Following the Baltimore riots, and the posts I've done on related defensive subjects over the past few days, I've had several queries asking me what firearms should be considered for defensive purposes when a family is involved. There may be several people, all needing to use a firearm, covering each other, defending a vehicle or vehicles when traveling, that sort of thing. The inquirers fell into two camps. In some cases each individual already had a favorite firearm, but there wasn't much commonality in terms of caliber, magazines, etc. In others the family were all relative novices, wanting advice on how to select firearms and get training.
I'm going to approach this from the second perspective, that of a family wanting to equip themselves for defensive purposes and starting with a relatively clean slate. If you and your family are already trained and experienced in the use of firearms, you'll probably know enough about your needs that you won't need me to tell you about them.
All right. Let's begin with a few basics.
- A handgun is the most difficult firearm to learn to use effectively. It requires a lot more training, and a lot more practice to keep one's skills at an effective level. A long gun (rifle, carbine or shotgun) is usually simpler and easier to learn to use, and skill with a long gun is easier to retain than it is with a handgun. However, a long gun is seldom easily concealed, and is much more difficult to carry on one's person or in one's car unobtrusively. There's a trade-off between size, ease of use, and concealability.
- For basic home defense, a simple long gun such as a pump-action shotgun is probably the quickest, easiest and most cost-effective option. I've already covered that in a three part article some time ago. Follow those three links to learn more.
- For concealed carry, vehicle defense, etc. a handgun is going to be far more practical - but also more demanding in terms of time, skills and commitment. If you aren't willing or able to commit to those needs, you may end up being more of a danger to yourself and your loved ones than to a would-be attacker.
We'll proceed on the assumption that you're going to invest in handguns for yourself and your family. Here are my suggested important considerations. For considerably more detail, I highly recommend my friend and fellow blogger Kathy Jackson, a very experienced instructor with particular expertise in helping women get up to speed on shooting - something very important in the context of a family. Her articles and blog are indispensable reading for me, and I recommend them to all my students.
First, even before you select your handguns, start training. You can do this with BB or Airsoft copies of well-known handguns, which are freely available at very reasonable prices. I've covered the subject in an earlier article, which I recommend you read before proceeding further with this one.
Second, remember that caliber, cartridge, etc. are not, repeat, NOT the primary consideration in the selection of firearms for the whole family. You're looking for a basic common handgun that can be used by all the members of your family. That allows you to maintain a common stock of ammunition, magazines, holsters and other accessories that everyone can use (and, more important, know how to use), and not have to worry about incompatible equipment or accessories. Considerations include:
- Does this type/model of firearm 'fit' everyone's hands? Can everyone hold it comfortably, reach the trigger, extend it at arms length without too much strain from the weight, etc.? It's no good giving a humongous pistol or revolver to someone with upper body strength limitations. Pick something everyone can hold and use.
- Can everyone operate all the controls and moving parts? Some people have difficulty operating the slide of some semi-automatic pistols. Others have dexterity issues, making it tricky for them to manipulate controls such as a revolver's cylinder release or the disassembly/takedown catch on a pistol. Try to find a firearm that everyone can operate. (This may be less important when it comes to takedown, cleaning, etc. if someone in the family will be primarily responsible for this. If a younger person can't take down a pistol, his or her father or mother probably can. As the youngster grows older, it'll become easier for them to do it too.)
- Are holsters, magazine carriers, etc. available to fit everyone in the family? Some may have different carry needs to others - for example, a man who habitually wears a business suit and drives to different locations might find a shoulder or cross-draw holster the most appropriate method of carry, whereas someone working on a farm might prefer a strong-side holster offering greater protection to the firearm from thorn bushes, etc. Women often can't comfortably wear the same holsters that men use, due to their different body shape and composition.
