Friday, February 24, 2012

It's time for the Diagram Prize once more!


The annual contest for the Diagram Prize is under way. The competition seeks the book with the oddest title of the year. Past winners include:

  • Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Nude Mice
  • Oral Sadism and the Vegetarian Personality
  • Reusing Old Graves: A Report on Popular British Attitudes
  • People Who Don't Know They're Dead: How They Attach Themselves to Unsuspecting Bystanders and What to Do About It
  • Managing a Dental Practice: The Genghis Khan Way


The Telegraph reports that some of the finalists in this year's competition are:

  • Cooking with Poo, a Thai cooking book by Saiyuud Diwong. 'Poo' is Thai for 'crab' and is also the chef’s nickname.
  • The Great Singapore Penis Panic And the Future of American Mass Hysteria by Scott D Mendelson ... an analysis of the 'Koro' psychiatric epidemic that hit the island of Singapore in 1967.
  • Mr Andoh's Pennine Diary: Memoirs of a Japanese Chicken Sexer in 1935 Hebden Bridge by Stephen Curry and Takayoshi Andoh ... is the story of Koichi Andoh, who travelled from Japan to Yorkshire in the 1930s to train workers at a hatchery business the art of determining the sex of one-day-old chicks.


There's more at the link. Great fun!





Peter

Around the blogs


It's been too long since our last look around the blogs, and there are lots of posts meriting honorable mention. Here are a few of them.

Neptunus Lex reminds us that the odious Scott Ritter has been convicted of sex offenses and sentenced to a lengthy term in jail. My reaction? I'm torn between "How are the mighty fallen!" and "It couldn't happen to a more deserving fella". It's strange how a man with so brilliant a mind (and, let's face it, he really was, and presumably still is, highly intelligent) could end up deluding himself so tragically. See also 'Hubris' and 'Nemesis' . . .

We've mentioned this country's, Europe's and the world's economic problems on many occasions on this blog. I note that more and more bloggers are writing about them. Here's a selection from my recent reading.



TOTWTYTR describes the emergency medical 'Call Of The Week'. You wouldn't believe me if I told you what it was, so I'll let you click over there and find out for yourself!

In his latest 'Monday Pun', Grouchy Old Cripple serves up a threefer. It's so full of groans, I couldn't resist linking it. The comments from his other readers are also giggleworthy!

We've met industrial chemist Derek Lowe in these pages on previous occasions. I found two of his recent articles very interesting. In the first, 'When Reagents Attack!', he challenges his readers to tell their stories of how various chemicals and agents caused unexpected laboratory reactions and interactions. The result is a series of funny and frequently explosive accounts! The second, 'Ten Tons Of Sodium And Just One Lake', embeds a video report about the destruction of sodium after World War II by dumping it into a lake, where it (naturally) exploded on contact with the water. Good thing the EPA wasn't around at the time! Recommended viewing.

The Presidential elections scheduled for November this year come in for their share of fisking. Author Sarah Hoyt, blogging at Classical Values, talks about them in an article titled 'Handicapping The Syphilitic Camel Race'. Here's an excerpt.

The closer we come to the elections, the more I alternate between rage and sheer unremitting depression. This post is as much as anything a way to organize my thoughts.

There is no doubt that this year of all years we are faced with not just a very weak field, but a field that makes us wonder what we’ve done to deserve Biblical proportion retribution.

. . .

I still say we’d do best picking from the phone directory. But that’s neither here nor there.

Remember that thing about government being a necessary evil? Yeah, so are the people who administer it.

. . .

There are people who are far better but they’re not running. Some never ran. I think this is because the smarter people who could run know the next president is sort of a sacrifice. We’re killing him so the crops will grow again. Oh, not literally (I hope) but in effect. With what’s about to hit us in the field of economics, the best the next president can hope for is squeaking a second term by the skin of his teeth AND being remembered with admiration in a hundred years. But the next president is going to have to cut all goodies drastically and p*ss off everyone. And we’re going to make him eat live toads for it for the remainder of his natural life. (Metaphorically speaking, I hope. Poor toads.)

. . .

Do I like what we’re faced with? Oh Lord – I did say I’m oscillating between despair and anger, didn’t I? BUT I understand how we got here. And, as my friend Jerry Pournelle (who is considerably to the right of me, but who is an honorable and intelligent man) says “Despair is a sin and it might be needless.”

