Friday, January 3, 2025

Fascinating!

 

It's a big momma!


Scientists from the Schmidt Ocean Institute studying deep-sea habitats off Chile recently came across a rare and mesmerising sight: A giant squid mother carrying its eggs.

Usually, squid species lay their eggs on the seafloor and leave them alone after they despatched them, but this species of squid – the black-eyed squid (Gonatus onyx) – carries and broods its eggs for several months and therefore is one of only two so far confirmed species that are known to take care off their offspring after spawning.

While releasing the video via social media, the Schmidt Ocean Institute said: “A female Gonatus onyx will carry her large egg mass for months, keeping it suspended from hooks on the squid’s arms. It is a dangerous time… brooding squid cannot move very quickly, and may be easy prey for deep-diving marine mammals.” 

“After laying the eggs she will go without feeding, and by the time they hatch, she will be close to death,” the Institute added.


There's more at the link.



Nature never ceases to amaze me with its infinite variety.  How many of those 3,000-odd eggs will grow to maturity?  Not many, I'd guess, otherwise we'd be overrun with giant squid.

Peter


About those underwater pipelines and cables in the Baltic...

 

I'm sure readers have been following the repetitive saga of ships' anchors dragging (accidentally, of course - yeah, right!) along the bottom of the Baltic Sea and cutting communications cables, fuel pipelines, etc.  In each case over the past couple of months, Russian and/or Chinese involvement has been alleged.

The governments in the region have been vehement in their condemnation of such "accidents", and casting suspicion upon Russia as the impetus behind them.

Remind me, please, o governments . . . whose gas pipelines under the Baltic were destroyed by sabotage just a couple of years ago, after the start of the Ukraine invasion?  They weren't in the war zone, but their destruction undoubtedly harmed Russia's economy (and will cost hundreds of millions of dollars to repair, if they are ever repaired).  Nobody has claimed responsibility, but it seems clear that the sabotage could not have been carried out without a lot of official eyes looking the other way (including in the USA, which might even have carried out the attack - nobody knows for sure).

As far as Russia is concerned, its pipelines were attacked first.  I reckon their perspective is "If you do it to us, why shouldn't we do it to you?"  Goose, gander, meet sauce.  That's a very hard perspective to counter, isn't it?  It's nothing more than the Golden Rule in operation.  "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Makes you think, doesn't it?

Peter


Bureaucrats and insurance - a marriage made in hell

 

California has published its new regulations governing property insurance in that state.  The devil is, as always, in the details.


The new rules, released Monday by the California Department of Insurance, allow providers to pass the cost of reinsurance on to policyholders. 

Reinsurance is effectively the insurance taken out by insurers. It transfers some of the risk so that no company has too much exposure to a potential catastrophe. 

The cost of reinsurance has boomed in recent years, due to the increased risk of natural disasters in the state. 

This, in part, is why insurers have been pulling out of the state, and regulators hope the reform will make the market more attractive to home insurers.

Earlier this year, State Farm gave the state an ultimatum - threatening to ax cover if it did not allow the insurer to raise home insurance rates for millions.

. . .

Doug Heller, director of insurance for the Consumer Federation of America, speculated that consumers could see price increases of 30 percent to 40 percent, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

. . .

To make up for the price rises imposed on customers, regulators have attached a condition to the reform. 

This is that insurance companies that pass on their reinsurance costs must also commit to writing more policies in wildfire-prone parts of the state, or pledge to maintain their presence there. 

. . .

Insurers will have to start increasing their coverage by 5 percent every two years until they hit the equivalent of 85 percent of their market share. 

That means if an insurer writes 20 out of every 100 state policies, they would need to write 17 in a high-risk area, Lara's office said.


There's more at the link.

How many people can afford premium increases of that magnitude?  And how much will premiums go up in future years?  This is just the start.  How many people will end up not being able to afford to insure their homes?  How many will be forced to sell them?  And, if existing owners can't afford to insure them, how will buyers - at California real estate prices, mind you - be able to afford to insure their new homes?

This might lead to a large-scale collapse of the entire housing market in many high-risk areas of California, because the combination of high prices and high insurance rates will make almost everything unaffordable.

Also, put those conditions together:

  • People in high-risk areas face the greatest premium increases, due to the risk factor.  They may pay 30-40% more this year than they did last year, with more increases to come.
  • Insurance companies must adjust their coverage until they issue 85% of their policies to people living in high-risk areas.
  • Those 85% of policies, given such drastic premium increases, are going to bring in billions upon billions of dollars to the insurance companies.
  • How much will they have to kick back to California's politicians and bureaucrats for the privilege of doing business there?

