Sunday, September 26, 2021

Sunday morning music

 

Here's a treat:  an hour-long classical guitar concert in St. Mark's Lutheran Church in San Francisco, in March 2021.  The performer is Ana Vidović, a former child prodigy from Croatia who's grown to worldwide prominence.

The performance includes the following works:


Flute Partita in A minor, BWV 1013 by Johann Sebastian Bach (Transcribed by Valter Despalj)
-Allemande (3:06)
-Corrente (8:40)

Violin Sonata No. 1, BWV 1001 by Johann Sebastian Bach (arr. by Manuel Barrueco)
-Adagio (12:44)
-Fuga (16:38)
-Siciliana (21:19)
-Presto (24:25)

Un Dia de Noviembre (27:36) by Leo Brouwer

Gran Sonata Eroica, Op. 150 (32:17) by Mauro Giuliani

Sonata in E major, K. 380, L. 23 (41:39) and Sonata in D minor K.1, L. 366 (46:28) by Domenico Scarlatti

Nocturno (48:55) by Slavko Fumic

Encore - Asturias (53:49) by Isaac Albeniz


There are a couple of minutes of introductory talk before the music begins, so skip them if you feel so inclined.




Lovely playing from a lovely performer.

Peter


Saturday, September 25, 2021

Saturday Snippet: How our forefathers coped with everyday life

 

Recently I came across a fascinating book titled "Lost Skills of the 19th Century: A Practical Guide to a Variety of Useful Arts No Longer Widely Known or Practiced".



The author has taken a common task for every year of the 19th century, and provided an excerpt from a contemporary source describing how to accomplish it.  It's a series of vignettes of a way of life long past.  It's also a sobering lesson in how hard our forefathers had to work in areas that today we take for granted.  For example, they had to preserve meat through the winter by doing it all themselves, whereas we rely on freezers, cans, etc., avoiding all the drudgery.

I've selected a few of the tasks addressed in the book for your reading pleasure - and gratitude that we don't have to do that today!


(1803) PRESERVING BEEF

From DEANE’S NEW-ENGLAND FARMER.

As farmers are most commonly too far distant from market places, to be supplied from them with fresh meat, and as it is most convenient for them to kill only at certain seasons, they ought to be well acquainted with the best methods of keeping meat in good order, by salting.

The common method of preserving pork, reserving the lean parts for use in the cold season, and applying a large quantity of salt to the fat, is perhaps as good as any can be. But beef is greatly injured, and rendered unwholesome by a severe salting.

A good method of preserving beef, which I have known to be practised for several years past, is as follows: For a barrel of beef of the common size, reduce to powder in a mortar, four quarts of common salt; then eight ounces of salt petre, and five pounds of brown sugar. Let the salt be well rubbed into the pieces, pack them close in the barrel, and sprinkle the salt petre and sugar evenly over each layer. No water at all is to be applied. The juices of the meat, if well packed, will form a sufficient quantity of brine; and the beef will keep sweet and good through the following summer, supposing it killed and packed in the beginning of winter, or late in autumn; and will not be too salt to be palatable.—Draining off the brine and purifying it by boiling and scumming, with the addition of a little salt in the beginning of summer, and returning of the brine upon the meat, will be a real improvement.

~ ~ ~

(1806) STARTING VEGETABLES IN WINTER WITH DUNG

The American Gardeners Calendar - January - Work To Be Done In The Kitchen Garden

As it is generally the ambition of most gardeners to excel each other ... all necessary preparations should be made this month for that purpose, by preparing dung for hot-beds, in which to raise the plants; for they, being of a tender quality, require the aid of artificial heat under shelter of frames and glasses, until the middle or latter end of May, especially in the middle and eastern states.

But by the aid of hot-beds, defended with frames and glasses, we obtain early cucumbers, in young green fruit, fit to cut or gather in February, March and April, &c. and ripe melons in May and June…

In order to raise early cucumbers and melons, you must provide a quantity of fresh hot stable-dung, wherewith to make a small hot-bed for a seed-bed, in which to raise the plants to a proper growth for transplanting into larger hot-beds next month to remain to fruit; for this purpose a small bed for a one or two light frame may be sufficient, in which case two cart-load of hot dung will be enough for making a bed of proper dimensions for a one-light box, and so in proportion for a larger.

Agreeably to these intimations, provide the requisite supply of good horse-stable-dung from the dunghills in stable-yards, &c. consisting of that formed of the moist stable litter and dunging of the horses together, choosing that which is moderately fresh, moist, and full of heat… always preferring that which is of some lively, warm, steamy quality: and of which take the long and short together as it occurs, in proper quantity as above. And being thus procured, proceed to making the hot-bed, or previously to forming it into a bed, if the dung is rank, it would be proper to prepare it a little to an improved state, more successful for that purpose, by forking the whole up into a heap, mixing it well together; and let it thus remain eight or ten days to ferment equally, and for the rank steam and fierce heat to transpire, or evaporate in some effectual degree; and by which time it will have acquired a proper temperament for making into a hot-bed, by which treatment the heat will be steady and lasting, and not so liable to become violent or burning, as when the dung is not previously prepared.

Choose a place on which to make your hot-bed, in a sheltered dry part of the framing ground, &c. open to the morning and south sun: and it may be made either wholly on the surface of the ground, or in a shallow trench, of from six to twelve inches deep, and four or five feet wide, according to the frame; but if made entirely on the surface, which is generally the most eligible method at this early season, it affords the opportunity of lining the sides of the bed with fresh hot dung, quite down to the bottom, to augment the heat when it declines, and also prevents wet from settling about the bottom of the bed, us often happens when made in a trench, which chills the dung, and causes the heat soon to decay.

Then according to the size of the frame, mark out the dimensions of the bed, either on the ground, or with four stakes; making an allowance for it to be about four or five inches wider than the frame each way: this done, begin to make the bed accordingly, observing to shake and mix the dung well, as you lay it on the bed, and beat it down with the back of the fork, as you go on: but I would not advise treading it, for a bed which is trodden hard will not work so kindly, and be more liable to burn than that which is suffered to settle gradually of itself: in this manner proceed till the bed has arrived at the height of four feet, which will not be too much; making an allowance for its settling six or eight inches, or more, in a week or fortnight’s time; and as soon as finished, let the frame and glass be put on: keep them close till the heat comes up, then raise the glass behind that the steam may pass away…

Three or four days after the bed is made, prepare to earth it; previously observing, if it has settled unequally, to take off the frame and glasses, and level any inequalities; make the surface smooth, put on the frame again, and then lay therein as much of the above-mentioned earth as will cover the whole top surface of the bed, about three or four inches thick, then fill two, three, or more middling smallish garden-pots with more of the aforesaid rich earth, place them within the frame on the hot-bed, put on the glass or glasses, and continue them till the earth in the pots is warm ; and when that is effected, sow the seeds in the pots…

If the bed should heat too violently, as is sometimes unavoidably the case, the pots can be readily drawn up more or less, out of danger of burning the earth, &c. therein; and thus, the sowing in pots in a new made hot-bed in full heat may prove of greater advantage than sowing in the earth of the bed, with regard to more probable safety from burning.

After sowing the seeds, put on the lights or glasses close; but when the steam from the heat of the bed rises copiously, give it vent by raising one corner of the upper ends of the lights, half an inch or an inch, which is also necessary in order to prevent any burning tendency from the great heat of the bed in its early state.

Continue now to cover the glasses of the hot-bed every evening, about an hour before sun-setting if mild weather, but earlier in proportion to its severity, with garden mats; and uncover them every morning.

(Blogger's note:  After reading that, all I can say is, "Thank Heaven for today's supermarkets and their fresh fruit and vegetable selections!")

~ ~ ~

1817 - HOW TO BLEED SOMEONE IN AN EMERGENCY

The Medical Companion: With a Dispensatory and Glossary.