One thing we do know. We can’t endure another four years of the current “regime.” Emboldened by not having to stand election again, they will go off the rails even more than they already have.

So, your choice is Obama, a syphilitic camel, or the sweet meteor of death. And you know those damn meteors never show up when you want them to.

. . .

You know and I know the moment Obama is out of office, the statistics stop being cooked, and we see the economy for what it is. You know and I know the moment Obama is out of office, the press will wake up to how grave our financial situation is. AND sad to say, this is to the good.

So, bring on the clowns… er… the syphilitic camels. We’ll elect one of them and make him rue the day he was born!


There's more at the link. Thought-provoking reading, even for those of a different political stripe.

Borepatch also comments on the upcoming elections, and points out that most of the candidates are fundamentally fascist in their policies and perspectives.

Warren Meyer, writing at Coyote Blog, points to what he calls the 'Worst American Rail Project Ever?' Here's an excerpt.

At the end of the day, riders are paying $3.2 million of the total $65.3 million annual cost. Again, I repeat my reaction from four years ago to hearing that riders really loved the train. Of course they do — taxpayers (read: non-riders) are subsidizing 95.1% of the service they get. I wonder if they paid the full cost of the train ride — ie if their ticket prices were increased 20x — how they would feel about the service?

Of course, the Railrunner folks are right on the case. They have just raised prices, which “could” generate $600,000 in extra revenue, assuming there is no loss in ridership from the fare increases (meaning assuming the laws of supply and demand do no operate correctly). If this fare increase is as successful as planned, they will have boldly reduced the public subsidy to just 94.2% of the cost of each trip.

By the way, it is interesting to note ... that ridership on this line dropped by over half when the service went from free to paid (ie when the government subsidy dropped from 100% to 95%). The line carries around 2000 round-trip passengers (ie number of boarding divided by two) a day. It is simply incredible that a state can directly lavish $60 million a year in taxpayer money on just 2000 mostly middle class citizens. That equates to a subsidy of $30,000 per rider per year, enough to buy every daily round trip rider a new Prius and the gas to run it every single year.


More at the link. Infuriating reading - particularly when governments at all levels are bleating about how short of money they are. With waste like this, it's no wonder they're short of funds!

Chris Wild, over at Retronaut, provides a photographic essay about the reconstruction of the Truman White House from 1948-1952. He has some very interesting pictures, including this one showing how the entire interior structure was demolished, leaving only the exterior walls, before being rebuilt 'from scratch'.




More pictures at the link, and still more at the White House Museum.

Finally, the Silicon Graybeard reports that medical 'ethicists' are attempting to justify deliberately killing people who are gravely ill. He says, "I'll bet the underlying reason for this is Obamacare, which is going to force the government to decide who gets what level of care." I think he's right! Go read his whole post. It's worth your time - particularly since this may lie in your future, and mine.

That's it for this week. More food for thought from fellow bloggers soon!

Peter

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Not entirely safe for work, but funny!


This video clip features a scantily-clad woman. Even though she's not doing anything naughty, it may offend some viewers, so I suggest you treat the clip as Not Safe For Work, just in case. Nevertheless, it made me laugh; so here it is.







Do women really go to such extremes to get into tight jeans? I've never seen such goings-on (you should pardon the expression), so I don't know. Perhaps better-informed readers could enlighten the rest of us?



Peter

A keyboard for blondes?


When I first learned of the Web site 'Keyboard For Blondes', I thought it had to be a joke - but apparently these things really do exist, and you can buy them!




(The site plays very annoying music. You can silence it by clicking on the 'Mute Sounds' link in the top right-hand corner of its index page.)




There are special 'blonde' keys:




and you can download customized software to add 'blonde' functionality to your keyboard. However, I don't think I'm going to be a customer of theirs. Miss D. isn't blonde, and she has better taste. If I bought one for her, she'd probably use it for target practice with her Valentine's Day present!





Peter

Clear your Google search history before March 1st, 2012!


The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has released a very useful article on 'How to Remove Your Google Search History Before Google's New Privacy Policy Takes Effect'. Here's an excerpt.

On March 1st, Google will implement its new, unified privacy policy, which will affect data Google has collected on you prior to March 1st as well as data it collects on you in the future. Until now, your Google Web History (your Google searches and sites visited) was cordoned off from Google's other products. This protection was especially important because search data can reveal particularly sensitive information about you, including facts about your location, interests, age, sexual orientation, religion, health concerns, and more. If you want to keep Google from combining your Web History with the data they have gathered about you in their other products, such as YouTube or Google Plus, you may want to remove all items from your Web History and stop your Web History from being recorded in the future.

