Thursday, October 6, 2011

Doofus Of The Day #530


Today's award goes to the person or persons responsible for designing the new bicycle lane system in Moscow, Russia. According to an e-mail from reader Vladimir S, it's a nightmare. He enclosed these pictures to illustrate his point.








Looks more like a death-trap for cyclists than a lane, if you ask me! Those drain covers in the last picture give me the willies. I can just see my bike's front wheel slotting neatly into one of them, and me going base over tip into the traffic!





Peter

"Fed up with lunch"


That's the title of a book by teacher Sarah Wu, who's documented a year of eating the lunches served to her pupils at school. USA Today reports:

In January of 2010, an elementary school teacher decided to eat school lunch every day for a year and write about it anonymously as Mrs. Q. on her blog, Fed Up With Lunch.

She secretly photographed the meals, ate them and then described the taste and texture of heavily processed chicken nuggets, an unusual peanut butter and jelly sandwich that made her sick, mystery meats and reheated vegetables. She developed a following of thousands of people.

This week she is revealing her identity for the first time — Sarah Wu, 34, a speech pathologist in the Chicago public schools — and releasing her new book, Fed Up With Lunch (Chronicle Books). "With the blog, I really wanted a public record of these meals that I couldn't believe were being served to kids," she says. "I thought the book would reach a wider audience."

It all started one day when Wu didn't have time to pack her own lunch and bought a school lunch instead. It was a hot dog encased in soggy dough, six tater tots, a Jell-O cup and chocolate milk, she says. "I thought to myself, 'I cannot believe this is the food the kids are eating'."


There's more at the link.

I've never had a school lunch in my life. When I was a schoolkid in South Africa, we were expected to bring our own lunches. Kids from poorer families seemed to have no trouble bringing them, just like kids from better-off families. I'm still not sure why so much money and effort are expended on US school lunches when the quality of the food - that I've seen when visiting schools as a pastor, and that reported by people like Ms. Wu - seems to be so very poor. Seems to me like throwing good money after bad, the same as much of our expenditure on a failing educational system . . . but I'm sure there will be those who disagree.

What say you, readers? Are school lunches a good thing, particularly when their quality seems to be so abysmally poor in so many school districts? Let's hear from you in Comments.

Peter

It's a small world, indeed!


Yes, it's that time of year again. The winners of the 2011 Nikon Small World Microphotography Competition have been announced. Here are a few of them.



The winner of the 2011 competition, Dr. Igor Siwanowicz of the
Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology in Germany, took this
photograph of a green lacewing larva at 20x magnification




Second place was taken by Dr. Donna Stolz of the University of Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, USA, with this picture of a blade of grass at 200x magnification




This picture, by Dr. Jan Michels of the University of Kiel in Germany,
took 9th place. It shows a ventral view of a marine copepod at 10x magnification.



There are many more images at the link - 115 of them, to be precise. Recommended viewing for those interested in microphotography.

Peter

In memoriam: Steve Jobs


I didn't put up a post last night about Steve Jobs' death, because I was in two minds whether or not to do so. You see, I wanted to be honest about him, but at the same time, there's the old saying: De mortuis nil nisi bonum. However, the uncritical, almost adoring paeans of praise showered upon his memory by so many others have decided me to put in my $0.02 worth, if only to provide a rather different perspective on his life.

I have no argument with those who've lavished praise upon his technological vision and business prowess. I think Steve Jobs unquestionably changed the way the human race interacts with technology, searches for information, and applies knowledge to our everyday problems. You can probably count on the fingers of one hand other people who've had a similar impact over the past fifty years. He was, and will remain, a giant in his field. I've no doubt that centuries from now, he'll be remembered and studied as one of the men who changed his era.

On the other hand, I've long held serious doubts about him as a human being. From an early age, he demonstrated a self-centered ruthlessness and - let's not mince words - a fundamental dishonesty that I found very jarring in someone so gifted. A couple of examples:

  • In the early 1970's Atari challenged their employees (including a young Steve Jobs) to design a computer using less than 100 chips. They offered a bonus of $100 for every chip less than that figure. Jobs got his friend, Steve Wozniak, to design a computer that required only 46 chips - but told Wozniak that the bonus was only $600, and gave him half of that, or $300. He kept almost all of the real bonus for himself.
  • Jobs had a relationship with Chris-Ann Brennan that resulted in the birth of his first child, Lisa Brennan-Jobs. However, he initially would not acknowledge her as his daughter. He refused to undergo a paternity test, even claiming in a court submission that he was sterile and infertile, and thus could not be her father. Jobs was by this time a multimillionaire, but his refusal to pay child support forced Ms. Brennan to go on welfare for a time. Jobs was eventually forced to acknowledge paternity, and paid child support.


His attitudes carried over to his otherwise highly successful career at Apple. The Telegraph points out:

He oozed arrogance, was vicious about business rivals, and in contrast to, say, Bill Gates, refused to have any truck with notions of corporate responsibility. He habitually parked his Mercedes in the disabled parking slot at Apple headquarters and one of his first acts on returning to the company in 1997 was to terminate all of its corporate philanthropy programmes.

Jobs's management style owed less to Zen Buddhism than to George Orwell. No aspect of corporate life was immune from his authority and he was almost pathologically controlling when it came to dealing with the press.

Journalists found that he would try to stifle even anodyne stories if they had not received his blessing. One described getting an interview with Jobs as about as easy as getting an interview with Saddam Hussein, "except Saddam would probably be more helpful and certainly more polite".

He ruled Apple with a combination of foul-mouthed tantrums and charm, withering scorn and carefully judged flattery. People were either geniuses or "bozos", and those in his regular orbit found that they could flip with no warning from one category to the other, in what became known as the "hero-shithead roller coaster". Employees worried about getting trapped with Jobs in a lift, afraid that they might not have a job when the doors opened.

One senior executive admitted that before heading into a meeting with Jobs, she embraced the mindset of a bullfighter entering the ring: "I pretend I'm already dead."


There's more at the link.

I'm sorry that Mr. Jobs died so young. Who knows what he might have achieved in future years? Yet, at the same time, I'm sorry for him, that he didn't seem to develop a more open, warmer, more caring personality over time. He was a Buddhist. I'm sorry he didn't appear to attach greater importance to that religion's understanding of karma (which can be expressed "as you sow, so shall you reap", if not in this life, then in the next). He may have inspired, overseen the development of, and marketed a great number of revolutionary products, but he left an awful lot of very unhappy, even miserable, human beings in the dust behind him as he did so.

