... the more we learn, the more suspicious it looks. John Solomon, a widely trusted and respected independent journalist, reports:
In a sworn declaration, a respected mathematician says his analysis of election data and phone interviews with Pennsylvania voters raises questions about as many as 100,000 absentee ballots requested in the key battleground state where President Trump and Joe Biden are separated by just about 82,000 votes.
Williams College Professor Steven Miller, a Yale and Princeton trained math expert, said he analyzed Pennsylvania ballot data collected by former Trump campaign data chief Matt Braynard as well as 2,684 voter interviews conducted by a phone bank and found two concerning patterns. One involved possible votes that were not counted, the other ballots that appeared to be requested by someone other than a registered voter.
"I estimate that the number of ballots that were either requested by someone other than the registered Republican or requested and returned but not counted range from 89,397 to 98,801," Miller said in the sworn statement provided to Just the News.
According to Pennsylvania state data for early and absentee ballot requests, there are roughly 165,000 ballots requested in the names of registered GOP voters that had not been counted as of Nov. 16.
Federal Election Commission Chairman Trey Trainor told Just the News that Miller's analysis provides fresh evidence of potential voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
"This data, which is provided by an expert witness, who would be qualified in almost any court in the country, adds to the conclusions that some level of voter fraud took place in this year's election," Trainor said.
"Therefore, the rush to certify results that are this suspicious from places with known election violations would nullify millions of votes that were legally cast by individual voters."
The Pennsylvania Department of State's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday evening.
There's more at the link.
There's a mountain of evidence (substantiated by voter affidavits) that the mail-in ballot process in Pennsylvania was deliberately, systematically and criminally misused. If that evidence is honestly and fairly processed, I expect criminal charges to result. I think there's more than enough to call the outcome of that state's elections - all of them, for every office - into question. Nor are the problems limited to Pennsylvania alone. There are more than enough to go around, in many states.
Ignore the drumbeat of demands in the mainstream media, and from the Democratic Party, that President Trump should concede this election. They don't get to call the winner. That'll happen when all the votes are officially certified and tallied - and we're a long way from that yet. (What's more, if they're so all-fired certain that Joe Biden won this election fair and square, why are they making such a fuss about getting President Trump to officially concede? Might it be they're more nervous than they want us to think?)
This is going to drag on through state and federal courts, probably all the way to the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. The video clip below states the present position entirely accurately, IMHO.
I daresay it'll be December before we know the true winner - and it may take even longer than that, if the votes in some states are disqualified, and the election has to revert to its Constitutional backup processes through state legislatures and/or the US Congress and Senate. That's not what any of us want . . . but it's looking increasingly likely, given the electoral shenanigans that keep raising their ugly heads.