. . .

Note that removing your Web History also pauses it. Web History will remain off until you enable it again.

[UPDATE 2/22/2012]: Note that disabling Web History in your Google account will not prevent Google from gathering and storing this information and using it for internal purposes. It also does not change the fact that any information gathered and stored by Google could be sought by law enforcement.

With Web History enabled, Google will keep these records indefinitely; with it disabled, they will be partially anonymized after 18 months, and certain kinds of uses, including sending you customized search results, will be prevented. If you want to do more to reduce the records Google keeps, the advice in EFF's Six Tips to Protect Your Search Privacy white paper remains relevant.

If you have several Google accounts, you will need to do this for each of them.


There's more at the link, including detailed instructions on how to clear your Google search history. I highly recommend that anyone who's security-conscious and/or concerned about online privacy should follow them.

I think we owe a vote of thanks to the EFF for bringing this matter to our attention.

Peter

Go, buffalo!


Throughout Africa, poaching of big game is an ongoing and endemic problem (particularly of rhino for their horns, which are considered an aphrodisiac in the Far East and sell for - literally! - twice their weight in gold, and of elephant for their ivory tusks). South Africa didn't see as much of it in the past as many nations further north on the continent, thanks to some very rigorous policing. However, that meant that South Africa became almost the only nation on the continent with adequate stocks of big game - and that attracted the poachers, once they'd 'shot out' the game of other countries. Poaching has thus become a major problem in South Africa. According to SA National Parks, almost one rhinoceros per day has been poached this year.

A major part of the problem is that poachers are sneaking across the international border between Mozambique and South Africa to kill rhino in the Kruger National Park and neighboring areas, and saw off their horns. If they can get them back across the border, the relatively inefficient and corrupt law enforcement authorities in Mozambique are much less of an obstacle to smuggling the horns to the Far East.

However, hunting Africa's big game has hazards of its own, because sometimes said game doesn't feel like being hunted! A gang of three suspected poachers found that out the hard way a couple of days ago. A tip o' the hat to reader Glen W. for sending me the link to the story.

A suspected poacher was killed by a buffalo in the Kruger National Park, park authorities said on Wednesday.

"A person was killed by a buffalo just north of Punda Maria last night. Apparently there were three men and two of them ran away," spokesperson William Mabasa said.

Reports on Wednesday said the men were poachers, but Mabasa could not confirm this.

"But you could ask yourself, what would you want in the park at night without coming through the gate?"

Lieutant Colonel Mohale Ramatseba said the 35-year-old man was trampled and died at the scene.


There's more at the link.

I bet most South Africans - who appreciate the fact that tourists who come to view the big game of the continent bring money and jobs with them - will be cheering loudly for the buffalo! They're certainly bad-tempered animals where humans are concerned. I think Robert Ruark described them very well when he said that they "look at you as if you owe them money".



Cape Buffalo (image courtesy of Wikipedia)



The news report above reminded me of others during the 1990's (see, for example, this one) to the effect that lions and leopards in the Kruger National Park were killing and eating illegal immigrants trying to sneak into South Africa from Mozambique. The general reaction among most of the population was to shrug and say, "Well, the lions have to eat, too!" Perhaps South Africa might wish to consider earning valuable foreign exchange by offering to 'export' some of its lions and leopards to the US-Mexican border region . . .





Peter

A breath test for cancer?


I was very pleased to see that a proposed 'breath test' for lung cancer has completed its initial clinical trials successfully, and is now set for further development and expanded testing. MIT's Technology Review reports:

Someday soon a breath test could do more than just tell if you've been drinking. Metabolomx, a startup in Mountain View, California, recently completed a clinical trial that shows that its breath test can spot lung cancer with 83 percent accuracy and can also distinguish between several different types of the disease, something that usually requires a biopsy. The accuracy of the test matches what's possible with low-dose computerized tomography imaging of the lungs.

. . .

Chemical results of a tumor's metabolism are dissolved in the blood, and can end up in the breath. Trained dogs can identify breath samples from patients with lung cancer with 98 percent accuracy. Researchers have been working on a noninvasive cancer breath test for years, but have struggled to make one that is simple, reliable, and portable enough.

. . .

In the current version of the system, a patient must breathe through a tube for about five minutes. Pumps draw the breath through a series of filters to dry it out and remove bacteria, then over an array of sensors.