I don't seek to judge Mr. Jobs' soul. I have far too many sins, flaws, faults and failings of my own to judge anyone else! I'll need God's mercy every bit as much as he will, possibly (probably?) more. Yet, that doesn't prevent me - us - from examining his life, and doing our best to learn from it. Just as we're inspired by his business acumen and technological savvy, let's be informed by what he got wrong in his personal life and the flaws in his personality, and try to do better in our own. That may be a more fitting memorial to him, in the long run.

In his 2005 commencement address at Stanford University, Mr. Jobs said this:

Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.


I submit these words demonstrate what may have been at the root of many of his personality flaws. They portray an introspective, almost introverted focus, concentrating on what you want, what's important to you, and dismissing anyone and everyone, anything and everything else as 'secondary'. Whilst it's undoubtedly vital to have goals, priorities and desires, I submit that taking their impact on others into account, and trying not to harm or diminish others while striving to achieve them, is equally important. Otherwise, we end up in a 'dog-eat-dog' world, where to achieve our own success, we must cause someone else's failure.

I'm sorry if what I've written here upsets some of Mr. Jobs' more uncritical admirers. As I said earlier, I fully accept and admire his genius. I don't think it detracts from that to point out that, like all of us, he had feet of clay. We can learn as much from the latter as from the former, if we're willing.

Peter

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Doofus Of The Day #529


As with yesterday's winner, the video is self-explanatory.

CAUTION: Language alert - there are a few unfortunate words.







I guess I can understand people doing stupid things . . . I may even have been guilty of that myself from time to time . . . but why, oh, why do they film themselves doing it???

(I shouldn't complain, I suppose. How else would we be able to derive so much schadenfreude from them?)





Peter

Ever heard of a 'mamachari'?


I hadn't, until I read this article in The Truth About Cars.

Millions of Japanese were stranded in downtown Tokyo on March 11 afternoon after the 8.9-magnitude earthquake closed down the sprawling mass transit system. “Suddenly, bikes became a lot more attractive to many people,” says the Nikkei. In a matter of minutes, bicycle stores were empty.

In the aftermath, saving power replaced Buddhism and Shinto as a religion in Japan. Salary-men were urged to ditch their blue suit and tie for “super cool biz” (short sleeves and open collars). Thermostats of the A/C were set to barely bearable, the nation perspired for a noble cause, and the bike race was on.

In short order, bikes turned into big business. Downtown office buildings opened high-tech full-service indoor bicycle parking operations: Racks for the bikes, showers, lockers. The monthly fees are steep: They range from $200 to $300 a month per bike. That approaches Manhattan fees – for a car. But in Tokyo, I get a free shower and don’t have to tip Gonzalez. I can also buy a bike for the same price. A really cool bike.

The real craze in Tokyo is not the Roppongi daytraders that switched his Porsche for a Miyata (the bicycle.) The REAL craze in Japan is mamachari.

That’s a Japanese portmanteau of “mama” (mama) and “charinko” (bicycle): It denotes a utility bike with chainguard, fenders, rack, skirt guard, dynamo lights, baskets, and child carriers. It used to be to conveyance of choice of a housewife with two small children and shopping bags. Helmets? Who needs them?




Now, mamachari have been co-opted by the super-cool set. There are weekly mamachari meets, mamachari races, and of course, gobs of mamachari blogs.


There's more at the link.

Of course, I don't find the concept at all unfamiliar. Anyone who's spent as much time in the Third World as I have will know the amazingly inventive ways in which bicycles are used to carry anything and everything. (It's not always safe, nor is it always reliable: but if it can be balanced on a bicycle, odds are someone has!) For those who haven't had the benefit (?) of Third World exposure, here are a few examples.




(Yes, those are all genuine Third World bicycles with Third World loads; and no, none of the shots was staged or faked - they're all real!)

Most mamacharis are probably in far superior condition overall to the average Third World bicycle, and don't carry loads as heavy; but they're apparently almost as ubiquitous. I'm surprised to read about the cultural enthusiasm that appears to have surrounded the mamachari. It's not just a means of transport; it's become a status symbol, as in "My chari is more mama than yours!" (or words to that effect).

They're apparently very well equipped for the urban lifestyle. Tokyo By Bike describes them in greater detail.

The mamachari is a cultural icon, it's the Japanese equivalent of the family station wagon. It's the family workhorse used on shopping runs, for riding to the local station, taking the kids to school or picking them up from sports practice. Without it families around the country would be in a right pickle.

The defining features include a top tube bent low that is easy to step over, a shopping basket on the front, a luggage rack on the back, mudguards, chain guards, dynamo lights, an integrated lock, a bell and a hefty rear stand that keeps the bike stable and upright when parked.

Oh, I forgot one of the most defining features of the mamachari, which is brakes that go "SCREEEEEEEEEEEECH!" when even slightly feathered, startling everyone within earshot.

After purchasing a mamachari, the upgrade of choice is a child seat. These can be mounted on the rear luggage rack or behind/between/in front of the handlebars. It's not unusual for a mamachari to sport two child seats, and on occasion you'll spot one with three! When the government implemented a ban recently on carrying two children on a mamachari mothers across Japan campaigned against the ruling and the government was forced to back down.

. . .

When buying a bicycle most Japanese don't consider anything other than a mamachari and initially I found this odd because when I think of bicycles I think recreation, mountain biking, commuting, racing, or for getting air off the top of a set of stairs. But in Japan I realized I'm in the minority, as even your average Japanese male purchases a bike for its utility, for making short trips to the station with a briefcase in the basket and carrying groceries home from the supermarket etc.

In a country of 130 million people 85% own a bicycle. Who'd have guessed that the majority use their bikes for practical purposes rather than jumping gaps?

. . .

For those of you saying "Well thats fine but you can't race a mamachari can you?" I'd like to direct your attention to the Mamachari Endurance Race held annually at the Tokachi International Speedway which attracts hundreds of participants and thousands of spectators all of whom enjoy the festival like atmosphere. Suffice to say its all just a little fun with few serious racers, but plenty of great costumes.


Again, more at the link. Here's a video clip about the beast.







