Yesterday saw yet another example of a transgender individual going insane and trying to destroy everyone around him - taking them with him, so to speak.
Ten people including the shooter are dead after an assailant opened fire at a high school in western Canada in the town of Tumbler Ridge on Tuesday in one of the country's deadliest mass casualty events in recent history. Initial reports by local police and the Canadian media described the shooter as female.
However, the authorities reluctance to release the identity of the suspect was an immediate red flag. Their reports only indicated that the shooter was a female in a dress.
Independent journalists now say they have the identity of the alleged shooter, corroborated by family members: Jesse Strang, a 17-year-old biological male who started identifying as a "woman" in 2023, is reportedly the culprit behind the school massacre which left 10 dead and 25 wounded.
. . .
The tragedy represent yet more evidence that transgenderism is a dangerous mental health crisis. Multiple mass shootings (including school shootings) have been perpetrated by transgender suspects in recent years, and suspected Charlie Kirk shooter, Tyler Robinson, was living with his transgender boyfriend at the time of the shooting.
In almost every instance, the transgender status of the shooter has been covered up or dismissed by authorities and the establishment media.
There's more at the link.
One has to ask whether someone who suffers from gender dysphoria, particularly if they insist on living a transgender lifestyle should not be automatically classified as potentially dangerous. Not all of them are, of course; I've known three genuinely transgender individuals, all of whom have undergone permanent sex-change surgery and lived as their chosen gender for decades. However, they are the exceptions that prove the rule. I've met dozens, perhaps scores, of "pseudo" transgender people whose behavior, outlook, etc. demonstrate serious mental problems, to the point that some might better be labeled as bat**** crazy. Where does one draw the line? Is it possible to draw a line and say that, if someone crosses it in any measurable way, he or she is more or less dangerous to society?
Strang killed nine victims, including his mother and younger brother, and injured 25. The small, close-knit community where they lived will be haunted by the horror of his crimes for years to come. May the souls of the victims of yesterday's shooting receive mercy from God, and may those who mourn them receive what comfort they may. May the injured be blessed with healing, and may their families be given grace to help them recover. And, please God, may the rest of us learn from this and all too many other tragic examples, and do what we can to protect ourselves and our loved ones from transgender insanity and violence.
Peter
12 comments:
I would say "no." Because let's be real here, the percentage of Trans people who've gone off their rocker and started shooting is tiny. Even if you don't believe the probably politically motivated estimates of more than 2 million transgender/non-binary people in the US and think it's closer to 1 million or even 500k, a one in one hundred thousand occurrence rate is kind of small.
In my newspaper, the short article used "her" as the defining adjective four times. Never a mention of 'male' or 'him'.
Looks like Canada has experienced the real reason for banning many guns, though the country won't admit it. The sane folks don't kill people - the insane ones do. Too bad Canada is punishing the law-abiding gun owners instead of attacking the true problem, which is mental illness.
Flooding an XY body with XX hormones is about as successful as fueling your diesel truck with gasoline. One can expect excitement but not the good kind.
They are dangerous. All the unnatural hormones make them unstable and they also have a tendency to target schools - especially religious ones.
I can't properly site this statistics, but I haven't seen it challenged: they have a 40% suicide attempt rate. That alone should be a cause for some action.
Everyone pushing this should be liable for the deaths they cause.
Canada has laws about gun ownership that make this impossible. How well did those work out this time? Next step - ban more guns. Let the crazies run free.
The part of the medical industry that decided to pursue the basically unknown transitional methods of having someone with a mental aberration modify their body has created monsters. Whether they're made accountable for their experiments is to be seen, but they should be. I see malpractice insurance for those that practice those types of medical procedures becoming unaffordable, and the law suits allowing some attorneys to increase their income.
I didn't say that Canada wouldn't do something dumb instead of something sensible.
When the identified the shooter as a gun person, you knew the cover up was on.
Please rationalize to the rest of the group why such an alarmingly high percentage of mass shootings in the five years have at the hands of transgender people.
Now answer if these people were truly transgender, or victims of a predatory grooming system. Much of the alphabet movement is the result of of people with minor loneliness issues jumping on on a bandwagon to join a fad and failing to address the core issue - then refusing to face inevitable realities.
Don't forget Canada has some of the most prohibitive gun laws on the planet, and the major weapon employed in this tragedy had been deemed illegal to possess for over fifteen years.
TRANS is a mental issue. It is driven by Big Pharma and Big Med to make money. The Left that is pushing this have no real reason to do it but for money and to destroy the West Countries.
Please explain to me why I should be scared of all members of a group because members of that group are disproportionately represented in an extremely small group of wrongdoers.
Scared? No. Wary? Definitely. Armed and ready to defend myself? Absolutely.
Post a Comment