The art of opening a vein, and the necessary cautions respecting the operation, should be learned by every one; since cases of emergency may happen, when the necessity of its being performed is evident, and where life may be lost before medical assistance can be obtained. Another qualification necessary to be possessed, is that of being able to stop the flow of blood from a vein thus opened.

To bleed, you are to apply a ribbon or ligature with some degree of tightness, an inch or two above the elbow joint; and as soon as a vein is conspicuous, place the thumb of your left hand about an inch below the place of your puncture, and then with your right hand, holding the lancet firm betwixt your thumb and fore finger, make an incision obliquely into the vein, without changing its direction, or raising the handle, lest the point; being lowered in proportion, should cut the under part of the vein, or perhaps even wound an artery.

When the quantity of blood you wish, is drawn, un-tie the ligature, and close the orifice. To accomplish this, let the thumb be placed on the orifice, so as to bring its sides together, and to press it with a moderate force. The flow of blood will now be stopped, and the operator, with the hand, must introduce a compress, made by twice doubling a piece of linen about two inches square, between the orifice and his thumb; over this place another compress, three or four inches square, of a thickness sufficient to fill up the hollow of the bend of the arm, confining the whole with a ribbon or tape, passing over the compress, and above and below the elbow, in the form of a figure eight, finishing with a knot over the compress.

If the bleeding continue obstinate, the sleeve of the gown or coat above the orifice, ought to be ripped or loosened; and if this do not succeed, the lips of the incision should be brought nicely together, and while they are compressed firmly by the thumb of the operator, the coldest water should be poured on the arm, or the orifice washed with sharp vinegar. The placing of a piece of adhesive plaster over the orifice in the vein, generally succeeds in checking the flow of blood.

To bleed in the foot, a ligature must be applied above the ankle joint, and after opening the most conspicuous vein, if the flow of blood is not copious it may be increased by immersion of the part in warm water. On removing the ligature, the blood will readily cease to discharge, and a piece of court plaster is the best bandage.

Topical blood-letting is executed by the application of leeches, as near as possible to the part affected, or by a scarificator, or an instrument with a number of lancets acted upon by a spring.

When leeches are employed they must be previously prepared by drying them, or allowing them to creep over a dry cloth; the part also, to attract them, should be moistened with cream, sugar, or blood, and they confined on it by applying a wine-glass over them.

When the scarificator is used, as soon as a wound is made, a cup exhausted of its atmospheric air, by burning over it for a few seconds, a bit of soft paper dipt in the spirit of wine, and on the flame of which being nearly exhausted, must instantly be applied over the scarified part; when full, it is easily removed by raising one side of it, to admit the air. When you have taken away in this manner a sufficient quantity of blood, the wounds are to be covered with some cream or mild ointment.

~ ~ ~

1839 - BIRCH BARK CANOE CONSTRUCTION

Indian Traits: Being Sketches of the Manners, Customs and Character of the North American Indians, Vol. I.

… Canoes were also made,—chiefly in New England,—as they are by the modern Indians, of bark, particularly that of the birch-tree. The tribes of the Northern Lakes make them wholly of this material, with a little soft wood and pine-gum, or boiled pitch, without a nail or a bit of metal of any kind to confine the parts. The entire outside is bark. Where the edges of it come together at the bottom or along the sides, they are sewed very closely with a sort of vegetable thread called wattap,—made of roots,—and the seam is then plastered over with gum. Next to the bark, are pieces of cedar, shaven flat and thin, not thicker than the blade of a knife. These run lengthwise, and are pressed against the bark by means of cedar ribs fitted to the bottom and sides of the canoe, in the opposite direction, and which, at the upper end, are pointed, and run into a rim of cedar. This rim, being about an inch thick and an inch and a half wide, forms the gun-wale, (as the whites call it,) to which the bark and ribs are all sewed with wattap. Across the boat are several bars, which keep it in shape, and are also fastened to the gunwale. The seats of those who paddle are alongside of, but below the bars,—made of plank or board, a few inches wide, and hung by a cord or withe at each end to the gunwale. In small bark canoes, however, no seats are used. The Indian adjusts himself on the bottom. They are sometimes thirty feet long, and of course capable of accommodating quite a party, like a log canoe; but more frequently they are made for the use of two or three people, and are so light and small as to be very easily carried a long distance on a man’s head. This makes them convenient for travelling in the winter, when the streams and lakes are frozen, as well as for navigating shallow or rapid streams.

The bark-canoes, of whatever size, indeed, are so fragile as to be easily damaged and destroyed by overloading, or by running against obstacles in the water. The larger ones, used on the Lakes, are made to carry a weight of stores, tents and baggage, to the amount of from four to eight thousand pounds; but in this case the bottom is defended by a layer of long poles, which cause the burden to press equally on all points. The paddles are of red-cedar, and very light. The blade is about three inches wide, except the steersman’s, behind, which is five inches. One of the crew looks out in front, to prevent running upon rocks. In mounting a rapid current, a stout pole is used instead of the paddle; and those who use it are obliged to stand erect. This makes the navigation exceedingly difficult, and sometimes dangerous, even for those most accustomed to it. Of the whites, perhaps not one out of ten could safely for the first time navigate a small birch canoe, even in smooth water, without oversetting it.

An advantage in most of these boats, which should not be forgotten, is, that the two ends being generally fashioned and shaped much alike, both answer equally well for the prow or stern, so that there is no necessity of turning them round. When they are so constructed, as to admit of a sail being hoisted, the Indians will accomplish sixty miles with them in a day; without it, about half that distance.

It is but two or three years since a member of the Penobscot tribe, residing at Old Town, in Maine, paddled one of the smallest kind of birch canoes all the way along the Atlantic Coast from the mouth of his own river to the harbor of New York.

~ ~ ~

(1850) HOW TO FIND GOLD IN THE STREAMS OF CALIFORNIA

Mc’Neils Travels in 1849, To, Through and From the Gold Regions, in California.

At this point I think proper to offer some remarks respecting the digging and washing of the gold, and the best places for finding it. On the sides and tops of mountains gold is not found in large quantities, nor on the plains. But dig wherever you may think proper in that country, you will find some. When a river is high you cannot work along it to advantage. The explorer, if passing along a river when the water is high, may correctly judge that gold may be found at the foot of a fall or eddy, where he will or may be very successful when the water is low, the swiftness of the eddy having accumulated the gold scales in piles in places called “pockets.” In such places the diggers should not be discouraged if at first they find none, but dig on until they get to the rock where they will find it the most, as gold, being the heaviest, passes through the sand and gravel, and settles on the rock. In those eddies, or pockets, or gravel bars, formed by the current of the river, some, not aware of what I said, will dig down one, two, or three feet, and finding none will leave the spot, while an old miner, coming afterwards, will dig deeper in the same hole, and find thousands of dollars safely deposited on the rock. In the slate rock it is only found in the crevices, as if it had been melted and poured into them by the hands of the Almighty. In the white flint rock it is not found so distinct or separate, but is there frequently seen commingled with the rock itself, the gold still being perfectly pure or almost, only losing two cents in the ounce when assayed at the mint, yielding seventeen dollars and sixty cents to the ounce, some say a great deal more, but the gold I gathered, which was the purest of the pure, only afforded that amount in the mint at New Orleans. While I was at the mines the New York and Massachusetts companies arrived, bringing with them patent gold washers, but were compelled to throw them away and use the common simple cradle, reminding me of the old woman who remarked that the old way of getting children is the best in the world. I will now describe the simple cradle. It resembles a common baby cradle, about four feet and a half long, of white pine, having bottom, sides, head board, but none at the foot. On the bottom three cleats, an inch wide and eighteen inches apart, are nailed. A kind of hopper, the bottom of which is sheet iron perforated with half inch holes, having a low raised board round the edge, is fastened across the top of the cradle. The sand, gravel and gold are poured into this hopper, and then while water is poured on these with one hand, the cradle is rocked with the other, by which motion the gold, sand, and gravel are forced into the body of the cradle, where the gold, being the heaviest, lodges against the wooden cleats, while the sand and gravel pass onward and out by the foot of it. Then the gold along those cleats, and the little sand and gravel still mingled with it, are taken out, put into a pan and washed at the edge of the river as clean as you can get it without wasting any of the gold. Then it is placed on a handkerchief spread in the sun, and when it is dry the remaining sand is blown from it as one blows the dust from beans. This sand is as black as powder. The fact is, gold is only found in black sand. The pure gold is then put into a double sewed buckskin bag or purse, and is then ready for preservation or exportation.