I must confess, I find the concept of an old-fashioned bicycle dominating urban transport in one of the world's most technologically sophisticated economies to be more than a little refreshing!





Peter

Do 'smart' electricity meters involve hidden dangers?


I'm alarmed to read an article from last month about problems emerging in Australia related to the use of so-called 'smart' electricity meters.

An explosive investigation into the massive mistakes being made with power bills reveals serious flaws that affect nearly every electricity user.

A whistleblower has told how his his power company offered to pay him off when he uncovered issues with their smart meter billing, sparking calls for a national inquiry.

Australia's Energy bosses have reason to be concerned, as one man's discoveries are about to become public knowledge.

Evidence of serious systemic billing errors affecting Australia's largest power company Origin Energy have come to light - resulting in overcharging and usage mistakes as high as 200 per cent.

. . .

With a Bachelor’s degree in electronic engineering, a Master's in digital communication, a Doctorate in computer science and a stint as a forensic software analyst, [Dr.] Jayasooriah is the last person a company would want ‘questioning’ their business.

But Origin had little choice, and having suspected his bills were corrupt, Jayasooriah asked the Energy Ombudsman to review them. This is when cracks began to appear for Origin.

On the 16th of April a senior investigator with the Energy Ombudsman's office emailed Jayasooriah to ‘acknowledge the possibility of error’, confirming the bill was incorrect. However when Origin tried to correct it, they couldn't.

“They have tried to bill me three times, and they have given me three different figures,” he said.

For the same period he was billed for $460.08, $442.96, and $579 – not knowing if any of the amounts were actually correct.

Nor, it seems, does Origin or the Ombudsman.

. . .

... when Jayasooriah finally got a hold of ... consumption data, he uncovered information that may rock the foundations upon which our bills are constructed.

“They have given me something that is impossible to happen from a technical perspective.”

According to his calculations the company is suggesting he used more energy than he was actually supplied.

Origin claim the data comes from distributor Ausgrid. Ausgrid and Origin claim usage data is not fiddled with, and yet every time Origin issue Jayasooriah with a new bill, his usage information changes. In some cases by more than 300 per cent.

David Levy is an associate professor in electronic engineering at Sydney University. He acknowledges these mistakes could affect everyone with interval or smart meters.

“It means that there's some error in the processing or in the capturing of the data, which applies broadly to all users of such meters,” he said.

“It suggests that there is probably broader implications.”


There's more at the link.

If problems like that are affecting so many in Australia, what's the betting that such problems are equally prevalent here in the USA? I understand that already, up to 25% of retail customers have been switched by their power suppliers to the new 'smart' meters (whether they liked it or not). I'd be very interested indeed to see an investigation into whether some of them are experiencing similar problems.

Another problem with 'smart' meters is that they allow the power company to meddle with the settings of modern appliances in your home. They may not even bother to tell you that they're doing it! MIT's Technology Review reports:

If you bought a major appliance in the last three years, odds are it was "smart," even if you didn't know it. Meaning: it probably contains a wireless radio that can broadcast and transmit over a small personal area network, sending out information about a device's status and energy use, as well as receiving commands that alter its behavior.

Many appliances that don't even announce they have this capability are equipped with it, says Mike Beyerle, an engineer at GE whom I recently interviewed about GE's coming Nucleus home energy management system.

"We want to build up a base before we make a big deal out of it," says Beyerle.

It's an intriguing twist on the old business maxim "under-promise, over-deliver." In this case, manufacturers aren't even telling consumers what their devices are capable of because, in part, those abilities are useless without an energy management hub like GE's Nucleus or a utility company's smart meter.

. . .

Once a device is hooked up to an energy management system, things get interesting. Did you realize, for example, that your refrigerator's ice maker's defrost cycle can be shifted to another time of day by your utility in order to drive down power use during times of peak demand?

Ditto your clothes dryer. If a user is signed up for a "demand response" program in which they agree to have their energy consumption remotely reduced by a utility in exchange for a lower bill, various elements of a dryer can be shut down. For example, it might be set to dry at a lower heat but for longer, allowing the same level of drying but with less energy consumed.


Again, more at the link.

Hmm. I don't want to receive power bills of dubious accuracy. Still less do I want my power company messing with the settings of my domestic appliances. (What's the possibility of such fiddling causing 'brownout'-type damage to an appliance? I don't know . . . but I bet the odds are rather less than zero, and I bet twice as much that if they do suffer such damage, the power company will fight tooth and nail to avoid paying for repair or replacement of the appliance[s] concerned!)

I think I'll avoid 'smart' meters as long as I possibly can. They may be great from the power company's point of view, but they don't seem nearly so great from my perspective.

Peter

Updates on earlier blog posts


It seems the 'winner' of our Doofus Of The Day #525 award, the Chief of Police at the University of Wisconsin-Stout, has been abandoned by her superiors. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) reports:

Under pressure from FIRE, national media, and actors Nathan Fillion and Adam Baldwin, the University of Wisconsin-Stout (Stout) has reversed its censorship of theater professor James Miller's poster featuring a line from Fillion's character in Joss Whedon's television series Firefly.

. . .

At least 1,000 people wrote Sorensen in defense of First Amendment rights at Stout, and dozens of articles about the case appeared in the national media. Today, Baldwin (co-star of Firefly) wrote about Stout's apparent double standard in censorship. Baldwin noted that earlier this year, Stout apparently had no problem with "Kill the Bill" posters based on the film Kill Bill, which depicted Uma Thurman with a sword and advocated against Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's budget bill.

Finally, in a letter to all faculty, staff, and students today, the three senior administrators announced that Stout had reversed its decision, is developing a new protocol for handling such cases, and "will schedule workshops and/or forums during this academic year on First Amendment rights and responsibilities in higher education."


There's more at the link. Now, why couldn't UWS have done the right thing in the first place? Hadn't they ever heard of the First Amendment to the US Constitution? Or did they simply believe that their politically correct bull-droppings could override it at their discretion? (No prizes for guessing the correct choice between those alternatives . . . )

Next, last Monday I mentioned a 1944 Life magazine article about the Ledo Road, now available online. A couple of readers e-mailed me, asking where they could find more information about this campaign. I wanted to mention that the article in question forms part of a larger site, The Ledo Road, which aims to serve as 'a single point of information' about the construction project. It's an excellent site, with many articles and pictures. Highly recommended.

