Wednesday, April 25, 2012

The catastrophic true cost of the failed War on Terror


Prof. Angelo M. Codevilla has written one of the most profound analyses I've ever read of the War on Terror since 9/11 and its consequences for America - military, political, social, economic and cultural.  I can only describe it as a masterpiece.  Here are a few excerpts.

America's ruling class lost the "War on Terror." During the decade that began on September 11, 2001, the U.S. government's combat operations have resulted in some 6,000 Americans killed and 30,000 crippled, caused hundreds of thousands of foreign casualties, and spent — depending on various estimates of direct and indirect costs — somewhere between 2 and 3 trillion dollars. But nothing our rulers did post-9/11 eliminated the threat from terrorists or made the world significantly less dangerous. Rather, ever-bigger government imposed unprecedented restrictions on the American people and became the arbiter of prosperity for its cronies, as well as the manager of permanent austerity for the rest. Although in 2001 many referred to the United States as "the world's only superpower," ten years later the near-universal perception of America is that of a nation declining, perhaps irreversibly. This decade convinced a majority of Americans that the future would be worse than the past and that there is nothing to be done about it. This is the "new normal." How did this happen?

September 11's planners could hardly have imagined that their attacks might seriously undermine what Americans had built over two centuries, what millions of immigrants from the world over had come to join and maintain. In fact, our decline happened because the War on Terror — albeit microscopic in size and destructiveness as wars go — forced upon us, as wars do, the most important questions that any society ever faces: Who are we, and who are our enemies? What kind of peace do we want? What does it take to get it? Are we able and willing to do what it takes to secure our preferred way of life, to deserve living the way we prefer? Our bipartisan ruling class's dysfunctional responses to such questions inflicted the deepest wounds.

. . .

America's current ruling class, the people who lost the War on Terror, monopolizes the upper reaches of American public life, the ranks of those who make foreign and domestic policy, including the leadership of the Republican and Democratic parties. It is more or less homogeneous socially and intellectually. In foreign affairs, the change from the Bush to the Obama Administrations was barely noticeable. In domestic matters, the differences are more quantitative than qualitative. Dissent from the ruling class is rife among the American people, but occurs mostly on the sidelines of our politics. If there is to be a reversal of the ongoing defeats, both foreign and domestic, that have discredited contemporary America's bipartisan mainstream, heretofore marginal people will have to generate it, applying ideas and practices recalled from America's successful past.

. . .

Ten years after 9/11, America is not at peace, is poorer, less civil, and less hopeful. But the experts are in charge as never before.

In the American political marketplace of 2012, the American ruling class's stock is at a historic low. President Obama and nearly all who vie to replace him try to disassociate themselves from the decisions of the past decade. So do most of our elites. But since none explains and accuses his own errors, it is by no means clear whether any have learned from their mistakes. More important is what the rest of the country may or may not have learned. For us to understand how these mostly intelligent people could have made errors so big for so long requires understanding the principles they violated, and the moral as well as the intellectual dimensions of their errors. More difficult yet, both intellectually and morally, is the essential task of explaining the hard choices that will be required to deal with the troubles bequeathed us by this decade of defeat.

There's much more at the link.

I believe this is a profoundly important article, one that merits the widest possible readership and intense discussion.  Please, dear readers, take the time and trouble to click over there and read it in full for yourselves;  and when you've done so, if you agree with me, please forward a link to it to your friends and colleagues, and urge them to do the same.  If you're a blogger too, or have a Facebook page, perhaps you'll consider linking to the article yourself.  Prof. Codevilla speaks wisdom - something that's in desperately short supply in US political and leadership circles right now.

Peter

6 comments:

Rev. Paul said...

So, if the War on Terror is over, we'll disband DHS, repeal the Patriot Act, dissolve the TSA, restore patriotism to the good ol' US of A, and and and ...

Oh. Right.

Johnny D. said...

I'm impressed. Thanks for pointing this out. I'm going to facebook it.

I have long stood against this whole GWOT thing.

Instead of what we ended up with, can you imagine if George Bush had committed just $50 billion to controlling our borders, spent another $20 or so billion beefing up our SEALS, Delta, Rangers, Recon Marines, etc., declared war on oil dependence and offered a $100 billion dollar prize to the person or persons or corporation that came up with a viable alternative to fossil fuels? I'm still under $200 billion.

George Bush would have walked away after his second term being hailed as one of our greatest presidents.

Tamara Kelly said...

Sigh....I argue regularly with my mum over this one. America could have BOUGHT the whole country and returned with change in its pocket (pun intended).

Anonymous said...

OK we need the Augean Stables Hercules Clean-Up solution to Washingtoon District of Control, “said Mr Obvious”.

I might wisely begin with the election of Ron Paul as President, but of course we can’t even manage to get that far. So I guess any of us with a couple of brain cells to rub together can figure out that if we can’t manage to do it one way, we have to wait upon another. Or total societal and economic collapse, I suppose, would be the major alternative.

As I’ve been saying quite literally for years, prayer is pretty much all we have left – unless we the people think we can win a rev0lution against the powers that be by successfully fighting with civilian hunting weapons against their trillions of dollars worth of automated military drones and militarized police. Then inevitably who would take their place? Just another batch of power-hungry sociopaths? A similar plan didn’t work out so well for the Confederate States of America 150 years ago, did it? So prayer is truly all we have left…

Pastor Glenn

Pakkinpoppa said...

You were right, that was worth the read.

Skip said...

They have won.