While lying asleep or awake at night I did not think it strange for lizzards to run over my body and up the legs of my trowsers, and for wolves, called the kyota, to steal my breakfast prepared for the morning.

In my travels through California I saw thousands upon thousands of the finest and fattest cattle I ever saw, perfectly wild;—deer, antelopes, and elk, but I never saw the wild oats, wheat and clover high as a horse’s belly, mentioned by Col. Fremont, as published in his travels, and have the strongest reasons for believing that they do not exist in that country.

I caution persons going from this country to California against the traders and speculators found in that country. When those strangers inquire for the best diggings, those traders direct them to the spot where they have provisions and mining implements for sale, whether those places are the best or not. Strangers, after digging with little success in spots to which they have been directed—perhaps in places which have been abandoned, become disgusted, leave the gold region, and return home, believing that the whole is a humbug affair; whereas, if they would travel a little and search for themselves, they would find plenty of gold, return well laden with the precious metal, and publish that it is the greatest or rather only El Dorado in the world.

~ ~ ~

(1867) INSTRUCTIONS FOR TRAPPERS

S. Newhouse:  The Trapper’s Guide.

OUTFIT FOR A CAMPAIGN ON FOOT. If the region in which you propose to trap cannot be reached by boat or wagon, you must be content with such necessaries as you can carry on your person. A trapper on foot should not tire himself with long stiff-legged boots, but should wear short half-boots (with soles well nailed), fitting snugly above and around the ankle. His pants should be gray woolen, closely fitting below the knee, but roomy above. His coat should be of the same material and color, with plenty of pocket-room. His hat should be of soft felt, gray, and with a moderate brim. He should carry a “change” of woolen drawers, wrappers, shirts, and stockings. A towel with soap, a night-cap, and a blanket, or, what is better, a Canton-flannel bag to sleep in, will complete his personal equipments. Then he must carry for shelter a small tent, made of firm cotton-drilling, weighing not more than two pounds and a half; for subsistence, a double-barrelled gun (rifle and shot), weighing seven or eight pounds, with ammunition, and fishing-tackle ; and, for all sorts of purposes, an axe of two and a half pounds (with a good length of handle), and plenty of tacks and nails. For cooking and table service he must carry a frying-pan, a camp-kettle, a hunting-knife, some knives and forks, spoons of two sizes, a few tin pressed plates and basins, and a drinking-cup. Above all, he must not forget to take a good supply of matches and a pocket-compass. These necessaries (exclusive of clothing) will weigh, according to my reckoning, about twenty-five pounds. The rest of his load must be made up of traps and provisions. If he is stout enough to undertake trapping on foot, he ought to be able to travel with about fifty pounds. He may take then five pounds of provisions and twenty pounds of traps, or any other proportion of these articles that will make up the remaining twenty-five pounds. His provisions should consist of articles that will be desirable as accompaniments to the produce of his gun and fishing-tackle, namely, sugar, tea and coffee (rather than whiskey), salt, pepper, butter, lard, sifted Indian meal, white beans, crackers, &c. The butter and lard should be put up in air-tight cans, and on arrival at the trapping grounds should be sunk in a spring. The best kind of knapsack for carrying such an outfit is made of rubber-cloth, with shoulder-straps: but you can easily convert your sleeping-bag or your blanket into a knapsack that will serve very well. If you trap with one companion or more, which is a good plan and according to the general practice), many of the articles named in the above list will answer for the party, and so the load for individuals will be lightened. Thus equipped, you can turn your back on the haunts of men, march into the wilderness, and, with a little hunting and fishing in the intervals of trap-duty, live pleasantly for months, and return with your load of furs, a stouter and healthier man than when you started.

~ ~ ~

(1879) HOW TO FRESHEN A BED

Wallace W. Nixon:  The Chemical Laundry Guide.

307. – RENEWAL OF FEATHER BEDS. In cities there are establishments where feather beds are perfectly renovated by steam, but the process employed would be impracticable for home use. By the accompanying simple treatment, however, feather beds that have become soiled and heavy can be readily rendered clean, sweet, and light. At first sight, the process may appear to be detrimental, yet it is not only an easy method, but attended with perfect success. Without emptying the beds, thoroughly scour the ticking with a clean stiff brush and strong hot soap-suds; then lay them on the roof of a shed or some other clean place where the rain will fall on them. In very dry weather, they may be made wet by several thorough sprinklings with a watering pot, but the wetting is much better effected by the rain. When thoroughly soaked, let them dry in the hot rays of the sun for six or seven consecutive days. Shake them up well and turn them over every day. If exposed to the night air they will become damp and then mildew, so they should so covered during the night, for the idea is, after they are once soaked through, to have them continue to dry without receiving additional moisture. This plan of washing the bed-ticking and feathers makes them very fresh and light. It is far easier than the usual mode of emptying the beds and washing the feathers separately, and it answers quite as well. Care must be taken to thoroughly air the bed before using it.

309. – HAIR MATTRESSES. Hair mattresses, even the most expensive ones, by use soon become hard and uneven, and are then anything but comfortable. The reason why they get in this condition in so short a time is, that at manufactories where hair mattresses are made, the hair was never properly picked free from bunches. The hair is usually stored away in large quantities, where it becomes matted together in knots and bunches. In this condition it is made into mattresses, and although at first the mattress seems smooth and even, as soon as it sustains a continued weight, as a person lying upon it, the bunches become apparent. If a mattress that has become hard and dirty be subjected to the accompanying treatment, it will be rendered a better mattress than when first bought. Simply rip the ticking apart and wash it; then carefully pick the hair free from bunches and let it remain in a dry airy place for several days. When the ticking is dry, fill it lightly with the hair and tack it together. The hair is not likely to again get in bunches.

~ ~ ~

(1895) PROPER RULES FOR LEAVING AND RECEIVING CALLING CARDS

George Henry Sandison:  How to Behave and How to Amuse.

It is a rule among the best people to call upon the stranger who is in town. If the visitor brings letters of introduction, an entree to society is easy through the usually observed forms. If strangers who have come to reside near us, or even to visit our locality, bear credentials of respectability, courteous and hospitable residents will call upon them, after sufficient time has elapsed for the recently arrived to have adjusted themselves to their new positions. No introduction is necessary in such a case. The resident ladies call between two and five o’clock, send in their own with their husbands’ or their fathers’ or brothers’ cards, and if they find the strangers disengaged, a brief and cordial interview ends the first visit. This must be returned within a week, or a note of apology and explanation for the omission is sent, and the return visit is then paid later on. If a card be sent in return for this visit, or is left in person without an effort to see the parties who have made the first visit, it is understood that the strangers prefer solitude, or that there are reasons why they cannot receive visitors.

A gentleman should not make a first call upon the ladies of the family of a new-comer without an introduction or an invitation.