Breath analysis instrument (image courtesy of Metabolomx)



Metabolomx has shown that the system can distinguish breath samples from patients with different subtypes of lung cancer.

. . .

Also, because it's not specific to a particular group of chemicals, the Metabolomx sensor could, in theory at least, be used to screen for any disease that has a metabolic breath signature — the company is currently exploring tests for other diseases, including tuberculosis.


There's more at the link.

This will be a huge blessing if it succeeds. I've worked (as a pastor and counselor) with many cancer victims. Their most frequent complaint was that the diagnosis 'came out of nowhere', without warning or any sign that anything was wrong. As a result, of course, treatment was often unsuccessful, leading to an early death. If a simple, low-cost breath test can identify the presence of at least some kinds of cancer, it'll make early detection much more feasible and much more affordable.

I don't usually pray for the success of any commercial organization; but this product has such vast implications for all of us, in terms of health and quality of life, that I might just break my own rule on this occasion!

Peter

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

How baby learned to chew


This is too cute for words!







All together, now: Awwwww!





Peter

Doofus Of The Day #575


Today's winner comes from Florida.

A Naples man is accused of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon after an incident Friday outside a bank, where he told deputies he was half orangutan and needed to call the “Fusion Center” to ask about his monkey blood.

. . .

In addition to monkey blood, Loescher repeatedly told deputies he was the director of the CIA and later told them he was Elvis Presley’s brother and a good friend of “President Bush” with whom he shares an attorney.


There's more at the link.

I knew orangutans were an endangered species, but I didn't realize just how endangered! If they share a blood relationship with this guy, they must be on their last legs!



Peter

Yet more proof that the US Administration is economically illiterate!


Valerie Jarrett is 'a senior advisor and assistant to the president for Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs for the Obama administration'. She's also just demonstrated that she's economically illiterate, and has no more business managing the affairs of this nation than she does pontificating on subjects she doesn't understand! (A tip o' the hat to the Weekly Standard and the Drudge Report for publicizing her remarks.)







Let me emphasize her idiocy once more:

"People who receive that unemployment check go out and spend it and help stimulate the economy, so that's healthy as well."


If Ms. Jarrett actually believes that, there's a bridge in Brooklyn, NYC I'd like to sell her - provided she pays in cash, and in small bills . . . Let me illustrate the absolute, almost unbelievable stupidity of her remarks.

  1. "Unemployment checks" are issued by the government. To get that money, the government had to first take it away from productive citizens and/or corporations through taxation. In effect, it denied those citizens and/or corporations the right to use their own money for their own purposes, and instead confiscated it from them to use for purposes deemed necessary by the government. (Whether or not they were, or are, or will be 'necessary' is, of course, highly debatable.) What it can't raise through taxation, it must borrow (and at present the US government is borrowing almost half of every dollar it spends). Those loans must be repaid, plus the interest on them, which represents a further drain on the national purse.
  2. In order to collect taxes, the government had to spend money on the collection process. It then had to administer the funds while they were allocated between departments and assigned to their final purpose; and finally, it had to administer the process of issuing the checks and getting them to their intended recipients. All of this cost money for things such as personnel, transport, communications, offices, furniture, computers and software, consumables (e.g. the paper on which the check is printed, the ink used to print it, the envelope used to mail it, etc.). Adding up all this administrative overhead, it probably costs somewhere between $1 and $10 to issue a single unemployment check. Guess who pays those costs? That's right - the taxpayer. You and I. Again.
  3. The recipient of the welfare check may use the money to buy things that are good and worthwhile, such as food, medicines, clothing, etc. On the other hand, they may spend it on things that have little or no worth - excessive alcohol consumption, drug abuse, gambling, etc. Thus, the recipient may or may not derive real benefit from that check. The same applies to the economy.
  4. Even if the recipient spends it on good and helpful things, they're only putting back into the economy money that the government forcibly extracted from it in the first place! They're not creating any new or fresh 'stimulus' by their spending - they're simply putting back into circulation what the government withdrew. Furthermore, they may not use it as wisely or as well as the people from whom it was taken through taxation. A business might have used its money to expand its operations, or buy more inventory, or hire more people. Because it had to hand over that money to the government, it couldn't use it for that purpose. We're left with the pious hope that the recipient of an unemployment check will use it in a way that's just as positive for the economy. (I trust you'll pardon my skepticism . . . )


Unemployment checks do nothing at all to stimulate the economy. On the contrary, they represent a net drain of resources from it! Ms. Jarrett is clearly incapable of understanding this most basic principle of economics . . . yet she's a senior adviser to our President! Heaven help us all . . .

