Among the commenters was fellow (albeit very intermittent) blogger 'Raven Prometheus', writing at Ruminations Of The Raven-Wolf. He said:

I, personally, have lost 4 bots like that. 4 times that my wife wasn't a widow and my kids weren't orphans. As far as anthropomorphizing them, we named them, noticed and recorded their "personalities", and kept track of their service numbers after we passed them on to replacing teams. One time my team member and I married two of them together (it's a long story), and were caught during the ceremony. It did end up getting us both a 4 day pass to Qatar...


That sounds like a heck of a story! I want to hear more - particularly about that robot honeymoon!

Intrigued by his comment, I wandered over to his blog and read through his archives. I thoroughly enjoyed his tale of the deodorant grenade. Here's an excerpt.

This was just an idea that a friend of mine (the clerk in the story) and I came up with one night at a Magic tournament when she, a few others that believe strongly in personal hygene, and I had taken a fresh air break outside. She asked if I was capable of making something like that, and I said "Sure!" and got an evil look in my eye, the one I call my "Bomb Techs Gone Wild Look". I think I scared her. Anyways, it would be a handy piece of ordnance. Just like Shower-In-A-Can (patent pending), another invention idea of mine. I think it would have to be considered a WND, though, Weapon of Nastiness Destruction...


There's more at the link.

Raven Prometheus, we want more! How about it? You write 'em, we'll read 'em! I invite those of my readers who share my interest to let Raven Prometheus know in Comments to this post, and/or add a comment over at his blog.

Peter

In memoriam: Ronald Searle


One of the most remarkable cartoonists, artists and creative minds of the 20th century died on Saturday.

Ronald Searle was born in England in 1920, in the same month as my late mother. He sold his first cartoon at the age of 15. He joined the Royal Engineers in April 1939, realizing that war with Germany was inevitable, but continued his cartooning, and published the first of what would become his famous St. Trinians cartoons in 1941. However, events overtook him. He was sent to Singapore, where he became a prisoner of war of Japan in 1942.

Searle was initially interned in Changi prison camp in Singapore. In 1943 he was sent to work on the Burma Railway, setting of a famous novel and film about a 'Bridge on the River Kwai'. He suffered many attacks of malaria while working there, and also from the effects of deliberate starvation by the Japanese, which eventually caused him to contract beri-beri. In September 1943 a Japanese guard attacked him, striking him with a pick-axe which penetrated deep into his back. This, coupled with the effects of his illnesses, prostrated him, and he was unable to continue working. Almost miraculously, he survived, and was returned to Singapore in December 1943.




He was transferred to Changi Prison in May 1944. Built to house 800 regular inmates, this structure was now crammed to bursting-point with some 10,000 prisoners of war. Searle lived in a cell containing 200 prisoners. He continued to draw, which was tolerated by the Japanese as long as his subjects were innocuous (he concealed his drawings of Japanese brutality, and recovered them after the war). The prison administrator, a Captain Takahashi, even had him spend three months drawing murals at a Japanese officers' club on a Singapore beach.

Searle wrote and spoke about his wartime experiences at various times. Here are some of his comments.

"What kept me going was that, if I could only show people what it had been like, I would have achieved something in the short life I was likely to have ... I desperately wanted to put down what was happening, because I thought if by any chance there was a record, even if I died, someone might find it and know what went on."


Searle said of the day he woke up to find a dead friend on either side of him, and a live snake underneath his head:

"You can’t have that sort of experience without it directing the rest of your life. I think that’s why I never really left my prison cell, because it gave me my measuring stick for the rest of my life... Basically all the people we loved and knew and grew up with simply became fertiliser for the nearest bamboo."


Of his second year in captivity, working on the Burma Railroad, he said:

"On many occasions there would come a . . . moment when the mind liberated itself from the body and went off independently into the most incredible flights of fantasy. This detachment of the mental faculties from the miseries of the flesh may have its parallels in drug-taking or religious trances, but for us it was an involuntary act of self-preservation that protected some of us from going stark, staring ravers, leaving us just mildly demented."




"It was not only the hard labour that nearly drove us out of our minds; it was also the insects, that curse of the jungle, and they ate us alive. Mosquitoes and foul fat flies were a horror, and their bites were often fatal. But it was probably the non-killers that made our lives the most miserable. At night after work, tired as we were, we were kept awake by the swarms of bedbugs that wandered over us, sucking our blood and nauseating us with their smell when we crushed them. Day and night the lice burrowing under our skin kept us scratching. Sometimes giant centipedes wriggled into our hair when we finally got to sleep and stuck their million poisonous feet into our filthy scalps as we tried to brush them off, setting our heads ablaze. I think there were moments when any one of us would have preferred to brave the mountain lions rumoured to be out there somewhere, than face another bug."