When should a lady call first on a new desirable acquaintance? She should have met the new acquaintance, should have been properly introduced, and should feel sure that her own acquaintance is desired. The oldest resident, the one most prominent in society, should call first. Good expedient for a first call is the sending out of cards, for several days in the month, by a lady who wishes to begin her social life in a new place. These may be accompanied by the card of some well-known friend, or they may go out alone. If they bring visits or cards in response, the beginner has started on her career with no loss of self-respect. First calls should be returned within a week.

After a dinner-party a guest must call in person and inquire if the hostess is at home. For other entertainments the lady can call by proxy, or simply send her card. In sending to inquire for a person’s health, cards may be sent with a courteous message. No first visit should, however, be returned by card only.

Bachelors should leave cards on the master and mistress of the house, and the young ladies. To turn down the corners of the card has become almost obsolete, except, perhaps, where a lady wishes it understood that she called in person. The plainer the card the better. A small, thin card for a gentleman, not glazed, with his name in small script and his address well engraved in the corner, is in good taste. A lady’s card should be larger, but not glazed or ornamented.


A different world from ours, in terms of social etiquette, day-to-day tasks, and the like.  Certainly, one had to work a lot harder for the everyday things in life that you and I take for granted!

Peter


Friday, September 24, 2021

We need to be together. Don't let Big Brother isolate us from each other.

 

I'm obliged to Sundance for putting up this video by Neil Oliver, from Britain, about our need for fellowship with people of like mind.  One of Big Brother's most insidious weapons against us is to force us into isolation, so that we feel helpless and alone.  Mr. Oliver points out that to resist this tactic, we have to reach out and engage one another, to nullify it by active resistance.

I strongly urge you to watch the video if you can.  If you'd rather read a transcript, I've included one below, with grateful thanks to the The Conservative Woman Web site in the UK for providing it.




Here's the transcript.


People are talking to me about the months ahead and the winter to come. Many fear a winter of discontent.

They dread the dark and what the dark might hold. The troubles of recent weeks have been hard enough, they say, while the sun has shone and it has been easy to be outside.

How will it be when the days are short and the nights are long? I say the autumn and the winter ahead will be what we choose to make them. It will be a test of who we are as people.

I say that in the most important ways, the winter should be the making of us. We are divided now. It is no longer just about physical divisions. Opinions have hardened to the extent that we cannot talk to each other.

These divisions run through families, between friends and neighbours. Such are the differences of opinion it has become easier to avoid people altogether. I say this has been no accident. Our leaders have done their utmost to drive wedges between us.

Apart from a few weeks at the beginning of it all, I say keeping us apart had nothing to do with health and everything to do with keeping us demoralised, fearful and helpless. When pressed they will say it was for our own good. I say it was a bad thing to do, that has had only bad results. I don’t believe the pubs and restaurants and the rest of the places folk meet to talk were ever a threat to health.

People who come together, might stay together. A stick on its own is easily broken, but a bundle of sticks is unbreakable. When we are physically together we communicate in ways that are impossible through a computer screen. We were stopped from gathering and so the glue holding communities together has flaked away.

Too many have been made strangers to each other, even enemies. Our leaders and their advisers are, I say, devoid of empathy – that ability to feel what others feel. Either that or they do not care what hurt they have caused, which is even worse. It’s time for faith leaders – more of them, at least, to speak up for the lonely and excluded.

Places of worship have a sacred obligation to open their arms. What is a church without a congregation after all – just an empty building. I say it is up to us now to come together – in every way we can – and remind ourselves and each other that there is no need to feel powerless, helpless. Each of us must find at least one other of like mind.

To begin with that one other might be enough. The important thing is to meet and to share, face to face. I will not abide by any more lockdown. I am not talking about militant action. My resistance will be peaceful and quiet.

Of all that has happened since last March, lockdown has hurt us most of all. Most people are in a worse place now than before – either in terms of their physical health, mental health, financial situation, relationships with family and friends, or a combination of all. Of all the ways, the enforced separation – the bar on being together with our fellow human beings has done most harm.

Too many people have been isolated. At home I have a basket filled with letters, more every day, from people who have had no one to talk to, to share thoughts with. I am glad they have written to me but it breaks my heart to know so many have found it best to send a letter to a face on the telly.

Having said that, I feel that every sender of every one of those letters is a friend of mine now, a kindred spirit. But that so much misery and anxiety has been heaped upon so many people, and for so long, is shameful.

The loneliness drips from the pages. I honestly can’t believe it has happened – that anyone, anywhere can look at our situation and think it’s been for the best. When it comes to vaccine passports I am way ahead of them.

By that I mean the introduction of vaccine passports, in my homeland of Scotland, will not exclude me from anywhere I want to be. I say that anywhere demanding such an abomination from any citizen is nowhere I would enjoy being anyway. If it comes to it, I would rather be outside in the open air. Let the wind blow and the rain fall, I don’t care. I would rather be out in the world, with others of like mind, than in any place demanding ‘Papers, please!’

I would no more seek access to a place demanding my papers than I would attend a dog fight. Those are not my kind of places. Venues and businesses that exclude – willingly or not and on account of government diktat, will fail. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon they will fail.

I have loved pubs, restaurants, theatres and the like – and when the atmosphere is right I will love them again. But this winter if they are closing their doors on those deemed unclean … then I will be elsewhere.

If I am at home, my door will not be barred. It will be open to my friends. Home is, anyway, my best place. Sometimes I will be in the homes of friends. In any event I will share space with those I love. We will share food and drink and bask in the warmth of fires and stoves.

We will talk about what is important. Our society grew out of such simple togetherness in the first place, thousands of years ago, and it will grow again from the same seed bed. I am not afraid – not of winter, not of long, dark nights.

The cure to all of our ills is togetherness, inclusion and not exclusion. I say it is simple and that we must find ways to be together. However scattered and isolated we may have been made to feel, we are many. We are enough.


If vaccine "passports" are imposed upon us, and businesses begin to discriminate between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, I strongly suggest that we all take Mr. Oliver's warning to heart.  Let's ignore and blacklist businesses and establishments that discriminate in that way, and patronize those that don't.  Let's support places that bring us together, and boycott those that would prefer to divide us.

Also, in our personal relationships, let's reach out to those of like mind, those who defend and support freedom, rather than those who would bend the knee to Big Brother and his ilk.  The old Dutch Republic motto, "Eendracht maakt macht" ("Unity Makes Strength"), is more than just an idiom.  It's a way of life.

Peter


That's an unfortunate misprint . . . or is it?

 

I happened to come across the listing for a Buck Knives 108 Compadre Froe on Amazon.com a day or two ago.  (A "froe", for those who don't know the term, is "a tool for cleaving wood by splitting it along the grain".)



In the item description, this sentence appears:



"Perfect for clearing, heavy chopping, splitting and atoning."  Obviously, the last word is meant to be "batoning", but someone left off the "b".

At first I laughed at the mis-spelling.  After all, as a retired pastor, I could appreciate the irony.  However, I was brought up short by a thought.  If we saw someone threatening to cleave us with a tool like that, might it not be a very positive incentive to atoning for our sins?

Hey, maybe that's not a misprint after all!  Perhaps we should add one or two of those to the thurible, aspergillum and aspersorium traditionally used in repentance services.



Peter


The "Great Replacement" is in full swing. Only we can stop it.

 

I can only thank God, quite literally and sincerely, that a man like Tucker Carlson exists, and is unafraid to speak the truth about the carnage and chaos being sown in this country at the present time.  Fox News, too, is to be commended for allowing him a platform to do so.

The pressure on him, and on Fox News, from the progressive left is unrelenting, savage and vicious.  For his latest comments on the border crisis, he's being accused of racism, white supremacist views, and a host of other politically-incorrect "evils".  He's not guilty of any of them, of course - he's merely describing what's actually going on, and when challenged, he can produce evidence for what he says.

Here's his view of the border crisis.  If you'd rather not watch the video, I've included a transcript of some of the main points below it.



