Jeff Childers points out that the tariffs on imports that President Trump imposed yesterday not only level the economic playing field, they overturn a decades-old system of trade that's become wildly warped and twisted in favor of others while being detrimental to the United States.
It would be easy to dismiss yesterday’s announcement as dry, economic arcana — tariffs, trade deficits, bilateral agreements, country-by-country charts, and economic reports. But don’t be fooled by all the paperwork. What Trump did wasn’t just a historic across-the-board trade action.
It was a once-in-a-century power shift.
To understand how truly historic it was, look back to Bretton Woods, 1944 — the postwar deal where America agreed to carry the world’s economic burdens in exchange for geopolitical dominance.
After the devastation of WWII, the United States promised to help rebuild Europe and Japan, by opening our previously protected markets to foreign goods, keeping our tariffs low to nonexistent, providing the world’s reserve currency, and underwriting global security with American military power.
In return, other countries were supposed to gradually liberalize their economies, buy American goods, and play by the rules. But they never did.
Instead, they took our postwar deal —designed to help them— and ran with it. They piled up tariffs, non-tariff barriers, VAT taxes, and trade cheats while the U.S. kept its markets wide open.
For decades, the American working class footed the bill while foreign economies fattened themselves, and American elites made billions facilitating and perpetuating the grift. That was globalism. It’s not an ideology— it is a business model. And Trump just crushed the model.
He didn’t just slap tariffs on a few industries, as has always been done before. Instead, he:
- Imposed the first across-the-board tariff on all imports in modern U.S. history (with certain exceptions).
- Reversed the postwar deal by demanding reciprocity rather than charity.
- Linked trade to national security, manufacturing independence, and economic sovereignty.
- Gave himself a live, adjustable tariff dashboard to pressure every foreign government, one-on-one.
In short, Trump didn’t “adjust policy” — he dismantled Bretton Woods.
For the first time since 1945, the United States is no longer offering up its consumer market as a global welfare program. Trump’s not playing the age-old game of whack-a-mole, with its endless unproductive diplomacy, swanky secret summits in Alpine resorts, and backroom G7 handshakes.
No, he’s negotiating right out in the open. Holding a sledgehammer of tariffs, leverage, and a crystal clear message: Open your markets to us, or pay dearly for access to ours.
That is why foreign governments, corporate media, and the parasite class are howling. The postwar free ride is over. The host finally vomited up the parasite. And the Bretton Woods era is finally finished.
There's more at the link.
Childers also points out that America's tariffs on our trading partners are not yet anywhere near their tariffs on our products. If their corporations want to avoid the impact of these new tariffs, the solution is simple.
Trump made two main points. First, taking his critics head on, he insisted tariffs will ultimately lower prices for Americans: “We will pry open foreign markets and break down foreign trade barriers, and ultimately more production at home will mean stronger competition and lower prices for consumers.”
In other words, he’s shaking off the ticks.
Next, Trump means to revitalize our infected body politic. He repeatedly explained how our once world-class manufacturing sector has been hollowed out, and our once vital industrial cities have been reduced to smoking ruins. It’s a valid point his critics mostly ignore, because they cannot argue the inarguable.
Trump intends to reverse America’s long, slow slide into industrial oblivion.
And he offered a simple solution to any foreign companies hurt by the tariffs: a generous invitation. “To any company that objects to our common sense reciprocal tariffs… my answer is very simple: If you want your tariff rate to be zero, then you build your product right here in America,” the President said.
“Jobs and factories will come roaring back into our country… this will indeed be the golden age of America,” Trump said.
It’s already working. Late last night, for example, Israeli officials indignantly tweeted that it had immediatly deleted all its tariffs on American goods, and demanded why Trump’s new Israel tariffs weren’t canceled yet ... Expect a lot more of this.
Judging by the anguished screaming coming from many of our trading partners, they really thought they could blackmail President Trump into abandoning (or at least drastically scaling back) his tariff initiative. Now that he's gone through with it (and isn't finished yet, because he has the power to adjust tariffs up or down in future against any trading partner that tries to play fast and loose with the new system of trade), they have a simple choice.
Effectively, it's an economic application of the time-honored Golden Rule: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". If they want the USA to charge lower tariffs on their exports, then they must charge lower tariffs on what the USA exports to them. Quid pro quo. Treat us the way you want to be treated. If you insist on imposing an economic burden on us, we'll do the same to you.
I'm still waiting for someone to explain how that's unfair . . .
Peter
10 comments:
Agreed. I hope the market plunge is just short term and people come back to their senses. Maybe a buying opportunity?
I’m still waiting for the other shoe to fall
The market at 40k plus is a chimera anyway - based largely on Inflation and endless government spending.
The one where the actual "created money" is 100s to 1000s of times larger than on the books, and all those rehypothecation quadrillions are considered "real dollars" or some other shoe?
Or maybe who is on the other side of all the paper debt in the world?
NPR is absolutely hysterical. If satan condemned President Trump, they’d give him a BJ in gratitude
Known as the "Tariff of Abominations," the Tariff of 1828 was the culmination of a series of tariffs first imposed in 1816 in an effort to protect Northern industries from cheaper British imports and increased in 1824. The law imposed high protective tariffs on imported goods, particularly benefiting Northern industries while harming the Southern economy because they were imposed on goods that the Southern states needed to buy. The Southern states strongly opposed the tariffs from the outset because they caused recession in their economies, leading to the Nullification Crisis of 1832–33.
Congress's passing of the Force Act in in 1833 authorizing the use of military force to collect the tariffs in response to South Carolina's Ordinance of Nullification was also one of the sources of resentment that led to the Battle of Fort Sumpter in 1861.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Tariff-of-1828
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff_of_Abominations
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 raised tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods in an attempt to protect American industries during the onset of the Great Depression. Hoover signed the bill against the advice of many economists and it backfired as many trading partners retaliated with their own tariffs, causing a sharp decline in global trade and worsening the Depression.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Smoot-Hawley-Tariff-Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot%E2%80%93Hawley_Tariff_Act
What is notable about these two previous cycles of high tariffs and the current round being imposed by the Trump Administration is that it appears everyone who remembers the last cycle needs to be dead before the latest bright idea fairy again gets the notion that trade tariffs are a good idea.
Tariffs are part and parcel of trade, but high tariffs that disrupt trade and cause tariff wars result in recessions.
I can see what President Trump is trying to do world wide, however what is worrying this closest ally of the US is the inconsistency of this tarrif policy. Australia does not levy ANY tarrifs on the US, we have a Free Trade agreement and the US enjoys a large trade surplus with us, yet we have just been hit with a 10% tarrif on all of our exports. Can anyone explain this to me??
United States Navy covering your ass. Any more questions?
So that's how alliances with the USA work now is it? The fact that Australia has stood with you in every war from WW1 to Afganistan counts for nothing now, not to mention what we are paying for the AUKUS nuclear submarines.
1st, Australia entered WW I with the British Empire/Commonwealth in 1914. The US was late to that party. Australian participation with US forces has been welcome. I do believe there was a little issue in WWII where the US might have stopped the rising sun from “waltzing” into Australia. That cost the US quite a bit in blood and treasure. As for purchasing the subs? How very nice of them to help pay for their own defense. (defence?). They might also want to replace the carries they got rid of in ‘82.
Post a Comment