This is yet another reason why we need to get rid of this entire Administration in November's elections. We can't afford to leave them in office to finish destroying our economy! (That has nothing to do with their party, either - after all, Republicans can be just as economically illiterate as Democrats. It has everything to do with the competence and quasi-Socialist ideology of the present Administration!)





Peter

Of roads, streets, avenues and the like


I've never been clear on why certain roads are called precisely that, while others are 'streets' or 'drives' or whatever. Now, an article over at Mental Floss answers the question. Here's an excerpt.

Although both terms are often applied to the same thing, a road is different from a street, at least in theory. Looking at the definitions and history of the usage of the words, the difference is a matter of place and purpose.

Roads run between two distant points — two towns, for example. In each of those towns, you’ll find streets: paved roads lined with houses and other buildings. It used to be the paving and the buildings that made a street a street, but today you’ll find many paved roads that have buildings on them (I grew up on Wisteria Road). Modern sticklers for usage will tell you that what sets streets apart today is the street life that comes with them. On Main Street in a given town, you might find people walking their dogs, having lunch in a sidewalk cafe, waiting for a friend on the corner, or simply people watching. On the road connecting Town A to Town B, you’re not likely to find any of this.

The term street, then, should be specifically applied to urban roadways. Streets connect people for interaction, while roads connect towns and cities for travel.

In the real world, though, these distinctions aren’t always made.


There's more at the link, including many more definitions of road-related terms such as avenue, boulevard and court. Interesting and useful information.

Peter

Organized crime takes advantage of a nuclear disaster


Japan's Yakuza (organized crime syndicates) appear to have infiltrated that country's nuclear power industry even before the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Following that disaster, their influence became much more visible. The Telegraph reports:

The yakuza are not a secret society in Japan. The government tacitly recognises their existence, and they are classified, designated and regulated. Yakuza make their money from extortion, blackmail, construction, real estate, collection services, financial market manipulation, protection rackets, fraud and a labyrinth of front companies including labour dispatch services and private detective agencies. They do the work that no one else will do or find the workers for jobs no one wants.

“Almost all nuclear power plants that are built in Japan are built taking the risk that the workers may well be exposed to large amounts of radiation,” says Suzuki. “That they will get sick, they will die early, or they will die on the job. And the people bringing the workers to the plants and also doing the construction are often yakuza.” Suzuki says he’s met over 1,000 yakuza in his career as an investigative journalist and former editor of yakuza fanzines. For his book, The Yakuza and the Nuclear Industry, Suzuki went undercover at Fukushima to find first-hand evidence of the long-rumoured ties between the nuclear industry and the yakuza. First he documents how remarkably easy it was to become a nuclear worker at Fukushima after the meltdown. After signing up with a legitimate company providing labour, he entered the plant armed only with a wristwatch with a hidden camera. Working there over several months, he quickly found yakuza-supplied labour, and many former yakuza working on site themselves.

Suzuki discovered evidence of Tepco subcontractors paying yakuza front companies to obtain lucrative construction contracts; of money destined for construction work flying into yakuza accounts; and of politicians and media being paid to look the other way. More shocking, perhaps, were the conditions he says he found inside the plant.



Satellite image of damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant (image courtesy of Wikipedia)



His fellow workers, found Suzuki, were a motley crew of homeless, chronically unemployed Japanese men, former yakuza, debtors who owed money to the yakuza, and the mentally handicapped. Suzuki claims the regular employees at the plant were often given better radiation suits than the yakuza recruits. (Tepco has admitted that there was a shortage of equipment in the disaster’s early days.) The regular employees were allowed to pass through sophisticated radiation monitors while the temporary labourers were simply given hand rods to monitor their radiation exposure.

. . .

A former yakuza boss tells me that his group has “always” been involved in recruiting labourers for the nuclear industry. “It’s dirty, dangerous work,” he says, “and the only people who will do it are homeless, yakuza, or people so badly in debt that they see no other way to pay it off.” Suzuki found people who’d been threatened into working at Fukushima, but others who’d volunteered. Why? “Of course, if it was a matter of dying today or tomorrow they wouldn’t work there,” he explains. “It’s because it could take 10 years or more for someone to possibly die of radiation excess. It’s like Russian roulette. If you owe enough money to the yakuza, working at a nuclear plant is a safer bet. Wouldn’t you rather take a chance at dying 10 years later than being stabbed to death now?” (Suzuki’s own feeling was that the effects of low-level radiation are still unknown and that, as a drinker and smoker, he’s probably no more likely to get cancer than he was before.)