- Finally, can everyone handle the muzzle blast and recoil of the weapon? So-called "manly men" love to pick calibers and cartridges that have a reputation for greater stopping power, forgetting that the more power comes out of the muzzle, the greater the kick at the other end of the gun. A lot of smaller-statured people find powerful handguns very uncomfortable to shoot. Guys, don't try to 'prescribe' to your family what they will, repeat, WILL learn to love! It doesn't work that way. Try to rent firearms at ranges that offer that facility and let everyone try them for themselves. Talk to friends who have different models, and ask whether they'll demonstrate their chosen weapons to your family and let everyone try them. (By all means buy them a box or two of ammo to do that, so that you aren't a drain on their resources.) Let everyone have a say in the choice, and choose a firearm that most (preferably all) of your family can shoot well.
It's been my experience (in well over three decades of instructing shooters) that .38 Special in revolvers, and 9mm. Parabellum in semi-automatic pistols, are the biggest, most powerful cartridges that can be handled and controlled well by almost any shooter. When you get bigger or more powerful than that, some shooters start to get very uncomfortable. "Manly men" will doubtless claim that "Bigger is better", and "the only reason they carry a .45 is because nobody makes a .46". Good luck to them. Those slogans were accurate in the era before modern bullet technology became available, and are still somewhat valid when you're talking about hardball or full-metal-jacket bullets, but modern expanding bullets are pretty effective across most calibers and cartridges. This image (taken from this excellent discussion of the topic, which I highly recommend) conveys the point very well.
So, pick a firearm chambered for one of those cartridges that can be operated by anyone in the family and that fits everyone's hands (if necessary with different backstraps, for pistols offering that facility). Standardize on it, and stock up on ammunition, magazines (at least 5 per pistol) or speedloaders (5 per revolver) and holsters. Practice (and get training) until everyone's competent, and then stay that way. Don't let your skills atrophy.
My personal recommendation? It's the same I made a couple of months back - I recommend the Ruger SR9c pistol (and/or its big brothers, the SR9 or the new, lower-cost 9E, both of which use the same 17-round magazines as the SR9c, but can't use the latter's smaller 10-round version) as very cost-effective, reliable solutions. (Shop around for those magazines - they're often available from online retailers for much less than Ruger's asking price.) Their grips appear to fit most hands well, they've proved very reliable in my hands and those of my students, and there don't appear to be many problems with their controls and operation. No, I'm not being paid or sponsored in any way to recommend them! I've just had good experiences with them.
Once those fancy rounds have been used up, how do all of the different calibers compare with ball ammo?
I pray it doesn't, but fear some day it may happen... the world I live in may one day fall into lawlessness. I might have a couple boxes of ammo around, but I don't have a lot of these high performance expanding defensive loads on hand because they are expensive! Or are you implying I need to start stocking up on the expensive stuff?
My preference has been for the Circuit Judge. I am worried about penetrating a wall and getting one of my kids on the other side. Also in a tense situation accuracy falls. It is easy for my small framed wife to handle as well. a 12 gauge is just too much for her.
@Clinton Johnson: Yes, you do need to stock up on your defensive round of choice. I've written about this on several occasions. You can't rely on being able to get what you want whenever you want it.
Of course, if you're using a larger caliber, ball ammo can serve in a pinch: but then, can everyone in your household control the larger caliber?
The chart you've shown is not 100% of the story....But it is representative of wounds that will be encountered..
But having taught as a pistol instructor for the past 6 years, I have never yet seen a person (including children) who cannot handle a pistol in .45 ACP....Many prefer them over 9mm as the recoil is less "snappy"...more of a push. (Few like the ,40, but that gives you the worst of both worlds..
.45, .38 and 9mm are all very similar in energy that the shooter has to absorb. THere is very little difference. Big, heavy slow bullet, or lighter faster bullet....Especially when the weight of the pistols are taken into account.
I know a fair number of small women who prefer the push of a .45 over the snap of a 9mm or a .38. Most of the issue with beginners is fear ...they believe that the .45 is gonna be hard to shoot (no matter what the pistol platform) and therefore they are afraid.
1) Someone, I believe Massad Ayoob, said that 'pool guns', which would be multiple users and one gun such as a family pistol/ shotgun/ rifle need to be sized to the smallest user. 6'5" hubby with ham hands can shoot a CAR-15 and a Glock 19 but his 5'4" wife might have a hard time with a big ole Glock 20 and an FN-FAL.