Peter

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Doofus Of The Day #528


The video is self-explanatory.







I hope he bought a crash-helmet before he tried that again . . .





Peter

De-facing art?


De-facing in an artistic sense, actually . . . Steve Payne has developed a novel approach to portraiture - replacing the faces of existing portraits with photographs of modern personalities. He writes:

I was always drawn to the fun side of image manipulation, the kind of stuff you can do using photos of your friends.

When I first started using photoshop I learnt quite a lot by trying to do that sort of stuff, turning people into JEDI’s, putting them onto movie posters, etc. Then gradually as the years went by I moved on to doing more professional retouching jobs and as I started to learn a different set of techniques I didn’t really do as much of the fun stuff anymore.

So… With that in mind. I decided to do some fun stuff! Yeah, why not!




One thing I’ve always wanted to try (I have a list) is to incorporate someone into a painting, mimicking the painterly brush strokes and making everything fit and work nicely and look natural and stuff. There’s an art to head swapping, I’ve seen so many awful attempts. The most important things to consider are anatomy, perspective and lighting. If you can get those things right, you’re more than halfway there. My artistic ability serves me well with this stuff, I can just tell if something looks wrong.




So I found a bunch of images online, faithful photographic reproductions of original artwork by George Dawe. He was an English portrait artist who lived in St Petersburg in 1819. He was commissioned to paint portraits of Russian Generals who had successfully fought Napoleon in the Patriotic War of 1812 and over a nine year period he completed over 300 of them.

Luckily for me the two dimensional works of art are in the public domain because the copyright has expired (under UK law this typically means the author died over 70 years ago) this means they can be used as a basis for a derivative work without permission.


There's more at the link. You'll find his blog here with the latest entries, and his archive may be viewed in thumbnail form here. I like the way he's done it - although it's a bit jarring to see Steve Jobs as a Russian general! Perhaps he'd have invented i-Perestroika?



Peter

An interesting musical (and societal) perspective


I've quoted Casey's Daily Dispatch on this blog before concerning economic conditions and prospects. However, today's edition struck a whimsical note, which started me thinking. The author, Vedran Vuk, took off at a tangent to consider country music versus rap 'music' (a suffix I typically refuse to grant to rap under any circumstances!). Here's an excerpt.

... country music is the sound of American politics. Think about it. There are always references to family, church, farmers, factory workers, small towns, etc. Politicians use the same approach word for word whether it’s referring to kitchen tables or visiting small towns. Furthermore, politicians never forget their obligatory mentions of farmers – which is particularly confusing since the vast majority of Americans no longer farm. According to the BLS, fewer than 1.2 million Americans are employed in farming, fishing, and forestry. Frankly, most Americans aren’t farmers and neither are most listeners of country music. So why the constant appeal to the farming profession? In my opinion, it’s a national obsession with a pastoral fantasy that no longer exists. And for this reason, it manages to pull at our heart strings.

. . .

While country music artists sing about working on the farm, many rap singers recount tales of growing up on welfare. With 46 million Americans collecting food stamps, which story better fits the modern American experience: the farmer or the welfare recipient? Exactly, but let’s take it one step further. The US currently has 2.3 million inmates behind bars. There are about 5 million Americans on parole or probation. Compare those numbers to the less than 1.2 million farmers.

In my opinion, rap music is a refreshing reminder that we’re not in Kansas any more. We don’t live in a country where everyone is really hard-working and was raised with good values. A sizeable portion of the population has no intention of staying out of trouble and getting a solid job. Their career ambitions amount to being the toughest and most-respected thug on the street. Their idea of a good time is some cheap drinks and if in luck, smoking a little crack or crystal meth in front of the TV. A good chunk of the US citizenry is not interested in balancing the budget and steering the nation to the “right” course. They do not give a damn if Rome burns the ground. In fact, they’re ready to partake in its destruction.

While country music may make us feel good, it’s just not a reflection of reality. Travel to an urban hellhole near you, and the whole rap music thing will make a whole lot of sense.


There's more at the link.

I've never been a fan of country music (perhaps because I'm an immigrant, and wasn't exposed to it growing up). As for rap music, my major exposure to it has been as a prison chaplain, where I've encountered it played, listened to, jived to, and lived out by inmates of the worst and most violent kinds. I suppose, as a result, I've come to associate rap almost exclusively with criminals. I have no time for it whatsoever. In fact, when I see how rap 'artists' portray, carry, and speak about themselves, I tend to instinctively check that I'm in a position to defend myself against them if necessary!

Even so, I have to admit that there may be something to Mr. Vuk's analysis. What say you, readers?

Peter

The ultimate flowchart?


A couple of months ago we looked at NPR's list of the top 100 science fiction and fantasy books. The list became something of a blog meme phenomenon, and is still circulating, with hundreds of bloggers having published it and indicated which books they've read.

Now SFSignal has produced what has to be the most complicated flowchart I've ever seen! They've taken NPR's booklist and created a decision tree to help you decide what (or what not) to read, or what would best suit the kind of person you are. When I describe it as 'fantastically complex', I'm not joking! Here's a thumbnail image of it.




You can read about it here, or click this link to see the image alone at SFSignal's Web site (click it again there to enlarge it to readable size). You can also play with an interactive version here, which is a lot of fun, even though it's not in flowchart format.

Congratulations to the good people at SFSignal for a very creative idea, very well executed!

Peter

State and municipal finances - the bust goes on


Michael Lewis, whom we've met in these pages before, has written a superb article in the latest edition of Vanity Fair analyzing the breakdown of US state and municipal finances. Here's a brief excerpt.

The people who had power in the society, and were charged with saving it from itself, had instead bled the society to death. The problem with police officers and firefighters isn’t a public-sector problem; it isn’t a problem with government; it’s a problem with the entire society. It’s what happened on Wall Street in the run-up to the subprime crisis. It’s a problem of people taking what they can, just because they can, without regard to the larger social consequences. It’s not just a coincidence that the debts of cities and states spun out of control at the same time as the debts of individual Americans. Alone in a dark room with a pile of money, Americans knew exactly what they wanted to do, from the top of the society to the bottom. They’d been conditioned to grab as much as they could, without thinking about the long-term consequences. Afterward, the people on Wall Street would privately bemoan the low morals of the American people who walked away from their subprime loans, and the American people would express outrage at the Wall Street people who paid themselves a fortune to design the bad loans.