A recent report in Japan’s Mainichi newspaper alleged that workers from southern Japan were brought to the plant in July on false pretences and told to get to work. Many had to enter dangerous radioactive buildings. One man was reportedly tasked with carrying 20kg kilogram sheets of lead from the bottom floor of a damaged reactor up to the sixth floor, where his Geiger counters went into the danger zone. One worker said, “When I tried to quit, the people employing me mentioned the name of a local yakuza group. I got the hint. If Tepco didn’t know what was going on, I believe they should have.” Former Tepco executives, workers, police officials, as well as investigative journalist, Katsunobu Onda, author of TEPCO: The Dark Empire, all agree: Tepco have always known they were working with the yakuza; they just didn’t care.


There's more at the link.

It's sobering to realize that such dangerous technology is so dominated, for want of a better word, by organizations whose primary interest is anything but its safe operation or the security of those living nearby! However, the influence of the yakuza in Japan is so deeply entrenched in society that I don't know whether the publication of Mr. Suzuki's book will make a difference. Many of the politicians who would have to take action to do so are themselves 'bought and paid for' by the yakuza.

I guess it's a bit like New Orleans during and after Hurricane Katrina. Many elected and appointed officials there were corrupt long before the storm hit. The disaster merely exposed the extent of the corruption. Those involved proceeded to 'play nice' while waiting for the publicity to subside (while throwing a few of the most venal - and most exposed - among them to the wolves). As soon as things had quietened down again, they went back to 'business as usual'. It took the election of Governor Bobby Jindal, a few years later, to begin to bring institutionalized corruption in Louisiana under control. (I've never forgotten how most of the members of the State's Board of Ethics resigned, shortly before new legislation he'd sponsored took effect. It would have required them to disclose details of their personal finances and potential conflicts of interest. He made a lot of the "good ol' boys" in Louisiana very unhappy . . . and, I'm pleased to report, he's continued to do so. Good!)

Peter

I've changed this blog's "Comments" settings


I've had a number of complaints from readers that Blogger's new captcha images (circled in red in the screen-capture picture below) are too difficult to read, and that consequently they've given up trying to comment here and on other blogs that use them.




Other blogs have reported the same thing, and I've had a couple of similar problems myself, where I've had to refresh the captcha images to find one that was readable. The same difficulty is being reported on Blogger support forums, such as, for example, in this thread: so it looks as if a lot of people are unhappy with the new system.

As a result, I've decided to follow the example of some other blogs, and disable word verification in my Comments system. You can now post comments without having to read a captcha image and enter it. I've also shortened the 'open comment window' to three days from the date of the post. After three days, all comments made in reply to that post will automatically go to comment moderation.

I hope this will solve the captcha problem; but it may also lead to an increase in 'spam' comments. If it does, I'll simply have to go to universal comment moderation. I don't want to do that, as it may sometimes take several hours for me to get to my comments folder and publish them; but we'll have to see how well this new approach works. Meanwhile, let's hope Blogger comes up with a better word verification system!

Peter

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Some very tricky arrivals and departures


The video clip below shows crosswind landings and takeoffs at DĂĽsseldorf airport in Germany earlier this year. The pilots generally do a pretty good job of dealing with the very tricky conditions, except for a Turkish Airlines Boeing 737 (see from 4m. 03sec.) which doesn't get its upwind wing low enough, and appears to have a hairy moment or two.







I'm glad I didn't have to land or take off there that day!





Peter

"What happens when phantom profits vanish?"


That's the title of a very important article by Charles Hugh Smith. He points out that most of the corporate profits driving the stock market rally are the result of currency manipulation rather than actual productivity gains or increased sales. They're 'phantom' profits, not the real thing. Here's an excerpt.

Though few domestic observers make mention of it, the large, global U.S.-based corporations are now dependent on non-U.S. sales for about 40% of their revenues (50% and up for many companies) and virtually all their profit growth. Overseas sales are made in the local currency: the euro, yen, renminbi, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and so on, and the profits are stated in U.S. dollars on corporate profit and loss statements.