I would say the same goes for a family looking to have multiple common platform weapons. One thing to consider is weapons that have common parts/ mags/ ammo but are available in different sized. The Mrs might prefer a short stocked CAR-15 and hubby might like a bigger AR with a full sized stock. She might like a Glock 26 and he might want a G17.
2)I largely ignore the caliber (presuming a reasonable choice) discussion since good ammo negates it. It is going to be a pretty unlikely situation where a normal family shoots 250+ rounds of defensive handgun ammo. Beyond that if they resort to ball that is OK. Ball ammo works decently but, especially in 9mm, the tolerance for bad shooting goes down. You will have to get decent hits to stop someone in a timely manner. Still since all handguns suck it doesn't matter that much. As a final thought on this matter. My friend H owns a bunch of older surplus handguns so testing them all for new JHP ammo is impractical so he carries ball ammo. Someone once said 9mm FMJ is like an ice pick to which he replied "If I stab someone 4-5 times in the chest with an ice pick it will do the job."
Commonality is a good thing, a really good thing.
Chances are you can get mags,ammo, parts for an 5.56 AR-15 and a Glock 9mm at pretty much every local gunshop.
Both are also fairly simple to work on.
And most importantly, there's a good chance that is what your friends, family, and neighbors have. If things are THAT bad, you really need to be teaming up with a lot of people.
Interestingly, I was involved in a similar exercise recently:
1. Handguns are "pieces of crap" that you use to fight your way to a rifle.
2. You can easily have a handgun with you all day, a rifle, not so much. Plan for that.
3. Commonality of equipment among a group is good; not just magazines and ammo, but also how the thing(s) work.
4. The only correct answer to the question "how much ammo/how many magazines do I need" is, to quote Tamara, "more."
5. Plan. Then practice the plan.
6. Your plan will fail. Have another as backup. Practice that one as well. Structure plans to have options.
7. Options should be Very, Very Simple.
8. Scenarios. Think 'em up, then practice them. Then practice them some more. Use blue guns for this, please.
9. Lone wolves don't last long; groups offer depth and skills overlap, but require more discussion, interaction and agreement. This will be a constant requiring regular work. Do not ignore it.
10. Groups - of any size or internal relationship(s) - require leadership. Do not confuse "managing" or "commanding" with "leading."
11. To quote Tuco Ramirez, "When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk."
11b. Anything worth shooting is worth shooting several times.
I held a ruger SR9s the other day, and it had a nice short trigger pull, but I didn't get to shoot it. I like the SR9's, but I don't really understand the difference in this striker fired pistol. Is there something about it that would make it less safe or suitable to carry?
@Unknown: I'm not sure I understand. There's the SR9 or SR9c, and the LC9s, but no SR9s. Which model did you see?
Also, all of the above models are standard striker-fired models. They all work basically the same way. They're perfectly safe to carry if used with a holster that fits them.
Interesting. We chose the SR-9C for our family. All four adults have one. We can all handle them comfortably and shoot accurately. We are able to share magazines and accessories. We are very confident with them.
"I know a fair number of small women who prefer the push of a .45 over the snap of a 9mm or a .38..."
Oh, sure, if they're taught correctly, and if they have no injuries or scars or insufficient wrist and hand strength that make the weight and recoil hard to handle...
But you don't see nearly as many youtube videos of women taking a chunk out of their forehead with the sights of a Ruger Mark III as you do with a Desert Eagle for a reason.
As my small child (girl) has NO interest in firearms and my wife says that killing violates her "oath" (she's an APRN/NP) SD is left to me. My choices are a bit different. I prefer my 1964 made Remington 870 riot gun in the house and my M-1873 SAA in .45 colt or my M-1911 in .45 ACP. for "walking around". Now for the detractors; I have killed wild hogs with all three, and see no need AT ALL for a "HI-CAP" 9MM pistol in my life.
Thanks, Peter. I have been looking for an excuse to get a Ruger SR9E. Now I'll be in dutch with the wife after I claim, "But, Honey! It's for us!"
Post a Comment