. . .

In academic papers and a popular book, American Mania, Whybrow argues, in effect, that human beings are neurologically ill-designed to be modern Americans. The human brain evolved over hundreds of thousands of years in an environment defined by scarcity. It was not designed, at least originally, for an environment of extreme abundance. “Human beings are wandering around with brains that are fabulously limited,” he says cheerfully. “We’ve got the core of the average lizard.” Wrapped around this reptilian core, he explains, is a mammalian layer (associated with maternal concern and social interaction), and around that is wrapped a third layer, which enables feats of memory and the capacity for abstract thought. “The only problem,” he says, “is our passions are still driven by the lizard core. We are set up to acquire as much as we can of things we perceive as scarce, particularly sex, safety, and food.” Even a person on a diet who sensibly avoids coming face-to-face with a piece of chocolate cake will find it hard to control himself if the chocolate cake somehow finds him. Every pastry chef in America understands this, and now neuroscience does, too. “When faced with abundance, the brain’s ancient reward pathways are difficult to suppress,” says Whybrow. “In that moment the value of eating the chocolate cake exceeds the value of the diet. We cannot think down the road when we are faced with the chocolate cake.”

The richest society the world has ever seen has grown rich by devising better and better ways to give people what they want. The effect on the brain of lots of instant gratification is something like the effect on the right hand of cutting off the left: the more the lizard core is used the more dominant it becomes. “What we’re doing is minimizing the use of the part of the brain that lizards don’t have,” says Whybrow. “We’ve created physiological dysfunction. We have lost the ability to self-regulate, at all levels of the society. The $5 million you get paid at Goldman Sachs if you do whatever they ask you to do—that is the chocolate cake upgraded.”

The succession of financial bubbles, and the amassing of personal and public debt, Whybrow views as simply an expression of the lizard-brained way of life. A color-coded map of American personal indebtedness could be laid on top of the Centers for Disease Control’s color-coded map that illustrates the fantastic rise in rates of obesity across the United States since 1985 without disturbing the general pattern. The boom in trading activity in individual stock portfolios; the spread of legalized gambling; the rise of drug and alcohol addiction—it is all of a piece. Everywhere you turn you see Americans sacrifice their long-term interests for short-term rewards.

What happens when a society loses its ability to self-regulate, and insists on sacrificing its long-term interest for short-term rewards? How does the story end?


There's much more at the link. It's a long article, but VERY well worth the time and effort needed to read it. In particular, if you're relying on a state or municipal pension, you really, really NEED to read it. Your retirement plans may need some adjusting.

Peter

Monday, October 3, 2011

Now that's a Seal of approval!


This video shows Irish journalist Charlie Bird encountering two elephant seal pups in Antarctica during a recent visit. They seem to regard him as a conveniently living, breathing mattress!







Well, they would regard him as a mattress, of course . . . a Seal-y, in fact!





Peter

The Ledo Road


While wandering the less traveled paths of the Internet today, I came across an online version of a Life magazine story from August 1944 about the Ledo Road, built across northern Burma from India to China. It's a fascinating historical piece for many reasons:

  • The Ledo Road was one of the most difficult civil engineering feats of the Second World War, carved through the foothills of the Himalayas out of dense tropical jungle.
  • It was intimately associated with the airlift of supplies from India to China known as 'The Hump', which we examined in Weekend Wings #10.
  • The road faced natural obstacles of terrain, weather (particularly during the monsoon, which dumped enormous quantities of rain and turned the soil to incredibly thick, glutinous mud - see the first picture below), and disease: obstacles so great that they threatened to curtail the entire project many times, even without enemy resistance.
  • By the time the Ledo Road was completed, it had lost most of its strategic value due to developments in other theaters of war. The immense cost and effort to build it proved to have been largely unnecessary - indeed, wasted.


Nevertheless, the project was heroic in every sense. The article has many historic pictures of the construction, and the men who built it. Here are three to whet your appetite, reduced in size to fit this blog.





Those who know military songs will understand the reference to 'hairy ears'.
If you don't know it, and can tolerate some fairly serious profanity,
do an Internet search for the phrase 'Engineers have hairy ears'.





There are many more images at the link. Highly recommended reading for history buffs and military enthusiasts.

Peter

Doofus Of The Day #527


Today's award goes collectively to the 'Occupy Wall Street' movement. I've been following their demonstrations with some interest (not much, because those conducting them appear to be the wackiest kind of moonbat progressives, but they have a certain entertainment value - if nothing else!). If you're interested, there's an extensive series of photographs here.

Today I found a 'Proposed List Of Demands' on the movement's Web site. Here's a selection.

Demand two: Institute a universal single payer healthcare system. To do this all private insurers must be banned from the healthcare market as their only effect on the health of patients is to take money away from doctors, nurses and hospitals preventing them from doing their jobs and hand that money to wall st. investors.

Demand three: Guaranteed living wage income regardless of employment.

Demand four: Free college education.

. . .

Demand six: One trillion dollars in infrastructure (Water, Sewer, Rail, Roads and Bridges and Electrical Grid) spending now.

Demand seven: One trillion dollars in ecological restoration planting forests, reestablishing wetlands and the natural flow of river systems and decommissioning of all of America's nuclear power plants.

. . .

Demand nine: Open borders migration. anyone can travel anywhere to work and live.

. . .

Demand eleven: Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all. Debt forgiveness of sovereign debt, commercial loans, home mortgages, home equity loans, credit card debt, student loans and personal loans now! All debt must be stricken from the "Books." World Bank Loans to all Nations, Bank to Bank Debt and all Bonds and Margin Call Debt in the stock market including all Derivatives or Credit Default Swaps, all 65 trillion dollars of them must also be stricken from the "Books." And I don't mean debt that is in default, I mean all debt on the entire planet period.

Demand twelve: Outlaw all credit reporting agencies.


There are more at the link (not that any of them are more economically literate than the shambles above . . . )

Reading that list, I can't help but wonder how on earth someone can be so blind to reality, so economically illiterate, so fundamentally stupid, as to believe that such steps should even be considered, let alone acted upon. There are many signs visible during these demonstrations saying 'Tax The Rich' - but where do they expect to find sufficient 'rich' to tax for even a tiny fraction of the amounts these demands argue should be spent? You could tax every single person earning more than $100,000 in the USA at a rate of (say) 95%, and you still wouldn't get close to these numbers!