In 2002, 1 euro of profit earned by a U.S. global corporation equaled $1 in profit when converted to U.S. dollars. That same 1 euro profit swelled to $1.60 in 2008 as the U.S. dollar depreciated against the euro. That $ .60 of profit was phantom, an artifact of the depreciating dollar; it did not result from a higher production of goods and services or greater efficiencies.

This is why profits earned in non-U.S. markets have risen so dramatically even as domestically earned profits have stagnated. The U.S. dollar has declined dramatically against the currencies of our major trading partners, boosting phantom profits across the board when the non-U.S. profits are converted to U.S. dollars on corporate profit and loss statements.

. . .

The strengthening dollar is putting these vast phantom profits at risk. Were the U.S. dollar to return to its 2002 relative value in other currencies, virtually all the phantom (forex-generated) corporate profits that have justified the stock market rally will vanish.


There's more at the link. I strongly recommend clicking over to Mr. Smith's Web site to read the whole thing.

The reason this is important is that corporate profits are behind most of the 'good news' on the economic front. I (and many others) have pointed out for a long time that this so-called 'good news' isn't good at all - it's nothing more than window-dressing on a catastrophe. When these 'phantom profits', as Mr. Smith calls them, begin to disappear, there won't be any more window-dressing available. At that point, we'll be confronted with the stark reality of our present economic condition.

The question is: are our national leaders ready, willing and able to do anything about it? Or will they simply look around in desperation for something - anything! - to use as fresh window-dressing, rather than face reality and change their ruinous policies?

I think you know as well as I do what their response is likely to be.





Peter

The human genome shows where we've come from


I was intrigued to read an article about the human genome at The Daily Galaxy. Here's an excerpt.

"Each little piece of the genome has its own unique bit of history and goes to a unique ancestor as you go further and further back," explained John Novembre, a population geneticist at UCLA. "As you look at different parts of the genome, you get access to different parts of history."

On the basis of this principle, Richard Durbin, a genome scientist at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute near Cambridge, UK, and Heng Li determined a way to calculate, from the ages of different segments of a single person's genome, changes in the population size of their ancestors.

The genomes of Venter and two others of European ancestry, two Asian men and two West African men all tell the same story up until about 100,000 years ago, when their populations began to split and then plummet in size, reflecting, it is believed, the first human migrations out of Africa.

The ancestors of Asians and Europeans dwindled by a factor of ten to roughly 1,200 reproductively active people between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago, Durbin and Li calculated. African populations also crashed, but by nowhere near the same extent, dropping to around 5,700 breeding individuals. Other studies have recorded population crashes at around the same time, Reich says.

. . .

Mining individual genomes can't reveal every chapter of human history, notes David Reich, who works with Li at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The approach reveals little about upheavals of the last 20,000 years, such as the peopling of the Americas, because few chunks of the genome are young enough. Similarly, Durbin and Li's method can't deduce the history of human ancestors who existed before about 2 million years ago because few regions of the genome are much older.


There's more at the link. Highly recommended reading.

It's actually pretty scary to think how humanity dwindled to no more than a few thousand individuals, a few tens of thousands of years ago. A tiny population like that would have been terrifyingly vulnerable to the whims of nature. If things had gone badly for them, there wouldn't be a human race today, and this planet would be populated only by plants and animals. I wonder what happened to reduce humanity's numbers to such a tiny margin? And how did those few humans manage to survive, and recover, and rebuild their numbers?

Call it Divine intervention, if you will, or sheer blind luck, or whatever: but I guess we'll never know for sure . . .

Peter

The truth about the latest Greek economic bailout


European financial authorities are trumpeting their triumph at having finally reached (another) bailout deal for Greece. Don't believe them. It's all a lie. The 'bailout' is nothing more than the financial equivalent of rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic. Here's why.

1. Greece has not avoided defaulting on its debts (as claimed by proponents of the bailout package) except in a purely technical sense. Instead, it's imposing a default on its private (i.e. non-state) creditors, by insisting that they accept a 'haircut' of approximately 70% of what they're owed. In other words, if you own Greek bonds worth (say) $100 million, you will now be forced to give up 70% of their face value, accepting in exchange new bonds with a much later maturity date, a much lower interest rate, and no insurance coverage to guarantee that you'll ever see your money again. As for the remaining 30% . . . if you're lucky, you might get it back. Someday. Also, note that Greece is effectively imposing this condition upon its private bondholders. Oh, the newspapers will speak of an 'agreement' to do so; but when a sovereign government is telling investors that unless they agree, it'll pass legislation to implement the deal whether they like it or not . . . just how 'voluntary' is that 'agreement'? (There are indications that Greece may not have the legal authority to impose such a 'haircut' on certain classes of bonds. If it tries to do so anyway, in defiance of international law, this may provoke yet another crisis.)

