Monday, February 2, 2009

False calls to SWAT teams lead to danger


I've been concerned for a long time about the militarization of some US police functions, where SWAT teams are increasingly equipped and trained (and act) like soldiers rather than law enforcement officers. There's a fundamental difference in approach. Soldiers set out to defeat an enemy by inflicting the maximum possible violence upon them, if necessary killing them. Law enforcement officers seek to enforce the law and arrest those who break it - without killing them, if possible. This 'mission overlap' is extremely unhealthy.

Matters now appear to be complicated by a growing number of hoax calls, sending SWAT teams to addresses where no crime has been committed and no criminals are resident. Yahoo! reports:

Doug Bates and his wife, Stacey, were in bed around 10 p.m., their 2-year-old daughters asleep in a nearby room. Suddenly they were shaken awake by the wail of police sirens and the rumble of a helicopter above their suburban Southern California home. A criminal must be on the loose, they thought.

Doug Bates got up to lock the doors and grabbed a knife. A beam from a flashlight hit him. He peeked into the backyard. A swarm of police, assault rifles drawn, ordered him out of the house. Bates emerged, frightened and with the knife in his hand, as his wife frantically dialed 911. They were handcuffed and ordered to the ground while officers stormed the house.

The scene of mayhem and carnage the officers expected was nowhere to be found. Neither the Bateses nor the officers knew that they were pawns in a dangerous game being played 1,200 miles away by a teenager bent on terrifying a random family of strangers.

They were victims of a new kind of telephone fraud that exploits a weakness in the way the 911 system handles calls from Internet-based phone services. The attacks — called "swatting" because armed police SWAT teams usually respond — are virtually unstoppable, and an Associated Press investigation found that budget-strapped 911 centers are essentially defenseless without an overhaul of their computer systems.

The AP examined hundreds of pages of court documents and law-enforcement transcripts, listened to audio of "swatting" calls, and interviewed two dozen security experts, investigators, defense lawyers, victims and perpetrators.

While Doug and Stacey Bates were cuffed on the ground that night in March 2007, 18-year-old Randal Ellis, living with his parents in Mukilteo, Wash., was nearly finished with the 27-minute yarn about a drug-fueled murder that brought the Orange County Sheriff's Department SWAT team to the Bateses' home.

In a grisly sounding call to 911, Ellis was putting an Internet-based phone service for the hearing-impaired to nefarious use. By entering bogus information about his location, Ellis was able to make it seem to the 911 operator as if he was calling from inside the Bateses' home. He said he was high on drugs and had just shot his sister.

According to prosecutors, Ellis picked the Bates family at random, as he did with all of the 185 calls investigators say he made to 911 operators around the country.

"If I would have had a gun in my hand, I probably would have been shot," said Doug Bates, 38. Last March, Ellis was sentenced to three years in prison after pleading guilty to five felony counts, including computer access and fraud, false imprisonment by violence and falsely reporting a crime.

In a separate, multistate case prosecuted by federal authorities in Dallas, eight people were charged with orchestrating up to 300 "swatting" calls to victims they met on telephone party chat lines. The three ringleaders were each sentenced to five years in prison. Two others were sentenced to 2 1/2 years. One defendant pleaded guilty last week and could get a 13-year sentence. The remaining two are set to go on trial in February.

A similar case was reported in Salinas, Calif., where officers surrounded an apartment where a call had come in claiming men with assault rifles were trying to break in. In Hiawatha, Iowa, fake calls about a workplace shooting included realistic gunshot sounds and moaning in the background. In November, a teenage hacker from Worcester, Mass., pleaded guilty to a five-month swatting spree including a bomb threat and report of an armed gunman that caused two schools to be evacuated.

Many times, however, swats don't get fully investigated or reported.

Orange County Sheriff's detective Brian Sims spent weeks serving search warrants on Internet providers before he identified Ellis through his numeric computer identifier, known as an IP address.

Law enforcement hopes lengthy prison terms will deter would-be swatters. Technology alone isn't enough to stop the crimes.

Unlike calls that come from landline phones, which are registered to a fixed physical address and display that on 911 dispatchers' screens, calls coming from people's computers, or even calls from landline or cell phones that are routed through spoofing services, could appear to be originating from anywhere.