After the end of the war, he was repatriated to England, arriving in Liverpool in late October 1945. He resumed his cartooning career almost as soon as he was demobilized. His wartime cartoons became world-famous after they were used to illustrate several war memoirs of fellow prisoners, including the best-selling 'The Naked Island' by Russell Braddon (which is well worth reading, and may be downloaded as a free e-book in various formats). He later published his own book of wartime prisoner cartoons.




Searle's wartime experiences have been of lifelong interest to me, for two reasons. First, my own father was supposed to be sent to Singapore in 1941. Only sheer blind chance prevented him from becoming a prisoner of the Japanese himself, as I described in Weekend Wings #9. Secondly, I grew up with friends of my parents who had been prisoners of the Japanese. Most never spoke about their experiences, but a few, when asked (and after they'd had a couple of brandies) would go into brutally horrifying detail. Searle's cartoons were a grim and graphic confirmation of their stories.

His post-war cartooning career was prolific and extremely successful all over the world. His St. Trinians School cartoons inspired a number of books and several films, the first appearing in 1954, and one being re-made as recently as 2007. Many clips from the films can be seen on YouTube.




His work was published and critically acclaimed in books, magazines and comics. Here are just a few selections from his output (click each image to be taken to its source, where more may be viewed).

A sardonic, cynical portrayal of Homer's Odyssey, drawing on his own military experience to reinterpret the legend:




A femme fatale from a 1948 article in a French magazine:




And, finally, he pokes fun at himself and his own profession in what appears to be a tongue-in-cheek self-portrait (click the image for a much larger view).




He spoke of his wartime experiences, and his enormous output, in this interview, recorded shortly before his 90th birthday in 2010.







Someone's even set up a Ronald Searle tribute blog, with many reproductions of his drawings and illustrations. It makes very interesting reading (at least, for someone like me!).

Ronald Searle was a truly remarkable man, one whom I held in high esteem for many reasons. I was always astonished by the fact that his ghastly wartime experiences didn't dehumanize him. He retained a whimsical, impish sense of humor, and was always one to seek the silver lining in every cloud (and try to draw it, of course!). The world is a much poorer place for his passing.

May he rest in peace, and may he be reunited with the many comrades he lost during World War II.

Peter

Monday, January 2, 2012

A great video of F/A-18's at work and play


Courtesy of Neptunus Lex, we find this video clip showing F/A-18 Hornet aircraft of the US Navy practicing their landings and take-offs. As the slow-motion sections show (see in particular from 1m.33s. to 2m.03s.), a carrier landing is much harder and rougher on the plane than a conventional one. Indeed, the former is more like a 'controlled crash', which is why naval carrier-based aircraft have much stronger undercarriages than land-based versions.







Neptunus Lex (a retired carrier pilot and US Navy officer) takes the opportunity to describe what's involved in landing the F/A-18 aboard a carrier. It's worth your while to click over to his place and read it for yourself.

Peter

The 'death' of a (mechanical) comrade in arms


I was interested to note the alleged reaction of US troops to the destruction of a bomb-disposal robot in Iraq. Gizmodo reports:

Scooby Doo was a damn good robot. During his deployment in Iraq he assisted in the disposal of 17 IEDs, 1 carbomb, and 1 unexploded bomb (which is always a major get for an EOD unit because of the intel they can gather about the bomb's maker). For every successful mission, the soldiers would draw a hashmark on Scooby Doo's head unit, similar to how fighter jet pilots mark the number of enemies they've shot down on the hull of their planes. Scooby became a member of a team with soldiers that relied on each other.

But one day Scooby met his match. Maybe he'd gotten cocky, turned maverick. His ego writing checks his body couldn't cash. We'll never know. But Scooby Doo was killed in Iraq when an IED he was trying to defuse exploded.

Like Luke after R2-D2 saved the day on the Death Star's trench run, the veteran EOD unit member brought Scooby's body into the repair depot at Camp Victory and said "you've got to fix Scooby." The repair tech said that Scooby was beyond repair, but he could have a brand new robot. No, you don't under stand, this soldier insisted, Scooby Doo had be fixed. He did not want some damn new robot—he wanted Scooby Doo back. Scooby Doo was part of the team. He'd saved their lives. It was reported that this veteran soldier was visibly upset.