If you think there won't be kickbacks involved, there's this bridge in Brooklyn, NYC that I'd like to sell you.  Cheap at half the price!  Cash only, please, and in small bills.

From where I sit, this has corruption, cronyism and political correctness written all over it.  Am I too cynical?  Or am I a realist?  What say you, readers?  Please let us know in Comments.



Peter


Thursday, January 2, 2025

Africa strikes again...

 

One has to laugh at reports like this.


A drunken police officer in Zambia freed 13 suspects from custody so that they could go and celebrate the new year, officials say.

Detective inspector Titus Phiri was arrested after releasing the suspects from Leonard Cheelo police station in the capital, Lusaka, before running away himself.

The 13 detainees were accused of crimes such as assault, robbery and burglary.

They are all currently on the run and a manhunt has been launched to find them.


There's more at the link.

Officer Friendly really was friendly to them . . . and probably Officer Hungover within a few hours, particularly once his superiors noticed what he'd done.  I suspect those he released are a long way from Lusaka by now, and have no intention of going back!

Peter


Some very disturbing facts about the H1B program

 

Robert Sterling has done a deep dive into the facts and figures behind the H1B visa program.  He's compiled them into a detailed thread.  Here are a few excerpts.


Before I start, one note: All charts in this thread are for applications that were “certified” (in other words, approved for entry into the H-1B lottery). I filtered out applications the gov rejected.

All numbers here are therefore for visas employers actually and realistically attempted to obtain.

. . .

To start with, this program is MASSIVELY popular with employers. The program has a statutory limit of 85,000 visas per year, but employers routinely receive approval for more than 800k applications per year (868k, or 10x the limit, in 2024).

. . .

Contrary to what I expected, the average salary for an H-1B is relatively low—slightly under $120k this year.

. . .

Almost all the prominent job categories are tech-related. The two top categories, for software developer roles, are 1.1M over five years by themselves.

. . .

15 companies alone received approval for 20k+ applications each.

. . .

... these are ALL Indian companies that import H-1B tech workers en masse:

Cognizant (93k)
Infosys (61k)
Tata Consultancy Services (60k)
Wipro
Capgemini
HCL
Compunnel
Tech Mahindra
Mphasis

These aren’t American companies that needed international talent to fill critical roles. They’re foreign companies that appear to have been founded to place overseas tech workers into US companies as contractors.


There's much more at the link.  It lays bare the reality behind the brouhaha and argument currently going on.  Highly recommended reading.

It seems to me that President Trump can "solve" the H1B crisis by two very simple moves, almost as soon as he takes office:

  1. Limit the issuing of H1B visas to the statutorily authorized 85,000 per year.  That would cut off 90% of the problem, right there.
  2. Refuse to issue H1B visas to third-party or intermediary companies (i.e. agencies who hire those people, then farm them out to other corporations for a fee).  This would force such companies out of business in short order, and also end the exploitation whereby they hold deportation over the heads of "their" staff like a club.  "Be a good boy, and accept your lower salary while we take the rest as our fee - and if you don't, we'll cancel your visa and you'll be gone."  That's how such companies appear to work.

I look forward to seeing what he actually does about it.

Peter


Life imitates art (well, advertisements, anyway)

 

How many of you remember this German advertisement for Volkswagen's Polo?




Well, the terrorist who detonated an explosion in a Tesla Cybertruck outside the Trump Tower in Las Vegas yesterday clearly hadn't seen it - or, if he had, he didn't learn anything from it.




You'll note the comment from law enforcement in that last video clip.  The Cybertruck was strongly enough built to contain most of the blast, and vent it upward rather than outward, with the result that (as far as I know) not a single window in the building was broken and no bystanders were hurt.  That can't be said of the wannabe terrorist driver of the rented Cybertruck, who was apparently very comprehensively broken indeed - a consummation (or should that be conflagration?) devoutly to be wished.

Elon Musk should think about using that video clip in an advertisement for the Cybertruck.  It speaks very well of the vehicle's toughness.

Peter


Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Our job for 2025...

 

... is to start reversing all this.



It'll be a big job, but if we don't get stuck in it'll just get worse and worse, until it's impossible to get rid of the burden.  Here's hoping President Trump and his crew can at least make a start.

Armor up!

Peter


A New Year conundrum

 

Courtesy of XKCD (click the image for a larger view at the cartoon's Web page):



The mouseover text reads:

"Inside is a third box, labeled DO NOT OPEN UNLESS YOU ARE IN THE TIME ZONE WHERE YOU OPENED BOTH PREVIOUS BOXES".



Be that as it may, I wish a happy, holy and blessed New Year to all my readers.  Thank you for your support during the past year.  May all the peoples of our divided country learn to come together again, to work for a united and better future for us all.  (Hey - I can dream, can't I?)

Peter