Here's part of the transcript from Fox News.


Biden explained the entire point of mass immigration back in 2015, when he was Vice President:

JOE BIDEN: An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me who are Caucasian, of European descent, for the first time in 2017 we'll be an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing. That’s a source of our strength.

"An unrelenting stream of immigration." Why? Joe Biden said it. To change the racial mix of the country. That’s the reason. To reduce the political power of people whose ancestors lived here, and dramatically increase the proportion of Americans newly arrived from the third world. And then Biden went further and said that non-white DNA is the source of our strength. Imagine saying that. This is the language of eugenics. It’s horrifying. But there’s a reason Biden said it. In political terms, this policy is sometimes called the great replacement — the replacement of legacy Americans, with more obedient people from faraway countries.

. . .

The Haitians now in Texas aren’t trying to escape violence in their own country. They haven’t been in Haiti in years. They’ve been living in South America. Many even had refugee status in South America, in countries like Chile and Brazil. But that wasn’t good enough. They waited until Joe Biden became president and came here, for the free health care and housing Biden promised them. So now they’ve arrived. Why wouldn’t they? You would. Who wouldn’t?

. . .

We don’t have to put up with this, we could solve it in a day. The administration could send these people back immediately. Haitians aren’t bad people, a lot of them are great people. But we have no obligation to let them into our country. American citizens owe no debt to Haiti. Haiti was never an American colony. It’s been an independent country for more than 200 years, since 1804. For much of that time, we’ve sent Haiti a whole lot of aid. So however sad and dysfunctional Haiti might be, it’s not our fault. That’s for sure. Yet Joe Biden is now punishing Border Patrol officers who tried to enforce the law, who dared to deter Haitians from entering this country illegally. They had reins, not whips, reins. But it doesn’t matter to the Biden administration. The officers' real crime was trying to do their job, to stop illegal migration into this country. They have now been suspended and likely will be fired. Can you imagine punishing law enforcement for enforcing the law? This is insane. Why do American citizens have a duty to follow the law at this point? That’s an honest question. People are going to start asking this question.


There's more at the link.

I note three things about the mass of illegal aliens the Biden administration is welcoming into our midst.

  1. They're poor, indigent, penniless.  They aren't coming here with the resources to support themselves.  They're also coming into an economy crying out for workers, but they don't have the skills needed for most of those jobs.  In other words, they're going to become burdens on the public purse before long, whether that's legal or not.  The Federation for American Immigration Reform points out:  "In 2017, the total cost of illegal immigration for the United States – at the federal, state, and local levels – was approximately $116 billion ... Evidence shows that the tax payments made by illegal aliens fail to cover the costs of the many services they consume ... FAIR maintains that every concerned American citizen should be asking our government why, in a time of increasing costs and shrinking resources, is it spending such large amounts of money on individuals who have no right, nor authorization, to be in the United States?"
  2. Every job taken by an illegal alien is a job that won't be filled by a legal US citizen or resident.  That means the "legal" will remain a burden on state funding in terms of welfare, food stamps and other entitlement programs, rather than earning his or her own living and making his or her own way in society.  It's perpetuating the "welfare state".  In the process, of course, it gives more power to the welfare state, because more and more people grow dependent on such support;  and the political party that promises more and greater welfare benefits can count on greater electoral support.  In this case, the Biden administration is ensuring that the Democratic Party will stand to benefit from the current influx.
  3. This influx is storing up immense problems for future administrations.  We already have at least 10-12 million illegal aliens in this country;  some estimate their number to be up to double that figure.  Now we're admitting so many illegals across our southern border that officials aren't even bothering to count them all.  We'll probably see at least 2 million more arrive during 2021, and at least the same again next year.  Sooner or later, the question of their future must be dealt with.  There will be only two answers:  kick them out, or offer them a pathway to permanent residence and, possibly, citizenship.  I don't believe either the Republican or the Democratic party has the guts to choose the hard option.  They'd rather pander to these future voters and give in to them - but, as Tucker Carlson points out, that way lies disaster for this country.  If we get another President with the will to act against illegal aliens and expel them, he'll face immense opposition, not just from political influences, but from the millions who'll riot on our streets rather than be sent back to the poverty and squalor from which they fled.

Essentially, if something isn't done very soon to stop this influx, it'll change America's demographics, and America's future, so greatly that there'll be no turning back.  That, of course, is precisely the aim and the goal of the Biden administration.

The question is:  what are you and I going to do about it?  If we do nothing, we're going to be swamped.  If we act, we're going to be regarded as criminals by the powers that be, and pursued, arrested and prosecuted in any and every way they can.  We're between a rock and a hard place.

Our Founding Fathers found themselves between a rock and a hard place, too.  They found a solution, and they made it work, no matter what the cost to themselves.


“Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”

― Patrick Henry


Will we have the courage to do the same?


“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”

― Samuel Adams


There are many things we can do to "throw a spanner in the works" of Big Brother.  They aren't necessarily related to illegal immigration at all:  but if you gum up many small parts of the machine, sooner or later the machine as a whole can't function any longer.  Others have already offered suggestions.  It's up to each and every one of us to consider them, read more widely, "think outside the box", and follow President Theodore Roosevelt's advice:


"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."


That advice has been a lodestone for me for many decades.  It's as true today as it was when he first said it.  Just as small teams of Americans are today providing a lifeline for Afghans to escape the Taliban, after our government screwed up that job so badly, so small teams of Americans can obstruct, filibuster, disrupt and frustrate the operations of Big Brother and its minions.  What's more, if you do it right, you won't even be breaking the law!

Resistance starts with you and I.

Peter


Thursday, September 23, 2021

OK, here's your soppy feel-good moment of the day!

 

I couldn't resist this.  I like kids and cats both, so how could I?




All together, now:  AAAAWWWW!



Peter


COVID and the world balance of power - an unholy relationship?

 

Two separate threads came together in my mind yesterday when reading an interesting article at Unz.  It's titled "Eurasia Takes Shape: How the SCO Just Flipped the World Order".  Here's how it opens.  Bold, underlined text is my emphasis.


The two defining moments of the historic 20th anniversary Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Dushanbe, Tajikistan had to come from the keynote speeches of – who else – the leaders of the Russia-China strategic partnership.

Xi Jinping: “Today we will launch procedures to admit Iran as a full member of the SCO.”

Vladimir Putin: “I would like to highlight the Memorandum of Understanding that was signed today between the SCO Secretariat and the Eurasian Economic Commission. It is clearly designed to further Russia’s idea of establishing a Greater Eurasia Partnership covering the SCO, the EAEU (Eurasian Economic Union), ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) and China’s Belt and Road initiative (BRI).”

In short, over the weekend, Iran was enshrined in its rightful, prime Eurasian role, and all Eurasian integration paths converged toward a new global geopolitical – and geoeconomic – paradigm, with a sonic boom bound to echo for the rest of the century.

That was the killer one-two punch immediately following the Atlantic alliance’s ignominious imperial retreat from Afghanistan. Right as the Taliban took control of Kabul on August 15, the redoubtable Nikolai Patrushev, secretary of Russia’s Security Council, told his Iranian colleague Admiral Ali Shamkhani that “the Islamic Republic will become a full member of the SCO.”

Dushanbe revealed itself as the ultimate diplomatic crossover. President Xi firmly rejected any “condescending lecturing” and emphasized development paths and governance models compatible with national conditions. Just like Putin, he stressed the complementary focus of BRI and the EAEU, and in fact summarized a true multilateralist Manifesto for the Global South.

Right on point, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev of Kazakhstan noted that the SCO should advance “the development of a regional macro-economy.” This is reflected in the SCO’s drive to start using local currencies for trade, bypassing the US dollar.


There's much more at the link.  It's worth reading in full.