And this is not uncommon. EOD units have been known to promote their bots to titles such as Staff Sergeant, award them Purple Hearts, and even hold funerals for their fallen brothers in robotic arms. They assign them personalities, dispositions. Some have even taken their robots fishing with them and let them hold the pole. Regardless of whether you call that camaraderie or laziness, I would argue that it's bonding. It's not hard to see where Scooby Doo's team was coming from. If your dog had been critically injured, and you took him to the vet, and the vet said, "Sorry, can't fix him, but how's about a new dog?" you'd tell him to go procreate with himself, your friend is not so easily replaced.

. . .

Scooby Doo now resides at iRobot's little on-site museum in Bedford, Mass. He has a plaque dedicated to him, and his head-plate still proudly displays his name and stats: 17 IEDs, 1 car bomb, 1 unexploded bomb.


There's more at the link (including pictures).

I must confess, I find this kind of 'personification' of a robot to be more than a little strange. I was certainly never tempted to anthropomorphize any of the weapons or equipment I used during my military service (although, when they didn't work properly, I frequently described them in terms of their ancestry, present worth and future prospects, just as if they had, indeed, been human!). I can't help but wonder whether the Gizmodo article exaggerates the 'bond' between the EOD unit and its bomb-disposal robot. Would any veterans of the Iraq and/or Afghanistan conflicts care to comment? Does it appear realistic, in the light of your experience of and/or with EOD people?

Peter

Some interesting facts about Belgian beer


I enjoy the occasional beer, although I'm not a heavy imbiber. I've always preferred Continental beers, and on the rare occasions I've passed through or near Belgium, I've sampled a few of its many brands of suds. However, I didn't know how dominant that nation's beer 'industry' had become in world terms. The Economist reports:

THE Trappist Abbey of St Sixtus of Westvleteren has little to offer those wishing to gawp at ecclesiastical architecture. The 19th-century buildings—squat, brick and functional—sit on a quiet country lane amid flat farmland, close to Belgium’s border with France. Yet the vast visitors’ car park is a clue that some people nevertheless consider the abbey worth a trip. For beer lovers, St Sixtus is a place of pilgrimage.



Abbey of St. Sixtus of Westvleteren (image courtesy of the Abbey's Web site)



The abbey and its most famous brew, Westvleteren 12 — a dark, strong ale — have taken first or second place in an annual poll of beer enthusiasts’ favourite tipples by RateBeer.com, a widely trusted reviewing website, for the whole decade that the survey has been running. Yet exactly how the American drinkers who predominate on the site get to knock back a Westvleteren 12 is something of a mystery.

Visit the abbey — no easy jaunt on public transport — and you can drink it to your heart’s content, or your head’s. But it is hard to buy elsewhere. The monks tightly ration takeaway sales of the tiny quantities they produce. The abbey’s website gives details of the brief windows when buyers may attempt to call with an order. If they are lucky and get through, they will be allotted a time to arrive at St Sixtus. They are then permitted to purchase two cases (four dozen 33cl bottles) in return for a solemn undertaking that the beer will not find its way to a third party.

Evidently some people are prepared to lie to a monk for the sake of beer. Cases of Westvleteren 12, on sale at €39 ($53) at the abbey, turn up on online beer-sellers for as much as $800. (In a rare easing of the rules, in November the monks released a batch of 93,000 six-packs for the Belgian market, to pay for repairs to the abbey. Next year 70,000 six-packs will go on sale worldwide.)

Pour reputation

As well as having a good claim to brew the best beer in the world, Belgium is also home to the world’s biggest brewer. Anheuser-Busch (AB) InBev, based in Leuven, a small university town half an hour by train from Brussels, turns out one in five of every beer sold around the world. Across the road from head office, the ultra-modern Stella Artois brewery pumps out one of the firm’s best-known international brands.

If St Sixtus fails to match the splendour of a medieval cathedral, the main brewing hall at Stella Artois comes close. The quiet and cavernous interior is dominated by 15 immense stainless-steel brewing kettles, whose column-like spouts soar heavenwards. In different ways both St Sixtus and Stella Artois illustrate the reverence with which Belgians regard their beer.

Their country also makes a bigger range than any other — 1,131 at the last count. Apart from six Trappist ales and other abbey beers, it churns out lagers such as Stella Artois and its stablemate Jupiler, the more popular brew in Belgium. Tipplers can also choose from an array of wheat beers, brown ales, red beers from West Flanders, golden ales, saison beers based on old farmhouse recipes, and any number of regional brews. Oddest are the austere, naturally fermented lambic beers of Brussels and the nearby Senne valley, a throwback to the days before yeast was tamed. These anachronisms have survived only in Belgium.


