It looks as if a "smoking gun" has been found in Wisconsin's electoral computer systems.
Paquette first observed that the WEC voter roll had an unusually high number of voter records that ended in zero. Assuming that the WEC voter roll assigned voter ID numbers sequentially, without breaks or outside manipulation, records ending in 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 should appear with equal distribution. As seen in Table 1, voter records ending in zero occurred in 30.6 percent of the voter records, while those ending in numbers 1 through 9 ended with each number appearing equally at 7.7 percent of the time.
Paquette was at a loss to explain this irregularity until he realized that every voter ID record ending in zero had two different Wisconsin voters assigned the same voter ID number. In searching the database, Paquette confirmed that in every case where the same voter ID number was assigned to two different voters, the voter record ended in zero.
. . .
The point of the “modified duplicate” scheme is to create false voters, all of whom nevertheless get legitimate state voter ID numbers. The non-existent “multiple duplicate” voters can then be hidden back in the voter roll, identifiable to the criminals by “algorithm locator numbers,” so they are available for use in fraudulent mail-in ballot schemes.
. . .
The probability that a scheme this complicated, consistent, and massive could happen by chance is near zero. The only logical conclusion is that someone penetrated the WEC server to embed the rule that would consistently alter the entire WEC voter registration database.
. . .
We now have abundant evidence that the WEC maintains a criminally infected voter registration database that was used in the 2024 general election and in the recent 2025 election for a seat on the Wisconsin State Supreme Court.
There's more at the link.
If true, this is a breach of all sorts of voting laws, Federal and state. I used to specify and program computer systems for a living, way back when, and I can't for the life of me figure out any way that this can be accidental. If it's in the system, it was put there deliberately and with malice aforethought.
I wonder how many other states have hidden bugs features like this in their electoral computer software? And how are we going to check for them? It needs to happen at once, if not sooner, before such bugs features can interfere in the next round of elections.
Peter
18 comments:
I have read that the Dominion voting machines for the 2020 election had code in them that would alter the Republican vote to a Democrat, returning a 52 to 48 percentage win for the Democrat. The Java code that performed this when triggered was actually put in the post, before the blog was "disappeared". The blogger noted that altering a Republican to Democrat vote prevented the problem of counting more votes than were registered. The blogger also said that it would only be triggered in districts that were "toss-ups" to avoid generating glaring vote discrepancies where the counted vote didn't match the counties' political demographics.
[Note there were scattered stories from this election where the person voted on the screen for President Trump, but the vote would be changed by the machine to Harris. Apparently, it wasn't enough to give the win to Harris.]
Since reading that, whenever I see a 52 to 48 win for the Democrat, I assume the win was accomplished via fraud, particularly if it's a Dominion counting machine. By picking 52 to 48, they can claim the election was "close" but "you didn't have the vote, enthusiasm, the base stayed home, etc" to win. Also it prevents a voting fraud court case since it's not "just a few miscounted votes".
There's no shortage of evidence proving widespread election fraud...from multiple states and in multiple elections. The problem is the bureaucracies that refuse to look at the evidence (and which will destroy said evidence when possible) and the judiciary who WILLFULLY turn a blind eye to it and routinely dismiss any and all legal actions to do something about the fraud.
I hate programming, but I’ve done some off and on for almost 30 years now. The identifier should either be a UNIQUE column so there can be no duplicates, or an Identity column so the database hands each record a unique new number. It could be stupid programming at first, but it would have quickly deteriorated to enemy action.
I would be amazed (astounded) if this happened just in Wisconsin.
We need to return to paper ballots.
I was a resident of Georgia from 05 to the end of 21. After 2020 election the GA State Senate had a committee investigate in 2021 check the election for fraud. They found fraud in multiple ways:
1. Mail in ballots were sent from bogus addresses in the state and outside the state, sometimes in mass.
2. The numbers of ballots reported at times could not match people voting
3. Fulton County stopped counting ballots because of a "water pipe issue" and cleared all people out, but per videos a few Democrats stayed behind pulling out hidden ballots and feeding them into the system
4. Many ballots showed just Biden and no others on them
5. A GA southern county clerk showed how the Dominion Voting Machine could change any ballot without being tied to the internet
6. The Dominion Voting Machines, mail in ballots, and additional drop boxes were a decision by the GOV and SoS without Legislature input or approval and per the Constitution the Legislature is required to make and approve all changes
7. Massive drop box stuffing happened (this was later shown in the film 2000mules)
8. Ballots are required per Federal Law to be kept for 22 months but a large amount are missing and were seen to be driven away by trucks
This was given to the GA State Senate President and GOV Kemp but neither took it forward.
The President, Congress, and the Supreme Court all have powers to examine the fraud, and correct the problems. They can jerk the chains of the lower courts, demand accountability, and fraud will become very hard to accomplish. Will they work together to solve this problem? No. The only way it will be solved is by a huge demand by citizens, who are spending most of their days staring at a small screen and playing video games.
