Wednesday, June 12, 2024

A giant of the Cold War skies bids farewell

 

It's been announced that Russia's Air Force will retire its last remaining Antonov An-22 strategic transport aircraft this year.  The photograph below shows the prototype aircraft at the Paris Air Show in 1965, the year it first flew.



The An-22 was a behemoth.  It could carry up to 80 metric tons (approximately 88 US tons) of cargo, roughly equivalent to today's Boeing C-17 Globemaster III and almost twice the payload by weight of the contemporary Lockheed C-141 Starlifter.  It was routinely used to ferry intercontinental ballistic missiles around the Soviet Union, as well as carry large, heavy cargoes to favored client nations.  It was the largest turboprop-powered aircraft ever built, using the same engines that powered the Tupolev Tu-95 strategic bomber.

The An-22 was regarded by the Soviet Union as a strategic asset due to its missile-ferrying duties, which led to a potentially serious incident back in 1975.  At the time, the Soviet Union was pouring armaments and surrogate forces into Angola to support its favored MPLA "liberation movement" (a.k.a. terrorist organization).  South Africa, with US encouragement, was at the same time intervening on behalf of another such organization, UNITA.  I'm informed by sources I consider reliable that in late 1975, some South African special forces were camped out within sight of the runways at the international airport in Luanda.  They managed to get their hands on a number of man-portable ground-to-air missiles (presumably taking them off MPLA forces that "no longer needed them"), and sent an excited signal back to South Africa saying that they planned to sneak up to the runway and shoot down as many as possible of the parade of An-22's arriving every day, filled with armaments.  They would have been "sitting duck" targets, having no alternative airport within range to which they could be diverted after their long flight down the African continent.

I'm told that this was mentioned in passing between a South African liaison officer and the US embassy in Pretoria, and led to seismic-level upheavals.  The CIA was convinced that if South Africa shot down some of the Soviet Union's scarce strategic transports (only 68 were ever built), the Soviets would react very harshly, escalating the war in Angola out of control, and would probably act against other important US client states around the world.  The reconnaissance forces near Luanda were duly told not to carry out their plan, but to allow the An-22's to arrive and depart undisturbed.  They were bitterly disappointed, and I was told that some of the signals they sent back to Pretoria were "sulfurous" - but they obeyed orders.  I've often wondered what would have happened if two or three of these monster aircraft had bitten the African dust . . .

As far as I know, there's only one An-22 flying outside the Russian Air Force, a privately-owned example operated by Antonov Airlines of Ukraine.  I don't know whether it's still operational.  To give you some idea of the enormous size of this plane, here are two video clips showing its arrival and departure at European airports.






So, at last, a giant of the skies goes to its rest.  It will not be forgotten.

Peter


9 comments:

JNorth said...

They were big but not C-5 or even C-17 big, hell, Antonov built built bigger the AN-124 and the single AN-225 (destroyed by Russia a year or two ago) are / were pretty amazing. Not something Russia can replace since Antonov was never Russian.... guess what country it's in, might be why they are doing well with drones.

riverrider said...

rumor has it that the ukrainian an-22 was destroyed on the tarmac early in the war. they made a big deal of it for a couple of news cycles.

heresolong said...

Possibly driving the Russian decision is the fact that Antonov is a Ukrainian company. Also, Antonov Airlines is a subsidiary of Antonov Company.

Anonymous said...

In the sceme of things this is a lightweight cargo aircraft. Comparing it to a C17 is kinda amusing since that is very much a light lifter. Even the static display (C5) is not a very heavy lifter. These were designed for cubing out, not grossing out. Fitting oversize cargo was the design point, not weight.

If you want gross weight lifting look to the 747. 125+ tons all day long.

LL said...


The Antonov An-22 Антей had a NATO code word, "Cock" attached to it. I just wanted to add it here for local color.

1chota said...

sometimes it is better to act and then beg forgiveness than to ask and be turned down. just sayin'.

Tree Mike said...

Quite the bird. Largest turbo prop plane EVAAAAR! That makes it a large Marge, by any standard.

Old NFO said...

It did get the job done, for many years.

Sid said...

Good article. Haven’t heard C141 mentioned in a long time. Till now. Worked those back in the day. Enjoyed it. B model, I’m not that old…