This has been building for a long time, driven by Russian and Chinese interests in diminishing the international role of the United States and taking its place as dominant powers in Asia and Eastern Europe.  Now that the USA is riven by internal dissent, governed by an administration that took office through electoral fraud and is utterly incompetent to do its job, and shadow-governed by oligarchs and internationalists who are determined to destroy America's history and reduce it to the same miserable state as the rest of the First World . . . it looks like Russia and China are moving openly and rapidly to cement their positions, and shut out US interests for the foreseeable future.  Everything the USA has tried to achieve - shutting Iran out of the international community, preventing a Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, controlling rising Third World powers and keeping them under American rather than other influence - has now been, or is in the process of being, nullified.

One can't blame them, of course.  There's an old saying in physics, dating back to Aristotle, that "Nature abhors a vacuum".  It means that a vacuum - the absence of anything, to put it simplistically - is not found in nature, because something always moves in to fill the void.  The same principle has long been applied to politics and geopolitics.  Throughout human history, when one power loses influence, another power steps up to take its place - or take it away and cling to it until an even stronger power comes along.

In recent centuries, the influence of the British Empire of the 19th century was supplanted by the influence of the American Empire in the 20th.  That, too, is now waning, and Russia and China are determined to take its place in Afghanistan, and also in as much of the rest of the world as they can manage - particularly if they can do it quickly, before a more competent, capable administration takes over here.  (That assumes it can or will happen, of course.  With our democratic elections undermined, perhaps fatally, by electoral fraud, that may no longer be possible by peaceful means.)  Once presented with a fait accompli, they hope America will find it too troublesome to resist - not to mention being too distracted with internal divisions to be able to give the problem the attention it deserves.

However, the Unz article raises another specter - that the whole COVID-19 crisis may have been engineered by international forces, and by their allies in the US establishment, to facilitate this change of power.  A couple of weeks ago, Vox Day highlighted an August article by Fabio Vighi titled "A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy:  Systemic Collapse and Pandemic Simulation".  It's profoundly disturbing in its implications.  Briefly, the author argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was deliberately engineered to allow the powers that be to use it as cover to finagle their way out of the economic dead-end to which they'd condemned the economies of the First World.  Here's an excerpt.


Joining the dots is a simple enough exercise. If we do so, we might see a well-defined narrative outline emerge, whose succinct summary reads as follows: lockdowns and the global suspension of economic transactions were intended to:

1) Allow the Fed to flood the ailing financial markets with freshly printed money while deferring hyperinflation; and

2) Introduce mass vaccination programmes and health passports as pillars of a neo-feudal regime of capitalist accumulation.

As we shall see, the two aims merge into one.

In 2019, world economy was plagued by the same sickness that had caused the 2008 credit crunch. It was suffocating under an unsustainable mountain of debt. Many public companies could not generate enough profit to cover interest payments on their own debts and were staying afloat only by taking on new loans. ‘Zombie companies’ (with year-on-year low profitability, falling turnover, squeezed margins, limited cashflow, and highly leveraged balance sheet) were rising everywhere. The repo market meltdown of September 2019 must be placed within this fragile economic context.

When the air is saturated with flammable materials, any spark can cause the explosion. And in the magical world of finance, tout se tient: one flap of a butterfly’s wings in a certain sector can send the whole house of cards tumbling down. In financial markets powered by cheap loans, any increase in interest rates is potentially cataclysmic for banks, hedge funds, pension funds and the entire government bond market, because the cost of borrowing increases and liquidity dries up. This is what happened with the ‘repocalypse’ of September 2019: interest rates spiked to 10.5% in a matter of hours, panic broke out affecting futures, options, currencies, and other markets where traders bet by borrowing from repos. The only way to defuse the contagion was by throwing as much liquidity as necessary into the system – like helicopters dropping thousands of gallons of water on a wildfire. Between September 2019 and March 2020, the Fed injected more than $9 trillion into the banking system, equivalent to more than 40% of US GDP.

The mainstream narrative should therefore be reversed: the stock market did not collapse (in March 2020) because lockdowns had to be imposed; rather, lockdowns had to be imposed because financial markets were collapsing. With lockdowns came the suspension of business transactions, which drained the demand for credit and stopped the contagion. In other words, restructuring the financial architecture through extraordinary monetary policy was contingent on the economy’s engine being turned off. Had the enormous mass of liquidity pumped into the financial sector reached transactions on the ground, a monetary tsunami with catastrophic consequences would have been unleashed.

As claimed by economist Ellen Brown, it was “another bailout”, but this time “under cover of a virus.” Similarly, John Titus and Catherine Austin Fitts noted that the Covid-19 “magic wand” allowed the Fed to execute BlackRock’s “going direct” plan, literally: it carried out an unprecedented purchase of government bonds, while, on an infinitesimally smaller scale, also issuing government backed ‘COVID loans’ to businesses. In brief, only an induced economic coma would provide the Fed with the room to defuse the time-bomb ticking away in the financial sector. Screened by mass-hysteria, the US central bank plugged the holes in the interbank lending market, dodging hyperinflation as well as the ‘Financial Stability Oversight Council’ (the federal agency for monitoring financial risk created after the 2008 collapse), as discussed here. However, the “going direct” blueprint should also be framed as a desperate measure, for it can only prolong the agony of a global economy increasingly hostage to money printing and the artificial inflation of financial assets.

At the heart of our predicament lies an insurmountable structural impasse. Debt-leveraged financialization is contemporary capitalism’s only line of flight, the inevitable forward-escape route for a reproductive model that has reached its historical limit.


Again, more at the link.  I'm very grateful to Vox for linking to the article;  without that, I might have missed it.  I think it's going to become a seminal analysis of the whole COVID-19 episode that informs future scholars for decades, perhaps generations.  Highly recommended reading.

If you put those two articles together - the replacement of US influence with Russian and Chinese leadership in Eastern Europe and Asia, and the use of the COVID-19 pandemic to manipulate economic problems in the First World and postpone what would otherwise have been inevitable collapse - they take on new depth and meaning.  I postulate the following:

  1. First World governments and the powers/oligarchs/whatever behind them (in North America and Europe) are facing, and know they are facing, an economic impasse that cannot continue.  There is no way the old economic models of tax-and-spend, borrow-and-deficit-spend, financialization of debt, etc. can continue, except in the fevered imagination of progressive far-left ideologues.  They've led to ever-increasing deficits and an economic strait-jacket that now cripples the administration of most First World economies.  This not only hampers effective government, it forces First World governments to concentrate on their internal problems and give less attention to the international spheres of influence they previously dominated.
  2. Russia and China are not blind to this.  They've both been through economic and political hard times, one through the collapse of the Soviet Union, the other through the "Great Leap Forward" and the decades of economic ruin it fostered.  Both nations have clawed their way out of the mire, and are forging ahead based on their own interests, rather than those of the rest of the First World.  China is now the economic engine of the world, without question;  and Russia, although very much playing second fiddle to China in that sense, retains a strategic perspective and international influence that China can't (yet) do without.  It's in China's interests to promote Russia's interests, and vice versa, so that both nations have a trustworthy ally in each other.  (Needless to say, neither of them regards the USA or Europe in that light.)
  3. Russia and China will therefore take advantage of the internal preoccupations of Europe and North America to take control of as many economic and natural resources as they can, using diplomatic means, economic pressure, and any other tools that come to hand to do so.  They calculate that by the time the "Old World" comes to its senses and sorts out its internal woes (if, indeed, it's capable of doing so at all), they will dominate the rest of the world, have a "lock" on its resources, and be able to dictate terms to the newly beggared economies of their former rivals.  Frankly, it's hard to see how they're wrong.
There are many signs pointing to what's going on, dating back over many years.  For a start, I encourage economics buffs to examine the enormous purchases of gold made by Russia and China in recent decades, boosting their reserves of the precious metal to unprecedented highs (and, not coincidentally, soaking up almost all available supplies, so that the rest of the world is finding it very hard to get its hands on the metal).  If they plan to destabilize the dollar as the world's reserve currency, they know they'll need an alternative store of wealth - and now they have one.  At the same time, they're trying to reduce their holdings of US dollars (still the world's reserve currency, but of diminishing importance), and trying to position their own currencies to take over the dollar's place in international commerce.  (I'll be very surprised if the Chinese renmimbi doesn't do that within the next decade.  By now, it's probably inevitable, given the wholesale expansion of the US money supply by reckless, feckless Federal Reserve money-printing.)