I'll willingly talk to anyone, of any political persuasion, even if it (and they) are diametrically opposed to my own. I'm willing to concede that I may be wrong on some (even, perhaps, many) issues. I'll gladly give someone an opportunity to state their case, intelligently and rationally, so that I can consider their position objectively. However, the 'Occupy Wall Street' moonbats are neither intelligent, nor rational, nor objective. They're way out there, not so much in left field as in cloud cuckoo land! Doofi, indeed . . .

Verily, the mind doth boggle!





Peter

Is Project Gunrunner another Watergate?


That's the suggestion of Forbes magazine. Here's a very short excerpt from their lengthy exposé of the scandal.

For political context we ... need to step back to April 16, 2009 — four or five months before we think Fast and Furious began. On this day President Barack Obama was visiting Mexico. While there he said, “This war is being waged with guns purchased not here but in the United States … more than 90% of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States, many from gun shops that lay in our shared border.”

This 90% statistic was, to be kind, math so shoddy a third grader should know better.

The figure was based only on guns the Mexican government sent to the ATF for tracing. On April 2, 2009, Fox News reported that, according to statistics from the Mexican government, only about a third of the guns recovered at crime scenes in Mexico are submitted to the ATF. The Mexicans, as it turns out, only send guns to the ATF they think came from the U.S. Also, many guns submitted to the ATF by the Mexicans cannot be traced. As a result, the reporters determined that only 17% of guns found at Mexican crime scenes have been traced by the ATF to the U.S.

Now, because President Obama used the made-up 90% figure to push political positions — he was using the statistic to argue that the U.S. needs more gun-control laws — it’s difficult not to sniff politics in what happened next.

Later in 2009 the ATF started the Fast and Furious program by allowing firearms to be smuggled from U.S. gun stores into the arsenals of Mexican criminal gangs. As these guns wouldn’t be seen again until they resurfaced in crimes (there were no tracking devices installed or other means to trace these guns), the only purpose for letting these guns “walk” seems to be to back up the president’s position that guns used in Mexican crimes mostly come from the U.S. (Though the Obama administration insists the gun sales were a part of a new crime-fighting technique.) Also, given the cover up that has ensued since Fast and Furious broke, it doesn’t seem like a conspiratorial leap to conclude that politics mixed with policy to create this crazy program. (But again, administration officials insist this wasn’t about politics.)

Gun storeowners have a right to think it was about politics.

Sometime around September 2009, ATF agents began pressuring gun storeowners in Arizona to sell firearms to people the ATF thought would sell the guns to Mexican cartels and gangs. As gun-storeowners can’t do business without federal licenses, and because the ATF has the authority to shut down a gun store if the establishment’s paperwork isn’t in order, these requests were likely taken as orders. This put the gun storeowners in a catch-22: the law requires them to report suspicious activity and not to sell to people they think are breaking the law, yet the ATF was telling them to sell to suspicious people who wanted to buy AK-47s by the dozen.

Actually, it’s even worse than that: According to court records obtained by Fox News, two of 20 alleged smugglers who were later indicted in the Fast and Furious investigation had felony convictions. As gun-stores must run a person’s name through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) before selling that person a firearm, this should have stopped these felons from buying even one measly.22 rifle.

Congressional and law-enforcement sources say this situation suggests the FBI, which operates the NICS system, had to have knowingly allowed the purchases to go forward after consulting with the ATF. Given that we know the director of the FBI was in on at least one early meeting on this issue, this seems logical.


There's much more at the link. I HIGHLY recommend reading the entire article. Not only does it summarize the whole scandal in a very readable way, it shows just how serious it's become. I agree with the author's conclusion:

Given all the politics and the cover up that even the former ATF director says has occurred, could operation Fast and Furious have been about anything other than pushing for new gun-control laws? And given all of this obfuscation from the Obama administration, isn’t this scandal comparable to the cover up that surrounded Watergate?


Yes, that's how bad it is. US law enforcement officers have been killed - murdered - by weapons that another law enforcement agency (the ATF) illegally allowed criminals to buy. Indeed, in at least one case (and probably more), that agency actually bought the guns itself using taxpayer money, in order to give them to the criminals! In Mexico, it's believed that at least 200 deaths, probably more, have resulted from this flood of illegal weapons.

It's time for a special prosecutor to be appointed, and criminal charges to be prepared. If higher-ups don't go to prison for these crimes, I'll reluctantly have to believe that our system of criminal justice is irretrievably flawed.

Peter

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Driving in Asia, redux


Back in August, I put up a video clip of drivers in Asia, and their misadventures, accidents and weird behavior. I've since discovered this clip, 'Driving in Asia 2', which contains even more mayhem!







I think I'll stick to flying in that part of the world!





Peter

It's Ig Nobel time again!


The annual Ig Nobel awards were presented last week, to the delight of tongue-in-cheek scientific geeks and research nerds all over the world. The awards are described as follows:

The Ig Nobel Prizes are an American parody of the Nobel Prizes and are given each year ... for ten unusual or trivial achievements in scientific research. The stated aim of the prizes is to "first make people laugh, and then make them think".

. . .

The first Ig Nobels were awarded in 1991, at that time for discoveries "that cannot, or should not, be reproduced". Ten prizes are awarded each year in many categories, including the Nobel Prize categories of physics, chemistry, physiology/medicine, literature, and peace, but also other categories such as public health, engineering, biology, and interdisciplinary research.

. . .

The awards are sometimes veiled criticism (or gentle satire) ... Most often, however, they draw attention to scientific articles that have some humorous or unexpected aspect. Examples range from the discovery that the presence of humans tends to sexually arouse ostriches, to the statement that black holes fulfill all the technical requirements to be the location of Hell, to research on the "five-second rule", a tongue-in-cheek belief that food dropped on the floor will not become contaminated if it is picked up within five seconds.


There's more at the link.

