There's an alleged 'artist' who needs a clue-by-four upside the head. A number of readers sent me the link to this story, and after I got over my nausea and disgust, it seemed to me a perfect opportunity for a joint road trip by right-thinking men and women.
Richard Whitehurst is a Columbus-based artist who made his mark on the Ohio scene by showing at the William Strunk Jr. Museum of Contemporary Art in Akron and internationally regarded galleries such as Alexandria Asheton Gallery and Seward Projects Space. He was the 2006 recipient of an Akron Culture Committee fellowship and has quickly become a seminal figure in the often overshadowed Rustbelt regional art scene, rapidly moving from sculpture and installation to more challenging situational based work that would make Nicolas Bourriaud’s head spin.
In fact, his new controversial work, THE RAPE TUNNEL, which is set to go on view at Columbus’ 4D Gallery on October 30th, has come under fire from Columbus-based feminist groups not to mention, local law enforcement officials. The artist plans to place himself in a room, the only entrance or exit being a 22 ft long plywood tunnel constructed by Whitehurst himself. Then he says that for the duration of the gallery’s opening (from 7:00 p.m. to midnight) he will rape anyone who travels through the tunnel into that room.
On a recent trip to Ohio, nearly all art-related conversation stirred wildly around Whitehurst and his tunnel, with half the people hailing him a vastly important figure to keep an eye out for, while others regarding his work as cheap and exploitative – not to mention very dangerous.
We’ll let you readers decide. The following interview was conducted on September 22nd via e-mail correspondence.
Please describe the project.
In the 4D Gallery main room, I’ve constructed a 22 ft tunnel out of plywood that leads into the project room. There is no way in or out of the project room except for this tunnel. As you travel through the tunnel, it gets smaller and smaller, making it so that you have to crawl and put yourself in a submissive position in order to reach the tunnel’s destination. At the end of the tunnel the subject will find me waiting in the project room and I’ll try to the best of my ability to overpower and rape the person who crawls through.
Why rape?
Because as an artistic gesture, it’s one of the most impactful I can think of. For the past ten years Ohio’s art scene has been largely centered around a string of alternative spaces in Akron’s warehouse district, where people had been putting on art shows. At the beginning I happily participated along with everyone else but then I started to feel like it wasn’t going anywhere. It dawned on me that if the work we created had never existed the world would be no different than if it had. None of it mattered to anyone outside of our small and insignificant circle of peers. I wanted something that would have more impact.
I started to think differently about my work. In 2007 at the Seward Projects Space in Columbus, I had my first breakthrough with an installation that was to be the prototype for this current one. It was called THE PUNCH-YOU-IN-THE-FACE TUNNEL. It was the same set-up as THE RAPE TUNNEL except at the end of the tunnel I’d punch the subject in the face instead of raping him or her. The impetus was completely reactionary to the current state of art, and motivated by pure frustration.
As it turns out, I ended up breaking the nose of the third person to crawl through the tunnel, an aspiring model. She went to the hospital and eventually sued me. Her modeling career was put on hold. The civil case was long and drawn out and the matter still hasn’t been resolved. To this day she still has unpaid medical bills. The point of this long aside is that all this took place two years ago, and I’m still having an impact on this young lady’s life, something not many other artists could claim about their work.
Rape seemed like the next logical step.
But rape is way more extreme than a punch to the face. Is your intention to ruin people’s lives?
Possibly. I’m not necessarily concerned with the positive or negative effects of this project so long as there is some effect on people’s lives. I’ve merely set up a situation where there is potential to impact people in meaningful ways. Maybe I won’t be able to rape everyone who crawls through the tunnel, but the door is open for all kinds of scenarios; rape, serious injury, maybe even death. I might even get arrested.
Right now the installation isn’t even complete, and I’ve riled up a substantial portion of the local population. The installation as an idea is powerful enough itself.
By “substantial portion of the local population” are you referring to people that have been protesting this event?
