I noticed yesterday that I was having lots of strangers show up to scream at me whenever I posted any information about election fraud, but they were all low information types just barfing up “fact checks” which was basically whatever the news had just told them, but none of them had the basic knowledge of how fraud works to even sorta discuss any of the actual data. So I got curious and posted the following on facebook:One quick question, only answer if you have worked in auditing/stats/fraud/investigations/or other data analysis type fields. In your entire career, have you ever seen a case that threw up this many flags that DID NOT turn out to be fraud?
Again, flags are not proof. They are merely anomalies which would cause an auditor to check. Nor am I claiming this is a scientific poll (though I’d bet I’m still more accurate than Nate Silver!). There is of course a sampling bias as I know many of these people in meat space (and their resumes on this topic are killer) but it was also open to the public so anyone could comment and it got shared a hundred times.
The consensus thus far is overwhelming. No. Not only no but hell no. There have been a few hedging their bets (but they are still suspicious) and zero saying that there is nothing wrong (like in every single other thread, where I get screamed at by Dunning-Krugerands). I’m not claiming this is an accurate sampling of every professional of this type in America, but it is pretty telling.
Big Six accounting for four years. #4 global investment bank, running the antifraud unit, also for 4 years.
Worked in immigration fraud for many years and currently an Intel analyst at a different agency. Just the sheer number of statistical anomalies covered here and elsewhere raises so many red flags, it’s like all the coaches in the NFL started frantically tossing their challenge flags. Then there’s the poll worker shenanigans in Georgia, Michigan and Pennsylvania that tells me the Democratic city machines in those states were going “F****k, he’s behind! Quick, find more Biden only ballots!”…..
No. 25 yrs investigating financial fraud and money laundering. Where there is smoke there is fire. When you have this many unconnected witnesses saying the same/similar things, that is very strong corroboration. Not evidence of made up stories.
I was a CPA for 45 years and never saw anything as suspicious as this election.
25 years of investigating white collar crime, primarily complex DoD contracting fraud. Something with this many allegations would absolutely deserve a very thorough preliminary investigation. The Hunter Biden situation would have already gotten an accepted referral to an AUSA for gj subpoenas for records.
18 years insurance work comp fraud investigator.
This many red flags, I'd be able to retire on the billing.
There's much more at the link, with many more comments. They make interesting and entertaining reading.
Ignore the mainstream news media when they keep on bleating like sheep that there's no electoral fraud, or that there's no evidence for it. There's evidence in plenty - more than enough to prove criminal conspiracy, in my opinion. I hope and pray that criminal charges and convictions result . . . but this is America, and politics tends to outweigh considerations of criminal justice. If I have to, I'll settle for overturning the fraudulent results, and awarding the election to the true victors.
There's a whole lot more to come - at least thirty days more of this crap, and possibly longer than that. The court cases may have been filed, but few have had even preliminary hearings as yet. Take a deep breath, settle down, and keep your powder dry. If these shenanigans aren't overturned, we're going to need it.