This year's winners included many outstanding entrants. ABC News reports that they included:

Medicine: To two teams from the Netherlands and the United States who studied how having the urge to pee can affect one’s decision-making. The first team found that when people have to pee a little, they make quicker, better decisions. The second group found that when they really have to pee, they become basket cases, more dangerous on the road than drunk drivers (“Hey! There’s a gas station! I’ll pull over!”). To quote from their paper in Neurourology and Urodynamics: “The magnitude of decline in cognitive function associated with an extreme urge to void was as large and equivalent or greater than the cognitive deterioration observed for conditions known to be associated with increased accident risk.”

Psychology: To Karl Halvor Teigen of the University of Oslo “for trying to understand why, in everyday life, people sigh.” (No, we don’t do it when we’re sad, or breathe sighs of relief. Teigen’s survey showed we do it when we’re ready to throw in the towel.)

Physics: To four French physicists and one Dutch colleague, “for determining why discus throwers become dizzy, and why hammer throwers don’t.”

Chemistry: Ever had too much wasabi, the bright green stuff at a Japanese restaurant? Makes your mouth feel like it’s on fire, right? Seven Japanese researchers applied this observation in order to make perhaps the world’s most original alarm for real fires. They calculated “the ideal density of airborne wasabi (pungent horseradish)” to spray on sleeping people in case of emergency.


Again, more at the link. The full list of winners may be found here.



Peter

Staying alive, pod-style


It seems a Japanese company has come up with a novel approach to surviving earthquakes, tsunamis, floods and other natural disasters. The Australian reports:

A SMALL Japanese company has developed a modern, miniature version of Noah's Ark in case Japan is hit by another massive earthquake and tsunami: a floating capsule that looks like a huge tennis ball.




Japan's Cosmo Power says its "Noah" shelter is made of enhanced fiberglass that can save users from disasters like the one on March 11 that devasted Japan's northern coast, leaving nearly 20,000 people dead or missing.

Company president Shoji Tanaka says the 300,000 yen [about US $3,900] capsule can hold four adults, and that it has survived many crash tests. It has a small lookout window and breathing holes on top. It also can be used as a toy house for children.


There's more at the link.

It's not a bad idea if you're in a tsunami-prone area, I guess: but after the March earthquake and tsunami in Japan, rescuers were searching for weeks to find any survivors who'd been washed out to sea. There was simply too much wreckage out there to be searched any faster. Could this thing stay afloat for that long if necessary? Could it contain sufficient emergency food and water supplies to keep its occupant(s) alive until rescuers found them?

I suspect this may be more of a 'feel-good' device than a practical lifesaver. Still, if I lived in an area where the risks were very high, I suspect I'd rather have it, than have nothing at all!

Peter

Act sober - but die of cirrhosis?


I'm in two minds about a medical 'advance' reported in the Telegraph.

Scientists are developing a "stay sober" pill which allows you to drink as much as you want while limiting the effects of alcohol on their brains.

In tests for the drug, mice given the drug did not even display signs of getting tipsy, despite being fed enough alcohol to make them stumble and fall over.

The research paves the way for a tablet that stops people embarrassing themselves on nights out.


There's more at the link.

The new pill may, indeed, be useful to prevent or limit drunken behavior: but I'm willing to bet it can't prevent the damage heavy drinkers do to their bodies by imbibing too freely for too long. What's the good of being able to act sober, even if you're not, when you're simultaneously accelerating your untimely death from alcoholic liver disease and/or cirrhosis?

Peter

Tell me again why we're still using Facebook?


I note with more than usual displeasure that Facebook appears to be up to its old tricks again. USA Today reports:

Facebook has touched a nerve with a broad range of critics upset about the social network's latest batch of online sharing technology.

Ten consumer and privacy groups have joined Reps. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Joe Barton, R-Tex., in calling on the Federal Trade Commission to investigate new sharing mechanisms designed to accelerate the collection and dispersal of information about Facebook users' Internet activities.

In the spotlight are Timeline, a feature that maps everything a user has ever done on Facebook, and several "Open Graph" applications designed to broadcast a user's surfing patterns and Web interests to friends and friends of friends.

. . .

Laura Antonini, research attorney at Consumer Watchdog, says Facebook's new sharing features "disregard the privacy of its users by making sweeping changes that expose personal information without giving users the chance to choose what information they want shared with the world."

. . .

Meanwhile, security experts say Facebook has also raised fresh security concerns, as well. The company has recently rolled out new mechanisms to encourage users to share more educational, career and health information, and to recruit "subscribers" to follow them on Facebook, akin to how people follow each other on Twitter.

Crime gangs will almost certainly tap into the richer information Facebook users divulge about themselves to trick victims into infecting their PCs with a virus, says Catalin Cosoi, researcher at antivirus firm Bitdefender. "This will make it a lot easier to obtain valuable information about an individual," Cosoi says.

And as the company promotes Twitter-like following of recent wall posts among Facebook users, spamming scams now common on Twitter almost surely will migrate to Facebook. "Facebook has underestimated the sophistication of the cyber underground," says Tom Kellermann, chief technical officer of mobile security firm AirPatrol. "If you build it they will come."


There's more at the link.

I've long been not just suspicious, but downright aggravated by Facebook's cavalier disregard for customer privacy. They keep pushing the envelope, sometimes doing so without any prior warning and then acting hurt and upset when people complain about their excesses. I regard them as absolutely untrustworthy. They can protest all they like that they track their users 'responsibly', but that depends on who gets to define what's 'responsible', doesn't it? It's like Google's motto, 'Don't be evil'. Who defines 'evil'? And where can we find the definition, so we can be informed of what they may, or may not, be up to?

There's a good reason I keep cookies turned off in my browsers, and delete persistent 'flash' cookies several times a day. It's not paranoia. It's a sense of security and a desire for privacy. That's also why I don't use Facebook, thank you very much. Why should I let a bunch of irresponsible, untrustworthy, info-grabbing geeks into my system?





Peter

Saturday, October 1, 2011

A Bellagio display - on the cheap


I'm highly amused to learn about a group of kids in Tennessee who decided to imitate the famous fountain display at the Bellagio in Las Vegas. Here's an example of the original:







And here's what kids with imagination, squirt bottles and SuperSoakers can produce:







Way to go, kids! Full marks for creativity!





Peter

BigDog gets supersized!


Readers may remember that a few years ago, we took a look at BigDog, a prototype robotic 'mule' developed by Boston Dynamics. It was intended to carry supplies for a military patrol, taking the weight off the soldiers, freeing them to concentrate on crossing difficult terrain and/or dealing with the enemy.