Yes.
How do you feel about the protesters?
I’m fine with them. They have the right to speak out against this installation. The project would be an utter failure if it didn’t create this kind of open dialogue.
Are you pro-rape?
Not really. I personally think rape is morally reprehensible and something that should generally not be allowed in our society. Most people feel this way, which is why the act is exploitable for the purposes of my work. If people were not so repulsed by rape then this project would fail.
Does this mean you’re willing to go to jail for the sake of your work?
I am. The local authorities are already threatening to have this exhibition shut down. Caroline Miffen [4D Gallery director] to her credit has hired a team of lawyers working hard to ensure that THE RAPE TUNNEL will proceed as planned. At the end of the day there’s a disclaimer on the door so people know what they’re getting into.
It would seem that what you are proposing to do will not technically constitute rape for the obvious reason that whoever enters into the tunnel is acting of their own free will, therefore making the act consensual. If you aren’t really raping anyone, doesn’t that undermine the credibility of the project?
First of all, I want to make it clear that I plan to make the experience as unpleasant as I possibly can to anyone who dares to crawl through the tunnel. I will try to the best of my ability to make them regret their decision.
Secondly, rape is not always a black and white issue. The definition is argued almost everyday in courtrooms around the country. The woman who gets too drunk one night and regrets having sex the next morning, was she raped or not? There is no easy answer. I hope some of that ambiguity will manifest itself in this project.
There's more at the link, including a photograph of the self-proclaimed 'artist' and another of his 'Rape Tunnel' under construction.
I regret (deeply) that my ongoing recovery from heart bypass surgery will prevent me from being at the exhibition. Nevertheless, I invite any of my readers who'll be in the area to equip themselves suitably, enter the tunnel, and give Mr. Whitehurst the thrashing of his life (at least). Who knows? He might learn something from it . . . although I doubt it.
There's nothing funny, or interesting, or romanticized about rape - and it's certainly not the subject for any form of artistic expression, unless Zeus and Leda are involved!
Peter
9 comments:
If you ask me, someone should indeed walk down that tunnel... with a loaded .45 in hand.
It's a hoax. There's a link in one of the comments on the original article to a photo of a wind tunnel that was taken as-is and put into the article. Appropriate tarring and feathering should still be applied to the person who came up with it, but the installation itself is fake.
Surely you know of a clinic where you could find volunteers with horrible STDs...
Unfortunately, as Mamma Bear pointed out, it is in fact a hoax. See here: http://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2009/09/artlurker_explains_rape_tunnel.php for the "explanation."
The doofus wanted to stimulate concersation? I'll be glad to stimulate conversation with him, and add a few comments for Peter, whose recovery prevents personal participation in the conversation.
stay safe.
WV = acklysti: what the "artist" will have when we are finished.
I read about this the other day.
After thinking about it, I suggest sending Tam and Bobbie ( RobertaX) through his front door with Brigid and Breda stationed at the back door.
Should be a good Utube clip!
I'm glad it's a hoax. But it still offends me on so many levels I'd like to see him wet his pants when confronted by that group of ladies.
Thanks to those who've pointed out that it's a hoax: but let's make the road trip to wherever the author lives, anyway. The clue-by-four remains a requirement, IMHO!
Gamachinist: I do like the way your mind works . . .
:-)
I hope to hell that my tax dollars NEA (National Endowment for the Arts) money wasn't used to "sponser" this non-event. If so, I demand a refund. And this a**hole's head on a rusted iron platter.
I'm currently reading "Atlas Shrugged", & it sets my BS threshold trigger that much lower then normal.
B Woodman
III-per
Just the latest in a long line of alleged works of "art" Remember "Piss Christ" from a while back?
Shock for shock's sake isn't art.
The little dork needs to have his head pushed, hard.
I'm in Cincy. Have CCW and vacation to burn. Let's go!
Steve
Post a Comment