There's a lot more at the link. Interesting reading for those who enjoy a cold one now and again - and perhaps for the Atomic Nerds, who make their own. I wonder if they'd like to try brewing a saison or lambic beer for this year's Blogorado gathering? Hmmm . . .

Peter

The man who 'killed' Obi-Wan Kenobi is dead


I'm sure almost every one of my readers has seen the original Star Wars movie. Here's the scene where Obi-Wan Kenobi is killed in a light saber duel with Darth Vader.







I'd always assumed that the actor playing Darth Vader in that scene was David Prowse, who usually portrayed the character in the first three Star Wars movies. However, an article in the Daily Mail informs us that in the light-saber fencing scenes, his character was played by British Olympic fencer Bob Anderson, who has just died. Here's an excerpt.

Bob Anderson, 89, was a former Olympic swordsman who worked on many of the best known films of the past seven decades - but very few people are aware of the influence he had on some of our favourite movies.

He is most famous for donning Darth Vader's black helmet and fighting lightsaber battles in the original Star Wars trilogy - most famously with Obi Wan Kenobi.

Anderson also worked as a sword master or trainer on movies including the James Bond film From Russia With Love, The Legend of Zorro and the first Pirates of the Caribbean film.

He also worked on the Lord of the Rings in which he was responsible for crafting fighting moves for some of the characters.

But it was announced today by The British Academy of Fencing that Mr Anderson died early on New Year's Day.


There's more at the link.

I guess we owe Mr. Anderson our thanks for some classic moments in cinematic fencing. May he rest in peace.

Peter

The best argument for voter ID I've heard so far


Fellow blogger Mr. B. at In The Middle Of The Right has posted an excellent perspective on why voter ID isn't an unduly onerous or discriminatory requirement. Here's an excerpt.

Getting a job must be an "undue burden" for the poor and people of color, or something like that....



Department of Homeland Security, Form I-9, Page 4 (click the image for a larger view)



One from list "A"or one from list "B" and one from list"C".



Department of Homeland Security, Form I-9, Page 5 (click the image for a larger view)



That 's what it takes to get a job. You have to show proof of identity (and meet other employment requirements, but we are talking today about the requirements of the DHS), so that your SSN can be used to properly charge you a tithe percentage of your earnings to pay forward the obligations of the gubmint on debts incurred in the past, and to provide freebies handouts benefits to the lazy freeloaders deserving poor and illegals.

Yet to show enough ID to prove who you are when you cast your ballot for your masters leaders who will make decisions regarding your lifestyle and freedom and economic status for the next election cycle is an undue burden... So does this mean that to be employed is [a] burden for these folks? I know a lot of folks who are African-American who are gainfully employed and middle class who were somehow able to overcome the undue burden of providing ID for their I-9 so they could pay taxes earn a living. I really don't see how providing this proof of identity in order to be employed caused them a hardship.

Or it could be a blatant cover by the DNC and Eric Holder to hide the continued voter fraud perpetrated by the DNC and its {ACORN!} operatives. Some of which are funded by those same taxpayers.


There's more at the link. Highly recommended reading - and a great answer to all those who argue that requiring voters to produce an official identification document is somehow unreasonable or excessively burdensome. If you're not allowed to work in the USA without proving your eligibility to do so, why shouldn't you have to prove your eligibility to vote? Sounds reasonable to me . . .

Congratulations and thanks to Mr. B. for a very useful argument.

Peter

Sunday, January 1, 2012

New Year schadenfreude


Here are what the title of this video clip calls '34 painful hits in 31 seconds'.







I guess we may as well have a good laugh at someone else's expense to start the year off right . . .





Peter

Circle K can do without my business


I note that Circle K has seen fit to fire a clerk who displayed real courage and presence of mind when confronted by armed robbers. Fox 10 reports:

Eric Henderson was unemployed for two straight years before getting a job at a Circle K in Pensacola. Henderson said he’s been working as a sales clerk for the last 4 months. And the job was going smoothly until three robbery suspects showed up.

“She starts yelling shoot him, shoot him!" said Henderson.

Before the suspects had a chance to shoot, Henderson said he saw an opportunity to take the gun from 25-year-old Verna Sealey.

"I grabbed her around the neck and slammed her on the ground and grabbed the gun in both my hands,” Henderson said.

Henderson said Circle K's policy states clerks are not to provoke, chase or engage a robber. When managers saw the footage of Henderson fighting back, he said they fired him.

“I don't recommend anybody to put your life in danger, but in my opinion this clerk had an opportunity. He obviously felt like he was in danger and he saw an opportunity to save himself,” Detective Dylan Stackpole said.