I think it's clear that the USA and Britain, at least, understand what's going on.  They can't stop it, but they're turning to other nations threatened by it in an attempt to cement relations with them, and build up some sort of counter-weight.  Consider their recent so-called AUKUS partnership with Australia - forging a diplomatic and military alliance to offset the growth of a rival's power base, even at the expense of causing a rift with an older, long-term ally.  If they move fast, the three nations can offer important short-term economic and military assistance to each other.

I think these two articles, taken together, offer no comfort whatsoever to the USA or the European Union.  Those of us with an eye to the future should read them both very carefully, and more than once;  think about them;  and consider our personal exposure to whatever risks may flow from them and the events they predict.  We won't be able to stop what's coming, but we can at least try to protect ourselves and our families from the worst effects by choosing jobs and careers, educations, areas to live, etc. that won't be crippled by such developments.

What's more, we'd better be prepared to defend what we've got against the mass of people who are going to be left stranded when the structures and support on which they currently rely are no longer there.  That applies to nations, and communities, and individuals.

Peter


Rum infused with the world's hottest pepper. What could possibly go wrong?

 

The Hot Dang Show is a Web site and YouTube channel dedicated to all things hot and spicy - particularly those requiring a modicum of insanity to try.  (Side note:  the host is deaf and suffers from a speech impediment, so he sounds "different", but is still understandable.)

Recently, the host decided to try something new:  "overproof rum infused for three months with Carolina Reapers".  It's called "The World's Hottest Shot", and comes with a warning:  "Do not consume if you have heart, respiratory or digestive conditions or any other serious illness".

If the video below is to be believed, I'd say it lives up to its name and the warning!  The action begins at about the four-minute mark, if you want to skip the introduction.




Note to self:  never, ever buy that stuff except as a gift for enemies, and those whom you want to become your enemies!



Peter


Wednesday, September 22, 2021

"A Hinge Moment of History"

 

That's the title of a long, insightful article by Mark Steyn, a transcript of an address he delivered to the Gatestone Institute earlier this year.  I think it's one of the best-structured and best-argued articles by him I've ever read, and I plan to re-read it more than once.  It's right up there with the best of the late Prof. Andrew Codevilla, whose loss we acknowledged with sadness earlier this morning.

Here are a number of the introductory bullet points from Mr. Steyn's address, plus a few selected paragraphs.


  • I have lived in countries that have real domestic terrorism movements.... No country blessed enough not to have a domestic terrorism movement should be inventing one.
  • We are living in a blizzard of lies.
  • [W]e are more dependent on a handful of woke billionaires to tell us what reality is. They are far more open than ever that they get to determine what are the agreed facts. Google made an explicit announcement about this recently. They said that sometimes they would put warnings on things that are factually accurate because, even though they are true, they do not think it is in society's interest for people to be seeing it.
  • [N]ow you will be banned or deleted or blocked or silenced simply for disagreeing with the official version of events. For example, the Great Barrington declaration, which was written by three of the most prominent epidemiologists in the world from Harvard, Oxford, and I think it was Stanford. That was basically deleted from YouTube, banned from Facebook, simply because it contradicted the WHO, CDC official version of events.
  • It is just groupthink enforced by a cabal of woke billionaires, who have more power than anyone else on the planet.
  • The other thing that emerged during this year very quickly is that we are at a hinge moment of history. We were told a generation or two back that, by doing trade with China, China would become more like us. Instead, on issues such as free speech, we are becoming more like China.
  • American companies are afraid of offending China. American officials are afraid of offending China. We are adopting Chinese norms on issues such as free speech and basic disagreements with the government of China.
  • We're living in the early stages of a future that is the direct consequence of poor public policy over the last couple of generations. We are not even aware of that...
  • Right now, we are witnessing a non‑stop continuous transfer of power to a country that is serious about using that power. This is China's moment. Take it as someone who grew up, in large part, in a great power in decline. There's no real explicit handover day. People, in hindsight, expect to pinpoint the day that the baton was passed.... My great worry is that actually, the transfer to China has already happened. The baton has already been passed. We just haven't formally acknowledged that yet.
  • I'll say it straight out loud. I do not think that Joe Biden "won the election." I don't think it is a question of "widespread fraud." I think the way the system works with the Electoral College, you only need actually to spread fraud in six key cities in six key states.
  • If you have no basic election integrity, essentially, all the other issues are irrelevant.
  • At some point, if we're not prepared to stand up... My whole thing, in all the years, is that Western civilization is sliding off a cliff and most citizens of most Western nations are not even aware of it.
  • There is a moral component that we are overlooking. We live in an insane world where moral narcissism attaches to whether or not you rampage around some statue of a Confederate general who died 150 years ago. The fact that you're rampaging around the Confederate general while wearing shoes made by child labor somehow does not impact on your moral virtue at all.

Lord Moulton said that what matters in any healthy society are not the small number of things that one is obliged to do, or, at the other end of the spectrum, the small number of things that one is not permitted to do, but the big chunk in the middle. It is not a question of whether you have to do it, or you are forbidden to do it, but whether we decide for ourselves about those aspects of our lives through what he called the realm of manners. By his estimation, about 80 percent of life should be within the realm of manners rather than within the realm of law.

Now everything is law: How far you have to stand away from people. The realm of manners, in Lord Moulton's phrase -- choice -- has shrunk to nothing.

Everything now, is regulated by the state from above. We are now seeing, for example, influential voices. "The Guardian" newspaper in the UK for example, said the other day that whatever happens to the pandemic, and the COVID, and all the rest of us, they would like us to go into lockdown once every two years. It would supposedly be good for climate change. You do not see this in America, but you quite a lot on overseas news reports. BBC, in the early days of the pandemic was doing all these encouraging reports on how Ireland where it is illegal for you to go more than three miles from your home.

On how Ireland had, fantastically -- and this is really terrific news – they have managed to lower their carbon footprint simply by confining people to their homes and a three‑mile radius. The idea that this is the new normal is deeply disturbing.

At the same time, we have had a serious crackdown on free speech, particularly in America during election year, and culminating on January 20th by the convergence of the Big State and Big Tech.


There's much more at the link.  Recommended reading.

One of the greatest tragedies of the breakdown in the American educational system is that our young people are no longer taught how to think, but rather what to think.  If you ask the average young person today to analyze Mr. Steyn's article, or the article by Prof. Codevilla that we cited earlier this morning, they might mumble and mutter, but they'd find themselves hard-pressed to summarize their main points simply and concisely.  Their analytical abilities have been deliberately suppressed, it seems to me - which may be the entire goal of the progressive-left-dominated educational system in this country.  If future voters don't know how to evaluate the electoral pablum they're being spoon-fed, how will they know whether to support it or not?  Instead, they'll follow the propaganda with which the mainstream news and social media are bombarding them.  It's easier to do that, than to think for themselves.

I suspect the only way we can combat this insidious destruction from within of our society is to try to educate and inform our own young people, and those we meet, to think for themselves.  Discussing worthwhile articles like this one is a good start.

