Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Debt is still killing us, and President Trump's "big, beautiful bill" isn't touching it

 

To begin, let's listen to Victor Davis Hanson discuss why debt is such a critical issue, and might yet bring down not just the US economy, but the world economy.  Take eight minutes to watch this video.  It's worth your time.




With Mr. Hanson's warnings in mind, consider the bond market, where our debt crisis is playing out right now.  The deficit is funded by bonds - Treasury "securities" . . . which don't look too secure right now.


The prepandemic era, when too much savings chased too few bonds, is over. Governments everywhere must pay up, and big budget deficits are more dangerous.

The trend is global, but the U.S. is an especially big piece of the story because of annual deficits likely to top $2 trillion on the way to $3 trillion, and the potential erosion of the dollar’s reserve status.

. . .

The federal shortfall topped 6% of GDP last year, and under the budget plan approved by House Republicans early this week (but before final amendments), is expected to top 7% for a decade, according to independent estimates. That would be higher than any other sustained stretch in U.S. history, and more than almost any other advanced economy. Because of the U.S.’s size, this has an outsize global impact. Before 2023, it accounted for half of advanced economies’ deficits, according to the International Monetary Fund. From 2023 through 2030, it will be two-thirds.

Meanwhile, the U.S.’s “exorbitant privilege” as issuer of the world’s reserve currency may be eroding. Since early April, the dollar has fallen as yields rose, the opposite of the normal pattern.

. . .

Moody’s Ratings’ decision last Friday to strip the U.S. of its last triple-A debt rating told us nothing we didn’t already know. The U.S. is a fiscal train wreck, which we also knew in 2023, when Joe Biden was president, Fitch Ratings downgraded the U.S. and the 10-year bond yield touched 5%.


There's more at the link.

Next, Charles Hugh Smith explains just what the debt (and bond) crisis means for each of us as citizens and residents of the USA, in stark financial terms.  First, the total public debt as a percentage of gross domestic product:



Next, entitlement programs (Social Security and Medicare) as a percentage of the US budget:



And finally, how entitlement spending will determine growth in future US government expenditure:



He writes:


Apologists love to attribute the debt to inflation or "growth," but that's misdirection. As a percentage of the nation's GDP (gross domestic product), the debt has risen 4-fold since president Reagan shepherded Social Security reforms in the early 1980s, and doubled as a percentage of GDP since 2007, before the Federal Reserve bailed out the status quo with hyper-financialization.

Here is a pie chart of federal spending. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are 44%. Toss in the other mandatory spending--a big chunk of which is interest paid on federal debt--and there's not much left to cut. The reality is there is no way to slow the runaway debt train without tackling open-ended retirement / healthcare programs.

The vast majority of projected growth in federal spending stems from these programs and the interest paid on funds borrowed to fund them. Unfortunately, these facts don't disappear because we don't like them.

. . .

The passengers on the Titanic arguing with each other can't stop the ship from sinking by "winning the argument." Silencing those willing to discuss the issues factually doesn't actually make the factual realities go away.


Again, more at the link.

So, the crushing burden of our national debt is crushing the bond market, which in turn is making it more difficult for the Treasury to fund our ever-increasing government expenditure, which means that we're spending more and more money we don't have to increase a deficit that's already far too great to ever be paid off.  Get the picture?

This isn't a Republican or a Democratic problem, except in the sense that both parties have contributed to the situation getting this bad.  They're both equally to blame.  However, it's now grown to such an extent that this is a national problem, directly and immediately affecting the financial situation of every individual in the USA.  Those who've been relying on government programs (e.g. Social Security, Medicare and others) to fund their retirement are probably going to be sorely disappointed, because those programs will shortly be unaffordable in their present form.

Will our politicians have the guts to do something about it?  I somehow doubt it, based on their past performance.  That means we're all going to have to batten down the hatches, make sure we've put away emergency needs as best we can, and brace ourselves for impact.


There is no alternative any more.  This is out of control.


Peter


11 comments:

Texas Dan said...

Our debt is high, but not unmanageable relative to a revived (hopefully) ad real GDP, not one led by government spending. The key is to stop to hyperbolic growth of debt we have seen since Obama took over, and yes Trump owns some of it from term one. The Biden residency was disastrous in this regard, the BBB actually helps in this regard. The real problem, the rest of the world is totally hosed, because they aren't even trying. Countries that have created nanny states for their societies and businesses - that's everyone else - are in trouble, so we all are.

Xoph said...

It's been out of control for decades. I did a masters paper on social security twenty five years ago and told my wife we would be lucky to collect anything since we were planning for our retirement.