Scores of Caller ID spoofing services have sprung up, offering to disguise callers' origins for a fee. All anybody needs to do is pony up for a certain number of minutes, punch in a PIN code and specify whom they're calling and what they'd like the Caller ID to display.

Spoofing Caller ID is perfectly legal. Legitimate businesses use the technology to project a single callback number for an entire office, or to let executives working from home cloak their home numbers when making outgoing calls.

At the same time, criminals have latched onto the technique to get revenge on rivals or get their kicks by harassing strangers.

"We're not able to cope with this very well," said Roger Hixson, technical issues director for the National Emergency Number Association, the 911 system's industry group. "We're just hoping this doesn't become a widespread hobby."


There's more at the link.

This is a very worrying development, for all of us. Certainly, if I find unknown strangers trying to break into my home, my response will be violent and potentially lethal. After all, I'm a law-abiding citizen, legally armed, with no reason to presume that police will regard me as a target. However, if some prankster has sent them to my home with a hoax call . . . either they, or I, might end up injured or dead.

I'm trying to think of a suitable punishment for such hoaxers. Jail time doesn't seem sufficient. I'm thinking more along the lines of using them for shark bait!

Peter

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Punishment suggestion:

Send them on serious drug-raid SWAT missions and make them enter the targeted area first, nude, with their hands cuffed behind them.

If they live, do it again.

repeat until a) They get shot by belligerent drug-dealers or B) they have been through one raid for every time they pulled a SWAT-hack.

Sell the video rights for the benefit of the families they placed in danger.

Laugh.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of public horse-whipping...

Jim

Wayne Conrad said...

Those entrenched in the system think first of "strengthening" it to make this tactic harder. I think first of getting rid of the reason we brought SWAT into existence--the "war on drugs" (aka the "war on the Bill of Rights"). We'll also need to get rid of a large body of anti-gun-right law or the SWAT teams will just find other work. Get rid of the work and there will be nothing for these guys to do. Then we can get rid of the SWAT teams, too.

Why do we have to both get rid of the teams and get rid of their missions? If you get rid of local SWAT teams but keep the mission, Some other organization wanting to be "high speed" will step up to the plate. If you get rid of the mission but keep the local SWAT teams, they'll just find another mission. Nobody wants to "waste" all of that training.

When I weed the yard... I can hear my neighbor laughing, but I do it now and then... when I weed the yard, I have to both poison the ground and pull the weeds or I'll still have weeds next month.

I know I'm a dreamer. But I can't take a step in this country without getting a sticker in my socks. I'm tired of it.

Anonymous said...

Peter, if they come to your house you will be painted (over your dead body) with a brush that will make you seem like a rightwing Christian survivalist gun nut who hates blacks and left SA because you could not stand the black Gov. No stone will be left unturned to demonize you,and justify the results.
Just wait till "guns" become the new "drug".
The police are getting farther and farther out of contact with the people they serve. , and the prosecutors are political animals largely beholden to whatever PC crap will get them re-elected.

Anybody who volunteers for a swat team, should be excluded by definition. M.Scott Pecks Book, "The People of the Lie", has a very interesting bit on selecting people by by "volunteer". He was one of the shrinks the Army asked to examine the Mai Lai massacre. An excellent read on his research into evil, not very well known ,compared to his others.

Anonymous said...

At least in the story quoted, the police had the good sense to arrive with lights and sound making it obvious to the homeowner that there were cops outside, instead of a half dozen men in black just bursting in unannounced.

Anonymous said...

Jail time is not even on my list. hunting them down is WAY up on the list. Then a SMALL expression of my DISpleasure exacted from them. Two stones....

Afraid tho that I'd not be around to benefit...I'd answer the door armed and go down under the hail fo fire from the twitchy SWATties. I'd FOR SURE be blackened after death as rightwing Christian survivalist gun nut (ARSENAL!!!) who hates blacks and could not stand the black Gov. No stone would be left unturned to demonize me,and justify the results.

Then they have to deal with my kid...who already has a LOW opinion of such shenangans...and is a GOOD long range shot.

Old NFO said...

I agree Peter, the question is, when the first death occurs (either SWAT or a person in the house), will they be charged with Murder??? One hopes so...