Now comes news that BigDog has a bigger brother: LS3, also known as Alphadog. This one looks rather more deployable than the earlier prototype. Cnet reports:

The donkey-sized machine is designed to carry up to 400 pounds of gear and follow troops over rough terrain on missions of 20 miles and up to 24 hours.

That's more than BigDog's payload of 340 pounds and 12 miles; as a general rule, horses can comfortably carry up to 240 pounds. AlphaDog will have some degree of autonomy like animals, using computer vision to follow a leader or automatically trotting to GPS way points.



(Image courtesy of Boston Dynamics)



AlphaDog is also quieter than BigDog, and obviously doesn't run on the latter's noisy Leopard go-kart engine. We should see more details about the beast over the next six months.

"We expect to have the full-up system ready for initial field testing in mid-2012," says Boston Dynamics President Marc Raibert.

I just hope he has enough Milk-Bones to keep it happy.


There's more at the link. Here's a video clip of LS3 in action.







Looks like an interesting beast. However, I'm not convinced that something so noisy (even though Alphadog is a whole lot quieter than its predecessor, Bigdog) will be suitable for use in a combat zone. I mean, if the enemy can hear you coming from a long way off, he'll have plenty of time to prepare a warm reception for you! (That's one reason why, in earlier conflicts that used live mules rather than robotic ones, the mules' vocal cords were sometimes cut by their handlers, so that they couldn't call out even if they wanted to.)

Nevertheless, Alphadog demonstrates the extent to which robotics has developed. Now, if they'll put a saddle on it and turn it loose at a rodeo one evening, we'll see how difficult it is for riders to stay aboard. (Bonus points if they can program it to buck and rear!)



Peter

Doofus Of The Day #526


Today's award goes to multiple people involved with an air crash in Australia. The Sydney Morning Herald reports:

AIR safety investigators will examine why a Ferris wheel was installed next to an airstrip following yesterday's dramatic plane crash at a carnival on the mid north coast.

Amber Arndell, 13, and her brother Jessie, 9, had to be rescued from the top of the Ferris wheel. The pilot of the microlight, Paul Cox, 53, and his passenger, John Rowan, 32, were trapped for almost three hours inside the wreckage as it dangled 10 metres off the ground after it struck the ride at the Old Bar Festival at Taree about 10.20am yesterday.




''I went nose up and straight into it. Next thing I know I was stuck inside the Ferris wheel,'' he said.

At one stage, emergency services were forced to spray the plane with foam because it was leaking fuel on to the wheel, heightening fears of an explosion.

A Rural Fire Service spokesman confirmed all four people involved escaped unharmed.

Witnesses said the Cheetah S200 took off from a grass airstrip but failed to gain sufficient altitude to clear the Ferris wheel, which was placed at the southern end of the strip for the festival.

Following a loud ''crunch'', crowds of festivalgoers gathered at the scene, gasping at the sight of a plane dangling from the ride, and how close it had come to hitting the children.


There's more at the link. Here's a video report about the incident, including the moment of impact. You'll see a wing of the airplane drop to the ground.







Today's Doofi include:

  1. The idiot(s) who decided to erect a ferris wheel at the end of a freaking runway!!!
  2. The pilot who was so inattentive that he didn't see a freaking great ferris wheel in front of him!!!


Ye Gods and little fishes . . .





Peter

Politics and money - a corrupt alliance


I note with cynical amusement that the twelve lawmakers appointed to the 'Supercommittee' charged with reducing federal expenditure are receiving an unsurprising amount of attention (not to mention largesse) from familiar sources. The Washington Times reports:

When congressional leaders earlier this month named six lawmakers from each party to a debt reduction “supercommittee,” investing unprecedented power in a tiny cadre to slash funding, they set off a wild scramble among special interest groups to gain access and protect their interests.

Yet many groups with the most at stake didn’t have to change their plans. Some members of the supercommittee received more campaign contributions in July from political action committees controlled by corporations, unions and other lawmakers than anyone else in Congress, disclosures filed this weekend show.

. . .

The bulk of the nearly half-million dollars given to supercommittee members came from PAC's linked to the finance, insurance, real estate, and health industries — all of which stand to lose billions if committee members don’t protect their interests.

“They’ve already had longstanding relationships with these members and had them in their sights,” said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political influence. Now, the supercommittee members are “going to attract donations by virtue of living.”

Nearly all of the PAC contributions are in the thousands of dollars and come from groups aiming to further the mission of a trade group, corporation or labor union. The totals aren’t complete, because many groups report spending not on a monthly basis, but twice a year.

Doctors’ groups, whose business would be roiled by Medicare reform, gave tens of thousands of dollars to debt committee members; the PAC of the United Services Automobile Association, which sells insurance to military families, gave $27,000; the American Bankers Association gave $14,000; and two labor groups representing government employees even made donations to Republican supercommittee members.


There's more at the link.

Who was it said that America's politicians are 'the best money can buy'? There have been calls for 'greater transparency' from Supercommittee members: but, if you believe that will happen, there's this bridge in Brooklyn, NYC, I'd like to sell you. Cash only, please, and in small bills . . .

You'll have noted the American Bankers Association listed as a major donor. The reason for their urgent desire to influence lawmakers isn't hard to find. The recently-implemented Dodd-Frank Act drastically reduced the amount banks can charge for a debit card transaction. Coming on top of reductions in credit card transaction charges, this has slashed a major revenue stream for the banks - who are now trying to take it out of their customers' hides instead. Inevitably, this is causing a growing groundswell of opposition and outrage. (See, for example, these reports on BoA and Citibank's new fees and charges, and reactions to them.) The banks want to pre-empt lawmakers listening to that outrage by bribing them making donations to their re-election campaigns, in the hope that they'll be sympathetic to the banks' position.

May I make a suggestion to my readers? Let's try to spread the word to vote out of office any politician, from any political party, who accepts donations from companies or pressure groups trying to influence his vote on legislation that involves or concerns them. Let's make the politicians raise their money from the people who vote them into (and out of) office, rather than faceless corporations and lobbyists who have no vote in that process. Impossible, you say? I don't think so at all. Find a candidate who's honest, open and reasonable, and the people of his or her district will support them - at least, that's what I think. Others may differ.

Politics. Corruption. But I repeat myself . . .





Peter