Monday, May 4, 2009

More about my brain than I wanted to know!


Recently, at the recommendation of a colleague, I read a book by Dr. Daniel G. Amen called 'Change Your Brain, Change Your Life'.

I'd previously been a bit sceptical about Dr. Amen's theories, because he's built them up into a 'self-help empire' called Amen Clinics, complete with infomercials, multiple books all saying the same thing in different ways and focused on different target markets, and so on. I find most such 'empires' to be founded on sand, and more interested in making money than in really helping others. I note that my concerns are shared by others: there's at least one authority, Quackwatch, which questions Dr. Amen's claims.

However, Dr. Amen's book shook me with its pictures of what effect various substances allegedly have on the brain. He uses something called SPECT photography to take these images. The book describes the technique as follows:

What is SPECT? An acronym for single photon emission computerized tomography, it is a sophisticated nuclear medicine study that 'looks' directly at cerebral blood flow and indirectly at brain activity (or metabolism). In this study, a radioactive isotope (which, as we will see, is akin to myriad beacons of energy or light) is bound to a substance that is readily taken up by the cells in the brain.

A small amount of this compound is injected into the patient's vein, where it runs through the bloodstream and is taken up by certain receptor sites in the brain. The radiation exposure is similar to that of a head CT or an abdominal X ray. The patient then lies on a table for about fifteen minutes while a SPECT 'gamma' camera rotates slowly around his head. The camera has special crystals that detect where the compound (signaled by the radioisotope acting like a beacon of light) has gone. A supercomputer then reconstructs off line images of brain activity levels. The elegant brain snapshots that result offer us a sophisticated blood flow/metabolism brain map. With these maps, physicians have been able to identify certain patterns of brain activity that correlate with psychiatric and neurological illnesses.

. . .

My own area of expertise in nuclear medicine, the brain, uses SPECT studies to help in the diagnosis of head trauma, dementia, atypical or unresponsive mood disorders, strokes, seizures, the impact of drug abuse on brain function, and atypical or unresponsive aggressive behavior.

. . .

The higher-resolution SPECT studies of today can see into the deeper areas of the brain with far greater clarity and show what CAT scans and MRIs cannot - how the brain actually functions.


So far, so good. I found the book's photographs of the brain, showing the effects of alcohol, tobacco and drugs, to be very frightening - to put it mildly! Unfortunately, the photographs were too small to be usefully scanned for blog use.

Salvation is at hand in the form of an article in the Daily Mail, which discusses Dr. Amen's findings (somewhat uncritically) and reproduces some of his pictures in a larger format. I recommend reading the article, and, if you're interested in learning more, finding a copy of his book.

Here's a normal brain, as pictured by SPECT:




Here's a brain showing the effects of caffeine and nicotine:




The effects of alcohol:




The effects of cannabis (marijuana):




And finally, what the brain looks like when affected by Alzheimer's disease:




Now that's scary! If you've been using cigarettes, drinking moderate to heavy amounts of alcohol, indulging in marijuana from time to time, and enjoying three or four cups of coffee a day, for the past twenty years or so, your brain may look like those shown above - or worse! It's no wonder that there's a growing correlation between those habits (particularly in combination) and the incidence of Alzheimer's disease in later life. The damage to the brain appears very similar.

I can't say for sure that Dr. Amen's theories are correct. I'm no doctor, and as I said earlier, there are others who find his claims questionable. However, these pictures certainly make me think! I hope they do the same for you.

Go read the article, and if that makes you think even harder, go read the book. (And no, I don't get any commission on book sales!) Check out a dissenting voice as well. Once you've done that, make up your own mind.

Peter

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Also go and check out Dr. Russell Blaylock's book "Excitotoxins: the Taste that Kills" that shows CAT scans of the brain as it's being fried by monosodium glutamate and aspartame!

http://www.amazon.com/Excitotoxins-Taste-Russell-L-Blaylock/dp/0929173252

chicopanther

Anonymous said...

Interesting, in light of early research indicating that moderate coffee consumption might lower one's chances of getting Alzheimer's; there are others that show the same lowering from nicotine too! The question then is, is the problem the drugs, or the delivery system (inhalation of smoke, for example)?

Antibubba

LabRat said...

Just purely off the top of my head without having read any of the linked information, I question the "normal" brain. Normal how? The brain's pattern of use and where blood flow go change with all sorts of things, not just chemicals- as I've said before, the brain is an extremely energy-hungry organ, and it doesn't make much sense for it to NOT direct "traffic", as it were. I'd bet you'd see some pretty striking patterns on a "normal" brain taking, say, a math test- which, incidentally, burns about as many extra calories as jogging for the same length of time. (Just without the physical benefits.)

I also question why THIS imaging technique as opposed to a more standard one whose patterns and correlates to damage, normal, and abnormal use are better known. So far as I can tell the only one claiming this gives so much more clear information is Doctor Amens- and it's not as though neurology is a field known for stodgy conservatism.

Dano said...

Sorry, but I call bullshit.

There are way too many chemicals that affect the brain... how does one classify one as normal? Unless the pictures are of one person how can draw any type of conclusion?

Yea science... who knew it'd become pulp culture.

Aaron T. said...

I recall a talk a visiting scientist gave a while ago about Alzheimer's proteins and such. One of the interesting correlations was that people who smoked were less likely to get the disease.
Also, I question why the researcher mentioned has not used things like PET scans that show brain glucose consumption, an indication of brain activity. One definite reason that PET scans are better is that they produce color images instead of those boring black and white ones! :-)
If you are interested in this type of thing, you might want to check out the following: http://www.cannabis.net/drug-webs.html
Link is to effect of different drugs on spiders and their ability to spin webs.