This problem can be solved.
First, eliminate the fraud. There are so many kinds from drug pricing to paying for illegals that I'll just leave that point. 20% of GDP is healthcare, the majority of that for people over 50. Even if fraud is only 10% of all healthcare, that's 2% of GDP right there.
Second, attack the lifestyle choices that drive poor health. Attack hard, we have too many people on medication rather than healthy food. (Challenge- For 30 days, no grains, no sugar, no alcohol, no food with seed oils. This means cooking at home and no processed foods. I did this, and the health change has been dramatic. I'm continuing to follow this diet.)
Third - raise the retirement age. I'm over 60 and could collect early. Older folks need to transition to less physically hard jobs. I can still put in the same work as a young man as long as I have 2 days to recover from it. Flip side is I'm not ready to sit in a rocking chair all day.
Four - means test. Social Security is welfare tax for the old. It is not and has never been a retirement program. Monies collected are spent the same year, not invested. If you are a saver, you would be much better off being allowed to invest your own contribution. The government has spent all the money collected and left IOUs. (Note: I've contributed for 40 years and I'm saying I shouldn't collect anything. That is a breach of trust.)
Five-we must get a balanced budget and start paying down the debt-to protect the value of the dollar.
Six-Deflation is a good thing for the citizens, bad for the government. Treasury drives inflation by overprinting money to make paying govt debt more manageable. This behavior negatively impacts the people we are supposedly trying to help.


All of this has been known for decades. None of these are my ideas, although they are the ones I believe have the most impact. See Karl Denniger(marketticker.org) for many articles on healthcare fraud. If Trump is successful in draining the swamp and restoring the public's voice, we need to demand prosecution for fraud and negligence in maintaining public trust. In other words, those who allowed fraud should be held accountable and prosecuted.

Finally, we need to have a public discussion on whether Social Security has been successful and beneficial to society at large. Frankly, the government has raided the coffers and left IOUs, and played accounting games. In other words, it has been a program that has encouraged and enabled fiscal irresponsibility by Congress and the public. We need to be compassionate and help people, and many just won't save no matter the consequence. No matter what choice we make, they are all bad.

ruralcounsel said...

I suspect that any sane federal budget would be walking a knife-edge between trying to address the deficit/national debt and not triggering a depression.

Addressing the massive fraud/moneylaundering we've seen DOGE uncover should help, but may not be enough. Particularly since it seems Congress is failing to act on the institutionalized fraud that has been uncovered.

Anonymous said...

They will continue, until society collapses, while stealing everything they can- your IRA, your 401k, your home and land and business , and every cent of the value of your money aka fiat currency.

Paul said...

Elect the crooks and bottom 2% of the population to run things and this is what happens. If we let DOGE do its job it will find enough savings to actually do something. But that kills to many rice bowls that should not exist. It will all be over soon so we should at least try before it all ends.

Xoph said...

I suspect that any sane federal budget would be walking a knife-edge between trying to address the deficit/national debt and not triggering a depression.

I disagree. We haven't had a sane budget or fiscal policy for quite some time. If we eliminate waste and fraud and deport the illegals, and begin rebuilding the industry that was offshored, we could supercharge the economy. Our current crop of politicians are deep state and have not and will not take the action needed. Trump seems to want to do this all via our current legal process, which is infested.

Hoover dam was built in 2 years I think. We can get things done if the govt helps, not hinders. Will we get a sane group of legislators and judges? Aye, that's the rub.

lynn said...

The federal governments spending over the past couple of decades has risen from 17% of the GDP to 23% of the GDP. This cannot continue forever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending_in_the_United_States

I like this comment because it is true: “They will continue, until society collapses, while stealing everything they can- your IRA, your 401k, your home and land and business , and every cent of the value of your money aka fiat currency.”

lynn said...

I hope that the Senate adds a lot of spending cuts to the House bill but I doubt it.

lynn said...

For anyone who wonders how this might play out in the USA, here is a magnificent book about the economic collapse of the USA: "The Mandibles: A Family, 2029-2047" by Lionel Shriver
https://www.amazon.com/Mandibles-Family-2029-2047-Lionel-Shriver/dp/0062328247

The disaster starts in 2029. Yup, just under four years from now.

Aesop said...

This ends in Weimar/Zimbabwe/Venezuela.
Inevitably.
After that, comes the wars.
How much is internal, and how much is external, is the only open question.
Whether or not is not open for discussion.

Tale as old as time.

Anonymous said...

That daily signal video had one thing very wrong. Bill Clinton didn't give a f*ck about a balanced budget and paying down the debt. The contract with america republicans did that and he latched onto it because he didn't have any choice in the matter, looks like he was able to fool many people into thinking that was somehow his thing.

As far as the big beautiful bill goes i'm very disappointed in it but that's not anywhere near 100% trump's fault. Congress comes up with the budget not the president, he can ask for whatever but its up to congress to determine what's in the bill and everyone has to get their pork or they won't vote for it. There is no way that these cuts will ever happen because of that one issue alone in addition to many others.