I'm sure that Arizona's voting machines have had a similar infection since the 2020 election. Cartel kati was sec of state then, for her stolen election for governor.
So? Same with Arizona. Same with Georgia. Same with Broward County in Florida for previous elections.
Until people pay with serious jail time, I still come back with... "So?"
Will the system change? Probably.
Will the cheating stop? Probably not. Not until every vote is identified by a REAL ID identification, no mail-in/absentee ballots without a darned good reason (and mailed in by date before election so they are at the voter counters by day of election,) serious scouring of all election rolls and comparison of voter identification between states (to stop people from voting in NY/NJ and Florida, like what happens in... Broward County.)
I want same day voting only with exceptions being exceptions and not the rule. I want physical verification of voting so that someone can't go from precinct to precinct or state to state and vote all day long and if that means I gotta stick a finger in an ink pot then, yes, do that too.
Until the system is hardened against cheating and people get held accountable for cheating (serious jail time, not slap-on-the-wrist sentences) then, again, "So?"
Seriously. I have no problem with someone being tried for voter fraud or vote manipulation and receiving a life sentence or even the death penalty. Because voting should be a protected right of every American citizen, that being a person 18 years of age or older who is a citizen and who has their voting rights not taken away or have their rights restored.
Wasn't Kemp 'gotten at' when daughter's fiancé's car just mysteriously blew up, then he immediately withdrew his objections to the election?
I have long thought a scarlet letter suitable in these cases.
If there was really stupid programming one might POSSIBLY end up with a duplication of one type of number (via a classic stupid programmer trick referred to as a fence post error). But that would only give a roughly 2x quantity of the favored (likely 0). The thing is not even a sophmore level programmer would use that kind of a way to sequential generate numbers, If there had been ANY code review the problem would be obvious, and the ratio seen 30% to 7.9% is between 3x and 4x rather than the ~2x ratio such a bug would generate thus that is NOT what is generating the issue.
In my time as a voter (40+ years) I have used every system, paper Ballots Human counted(Worcester), Paper Ballots punched (like the infamous 2000 Florida ballots, Worcester) Mechanical Counting Machines (Waltham), Scan tron (think fill in the bubble like an SAT test though using indelible ink, North Andover and current residence), and scantron connect the arrows (current residence, also done with indelible ink). The scantron types seem the best compromise. They are read by machine and the ballots stored in sealed boxes. The ballots can easily also be counted by breaking the seal and counting via human.
I will note that even in Worcester Ma with ancient paper ballots the vote for that precinct was complete before midnight (heard it listed on the radio). My current towns count was done in the 2024 election by 10 PM with the vote ending at 8. California's week long counts are highly suspect.
One nasty feature of many electronic machines is I have heard they give you a paper record that includes a quick reading optical value as well as voter readable (usually, though not always) copy. There is no easy way to verify what's in the optical code is equivalent to what's in the user readable report is equivalent to what the machine recorded. The chain of custody is inherently untrustworthy a very bad (and rather suspect) design.
@ Beans
a number of us (all volunteers, BTW) have been discussing your last paragraph.
we began wondering why we offered to put our lives on the line; we feel that these people should be offered the same
we offered our lives to defend our country and the Constitution: they should be happy give their lives (if caught and convicted) in their attempt to wreak havoc on our coutnry and the Constitution
IMHO
I used to be a programmer, lots of database and electronic test equipment stuff. What so many people don't understand is that what you see on the screen and what goes on in the computer don't have to match. You can show the person what they want to see and make the system do what you want it to do. Shows voted for Trump, records voted for Harris. Phone shows location is 'off' but it's still on. Search for something on Google, results are what they want you to see. Slot machine is programmed to pay out better on 'off' days like Tuesday but not so much on Friday. Computer on the car reports cleaner emissions than it's really producing. These are just a few things that came to mind in the past couple minutes. A programmer can make software do whatever they want it to without fully showing the user what it's actually doing.
That said, in most companies and government entities, systems and functionality of them are supposed to be audited for proper function and reporting. Makes you wonder if they really do that or if the auditor is paid off to overlook the problem. Or what the auditor sees is a clean system that runs altered software when they aren't there. The layers of malfeasance are so deep it becomes very difficult trust anything the government or it's agents tell you. When state agencies defy court orders to turn over evidence for examination and nothing happens to the people who refuse (like Maricopa county AZ) or blatant examples of fraud are ignored... And they wonder why we don't trust them.
Benford's Law might come into play here...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law
Neither Pam Bondi nor Kash Patel could be reached for comment about possible multi-year federal election fraud.
Nothing to see here.
Interesting to bring up Benfords law. The reason it works that way is that numbers it's looking at are counting quantities. In other words in a large group your more likely only one of something is more likely than two of, which is more likely thank three, etc.
But ID numbers aren't counting numbers, they are sequential, so something assigning based on counting numbers is messing with the natural + 1 sequence.
Over time that could be people moving out or dying, but that should be statistically random, meaning only slight variances in counts of numbers.
Traitors + Rope + Tree = Justice
Post a Comment