(By the way, having shared a number of experiences similar to Mr. Steyn's, I can confirm from personal experience that many of his comments are entirely correct.  For example, he says "No country blessed enough not to have a domestic terrorism movement should be inventing one".  I couldn't agree more!  Having lived for eighteen years, in uniform and out of uniform, in a terrorism-plagued, civil-unrest-torn society, and seen its worst excesses "up close and personal", allow me to assure you:  we do not, at this time, have a domestic terrorist movement in the United States worthy of the name.  If that ever changes, you'll know about it without needing to be told.  Trust me on this.)

Peter


Why do Amazon's prices change, depending on whether one's logged in or not?

 

I'm finding, more and more often, that when I look up products on Amazon.com, the price advertised will depend on whether or not I'm logged in to the site.  Just yesterday, for example, I looked up a cleaning product, a 10-pack of Chore Boy scourers.  The exact URL used in both cases was this:


https://www.amazon.com/Chore-Boy-Cer-Scouring-Pack/dp/B007VGICGK


When I was not logged in, and using the Brave browser, this is what was returned (clickit to biggit):



When I was logged in, using the Chrome browser but the identical URL, I got a different price:



I contacted Amazon's customer support chat, and asked the lady who responded why I was getting a different price like that.  She could not answer my question, and asked me to submit screenshots of the differences to the customer service department.  I've done so, but haven't yet had any response.

Even more intriguing, when I went to the same URL this morning, one of the prices were different.  "Not logged in" still showed a price of $10.25, but "logged in" showed $11.50.

That's not the only product where I've observed such differences in pricing, depending on whether or not I'm logged in to Amazon's Web site.  Are they assuming that loyal customers can safely be charged more, because we won't actually compare prices?  Are they trying to attract what their algorithm might consider "new" (or at least not-logged-in) customers with lower prices, only to spring a switcheroo on them when they do log in?

Can anyone suggest what's going on with Amazon's pricing algorithm?  Something ain't right, for sure!  If you've noticed anything similar, please let us know about it in Comments, giving the specific product URL if possible.  It'll be interesting to find out how widespread this problem is becoming.

Peter


America has lost one of its most incisive, insightful voices

 

Professor Angelo Codevilla, whom we've met in these pages many times before, has died of injuries he suffered from a vehicle accident.  He was apparently knocked down by a drunk driver.

It may be a measure of the cynicism and suspicion that dominate American politics today that not a few people - including myself - upon hearing the news, instantly harbored dark suspicions that the "establishment", the "ruling class" as he famously dubbed them, had finally had enough of him, and had taken steps to get rid of what they doubtless regarded as his pernicious influence.  That's probably not true (at least, I sincerely hope so) . . . but if anyone did more to expose the malicious, malignant influence of the current powers that be and the oligarchy behind them, I don't know who that might be.

Prof. Codevilla's voice will continue to resound long after his death.  You'll find a fairly comprehensive list of his important essays and articles here.  I very highly recommend that you bookmark it, visit it often, and select - at random, if you prefer - one of his articles to read and ponder.  He's that important a chronicler of our decline and fall as a nation, and offers insights and potential "cures" that few others could match in his lifetime.  A good overview of his thought may be found in this interview, which I recommend to your attention.

As a way to honor this great man, here are excerpts from, and the conclusion to, his most recent article, " Epitaph for the ‘War on Terror’ ", published just six days ago.  I think it's as powerful as any of those that preceded it.  Bold, underlined text is my emphasis.


Progressive thought had always looked away from the reality of war as the midwife of nations and the gravedigger of decadences. Kissinger wrote that America should only fight “wars that it could afford to lose”—as if there were such things. Thus it blurred distinctions between war and peace. Intellectually crippled in this way, U.S. military forces therefore have not aimed for victory.

Instead and because of this, military operations have been planned and executed on the basis of what will fulfill our foreign policy establishment’s personal and institutional interests, as well as its evolving ideological criteria. Contact with reality, having produced results very different from those the ruling class envisions, that class explains defeat in terms of its most fundamental animosities—toward its domestic competitors.

. . .

Treating the American people, especially conservatives, as the main threat results from the growth and clarification of attitudes endemic to Progressivism and already translated into policy and lack thereof ... America’s defeat by foreigners does not threaten these progressives’ prerogatives and identities as do their domestic rivals. 

Blaming domestic rivals to deflect defeat’s consequences in foreign wars is all too usual. Nevertheless, statements by Joe Biden’s Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin and Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley that “domestic extremists,” whom they functionally define as whomever opposes the ruling class, pose the greatest danger of terrorism—especially if they are white—is egregious in history. The official reorientation of the U.S. armed forces’ focus on fighting what is arguably the American people’s majority, is even more so. A grassroots progressive group called the Democratic Coalition leaves no doubt about the ruling class’s 2021 practical agenda: “we cannot rest until all of Trump’s traitorous, insurrectionist foot soldiers face justice.” Insofar as they are serious, and even if they are not, this augurs civil war.

. . .

Estimates of the “War on Terror’s” cost in money start at $8-10 trillion. Cui bono? To whom did that money go? Yes, millions, maybe even billions, went to rent the cooperation of Iraqis, Afghans, etc. But the trillions went chiefly to Americans—to the national security establishment; the armed forces and intelligence community, for enhanced careers and operations, and to their contractors; plus to the horde of civilian specialists employed to improve health, education, welfare, and social practices in foreign lands; our transportation network; and all manner of manufacturing and servicing. The consultant class also took it to the bank, and the people who run the conferences.

Think of all the reputations, careers, retirements on the golf course, second homes, fancy cars and vacations all this made possible. 

Think also of how fast and far the “War on Terror” advanced the ruling class’ perennial objective to limit the freedoms of Americans outside its orbit, and perhaps shut down domestic opposition.

When leftist Americans (alumni of Americans for a Democratic Society, a covert CIA subsidiary) hijacked airliners to Cuba, the ruling class would not hear of ending the problem by forcing Castro to give them up. Instead, they made it a crime for ordinary air travelers to defend themselves. After 9/11, the Department of Homeland Security set about establishing a new way of life in America, based on badges and regulations about what clearance would be needed to go where. The ruling class cares nothing of their effect (or, overwhelmingly, the lack thereof) on terrorism, just as it does not care what effect its shifting, contradictory mandates concerning COVID have on public health. And it does not even try to explain how adding minuscule amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere adversely affects the planet’s climate. No. The ruling class takes any and all occasions to advance its overriding objective in its own domination.

Terrorism, however, is especially useful. The premise that since we cannot know who is most likely to pose threats, that hence we must refrain from focusing on (profiling) Muslims and assume that the folks next door are as capable of mayhem as anyone shouting Allahu Akbar, has done much to make America what it is today. Especially because it is an in-your-face lie. The lie serves to free the ruling class to absolve or indict for terrorism whomever it chooses.

Surprise, surprise! Turns out that not everyone is as likely a source of terrorism as anyone else. The real, congenital, terrorists are conservative white folks. U.S intelligence properly profiles them to prevent the worst of them from taking part in society. And if anyone suggests that this relates to the fact that these white folks don’t vote for the Democratic Party, the Wall Street Journal tells us that the U.S. justice system is fair and competent: “The privacy of Americans hasn’t been threatened, while the Patriot Act has provided the feds with tools to break up domestic terror cells.” You must believe that, or else!

That is why the New York Times formulated the “War on Terror’s” official epitaph: “A War on Terror Accounting Since 9/11. The fall of Kabul shouldn’t obscure the successes over 20 years. Experts say it is the success of a multilateral effort that extends to as many as 85 countries.”

Who are you to disagree, white man?


There's more at the link.

We are greatly diminished as a nation by Prof. Codevilla's loss.  May his surviving relatives receive what comfort they may in their loss;  may his sins be forgiven him;  and may his soul, through the mercy of God, rest in peace.  He will not be forgotten.



Peter