Are there plans to disrupt voting on Nov. 3?

 

Those who've been following my posts on attempts to disrupt and derail the forthcoming elections, and on the current urban unrest, will remember that I've reported information from unnamed sources in law enforcement and security services.  My contacts there stem from my days as a prison chaplain, when I had contact with other departments and agencies, and have developed from there.  Those contacts have so far been proven correct in all that they predicted would happen.

They're now telling me that momentum is building in liberal/progressive cities and states to disrupt the voting process on November 3rd.  They claim that there's real alarm in those circles about how many votes President Trump is getting from early voters.  The "powers that be" expect that their supporters will outnumber the President's in postal votes already cast, so they want to make sure that as few in-person votes as possible are cast for the President on election day itself.  In that way, they believe, they'll achieve victory.

I'm informed that the attack on voting will be three-pronged.  I'm paraphrasing the reports I've received, and not identifying specific cities or states, so as to avoid anything that might identify my sources (who would undoubtedly face retaliation if they were known).

1. Protests and demonstrations may be organized around polling stations - not right next to them, but in the streets leading to them, so that it's difficult for voters to make their way to them.  This will include an element of intimidation, threatening prospective voters in an attempt to make them turn back out of fear.  Public transit systems may also be disrupted.
2. Polling stations themselves may experience "difficulties" such as lack of working voting machines, or insufficient staff (which will be claimed to have been caused by the disruptions mentioned above), or power outages, or what have you.  This is expected to reduce the number of votes that can be cast, irrespective of other factors.
3. Natural "threats" such as the COVID-19 virus and/or the weather may be played up to the maximum possible extent.  Additional security measures may be imposed to "prevent infection" at polling stations (e.g. disinfecting voting machines after every use, requiring social distancing and masking, etc.).  Media fearmongering about the coronavirus is allegedly part and parcel of this plan, to make voters afraid and provide an excuse for such measures.  These steps are expected to slow down the rate of voting (i.e. the number of voters that can be accommodated every hour), preventing many from casting their ballot before the polls close.

It's said that the combination of all of those factors is expected to reduce the number of votes cast on election day itself by at least 20%, if not more than that.  Left-wing and progressive sources have been urging their supporters to vote early and/or by mail for months now.  They believe they have a solid lead in the votes already recorded.  They expect these measures, plus out-and-out voter fraud (which has already been alleged in various places, as in this report last week), to reduce the number of votes for President Trump by voters who actually make it to the polls on the big day.  Therefore, they hope that their presumed lead in early votes will give them victory.

Obviously, I'm not able to confirm the reports I've received:  but I will point out that my contacts have so far been proved correct, by the passage of time, in every warning they've given me.  I have no reason to disbelieve them this time.

I therefore suggest that anyone concerned with such threats should make time, this week, to vote early and/or send in a postal vote (the earlier, the better for the latter, as they usually have to be received by a deadline).  I think voting in person at a polling station is preferable, because that makes it much harder for someone to alter your vote, or pretend it wasn't received.

Over to you, dear readers.

Peter