There's more at the link, including a video report.

If Circle K rewards that sort of heroism by firing the guy, they can do without my business from now on. May I request those of my readers who feel likewise to please boycott them as well - and, in addition, to contact them, to let them know why none of us will be darkening their doorstep from now on? Perhaps, if they hear from enough of us, they might change this damnfool policy. I won't be doing business with them unless and until they do - and until they give Mr. Henderson his job back.





Peter

Fast food - slow decay!


If you habitually eat burgers, fries, etc. from fast food joints, this report from Canada should give you pause for thought.

A McDonald's plain cheeseburger turned 1 year old Thursday on the kitchen counter of a Canadian nutritionist who says it looks much as it did hot off the grill.

. . .

She left the unwrapped burger unrefrigerated on her counter for the past year and said not much has changed, apart from the bun turning stale. She said it "still smells slightly like a burger," although there has been no sign of mold, maggots or bacteria.

"Obviously it makes me wonder why we choose to eat food like this when even bacteria won't eat it," she told the Star.


There's more at the link.

Yep. If even bugs and bacteria won't eat it, why should I trust it in my stomach?





Peter

Of space travel and ancient pottery


I'm amazed to learn that the pottery of ancient Greece may help to improve the safety of space travel. The Israel Herald reports:

The study of the chemical and physical properties of ancient Attic pottery would help improve space missions, believe scientists.

Considering it importance, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded nearly 500,000 dollars to scientists from the Getty Conservation Institute, Stanford's National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) and the Aerospace Corporation earlier this year to study the secrets of Attic pottery.

Among other objectives, it is hoped that the project will improve our understanding of iron-spinel chemistry, which is critical to the advanced ceramics used for thermal protection in aerospace applications, such as protective tiles on the Mars Rover Sojourner, or the fleet of space shuttles, for example.

Attic pottery features red and black figures and was a fixture in ancient Greece from the sixth to fourth centuries B.C.



Red-figure Attic pottery, circa 530 BC (image courtesy of Wikipedia)



The iron-spinel ceramic pigments found in Attic pottery are able to remain chemically stable at very high temperatures.

It's the degree of iron oxidation that provides the red and black coloring associating with Attic pottery.


There's more at the link.

I know that spinels are "resistant to chemical weathering and abrasion", but who came up with the idea that the use of iron-spinel compounds as a glaze in ancient pottery might be useful to or relevant for modern space technology? It blows my mind to think that the hand-made pottery of ancient Greece, well over two millennia old - long before anyone had even flown, never mind gone beyond our atmosphere into space! - might help to produce better heat-shield tiles to protect spacecraft against re-entry into atmosphere.



Space Shuttle thermal protection system ceramic tile (image courtesy of Wikipedia)



I'd never have made the connection. I wonder what inspired the National Science Foundation to do so? Some modern scientist must have had a brainwave . . .

Peter

American Dream = "The Government Will Provide"?


That's the impression one gets from two news items I came across today.

The first is courtesy of a link from The Silicon Graybeard to a blog I hadn't previously encountered, Free North Carolina. It embedded this video report from Fox News, describing how today's students see the 'American Dream' and its implications. It's worth watching.







Within minutes of finding that clip, Tanker over at Mostly Cajun pointed me to this news report.

Employers are facing more uncertainty in the wake of a letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission warning them that requiring a high school diploma from a job applicant might violate the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The development also has some wondering whether the agency’s advice will result in an educational backlash by creating less of an incentive for some high school students to graduate.

The “informal discussion letter” from the EEOC said an employer’s requirement of a high school diploma, long a standard criterion for screening potential employees, must be “job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity.” The letter was posted on the commission’s website on Dec. 2.

Employers could run afoul of the ADA if their requirement of a high school diploma “ ‘screens out’ an individual who is unable to graduate because of a learning disability that meets the ADA’s definition of ‘disability,’ ” the EEOC explained.


There's more at the link. The report is particularly worrying because the ADAAA of 2008, which amended and updated the original ADA of 1990, specifically relaxed and expanded the definition of what constitutes a disability, and gave much more latitude to the (allegedly) disabled worker's perspective rather than an objective standard, or the interests of the employer. The EEOC's new interpretation of specified educational standards may once again favor the work-seeker over the legitimate requirements of the employer.

Putting these reports together, it seems that students already think that the American Dream means that the US government will provide for them in all things . . . and now an agency of that same government is telling them, in so many words, that they may not even need to be students at all if they can find a politically-correct reason to claim an educationally-related 'disability'!

Remember in November - and vote out every dumbass politician who practices or preaches this philosophy!





Peter