2. The agreement imposing the 'haircut' means that, because Greece hasn't technically 'defaulted' on its debt obligations, the credit default swap (CDS) agreements that provide insurance against such defaults will not go into effect. To put this in simple terms: when you bought your $100 million of Greek bonds, you also bought a CDS - an insurance policy - saying, in effect, that if Greece didn't repay what was owed, the seller of the CDS would do so. However, the seller of the CDS can - and will! - now turn around and say, "Since you're a legal party to the terms of the Greek bailout, that means your losses are voluntary; therefore, I won't compensate you for them." The fact that you're an involuntary legal party to the agreement is basically irrelevant. The bailout agreement therefore nullifies contracts of insurance that private-sector investors relied upon to cover their investment in sovereign debt. After that experience, just how willing do you think such investors will be to purchase more of the sovereign debt of any weaker Eurozone nation in future? (There's also the real possibility that some holders of Greek bonds may insist that they be compensated for their losses, even to the extent of suing the sellers of their CDS's. This might bring down the entire CDS system - and what that would do to all future private investment in sovereign debt, I leave to your imagination!)

Economist and political commentator Rodney Shakespeare goes so far as to refer to the bailout deal as 'the banking occupation of Greece' and 'a fraud'.







The real, fundamental problems of the Eurozone - epitomized by the Greek fiasco - have merely been punted down the road for a few months. I can't believe we won't see a further crisis involving Greece within six to nine months from now. Furthermore, the underlying cause of the problem - the unsustainable Euro itself - hasn't been addressed at all.

Here's my prediction: this is going to blow up in the faces of all concerned before the end of the year. If I'm wrong, I'll gladly eat crow on this blog in public . . . but I don't expect to have to do so.

Peter


**********

EDITED TO ADD: Less than half a day after I wrote this, Fitch came out with its own views - and they confirm mine. According to CNBC:

Fitch ratings agency on Wednesday slashed its rating for Greek sovereign debt to “C” from “CCC”, indicating that default is “highly likely in the near term”.

. . .

“In Fitch's opinion, the exchange, if completed, would constitute a 'distressed debt exchange' (DDE) in line with its criteria and consequently yesterday's announcements set in motion the agency's process for reviewing Greece's issuer and debt securities ratings,” Fitch said in a statement.


That rating downgrade puts Greece's sovereign debt below (i.e. worse than) junk bond status. Why am I not surprised?

Monday, February 20, 2012

Just because I can!


I can't resist posting this classic and very well-known, but still extremely funny cartoon. It had me spluttering and cackling into my coffee earlier today. I reckon, if I'm going to have to clean off my keyboard, my readers can do likewise!









Peter

Fascinating art on a miniature scale


I greatly enjoyed an article in the Daily Mail about Japanese artist Takanori Aiba. Here's an excerpt. (All images are taken from the artist's Web site.)

Tending to a bonsai tree is a time consuming and painstaking process at the best of time.

But imagine combining that arduous and complex task with building scale models of windmills, lighthouses and even the Michelin Man.




Well imagine no more because one Japanese artist has done just that with these bizarre but fascinating miniature sculptures molded around bonsai trees.




Using craft paper, plastic, plaster, acrylic resin and paint, former maze illustrator Takanori Aiba has but in huge effort for small results by constructing a host of sprawling miniature communities that wrap around the tiny trees.

Following his work as an illustrator for Japanese fashion magazine POPYE he has spent the best part of the last 10 years producing these detailed mini worlds.




On his own website Aiba describes the art form as 'an experimental approach to turn out a modern Bonsai style that portrays the beauty of spiritual accordance between human and nature in miniature'.


There's more at the link.

I was intrigued by the article and pictures, plus the images on the artist's Web site. I have to admit, they fascinate me! I'm going to have to devote more time to researching this and other art forms related to bonsai.

Peter

A Lolcat remembrance of Whitney Houston


Amid all the mourning for the late Whitney Houston, I can't help but think she'd have laughed herself to see this Lolcat over at I Can Has Cheezburger?






Peter