That's the opinion of Michael Deacon, a columnist for the Telegraph newspaper in the UK.
Young, single, Left-wing women across the US are so angry about the result of the election, they’ve embarked on a “sex strike”. That is: they’ve turned celibate, in order to punish men for Donald Trump’s win.
“For the next four years, I am going to abstain from sex with men,” declared one young woman on Tiktok.
“All I have to say [to men] is: ‘Good luck getting laid’,” sniffed another.
“Hope you thought that through, you guys,” jeered a third.
On the face of it, this may sound like bad news for the young men of America. Personally, though, I think they should applaud the strike, and urge its participants to keep going.
This is because any young woman who responds in such a comically petulant manner to the result of a democratic election is clearly an insufferable, spoilt, whiny, immature, narcissistic, attention-seeking, pathologically self-righteous brat. Thanks to the sex strike, therefore, young American men will be spared the tedium of going on a date with someone so mind-bendingly tiresome. Instead, their country’s dating pool will now consist exclusively of women who are sane, and who realise that there is no more unattractive a trait, in either sex, than an all-consuming fixation with politics.
That, however, is not the only reason why young male Trump voters should welcome the strike. There’s another. Because, if the sex strike lasts long enough, these Left-wing women will never reproduce.
Which means that, in future, there will be fewer Left-wing voters, and more conservative victories.
Hard to argue with his logic, isn't it?
Peter
12 comments:
The sluts won't be needing any abortions either, then. Win!
Stefan v.
And far less abortions. The women from the Left revel in the thought of having the option to have this procedure.
How many abortions do these women have anyway ? Abortion is supposed to be the last option. It is an elective surgery (many insurance companies refuse to pay for that), paid by OUR tax dollars. That isn't right.
I find it rather ironic that most of the women involved in the whole "4B" thing are women I wouldn't want to do the snuggle-struggle with in the first place.
As usual, it’s like they never think all the way through. The future belongs to the people who show up for it.
Never play cards with a guy named Doc, eat at a place called Mom's or sleep with a woman who's got more problems than you.
well, there not enough booze in the world to make some of them look good or worth the effort. even in my youth, there is no way in hell I would have touched any of them.
"Sex strike?" said one of my girlfriends who 's somewhat 'far left'. "Crazy I may be; stupid I'm not. If they want to play with themselves for four years, let'm have at it. Oh, I'll tell 'em what they wanna hear, but, believe me, if they've gottem, they're not gonna give up sex with their boyfriends, not even for one night."
"May your cats console you in your solitude."
Because these attention hungry sluts are capable of celibacy, or following through on ANYTHING. The same thing will happen that always does. Chad, Tyrone, Pookie and Ray Ray will continue to rearrange these whores guts.
No loss. No change.
This probably dates me, but I'm remembering a "Saturday Night Live" skit from the 1970s. It was a "Weekend Update" deal, with Jane Curtin and Dan Aykroyd. Jane was saying that because women were unhappy about some thing or other that was in the news, they would go on a no-oral-sex strike against men. Aykroyd retorted that that meant women wouldn't be getting any oral sex, either. Jane turned pale, and said "Never mind!"
Amen!
Aren't they shaving their heads too? Sort of an "Avoid at all costs" sign?
Post a Comment